verzetn
.
★★★
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2022
- Posts
- 1,744
Anglo countries with the exception of the United States, which was founded on the principles made by erudites known as the founding fathers... were all retarded when it comes to immigration policies and that's what's making them giga BROWN today and its pretty much irreversible at this point
the anglo countries would be mostly, canada, australia, new zealand, and to a lesser extent perhaps south africa and rhodesia (zimbabwe).
what doomed them, with the exception of giga US is, unlike the US, those anglo countries resorted to Anglo-supremacy and never really accepted anything other than anglo and to a lesser extend scottish and also discriminated against the irish (which imo is justified since irish are almost white niggers, along with many scottish, too much white trash genes).
For example, the US has like over 50% of population being of German ancestry. with significant number of other europeans. the US did a great job of assimilating the other cumskins into anglo culture.
on the other hand, the anglo settlements, kept being Anglo-only, even well into the mid 20th century, therefore dooming them to a low cumskin population. which needless to say, spelt disaster for them.
Europe was still ravaged by war and occasionally over-populated time to time, which depressed the wages and caused outflow of immigrants. and anglos could have taken advantage of that but they hardly did. an example was that Australia opened up to european immigration post ww2 and lots of Greeks moved there. and New Zealand in the 1960s actually signed a deal with the Dutch, allowing Dutch to easily migrate to new zealand, and they indeed did. which shows even in post war 1960s, still plenty of Europeans were very willing to migrate outside.
so now, imagine if anglo countries actually allowed cumskin immigration in the very beginning, just like the US. modern australia, instead of only having like 25 million people, could easily have 100 million now.
it's possible imo, the extreme racism and exluciseness displayed by the anglo cumskins could be a result of the native European genes, especially the Celtic genes, which probably is overly-presented among anglo population, especially among lower classes. which end up in them shooting themselves at the foot.
coz by the late 20th century, the prevalent ideology wind has shifted. now, a country opening up no longer should just open to other cumskins, but to the whole world, coz now, racism baddddddd. not only that, Europe post-ww2 began to recover and by the 70s, 80s, and 90s, they no longer had strong desire to migrate outside of europe.
all this means, the new immigrations those anglo countries could get were ethnics which is why you see the immigration makeup of anglo countries like canada, australia, new zealand etc. are dominated by rice and curry as they happne to be have enough population "rich" enough to afford to go to anglo countries.
so bascially, the anglos in non-US, bascially CUCKED THEMSELVES to a brown future by rejecting non-anglo cumskin immigrants earlier in their history.
the anglo countries would be mostly, canada, australia, new zealand, and to a lesser extent perhaps south africa and rhodesia (zimbabwe).
what doomed them, with the exception of giga US is, unlike the US, those anglo countries resorted to Anglo-supremacy and never really accepted anything other than anglo and to a lesser extend scottish and also discriminated against the irish (which imo is justified since irish are almost white niggers, along with many scottish, too much white trash genes).
For example, the US has like over 50% of population being of German ancestry. with significant number of other europeans. the US did a great job of assimilating the other cumskins into anglo culture.
on the other hand, the anglo settlements, kept being Anglo-only, even well into the mid 20th century, therefore dooming them to a low cumskin population. which needless to say, spelt disaster for them.
Europe was still ravaged by war and occasionally over-populated time to time, which depressed the wages and caused outflow of immigrants. and anglos could have taken advantage of that but they hardly did. an example was that Australia opened up to european immigration post ww2 and lots of Greeks moved there. and New Zealand in the 1960s actually signed a deal with the Dutch, allowing Dutch to easily migrate to new zealand, and they indeed did. which shows even in post war 1960s, still plenty of Europeans were very willing to migrate outside.
so now, imagine if anglo countries actually allowed cumskin immigration in the very beginning, just like the US. modern australia, instead of only having like 25 million people, could easily have 100 million now.
it's possible imo, the extreme racism and exluciseness displayed by the anglo cumskins could be a result of the native European genes, especially the Celtic genes, which probably is overly-presented among anglo population, especially among lower classes. which end up in them shooting themselves at the foot.
coz by the late 20th century, the prevalent ideology wind has shifted. now, a country opening up no longer should just open to other cumskins, but to the whole world, coz now, racism baddddddd. not only that, Europe post-ww2 began to recover and by the 70s, 80s, and 90s, they no longer had strong desire to migrate outside of europe.
all this means, the new immigrations those anglo countries could get were ethnics which is why you see the immigration makeup of anglo countries like canada, australia, new zealand etc. are dominated by rice and curry as they happne to be have enough population "rich" enough to afford to go to anglo countries.
so bascially, the anglos in non-US, bascially CUCKED THEMSELVES to a brown future by rejecting non-anglo cumskin immigrants earlier in their history.