Discussion The only real way to solve incel problem is if couples with bad genes stop giving birth to male child

[shrttistguy]

The only way to make sure future men won't suffer as incels is by banning bottom 20-30% couples from having a boy child, ie they could give birth only to a girl child. As ruthless & harsh as it may sound, it is only way to spare suffering of men yet to be born, in this modern feminist world. Just like a parent don't have autonomy of beating their child, they shouldn't have autonomy to do this merciless acts either.

 

[foidslayer69420]

no, can only be solved by raping women instead of waiting for consent before sex

 

[boneless goblin]

idk man, its mostly luck.
even chad and stacy can have a sub5 kid

 

[WeirdoDesperado]

Men only should take control over foids weaker than them and a small minority of chads. This soyciety is actually volcel and forces countless of men to endure inceldom. Men must stop giving easy and highly paid jobs to foids, they must stop giving free stuff for having a pussy, they must handle women in proper way because they're mentally children with princess syndromes and adultery should be criminal again.

 

[shitwolf]

kys + infiltrator

 

[shrttistguy]

idk man, its mostly luck.
even chad and stacy can have a sub5 kid

Exceptions are always there

 

[Justanotherbloke]

idk man, its mostly luck.
even chad and stacy can have a sub5 kid

This.

Ive seen moggers during my HS days with horrible looking parents.

 

[TooSomething]

Nigga has never heard of genetic recombination.

 

[boneless goblin]

This.

Ive seen moggers during my HS days with horrible looking parents.

exactly

 

[boneless goblin]

Exceptions are always there

and thats how incels exist , as exceptions

 

[shrttistguy]

and thats how incels exist , as exceptions

It would be reduced to exception of exception then

 

[boneless goblin]

It would be reduced to exception of exception then

nope.

 

[boneless goblin]

It would be reduced to exception of exception then

why only male children, if they breed out a female then wouldn`t that female then have children and keep the ugly genes alive.

 

[shrttistguy]

why only male children, if they breed out a female then wouldn`t that female then have children and keep the ugly genes alive.

Yes. & Those ugly women will further give birth to only female child most probably.

 

[Mr.Breb]

The only way to make sure future men won't suffer as incels is by banning bottom 20-30% couples from having a boy child, ie they could give birth only to a girl child. As ruthless & harsh as it may sound, it is only way to spare suffering of men yet to be born, in this modern feminist world. Just like a parent don't have autonomy of beating their child, they shouldn't have autonomy to do this merciless acts either.

no, can only be solved by raping women instead of waiting for consent before sex

Both in my opinion. Woman should go to public brothels and be fucked for free. However, it's impossible to be loved so we would only allow to reproduce people with good genes

 

[Mr.Breb]

This.

Ive seen moggers during my HS days with horrible looking parents.

age also counts. Anyway, we would reduce the amount of incels and there would be better methods to predict inceldom with time

 

[AdExpress]

attraction is relative no matter how much you try to close the gap between the top and the bottom women will still chose the top percents and try to get the best deal simples

 

[boneless goblin]

Yes. & Those ugly women will further give birth to only female child most probably.

copium is crazy

 

[Julius1]

Taking away rights from women, so men are the ones to choose their looksmatches seems more reasonable than cucking yourself from reproducing

 

[ChangCel]

Gene editing will fix this inshallah

 

[shrttistguy]

Taking away rights from women, so men are the ones to choose their looksmatches seems more reasonable than cucking yourself from reproducing

Just so you know human femoids aren't asexual beings which can reproduce on their own so don't make it a gendered thing. It would also cut reproductive autonomy of bad genes men as well. Not as much of a rocket science to comprehend.

 

[brutalist]

Eugenics will be adopted in the future I'm sure of it

 

[Ryo_Hazuki]

There's two reasons why this wouldn't work and is impossible even in theory.

1) Looks are relative. If you got rid of every sub5 on earth, then the people were are currently 5/10 would become the new 1/10 turbo-subhumans. Same goes for height. If you got rid of everyone under 6'2, then 6'2 would become the new 5'3. The only way to truly get rid of ugly men is to make all men look exactly the same. The only way to truly get rid of short guys is to make all men exactly the same height.

2) Men want women a lot more than women want men. I'm not just talking about sexually either. Men are the hopeless romantics. Men are hardwired to protect and provide for women at all costs. Men also hate being alone. If a man is single he wants a gf badly and is trying to get one and he'll take any woman he can get. Meanwhile women have a very strong in-group preference, and they don't mind being single. As "extreme" as this will sound, the average man is more attracted to a 2/10 woman than the average woman is to a 10/10 male. I know that doesn't SOUND right, but I've done many dating website experiments in the past using pics of morbidly obese old women and using pics of young super good looking guys. Obviously the young chads got a lot of messages, but the obese old women got MORE. Not only that but I talked messaged a lot of the men and they were much quicker to reply and more eager to meet than the women were with the chad.

The only real solution to the incel problem is AI gfs. Well, that part of the problem anyway. The other problem is being a subhuman and all of the downstream consequences. So we'd also need UBI and FDVR so we'd never have to set foot outside. Hopefully we'll have FDVR in the next 30 years so I can live my ideal life as a 10/10 Korean pretty boy.