R
Literally where? I just asked you to prove claims such as this one:
Don't back pedal here you literally used an appeal to tradition ''Second of all, back when only men had any say, it was legal to marry girls of just about any age, provided her father agreed to the marriage. Age of Consent did not exist.'' your quotes not mine you were trying to prove this as somehow proving age of consent don't exist but it does.
I did not appeal to tradition at any point.
Like btfo you literally just used an appeal to tradition when you say back when that is is a appeal to tradition if you trying to prove something is right.
Lmao. You're worse than some of the leftist cucks in this regard
Dude lmao you do realize ultimately the thing's that causes foid's to fuck chad's is younger lust right ?????? older women have even lower libido so their's less to worry about their are also shit like societal pressures to help enforce this so less women will ultimately fuck chad's women follow rules much more so than men you are bluepilled if you think that is a lie look at history even the declaration of female right's was signed by men women would fall in place in a heart beat it's better for the man aswell cause he is more emotionally mature and overall it increases human happiness think about it for a sec dude a women as soon as she turn's 25 cause of societial pressures is more likely to settle down later on most women whore around in the their primes most women peak at 16/17 just saying so ultiamtely it would help men.
So you're saying the goverment is cracking down on abuse rings. You've agreed that no legislation is being pushed to legalize young relationships. How does that support your argument again?
No you fucking moron i said their increasing it implicitly i never said their was legislation or their cracking down on it cause their's not in fact if anything they leave a blind eye to it what i am saying is ultimately it increases it's profit's they do this with drug trafficking as well https://www.thenewamerican.com/worl...d-top-mexican-drug-cartel-exposed-as-partners this argument boil's down to just cause the goverment doesn't out right say it doesn't mean their not encouraging like gtfo dude their doing it implicitly to increase it and they know this big brother isn't stupid they can see what's going on i mean is hitler any less responsible for the death of the jew's cause he didn't kill 6 million jew's or stalin or any dictator you implicilty support something and also big brother want's to atleast appear popular with the populace so they pass certain law's to crack down on pedophilia this is one of the rear cases where they play morality but in reality they will use the profit's made by these bastard's to strong arm it's ownself.
AoC = age of consent
Oh well never mind then i retract that statement their is a age of consent just cause the line becomes ambiguous near the older ages doesn't mean the gap doesn't exist.
There's no reason why a husband of a young teen wife would abuse her. I'm not advocating for the legalization of sexual assault, especially with kids involved, which is what you're talking about.
Doesn't matter still doesn't make it right it's not right to groom kid's.
Lmao you're reaching so hard right now. "Uhhh increasing tax on gas means more people will be poorer, which means families will have it harder, which means some parents will start selling their kids brooo" miss me with that shit
You have zero coherent arguments my dude
So hitler did nothing wrong right him personally not killing 6 million jew's mean's Hitler is completely innocent like dude gtfo
Your correct on 1 thing i am autistic but what does that have to do with anything
Don't back pedal here you literally used an appeal to tradition ''Second of all, back when only men had any say, it was legal to marry girls of just about any age, provided her father agreed to the marriage. Age of Consent did not exist.'' your quotes not mine you were trying to prove this as somehow proving age of consent don't exist but it does.
I did not appeal to tradition at any point.
Like btfo you literally just used an appeal to tradition when you say back when that is is a appeal to tradition if you trying to prove something is right.
Lmao. You're worse than some of the leftist cucks in this regard
Dude lmao you do realize ultimately the thing's that causes foid's to fuck chad's is younger lust right ?????? older women have even lower libido so their's less to worry about their are also shit like societal pressures to help enforce this so less women will ultimately fuck chad's women follow rules much more so than men you are bluepilled if you think that is a lie look at history even the declaration of female right's was signed by men women would fall in place in a heart beat it's better for the man aswell cause he is more emotionally mature and overall it increases human happiness think about it for a sec dude a women as soon as she turn's 25 cause of societial pressures is more likely to settle down later on most women whore around in the their primes most women peak at 16/17 just saying so ultiamtely it would help men.
So you're saying the goverment is cracking down on abuse rings. You've agreed that no legislation is being pushed to legalize young relationships. How does that support your argument again?
No you fucking moron i said their increasing it implicitly i never said their was legislation or their cracking down on it cause their's not in fact if anything they leave a blind eye to it what i am saying is ultimately it increases it's profit's they do this with drug trafficking as well https://www.thenewamerican.com/worl...d-top-mexican-drug-cartel-exposed-as-partners this argument boil's down to just cause the goverment doesn't out right say it doesn't mean their not encouraging like gtfo dude their doing it implicitly to increase it and they know this big brother isn't stupid they can see what's going on i mean is hitler any less responsible for the death of the jew's cause he didn't kill 6 million jew's or stalin or any dictator you implicilty support something and also big brother want's to atleast appear popular with the populace so they pass certain law's to crack down on pedophilia this is one of the rear cases where they play morality but in reality they will use the profit's made by these bastard's to strong arm it's ownself.
AoC = age of consent
Oh well never mind then i retract that statement their is a age of consent just cause the line becomes ambiguous near the older ages doesn't mean the gap doesn't exist.
There's no reason why a husband of a young teen wife would abuse her. I'm not advocating for the legalization of sexual assault, especially with kids involved, which is what you're talking about.
Doesn't matter still doesn't make it right it's not right to groom kid's.
Lmao you're reaching so hard right now. "Uhhh increasing tax on gas means more people will be poorer, which means families will have it harder, which means some parents will start selling their kids brooo"
miss me with that shitYou have zero coherent arguments my dude
So hitler did nothing wrong right him personally not killing 6 million jew's mean's Hitler is completely innocent like dude gtfo
Your correct on 1 thing i am autistic but what does that have to do with anything
