Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious There is no "age of consent"

Sir Silentium

Sir Silentium

π•―π–Šπ–šπ–˜ π–π–šπ–‘π–™ †
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Joined
Jan 8, 2025
Posts
11,629
Online time
7d 15h
All quotes from:


We need to replace the consent system with a system of strict regulation where the concept of consent is no longer considered. We can call this β€œno consent at any age.”
Consent is a woke term that has completely lost it's meaning now.

If we take it into a biblical perspective - a women shall submit to the man - and a women shall not deprive the man of an action.

Ephesians 5:22 "wives, submit to your own husbands"
1 Corinthians 7:5 "Do not deprive each other"

This should be the consent rule
- to make severe punishments for fornication.
- for wives to submit to the husband
- for no depravity is to occur

So the whole term of "consent" should be completely removed.


Throughout the world there are a bunch of laws regulating the age at which a female can legally make the decision to have sex. The age is entirely arbitrary, and ranges from as low as 9 to as high as 21 depending on the location. Generally in the developed world, 16 is the accepted norm.
The vast variation of the consent age difference alone shows how ridiculous the "age of consent" laws are. Each country has its own standard and view, which differs from both biological and biblical perspectives, basing "consent" around an age rather than marriage or puberty.

There are 2 methods:
1. Biological - having intercourse for reproduction when the female first goes through puberty has the ability to give birth, especially during the ages of peak fertility - 13 to 18 years old.

2. Biblical - having intercourse after marriage occurs. For females marriage occurs around 13 years old. For males marriage occurs around 17 years old - which is still around peak fertility. Although biblical scripts also base marriage off physical maturity.


The final layer of absurdity is that it is not the girl who is punished for engaging in the illicit act, but the man whom she has targeted to loose her wiles upon,
Especially in modern times, the male is constantly seen as the perpetrator, whilst the female is the victim - but this couldn't be further from the truth.
Females are seen as the weaker vessels, so when a women attacks and a man defends himself, he is seen as the perpetrator.

Such as domestic violence cases. Court rulings show that men are punished much more frequently and harsher than females, even though females assault men more overall.
The most common violence cases overall in order are:
1. Men on Men
2. Women on Men
3. Men on Women
4. Women on Women


this is obviously misandrist and what this creates is a situation where a girl can target a man for seduction, lie about her age, and get him locked up.
Females use their position of power in the consent case for their own benefit, manipulating the truth. We have seen from countless articles that females carry out this act in order for their own gain, such as manipulation through seduction (toxic femininity).


In other words, we must all agree that a woman under the age of 16 is utterly infantile to the point of needing her biological functions restricted by men with guns. There is zero evidence that a woman ever exits this infantile state. In fact, women become less capable of managing their lives as they age. A high school girl is generally much better behaved than a college girl, and a female who has graduated college is radically irresponsible. Women are so completely infantile that they will forego their childbearing potential by spending all of their most fertile years drinking, doing drugs and having β€œconsensual” sex with stampede of different men. When the woman reaches 30, and her looks have faded and she is alone, she will enter a quandary and begin blaming others for her unfortunate predicament. Women in their 40s and 50s will then get divorces and utterly destroy the lives of every member of their families in order to pursue some type of vague β€œpersonal happiness” agenda. Women in their 50s and 60s begin engaging in bizarre and anti-social political activism which serves the sole purpose of harming society at large. It is not until her biology slows down her ability to move freely that a woman ever becomes less dangerous and destructive, less of an existential threat to society at large, less of a public nuisance, than she was at the age of 16.
^ This quote above is the truth - the older women get, their irresponsibility differs - up until a certain point - where they want to "settle down" and forget about all youth and past years.

With so-called β€œconsent,” we have created a system where the completely unregulated primitive sexual desires of women completely control all aspects of society. Women are able to give or deny consent on an industrial scale, and use this mechanism to completely control the behavior of men. They use this power granted them by the state to transform society into something which they apparently believe benefits them.
Women naturally prefer quality, and Men naturally prefer quantity.

Men also naturally have a higher sex drive, in which women use to their advantage to seduce - then manipulate the man for their own benefit.
Historically this has always been the case.

Toxic Masculinity is seen as - violent, dominant, and overpowering. But Toxic Femininity is never taken into account - such as manipulation, gossip, and seductiveness for a benefit.


All female β€œrights” are given to them by men, as is clear by the simple fact that women are not capable of surviving without men, nor are they capable of physically overpowering men.
This started from the suffragette campaigning, which originally was implemented by the elites in order to tax women as well as men. This eventually lead to "equal rights" - which is now unequal rights - as women have more rights than men.



Similar past threads:

@InvoluntaryChigga @VersoffenerAssi @Rapistcel @Hoodpreet @ANTAGONIST @t3mcel
 
Last edited:
cobby.gif
 
Taking into account for how often men are accused more than women, women aren't even far off from men in regards to the crimes as a whole.
1774562077959
 

Attachments

  • 1774561978915.png
    1774561978915.png
    104.4 KB · Views: 68
There is it’s 16
 
All quotes from:



Consent is a woke term that has completely lost it's meaning now.

If we take it into a biblical perspective - a women shall submit to the man - and a women shall not deprive the man of an action.

Ephesians 5:22 "wives, submit to your own husbands"
1 Corinthians 7:5 "Do not deprive each other"

This should be the consent rule
- to make severe punishments for fornication.
- for wives to submit to the husband
- for no depravity is to occur

So the whole term of "consent" should be completely removed.



The vast variation of the consent age difference alone shows how ridiculous the "age of consent" laws are. Each country has its own standard and view, which differs from both biological and biblical perspectives, basing "consent" around an age rather than marriage or puberty.

There are 2 methods:
1. Biological - having intercourse for reproduction when the female first goes through puberty has the ability to give birth, especially during the ages of peak fertility - 13 to 18 years old.

2. Biblical - having intercourse after marriage occurs. For females marriage occurs around 13 years old. For males marriage occurs around 17 years old - which is still around peak fertility. Although biblical scripts also base marriage off physical maturity.



Especially in modern times, the male is constantly seen as the perpetrator, whilst the female is the victim - but this couldn't be further from the truth.
Females are seen as the weaker vessels, so when a women attacks and a man defends himself, he is seen as the perpetrator.

Such as domestic violence cases. Court rulings show that men are punished much more frequently and harsher than females, even though females assault men more overall.
The most common violence cases overall in order are:
1. Men on Men
2. Women on Men
3. Men on Women
4. Women on Women



Females use their position of power in the consent case for their own benefit, manipulating the truth. We have seen from countless articles that females carry out this act in order for their own gain, such as manipulation through seduction (toxic femininity).



^ This quote above is the truth - the older women get, their irresponsibility differs - up until a certain point - where they want to "settle down" and forget about all youth and past years.


Women naturally prefer quality, and Men naturally prefer quantity.

Men also naturally have a higher sex drive, in which women use to their advantage to seduce - then manipulate the man for their own benefit.
Historically this has always been the case.

Toxic Masculinity is seen as - violent, dominant, and overpowering. But Toxic Femininity is never taken into account - such as manipulation, gossip, and seductiveness for a benefit.



This started from the suffragette campaigning, which originally was implemented by the elites in order to tax women as well as men. This eventually lead to "equal rights" - which is now unequal rights - as women have more rights than men.



Similar past threads:

@InvoluntaryChigga @VersoffenerAssi @Rapistcel @Hoodpreet @ANTAGONIST @t3mcel
BASED and lolipilled
 
In my country the age of consent is 14.
 
All quotes from:



Consent is a woke term that has completely lost it's meaning now.

If we take it into a biblical perspective - a women shall submit to the man - and a women shall not deprive the man of an action.

Ephesians 5:22 "wives, submit to your own husbands"
1 Corinthians 7:5 "Do not deprive each other"

This should be the consent rule
- to make severe punishments for fornication.
- for wives to submit to the husband
- for no depravity is to occur

So the whole term of "consent" should be completely removed.



The vast variation of the consent age difference alone shows how ridiculous the "age of consent" laws are. Each country has its own standard and view, which differs from both biological and biblical perspectives, basing "consent" around an age rather than marriage or puberty.

There are 2 methods:
1. Biological - having intercourse for reproduction when the female first goes through puberty has the ability to give birth, especially during the ages of peak fertility - 13 to 18 years old.

2. Biblical - having intercourse after marriage occurs. For females marriage occurs around 13 years old. For males marriage occurs around 17 years old - which is still around peak fertility. Although biblical scripts also base marriage off physical maturity.



Especially in modern times, the male is constantly seen as the perpetrator, whilst the female is the victim - but this couldn't be further from the truth.
Females are seen as the weaker vessels, so when a women attacks and a man defends himself, he is seen as the perpetrator.

Such as domestic violence cases. Court rulings show that men are punished much more frequently and harsher than females, even though females assault men more overall.
The most common violence cases overall in order are:
1. Men on Men
2. Women on Men
3. Men on Women
4. Women on Women



Females use their position of power in the consent case for their own benefit, manipulating the truth. We have seen from countless articles that females carry out this act in order for their own gain, such as manipulation through seduction (toxic femininity).



^ This quote above is the truth - the older women get, their irresponsibility differs - up until a certain point - where they want to "settle down" and forget about all youth and past years.


Women naturally prefer quality, and Men naturally prefer quantity.

Men also naturally have a higher sex drive, in which women use to their advantage to seduce - then manipulate the man for their own benefit.
Historically this has always been the case.

Toxic Masculinity is seen as - violent, dominant, and overpowering. But Toxic Femininity is never taken into account - such as manipulation, gossip, and seductiveness for a benefit.



This started from the suffragette campaigning, which originally was implemented by the elites in order to tax women as well as men. This eventually lead to "equal rights" - which is now unequal rights - as women have more rights than men.



Similar past threads:

@InvoluntaryChigga @VersoffenerAssi @Rapistcel @Hoodpreet @ANTAGONIST @t3mcel
Buddy we have consent laws due to Paul
 
Gives from 12-13 have been fucked more than once. That's where the legal limit should be.
Though personally I give a fuck about foids getting abused
 
In my country the age of consent is 14.
t used to be the same where i'm from but worthless cucks voted for it to be raised around 4 years ago. None of the self-proclaimed conservatives even objected to this liberal american imported faggotry. In the news, they even said that 14 year olds are allowed to have sex with each other but will be "protected" from le evil hecking old creeps.
 
Nice thread! I will make a thread about "consent extremists" in the future, it goes beyond just sex.
 
Why do we care

We will never get any foid willing to have sex with us
 
Considering that it goes anywhere from 14-17 in europe it means there is no objective age of consent. Its a man made rule that makes no sense whatsoever if you are not gonna use it against highschool jocks who take all these womens virginities.
If you want me to wait till 18 then make it illegal for all men (both adult and minor) to have sex with a woman lower than 18.
Make the punishment for them a public castration or execution.
 
Considering that it goes anywhere from 14-17 in europe it means there is no objective age of consent. Its a man made rule that makes no sense whatsoever if you are not gonna use it against highschool jocks who take all these womens virginities.
If you want me to wait till 18 then make it illegal for all men (both adult and minor) to have sex with a woman lower than 18.
Make the punishment for them a public castration or execution.
 
BASED and lolipilled
:feelsYall: .org would never allow this kind of truth

Buddy we have consent laws due to Paul
Who is Paul :feelshaha:

Nice thread! I will make a thread about "consent extremists" in the future, it goes beyond just sex.
Cheers, tag me in it

Considering that it goes anywhere from 14-17 in europe it means there is no objective age of consent. Its a man made rule that makes no sense whatsoever if you are not gonna use it against highschool jocks who take all these womens virginities.
If you want me to wait till 18 then make it illegal for all men (both adult and minor) to have sex with a woman lower than 18.
Make the punishment for them a public castration or execution.
:yes::yes::yes:
 
Considering that it goes anywhere from 14-17 in europe it means there is no objective age of consent. Its a man made rule that makes no sense whatsoever if you are not gonna use it against highschool jocks who take all these womens virginities.
If you want me to wait till 18 then make it illegal for all men (both adult and minor) to have sex with a woman lower than 18.
Make the punishment for them a public castration or execution.
But in most of Europe it is legal for say a 16 and 24 year old to be in a romantic relationship (ask any AI). So what's your point?
However, I would only want to date at least 17+ year olds provided they look at least 18, but my preferred age range is 18-25
 
But in most of Europe it is legal for say a 16 and 24 year old to be in a romantic relationship (ask any AI). So what's your point?
However, I would only want to date at least 17+ year olds provided they look at least 18, but my preferred age range is 18-25
My point is that I should be able to fuck any age I want since they are already dressing like whores and losing their virginity in middle school
 
I'll add to this post:
On the Wikipedia page about Adolescent sexuality, there's a chart showing what percentage of 15 year olds were sexually active by country, and on average, 1/4 were sexually active. So, it's very likely that many people had sex at 13 years old. The implication is that 13 year olds having sex is natural, and people just start having sex when they feel like it. Using this logic, the age of consent doesn't make sense.

Also, all age based laws are nonsense since they are based on an arbritrary date.

Thoughts on these statistics?
 
Last edited:
But in most of Europe it is legal for say a 16 and 24 year old to be in a romantic relationship (ask any AI). So what's your point?
However, I would only want to date at least 17+ year olds provided they look at least 18, but my preferred age range is 18-25
My point is that there shouldn't be an age of consent - as these meaningless issues arise. Instead the term "consent" should be disregarded and marriage should be put in place.

Biblically there was no "consent" as there is today, as I mentioned previously:
Ephesians 5:22 "wives, submit to your own husbands"
1 Corinthians 7:5 "Do not deprive each other"


And back to your point, I don't believe that there should be a higher or lower age of consent - I believe that it should be completely disregarded. This is where we can get into the topic of courting.
 
I'll add to this post:
On the Wikipedia page about Adolescent sexuality, there's a chart showing what percentage of 15 year olds were sexually active by country, and on average, 1/4 were sexually active.
For females aged 15-16 I would believe this stat to be even higher in the US/EU. As in have had a past sexual experience.

So, it's very likely that many people had sex at 13 years old. The implication is that 13 year olds having sex is natural, and people just start having sex when they feel like it. Using this logic, the age of consent doesn't make sense.
Exactly. There is no punishment for these minors who are having sexual intimacy under the "age of consent."
There has to be a punishment in order for the governments role to even work.

Also, all age based laws are nonsense since they are based on an arbritrary date.
Yes, honestly it's just ridiculous. "She was only 17" like that is going to change anything.
 
I think we better stick to 18 being the age
 
I think we better stick to 18 being the age
The age should not be a factor. Look at what this "age" has done to society. Not only that but minors don't abide by it anyways.

Also in the west the age is 16, not 18.
And globally the average is somewhere around 14.

The age = 0
 
My point is that there shouldn't be an age of consent - as these meaningless issues arise. Instead the term "consent" should be disregarded and marriage should be put in place.

Biblically there was no "consent" as there is today, as I mentioned previously:
oh yeah ok, I was talking to the other user :feelsokman:
 
I should be able to fuck any age I want since they are already dressing like whores and losing their virginity in middle school
:yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes:
My point is that there shouldn't be an age of consent - as these meaningless issues arise. Instead the term "consent" should be disregarded and marriage should be put in place.

Biblically there was no "consent" as there is today, as I mentioned previously:


And back to your point, I don't believe that there should be a higher or lower age of consent - I believe that it should be completely disregarded. This is where we can get into the topic of courting.
100% this. Marriages that start early work way better than this consent bullshit. The nonsense people call "grooming" nowadays, is what men are naturally supposed to do. A dog can be better trained when it's a puppy not when it's already grown. Same applies to foids, which is why they got married very young historically all over the world. The vikings, greeks, romans, hebrews, arabs, persians, all did this. Nowadays during the times where foid should be learning how to be a wife, she is instead forced to go to the slutfactory (school), it's all by design.

FJQ39 BWQAcayDw

The last trad marriage in the US
 
Consent itself is a fake concept
 
All quotes from:



Consent is a woke term that has completely lost it's meaning now.

If we take it into a biblical perspective - a women shall submit to the man - and a women shall not deprive the man of an action.

Ephesians 5:22 "wives, submit to your own husbands"
1 Corinthians 7:5 "Do not deprive each other"

This should be the consent rule
- to make severe punishments for fornication.
- for wives to submit to the husband
- for no depravity is to occur

So the whole term of "consent" should be completely removed.



The vast variation of the consent age difference alone shows how ridiculous the "age of consent" laws are. Each country has its own standard and view, which differs from both biological and biblical perspectives, basing "consent" around an age rather than marriage or puberty.

There are 2 methods:
1. Biological - having intercourse for reproduction when the female first goes through puberty has the ability to give birth, especially during the ages of peak fertility - 13 to 18 years old.

2. Biblical - having intercourse after marriage occurs. For females marriage occurs around 13 years old. For males marriage occurs around 17 years old - which is still around peak fertility. Although biblical scripts also base marriage off physical maturity.



Especially in modern times, the male is constantly seen as the perpetrator, whilst the female is the victim - but this couldn't be further from the truth.
Females are seen as the weaker vessels, so when a women attacks and a man defends himself, he is seen as the perpetrator.

Such as domestic violence cases. Court rulings show that men are punished much more frequently and harsher than females, even though females assault men more overall.
The most common violence cases overall in order are:
1. Men on Men
2. Women on Men
3. Men on Women
4. Women on Women



Females use their position of power in the consent case for their own benefit, manipulating the truth. We have seen from countless articles that females carry out this act in order for their own gain, such as manipulation through seduction (toxic femininity).



^ This quote above is the truth - the older women get, their irresponsibility differs - up until a certain point - where they want to "settle down" and forget about all youth and past years.


Women naturally prefer quality, and Men naturally prefer quantity.

Men also naturally have a higher sex drive, in which women use to their advantage to seduce - then manipulate the man for their own benefit.
Historically this has always been the case.

Toxic Masculinity is seen as - violent, dominant, and overpowering. But Toxic Femininity is never taken into account - such as manipulation, gossip, and seductiveness for a benefit.



This started from the suffragette campaigning, which originally was implemented by the elites in order to tax women as well as men. This eventually lead to "equal rights" - which is now unequal rights - as women have more rights than men.



Similar past threads:

@InvoluntaryChigga @VersoffenerAssi @Rapistcel @Hoodpreet @ANTAGONIST @t3mcel
saar religion evil saar
 
100% this. Marriages that start early work way better than this consent bullshit. The nonsense people call "grooming" nowadays, is what men are naturally supposed to do. A dog can be better trained when it's a puppy not when it's already grown. Same applies to foids, which is why they got married very young historically all over the world. The vikings, greeks, romans, hebrews, arabs, persians, all did this. Nowadays during the times where foid should be learning how to be a wife, she is instead forced to go to the slutfactory (school), it's all by design.
:yes: :yes: :yes:


View attachment 1705460
The last trad marriage in the US
As soon as the girls get involved in the modern world, purity is lost.
 
Nice thread! I will make a thread about "consent extremists" in the future, it goes beyond just sex.
It's a sick obsession with people who didn't get proper guidance in childhood because their parents were dysfunctional bitch fit havers.

All that matters is experiencing genuine joy and if she experienced it in my presence I'm obligated to be there for her for the rest of her life. I don't get how soulless people can be to LIGHT UP in each other's presence and then pretend like there was nothing.
 
the comment section is so retarded jfl can't even be on cuckit for longer than 1 minute until I burst out in cringe
 
the comment section is so retarded jfl can't even be on cuckit for longer than 1 minute until I burst out in cringe
I replied to the comments and they all got removed kek
 
The age should not be a factor. Look at what this "age" has done to society. Not only that but minors don't abide by it anyways.

Also in the west the age is 16, not 18.
And globally the average is somewhere around 14.

The age = 0
IT when they realize AOC in Asia and africa averages 13 to 14 years old :feels: :foidSoy:
 
IT when they realize AOC in Asia and africa averages 13 to 14 years old :feels: :foidSoy:
And they won't call the Africans pedophiles because it doesn't fit their agenda :feelshaha: :feelshaha:
 
They just contradict themselves haha.

So one day it's "it's not about your looks, it's your personality"
And another day it's "just accept that it's your looks"
Every member of IT should just end it honestly if they really are this retarded anyway. We already have enough double digit IQ retards in society
 
Every member of IT should just end it honestly if they really are this retarded anyway. We already have enough double digit IQ retards in society
@IT
 

Similar threads

FastBlast
Replies
17
Views
1K
DCI Gene Hunt
DCI Gene Hunt
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
12
Views
958
ANTAGONIST
ANTAGONIST
SlayerSlayer
Replies
21
Views
948
Chud Norris72
Chud Norris72
parbate2025
Replies
10
Views
580
parbate2025
parbate2025
sam-urai780
Replies
15
Views
970
John"
John"

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top