anyone know why this
@Broken&BeyondRepair nigger got temp-banned?
they never say reason for the curious we have to make inquiries
IMO if there's a temp-ban mods should leave a notification on the user's message wall so we can check there to find out
low-tier normies who would have a slim chance of being able to bag themselves a high school foid, but zero chance of bagging a foid their age
This 100% does not exist in any way.
While yes there are HS girls willing to fuck guys who would be rejected by a PORTION (read: elitist minority) of 20yo women, those tend to be high-tier girls, the guys bagging HS girls def have the capacity to bag SOME of the 20yo women.
lowering the AOC would in fact intensify competition for high school foids, screwing over high school males in the process
I'm okay with this - I got screwed over in HS and had to be patient (still have to be) so Gen Z can do that too and learn empathy for our suffering - it builds character and wisdom.
Saying that Gen Y millenials should abstain from ascending w/ HS girls just so HS boys from Gen Z can ascend with them is a cucked attitude. Our preceding generation X certainly did NOT make that sacrifice.
Increasing the likelihood that males would graduate from HS a virgin would in fact be a net negative for men because every single man who turns 18 as a virgin is someone who has missed key developmental milestones.
No it is a net positive for men because we finally reach those milestones in a belated way.
Also the foid pussy is reusable so they will fuck the HS boys after they done fucking us.
[UWSL]In[/UWSL][UWSL] any case, lowering the AOC would not benefit a single incel. It would benefit Chads and normies.[/UWSL]
I don't agree. Chad gets to fuck them regardless, the laws and society revolve around him.
I was talking high school foids, 14 seems fine for me, around there. Obviously something like 7 is ridiculous.
IMO how ridiculous an age is depends on what action you are talking to, 7 seems fine for something like hand-holding for example.
Don't poison the water. You can be precise and say: the point at which the femoid becomes pubescent. You can't define interest in such a foid as pedophilic.
Interest in foids of any age can never be pedophilic because pedophilia is an attraction to small boys.
Attraction to undeveloped girls is korephilia.
They don't protect men from tinder, so rosties shouldn't be protected from jb's.
stop putting apostrophes in places like that
There we go again with the hair-splitting, the "it's not pedophilia but it's hebephilia" nonsense.
more like "it's not korephilia it's parthenophilia"
OK, it's marginally better. It's still unusual as fuck to be attracted to 13-year-olds as an adult
this is just you believing normy propaganda - it's not unusual to feel this attraciton at all, it's merely unusual to ACKNOWLEDGE it because it is usual to suppress it
Normy psychology works by suppressing many things to the point of LARPing those things do not exist.
IE bluepill soys LARPing they aren't being cucked, aren't feeling jealous, that they're feminists who think women are awesome and trustworthy, etc.
Men are even more attracted to foids that have finished developing features that increase the chances that reproduction ends in success and not miscarriage.
Men are only more attracted to IMPREGNATING foids like that.
The desire to do pre-creampie interactions (ie romance and foreplay) are not connected to that level of development.
The average age of an IT roastie is 35. The place of them going "oh no inwkell you shouldn't want to fuck a 14 year old" is coming from the place of them as 35 year old roasties (past the age of having the appearance of youthful fertility) using shame to discourage sexual interest in foids that, if nude, would more likely inspire higher penile blood flow than 35 year old roasties. That's just biology you self interested hags.
Their self-interest is also biological. TBH it's kinda hard to blame them for this desperation as SMV goes down and they have to rely on more conniving psychological cultural manipulations to secure their relevancy and influence over walking wallets.
its no competition, chad would just fuck 3 times a day instead of 2 times a way. you and me would still get nothing
Chad already fucks five times a day. He's limited by how much cum he produces.
Loli legality so we can coom in HS girls lawfully would not somehow give Chad more cum to spread around, so it would not help him at all.
not with us bro. it would still be socially stigmatized for unattractive males to be chatting them up and their friend group of other lolis would shun them for talking to an nonchad older guy.
So we talk to girls with fewer friends who are already being shunned and have less to lose by taking a chance with us.
INB4 incelTear calls this "targeting the vulnerable" or some crap - it's two wounded souls coming together.
i think you forget that the very basis of the blackpill is the fact that women are simply not attracted to us.
little girls wouldn't feel any differently bro theyre raised on tiktok and instagram since they were toddlers dude.
Not all of them acknowledge how shallow they are and like to LARP about being deep and not judging on looks, so they might give us a brief chance before losing interest, but if we can coom inside them before they lose interest then pair bond chemistry initiates.
PPEcel is actually saying the prime girls in society, which would make the most loyal, submissive wives, should be instead used as mere fodder for teenage boys to reach so called "milestones", which simultaneously defiles these young virgins, so they can begin their slut campaigns, and eventually get married to some cucked betabuxxer.
If they are destined to marry a betabuxer it makes more sense to just give the destined betabuxer the initial access. This will make him a less-cucked betabuxer who is happier and ultimately the foid will be happier too because she pair-bonds with just him and doesn't have flings with Chad to look back on and compare him to.
Isnt PPEcel is a mod now? We can't exactly call him an idiot.
If we can't call the mods idiots that's a problem, this makes me want to call every mod here an idiot just to see if they will abuse their powers to suppress those that do so.
That said, much as we might use highIQ/lowIQ descriptions, these generalizations like idiot aren't very helpful in fostering a sense of understanding.
We all have virtues, we all wisdomMog the general population and should respect each other for that, whatever our disagreements we have potential we should acknowledge regularly for homosocial comradery, instead of infighting and purity spiraling.
We can banter about someone's stance on things and talk about particulars without needing to make sweeping put-downs about their capacity.
I am a high-capacity individual and still make a shit-ton of fuck-ups on the constant, and I probably only catch and rectify about half of them.
PPEcel seems reasonably intelligent from what interactions I can remember having with him, he at least speaks in a clear manner and knows how to chill and shit.
There's a reflex to calling each other dumbasses even if we are just clashing over a segment of our thought processes - we should be more gentlemanly than this.
As a rule of thumb, anything that feminists fight for is bad for incels
I don't agree with that. Especially since there are different people using the feminist banner. I'd call the majority pseudo-feminist non-feminists because they actually promote things in the name of feminism harming long-term female interests as a whole for short-term benefit.
So if you support anything that feminists support, then you're almost certainly on the wrong side and probably consuming too much soy product.
While that may be a useful default policy or rule of thumb, I would not embrace it as an overall rule - it is worth thinking critically on all issues, not just taking a reflexive stance.
I don't like the idea of burning a clitoris for example so I'm fine with opposing FGM like feminists seem to like doing. Where I differ is just that I think all genital mutilation should be stopped, and I would be willing to temporarily promote FGM and hurt foids as a political maneuver to get them on board with banning MGM like they ought to have from the start.
And sex play can involve one or many teen Chads destroying a prime foid's anus, or worse. It takes some serious mental gymnastics or retardation to be a virgin incel that believes in the blackpill but still supports feminist laws.
more like pseudo-feminist laws, as what they are doing is actually bad for women
the true feminists are incels because what we want is in foids' long-term best interests
@Wizard32
Do you think PPEcel is showing signs of hypocrisy?
He says he doesn't like intellectual dishonesty, but at the same time, he constantly calls hebephilic desires, pedophilia, this is NOT the first time he's done this.
I don't think he outright called it that, but he called the distinction you refer to as hair-splitting.
TF if you want to have this conversation first you need to get on board with abandoning the use of pedophilia to refer to men's heterosexual interest in girls ALTOGETHER (no matter how young she is)
The distinction between hetero attraction to girls is korephilia (thinking preteen girls are cute) and parthenophilia (thinking teen girls are cute) which is certainly not splitting hairs.
That said, obviously a 12yo girls and 13yo girl have a lot more in common with one another than a 13yo girl has with a 19yo girl or a 12yo girl has with a 1yo girl.
That's one of the problems we face with these range groupings. It would def be hair-splitting to act like 12 and 13 are worlds apart.
It's not hair-splitting OTOH to acknowledge the worlds apart between 1 and 12 or 13 and 19.
We're going to face issues like this no matter how we choose to define subgroups IMO.
Maybe it would be more productive to argue about what tanner stages are ideal to begin doing certain things?
@PPEcel what would your stance be on comparing tanner stages?
If it was just 1 step apart I could see calling that hair splittting, but surely comparing tanner 1 to tanner 5 as being different is not hair-splitting.
One risk I see in all this though is we're purely focusing on secondary effects like "how big are boobs and how hairy is mound" and ignoring the more important question which would be cognitive competence and social power.