Toxic Femininity The promotion of female soccer is female hubris and privilege

[Kamanbert]

Idk in the US but it got popularized here in Europe.

They play like men from district divisions, it sucks, but they still get to be seen on major sports channels and think it's normal. Not only that but they'll regularly complain about being paid less when in fact they're overpaid because of their gender - no one would watch men playing so poorly nor pay men playing so poorly. Perfect example of how egalitarianism is an absurdity and always ends up being a cover power grab for women, not through meritocratic equality but through essentialism ie female privilege.

In this shitty french article they admit it but as usual spin it in a ridiculous and insulting way.

The intro already sets the tone :

"I spent the match asking the referee how much time was left to play": when men play football in the same conditions as women

See ! Those STRONG WOMEN ! It means they not only have it hard, but men couldn't do the same !

On the eve of the Women's Euro 2020 quarter-final between Germany and France, we're likely to hear again that when girls play football, the game is slow and the matches aren't spectacular. It's true, but it's normal, explains science.

SCIENCE. Basically what they did is to make men play football with a basketball and on a larger field. I wont go into the details of this but it's scientifically absurd, definitely something much more imponderable than they make it out to be, regardless this was supposed to emulate the physical and physiological conditions of those poor women ! All of a sudden we can say that they're naturally weak and inept, if it pushes some pro women narrative.

This narrative is reflected in the interviewed player's attitude :

One of the players, who had put himself in a girl's shoes for the sake of science, concluded that it was his worst football experience. When the presenter asked him if he would do it again, the answer came quickly: "No, never. Really, respect to the girls!"

Typical contemporary man here. This yielding, indulgent, complacent attitude to an ideologically oriented experiment and mediatic coverage. He doesnt know that when women read that kind of trash they really end up thinking that there's nothing wrong with them. That there's some merit in being obscenely privileged :

not only playing like utter shit and being over promoted and overpaid for it... but being praised for it at the detriment of men.

I'll go even further and say that such propaganda and cultural attitude over the years made women feel superior to men.

 

[Kamanbert]

Being an european man in 2025 is a ritual humiliation

 

[T1Dcel]

Being an european man in 2025 is a ritual humiliation

Also why would I watch some idiots kick a ball around for 90 minutes? What's the point?

 

[Lonelyus]

Just throw in some troons and the whole sport will be ruined

 

[Kamanbert]

This article is a summary of how modernity approaches femininity and masculinity.

From the premise of pro female sentiments, they confuse (sometimes on purpose, sometimes not - it genuinely flatters the female hubris) meritocratic equality with essentialism. Therefore this gives birth to the aporia of gender. Quoting google for that fancy word :

"an irresolvable internal contradiction or logical disjunction in a text, argument, or theory"

This article is a subtle hit piece against everything male, be it the psychic or the physical, if you read between the lines.

This aporia also works on an affective level. Women are in general objectively inferior, just as seen in this article. It's not something you can shrug off. Under egalitarianism, this means that they're not simply different, but the underdog, which will nourish sentiments of either ressentment (if the underdog stays the underdog) or superiority (if the underdog surpasses the top dog) and everyone with at least half a brain knows and sees that women constantly oscillate between those two sentiments.

This is perfectly represented in this article : women are inferior but... paradoxically superior ; see those exhausted pathetic men haha !

Especially if social ressentment (aka feminism) is added to the biologial ressentment. That's why this female soccer garbage is also constantly ridden with talks of gender pay gap and shit.

Egalitarianism is sick and destructive.

 

[SmhChan]

Foid soccer is a prime example of how it was never about money. You know whenever you bring up Govt and Corpos pandering to foids that borders on gynocracy, the blackpillers, bluepillers, and redpillers all smugly hit you with, "because foids spend so much money, that's why they are pandered to."

I can still suspend my disbelief when they say these flop and misandrist hollywood shows are still watched by foids since whenever you try to counter it, they bring up occasional hits like "Barbie" and "Adolescence". But when it comes foids' football, literally nobody gives a toss, yet, they still keep forcing this shit down everyone's throat, going as far as hijacking prime time. It was never about money, rather a 180° cultural shift.

https://www.goal.com/en-in/lists/aston-villa-sell-women-team-£55m-psr-breach/blt6bba7b837cfa3dc3

 

[underballer]

don't rly care but i will have to say that i think foid soccer mogs foid basketball

 

[Kamanbert]

Foid soccer is a prime example of how it was never about money. You know whenever you bring up Govt and Corpos pandering to foids that borders on gynocracy, the blackpillers, bluepillers, and redpillers all smugly hit you with, "because foids spend so much money, that's why they are pandered to."

I can still suspend my disbelief when they say these flop and misandrist hollywood shows are still watched by foids since whenever you try to counter it, they bring up occasional hits like "Barbie" and "Adolescence". But when it comes foids' football, literally nobody gives a toss, yet, they still keep forcing this shit down everyone's throat, going as far as hijacking prime time. It was never about, rather a 180° cultural shift.

https://www.goal.com/en-in/lists/aston-villa-sell-women-team-£55m-psr-breach/blt6bba7b837cfa3dc3

Yeah i agree. Explaining everything through muh money is cope.

 

[SmhChan]

Also why would I watch some idiots kick a ball around for 90 minutes? What's the point?

Football is fun, maybe it's because I'm autistically invested in its intricacies, but the millions that they get paid is definitely idiotic.

 

[Kamanbert]

Quote from Pierre de Coubertin, father of the modern olympics, just so you can see the difference between contemporary cucks and men from back then :

The question of women in the Olympic Games periodically comes up for discussion. It deserves to be examined carefully, as it touches the very essence of the Olympic mission. It is known that, in antiquity, women were not allowed to compete at Olympia; they did not even attend as spectators, except for a few exceptions for the priestesses of Demeter. This exclusion was not an accident; it stemmed from a fundamental concept of Greek athletics, which was a celebration of male strength and effort within a well-defined religious and social framework.


Today, customs have changed, and one could not think of banning women from the stadiums as spectators. Their presence even adds an element of grace and charm that does not detract from the solemnity of the competitions. But to have them compete themselves is a different matter. Let us say this frankly: a small female Olympiad alongside the great male Olympiad, what would be the point? Who would find pleasure or benefit in it? Physical exercises are beneficial to women, no one disputes that; they improve their health, strengthen their nervous balance, and prepare them for motherhood. But competitive athletics, with its excesses, its violence, and its records to break, is essentially a male domain. Transferring it into the female realm would be to distort it.
One might object that some women have already participated in Olympic competitions. This is true. In London, in 1908, a few appeared in exhibitions of figure skating or swimming; in Stockholm, this year, there were more, particularly in swimming and diving events. But these isolated cases cannot be considered a rule, nor can they justify an extension. They were concessions, tolerated exceptions, not an approval of principle. The International Olympic Committee has never seriously considered systematically opening the Games to women, and it is right to do so.

Unpractical, uninteresting, unaesthetic, and we do not hesitate to add: incorrect, such would, in our opinion, be this half-Olympiad for women. The Olympic Games are not just a sports tournament; they are an institution, a work of art and thought, a periodic celebration of chivalric spirit and male energy. To mix in female competitions would alter their scope and distort their character. This is not our conception of the Olympic Games, in which we believe the goal has been, and must continue to be, the realization of the following formula: the solemn and periodic exaltation of male athletics, with internationalism as its foundation, loyalty as its means, art as its framework, and female applause as its reward.

Let women cultivate sports for themselves, in their clubs, their gyms, their own associations—nothing better. Let them give exhibitions in graceful disciplines like dance or light gymnastics alongside the Games, why not? But the Olympic Games, properly speaking, must remain what they are: a celebration of the youthful masculinity of the world, before an audience where women have their place, but as inspirers, not as participants.

 

[Kamanbert]

Foids soccer makes me wanna puke. It's subversive in nature.

 

[Poopless One]

Sports (with the exception of boxing) are gay.

 

[NDManlet173]

Also why would I watch some idiots kick a ball around for 90 minutes? What's the point?