The Middle East is the most probable location for the next nuclear bombing to occur in history. This is mainly because of the Israel-Palestinian conflict, and the current relations of nuclear states in the Middle East, as Israel is a "suspected" nuclear state
I think it is very unlikely for NATO and China, Russia or North Korea to engage in nuclear conflict with each other in the future, because of “mutually assured destruction”, which NATO, China, Russia and North Korea would rather avoid. As a nuclear-armed state, the safest way to carry out a nuclear war is by targeting a non-nuclear state that is also not heavily protected by other nuclear states. This is why I’ve chosen the Middle East as the most probable location for the next nuclear attack to occur in history. There are over a dozen states in the Middle East, but only two of them (Israel and Turkey) are known or presumed to possess nuclear weapons
I think Israel is the most likely state to carry out the next nuclear attack in history, cause Israel is currently in a state of mass conflict with surrounding states in Levant and Arabian Peninsula, like Palestine and possibly Iran or Lebanon in future. As Israel is pretty much the only known nuclear state in the Middle East, Israel has the advantage over surrounding states, cause it means if Israel were to launch a nuclear attack on a rival state in their vicinity, it would probably not be a case of “mutually assured destruction”. This means Israel can launch a nuclear attack on their rivals without having to fear the possibility of a reprisal nuclear attack (since their nearby rivals are non-nuclear states)
Moreover, it's not confirmed that Israel is a nuclear state, only “suspected”. But think about it. The Jews invented and designed nukes. If the Jews designed and invented nukes, the Jews definitely had the intelligence and the resources to build viable nuclear bombs. So, why wouldn’t the "Promised Land" possess their own nukes?
Under what circumstances would the neo-Israelites launch a nuclear attack in the Middle East?
It’s simple. A nuclear attack by the neo-Israelites would have to be a “last resort”, such that Israel is on the brink of defeat / annexation by one or more of their rivalling states. If the Palestinians and supporting countries (like Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia) were to eventually gain the upper hand against Israel in the ongoing war, and it became clear to neo-Israelites that at the rate things are going, they will end up being wiped out or annexed by Palestine and supporting countries, the armed forces of Israel will most likely resort to nuclear solutions, in order to reverse the imbalance between the winning side and the losing side
I am not convinced that Zionist Jews will ever vacate the Levant. I believe Zionist Jews will do everything in their power to retain their occupation of Israel, even it means nuking a rival state in the Middle East. Even if Palestine, Iran and Lebanon have militaries like Hamas and Hezbollah to fight against the IDF, it is hopeless, cause at the end of the day, Israel is a nuclear state, while Palestine, Lebanon and Iran are not. The safest solution for Palestine is to submit to their oppressors. There is no state in the Middle East that has the means to annex Israel or send Zionist Jews into exile. Modern Jews are very powerful people, they are far from the weaklings that Jews were in ancient biblical times
For the sake of the humans that populate other countries in the Middle East, it’s the better outcome for the Palestinians to continue being oppressed by Jews. Palestinians do not have the means to defeat their bullies or send them into exile, at least not yet, and possibly never will. If Hamas start to edge closer to victory in the Israel-Palestine war (e.g., annexing large sections of Israel, and capturing, slaying or banishing a large share of the Israel population), it will not be a good sign for Palestine or for any supporters of Palestine, cause it will only provide the Zionist Jews with a stronger incentive to resort to nuclear weapons in order to reverse the tides of warfare
I think it is very unlikely for NATO and China, Russia or North Korea to engage in nuclear conflict with each other in the future, because of “mutually assured destruction”, which NATO, China, Russia and North Korea would rather avoid. As a nuclear-armed state, the safest way to carry out a nuclear war is by targeting a non-nuclear state that is also not heavily protected by other nuclear states. This is why I’ve chosen the Middle East as the most probable location for the next nuclear attack to occur in history. There are over a dozen states in the Middle East, but only two of them (Israel and Turkey) are known or presumed to possess nuclear weapons
I think Israel is the most likely state to carry out the next nuclear attack in history, cause Israel is currently in a state of mass conflict with surrounding states in Levant and Arabian Peninsula, like Palestine and possibly Iran or Lebanon in future. As Israel is pretty much the only known nuclear state in the Middle East, Israel has the advantage over surrounding states, cause it means if Israel were to launch a nuclear attack on a rival state in their vicinity, it would probably not be a case of “mutually assured destruction”. This means Israel can launch a nuclear attack on their rivals without having to fear the possibility of a reprisal nuclear attack (since their nearby rivals are non-nuclear states)
Moreover, it's not confirmed that Israel is a nuclear state, only “suspected”. But think about it. The Jews invented and designed nukes. If the Jews designed and invented nukes, the Jews definitely had the intelligence and the resources to build viable nuclear bombs. So, why wouldn’t the "Promised Land" possess their own nukes?
Under what circumstances would the neo-Israelites launch a nuclear attack in the Middle East?
It’s simple. A nuclear attack by the neo-Israelites would have to be a “last resort”, such that Israel is on the brink of defeat / annexation by one or more of their rivalling states. If the Palestinians and supporting countries (like Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia) were to eventually gain the upper hand against Israel in the ongoing war, and it became clear to neo-Israelites that at the rate things are going, they will end up being wiped out or annexed by Palestine and supporting countries, the armed forces of Israel will most likely resort to nuclear solutions, in order to reverse the imbalance between the winning side and the losing side
I am not convinced that Zionist Jews will ever vacate the Levant. I believe Zionist Jews will do everything in their power to retain their occupation of Israel, even it means nuking a rival state in the Middle East. Even if Palestine, Iran and Lebanon have militaries like Hamas and Hezbollah to fight against the IDF, it is hopeless, cause at the end of the day, Israel is a nuclear state, while Palestine, Lebanon and Iran are not. The safest solution for Palestine is to submit to their oppressors. There is no state in the Middle East that has the means to annex Israel or send Zionist Jews into exile. Modern Jews are very powerful people, they are far from the weaklings that Jews were in ancient biblical times
For the sake of the humans that populate other countries in the Middle East, it’s the better outcome for the Palestinians to continue being oppressed by Jews. Palestinians do not have the means to defeat their bullies or send them into exile, at least not yet, and possibly never will. If Hamas start to edge closer to victory in the Israel-Palestine war (e.g., annexing large sections of Israel, and capturing, slaying or banishing a large share of the Israel population), it will not be a good sign for Palestine or for any supporters of Palestine, cause it will only provide the Zionist Jews with a stronger incentive to resort to nuclear weapons in order to reverse the tides of warfare
Last edited:
