Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The MomPill

Overdosed

Overdosed

"Grass" said she has a BF
★★
Joined
May 25, 2021
Posts
598
What's typically seen as parental love is a mother holding her baby in her arms or a mother joyfully smiling with the company of her toddler. We even have a specific term for it: maternal instinct, but is it truly an instinct? Do mothers really love their children or is it conformation bias mixed cultural nuances and expectations?

It is certain whenever mothers give birth, then subsequently breastfeed their precious ones, they receive waves of oxytocin as a mean to deal with both birth pains and breast milk 1 that establishes relationships with their newborns. If those are the two hormonal revenues are (at least) the basis for maternal instincts, how is substituting going to affect the relationship? (Especially epigenetically).

This study shows that mothers experienced higher levels of oxytocin if they delivered vaginally, compared to C-sections. 2
However, caesarean sections (C-sections) is on the rise, in fact, it's been estimated that a third of childbirths by 2030 will undergo this method 3. It's also well known that using baby formula is becoming more common than breastfeeding. The problem is: baby formula consumption is contributed to compromised immunities and various metabolic disorders 4 while Breastfeeding improves IQ5, immunity (partly has to do with skin contact 6), and just suckling alone increases oxytocin which would help babies become more neurotypical 7.

If mothers really love their children, they won't trade their children's future and prosperity over anything trivial that'll return to haunt them evermore-of course, it's never that simple. You might be thinking this has to do with pain and time constraints, which is understandable to assume, however, there are temporary lifestyle choices that permanently effect the developed. For example, globally mothers are becoming overweight; and this dietary choice results in kids with lower IQ scores 420, slower processing speeds 8, premature 9 deliveries 10 (shortening potential lifespan of young girls 11), along with consuming fluoride-rich products 12. Women are also gradually postponing their childbearing years. This greatly, increases the probability that their children will develop autism 13, a condition that correlated with depression and suicide 14. Not to mention women's use of contraceptives (most of which are progesterone based) during their hoe phases, epigenetically proliferates their chances of baring children with homosexual tenancies 15, ending their genetic legacy.

This negligent behaviour doesn't seem to really be a reflection of one's relational circumstances.
In one study, 70% of 1,450 children were abandoned due to their appearance despite neither of them experienced life threatening conditions nor were they born with intellectual ailments 16. Experiments evince that babies' having undesirable aesthetic characteristics predicts potentially subjected to abuse and neglect by their mummies 17, even if they successfully reach into adulthood this maternal adversity shorten their telomeres 18. (Telomeres plays a factor in cancer prevention and longevity). Several mothers do this unintentionally or just in denial about it 19. It's already known that women 'hypergamously' yearn for more attractiveness on men, but researchers found that this carries over to their own children. Even if the women's kids look normal, they “prefer the luxury of exceptional attractiveness.” 20. In other words, even if most of you were spared from maternal abuse, you're not going to receive your mom's best.

Bluepillers love to object by asserting this partly has to do with men leaving the mothers of their child, but evidence suggests fathers (even unwed ones) don't normally abandon their offspring. 8 out of 10 single mothers who are involved with their children's fathers themselves leave the relationship afterwards, yet prior when their children enter into education 21. While new mothers initially favour traditional gender roles, after a year later, they typically reject them strongly regardless of the fathers' views. 22 (that's also the time recommended for mothers can -on average- to wean their babies 23 hence a decrease of oxytocin or an increase of serotonin 24. More studies are needed to show if there's a causation.) This shouldn't surprise anyone as women score lower in men regarding commitment, 6.68 and 7.27 respectively (with the only scores that women surpasses men are senses of Superiority/Arrogance and Exploitativeness/Entitlement) 25. It's even questionable if females are even monogamous 26. (BTW) Religious participates aren’t any better off 27.

We observe similar decision-making well into postpartumly as a survey reports that “The most common reason given by the fathers for not having more contact with their children was the mothers’ reluctance to let them” 28 with only 37% of women delaying divorce for the sake of their children (oppose to 58% of fathers) 29. It does without saying, women initiate >75% of all divorces and -likely- all non- marital breakups.

The same bluepillers love to also blame partners/fathers for a lack of involvement leading to divorce, when in reality its the result of the wives/mothers' 'temporary sexual cycle', described as “rotating polyandry”. This is when women find a new mate, reproduce, then about four years they become bored with their relationships, then subsequently attempt to “liberate” themselves from their mates (these would include Chads). After words their hormones prompt them to repeat their feral sexual cycle. 30 31
Women's subhuman, dual mating strategy is derived by their AVPR1 genes 32 but they're not that impactful during early maternity 33.

The maternal decision to amputate kids from their fathers is detrimental for children's upbringing. This kind of impact on pair bounding, however, isn't reflective found in parental death during development 34.
Research does suggests that children's biological (strong) father's guidance during adolescence is one of the strongest, if not the most potent, indicator of stability psychologically, otherwise steams a sense that father absence due to the feeling of worthlessness and lack of belonging (even if their mothers appears to be very nurturing) resulting the potential for self-harm and suicide 35. And indicator of success 36 (stepmothers had the lowest levels of involvement 37) for both sons and daughters 38. All the social benefits of career-orientated mothers seem to cease after 3 years of early development, peculiarly for sons 39 40 41.
Minors who primarily under the guidance of their single mothers are >50% more likely to be incarcerated, apposed to families with both parents 42. In situations where mothers and fathers may have similar ways of parenting, a youth’s interactions with his or her father (regardless if they were exposed to violence) plays a greater role in the emotional and behavioral development of the child during the early years of growth (Easterbrooks, et al.).

On a minor note, women, especially mothers, extract more taxes than they contribute 43 44 45 46, as well as increase their nation's debts 47 48 49. This increase of taxes can weaken their children for personal pursuits (related to finances), particularly building nuclear families, which negatively down-streams the incentives for sons to partake in society (especially in the labor force and education).

The research we've observe up to this point, most women seem adamant or undeterred to force their kids undergo some of the worse environmental experiences for childhood development. From this, we can extrapolate that women's choices appears to be an avenue of narcissism & being generally self serving. Maternal narcissism seem to be an emotional adaptation for attachment and shift in roles 50 This means, however, the child isn't seen as individual person rather an extension of the mother's self as a “love object” 51. In extreme cases mothers will become hostile once the child individually conflicts with narcissistic view of her “ love object”m which often results in a feedback loop of self identity and "child-parent shared phantasy" 52.

This fantasy had made many mothers feel secure enough to sexually abuse their children without much fear of consequences. One study reports that women, “primarily mothers,” are responsible for “25% (approximately 36000 children) of the sexually abused victims.” 53, although this compilation implies that Females are more than likely to sexually abuse their children in general, and it's more psychologically damaging 54

Narcissism might also explain why if children don't meet their mothers' expectations are at risk of being murdered. 70% of mothers have “experienced explicit aggressive thoughts toward their infants, and over a quarter (26%) of them had infanticidal thoughts” when their babies are fussy over a period of time, with 8.0/100,000 for infants and 2.5/100,000 for preschool-age children fall under filicide in the US, despite not having “significant mental illness as technically required by the law” 55.

One could argue that fathers are much as a risk of child endangerment as mothers if they had the same amount of exposure, however, “8% of fathers and none of the mothers (p<0.005) reported constant quarrels as effective on the filicide and “fathers were more often intoxicated during their offense than were mothers.” these help to explain why “Fathers’ motives were more impulsive in nature.” In other words, without being under the influence of drugs, fathers are far less likely to commit filicide. Compare this to mothers who typically “used drowning, criminal negligence, and poisoning” as killing methods Fathers tend more to committed suicide at the crime scene, suggesting they felt guilt for their crime, meanwhile after the murder, mothers tend to try to get rid of their baby's body. 56 This disregard for human life out of convenience is mirrored for the motivations for abortion with 74-78% “Having a baby would dramatically change my [socioeconomic] life”, 28-38% “Have completed my childbearing” while only <1.5% is involved in rape or incest 57 This compulsion doesn't stop with infants:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/three-los-angeles-children-stabbed-to-death-saturday-morning
https://metro.co.uk/2020/07/15/moth...kids-demands-taxpayer-funded-lawyer-12993998/
https://archive.ph/1i66G
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osaka_child_abandonment_case
https://www.tiktok.com/@cathtatehypnotates/video/6997479130405063941?is_from_webapp=v1&item_id=6997479130405063941&lang=en
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ers-dead-mother-deliberately-crashed-car.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ohcb-v-zXqGhgN70H6Y27Eq7zHxm2stDxeL1Nct26MIuE
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...d-three-children-aged-12-killing-herself.html
https://www.tech-gate.org/usa/2021/...n-russia-for-telling-husband-she-was-a-cheat/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...l-contact-three-times-boy-14-avoids-jail.html
And so many more cases.
Regardless, it's unlikely that ex-moms feel any remorse for their killings. 58 Few are even willing to go as far to kill themselves than care for their infants 59.

Mothers' propensity for violence isn't as simply imitating male behavior either, rather perhaps a cyclical victimization from their own parental abuses 60 as “the person responsible was most often the mother” 61 and abused daughters reported that 62% of the perpetrators were mothers 62. This behaviour is reflective when scientists tried to demonstrate the sociological, neuroanatomical view that women are the emphatic sex, to find that the emphatic differences between the sexes were indistinguishable. 63

Based upon the research, maternal instincts, if it ever existed, only seem to last during natural pregnancy and breasting.
If we took an honest review of mothers -or generally women-, we would conclude that they're not perfect nor that innocent. Please listen to the maternally abused, the whole concept that mothers are as parentally loving as they're typically depicted is just a cultural conformation bias, which doesn't stand with scientific rigor or testimonies. Ignoring this blackpill will only continue such injustice.

TL;DR: The default idea of the doting mommy is largely a meme:feelsclown:, because of it, a plethora of mothers have gotten away with inflecting many atrocities towards their children, including torture and murder :f:.
Women (regardless of their place in life) in general hardly place their necessaries above someone else's, even for own children (especially if they don't have “exceptional attractiveness” :foidSoy::chad:). They might sacrifice temporary conveniences, but rarely, ever will sacrifice their own well being over another, and the sciences prove it.
 
tbh, and as usual with bad things coming from women and fags and kikes, you see increasing honesty from increasingly confident agents

CasVqug.png
 
too long, didn't read + anime avi and banner
 
This is when women find a new mate, reproduce, then about four years they become bored with their relationships, then subsequently attempt to “liberate” themselves from their mates (these would include Chads). After words their hormones prompt them to repeat their feral sexual cycle. 30 31
Which is exactly why the "dual mating strategy" that's been observed is actually detrimental to human evolution as there are no genes to save you from shitty uninvolved parents. Being raised by single parent families or by an abusing family results in most of these kids not being successful, including Chads and Stacies.
 
What's typically seen as parental love is a mother holding her baby in her arms or a mother joyfully smiling with the company of her toddler. We even have a specific term for it: maternal instinct, but is it truly an instinct? Do mothers really love their children or is it conformation bias mixed cultural nuances and expectations?

It is certain whenever mothers give birth, then subsequently breastfeed their precious ones, they receive waves of oxytocin as a mean to deal with both birth pains and breast milk 1 that establishes relationships with their newborns. If those are the two hormonal revenues are (at least) the basis for maternal instincts, how is substituting going to affect the relationship? (Especially epigenetically).

This study shows that mothers experienced higher levels of oxytocin if they delivered vaginally, compared to C-sections. 2
However, caesarean sections (C-sections) is on the rise, in fact, it's been estimated that a third of childbirths by 2030 will undergo this method 3. It's also well known that using baby formula is becoming more common than breastfeeding. The problem is: baby formula consumption is contributed to compromised immunities and various metabolic disorders 4 while Breastfeeding improves IQ5, immunity (partly has to do with skin contact 6), and just suckling alone increases oxytocin which would help babies become more neurotypical 7.

If mothers really love their children, they won't trade their children's future and prosperity over anything trivial that'll return to haunt them evermore-of course, it's never that simple. You might be thinking this has to do with pain and time constraints, which is understandable to assume, however, there are temporary lifestyle choices that permanently effect the developed. For example, globally mothers are becoming overweight; and this dietary choice results in kids with lower IQ scores 420, slower processing speeds 8, premature 9 deliveries 10 (shortening potential lifespan of young girls 11), along with consuming fluoride-rich products 12. Women are also gradually postponing their childbearing years. This greatly, increases the probability that their children will develop autism 13, a condition that correlated with depression and suicide 14. Not to mention women's use of contraceptives (most of which are progesterone based) during their hoe phases, epigenetically proliferates their chances of baring children with homosexual tenancies 15, ending their genetic legacy.

This negligent behaviour doesn't seem to really be a reflection of one's relational circumstances.
In one study, 70% of 1,450 children were abandoned due to their appearance despite neither of them experienced life threatening conditions nor were they born with intellectual ailments 16. Experiments evince that babies' having undesirable aesthetic characteristics predicts potentially subjected to abuse and neglect by their mummies 17, even if they successfully reach into adulthood this maternal adversity shorten their telomeres 18. (Telomeres plays a factor in cancer prevention and longevity). Several mothers do this unintentionally or just in denial about it 19. It's already known that women 'hypergamously' yearn for more attractiveness on men, but researchers found that this carries over to their own children. Even if the women's kids look normal, they “prefer the luxury of exceptional attractiveness.” 20. In other words, even if most of you were spared from maternal abuse, you're not going to receive your mom's best.

Bluepillers love to object by asserting this partly has to do with men leaving the mothers of their child, but evidence suggests fathers (even unwed ones) don't normally abandon their offspring. 8 out of 10 single mothers who are involved with their children's fathers themselves leave the relationship afterwards, yet prior when their children enter into education 21. While new mothers initially favour traditional gender roles, after a year later, they typically reject them strongly regardless of the fathers' views. 22 (that's also the time recommended for mothers can -on average- to wean their babies 23 hence a decrease of oxytocin or an increase of serotonin 24. More studies are needed to show if there's a causation.) This shouldn't surprise anyone as women score lower in men regarding commitment, 6.68 and 7.27 respectively (with the only scores that women surpasses men are senses of Superiority/Arrogance and Exploitativeness/Entitlement) 25. It's even questionable if females are even monogamous 26. (BTW) Religious participates aren’t any better off 27.

We observe similar decision-making well into postpartumly as a survey reports that “The most common reason given by the fathers for not having more contact with their children was the mothers’ reluctance to let them” 28 with only 37% of women delaying divorce for the sake of their children (oppose to 58% of fathers) 29. It does without saying, women initiate >75% of all divorces and -likely- all non- marital breakups.

The same bluepillers love to also blame partners/fathers for a lack of involvement leading to divorce, when in reality its the result of the wives/mothers' 'temporary sexual cycle', described as “rotating polyandry”. This is when women find a new mate, reproduce, then about four years they become bored with their relationships, then subsequently attempt to “liberate” themselves from their mates (these would include Chads). After words their hormones prompt them to repeat their feral sexual cycle. 30 31
Women's subhuman, dual mating strategy is derived by their AVPR1 genes 32 but they're not that impactful during early maternity 33.

The maternal decision to amputate kids from their fathers is detrimental for children's upbringing. This kind of impact on pair bounding, however, isn't reflective found in parental death during development 34.
Research does suggests that children's biological (strong) father's guidance during adolescence is one of the strongest, if not the most potent, indicator of stability psychologically, otherwise steams a sense that father absence due to the feeling of worthlessness and lack of belonging (even if their mothers appears to be very nurturing) resulting the potential for self-harm and suicide 35. And indicator of success 36 (stepmothers had the lowest levels of involvement 37) for both sons and daughters 38. All the social benefits of career-orientated mothers seem to cease after 3 years of early development, peculiarly for sons 39 40 41.
Minors who primarily under the guidance of their single mothers are >50% more likely to be incarcerated, apposed to families with both parents 42. In situations where mothers and fathers may have similar ways of parenting, a youth’s interactions with his or her father (regardless if they were exposed to violence) plays a greater role in the emotional and behavioral development of the child during the early years of growth (Easterbrooks, et al.).

On a minor note, women, especially mothers, extract more taxes than they contribute 43 44 45 46, as well as increase their nation's debts 47 48 49. This increase of taxes can weaken their children for personal pursuits (related to finances), particularly building nuclear families, which negatively down-streams the incentives for sons to partake in society (especially in the labor force and education).

The research we've observe up to this point, most women seem adamant or undeterred to force their kids undergo some of the worse environmental experiences for childhood development. From this, we can extrapolate that women's choices appears to be an avenue of narcissism & being generally self serving. Maternal narcissism seem to be an emotional adaptation for attachment and shift in roles 50 This means, however, the child isn't seen as individual person rather an extension of the mother's self as a “love object” 51. In extreme cases mothers will become hostile once the child individually conflicts with narcissistic view of her “ love object”m which often results in a feedback loop of self identity and "child-parent shared phantasy" 52.

This fantasy had made many mothers feel secure enough to sexually abuse their children without much fear of consequences. One study reports that women, “primarily mothers,” are responsible for “25% (approximately 36000 children) of the sexually abused victims.” 53, although this compilation implies that Females are more than likely to sexually abuse their children in general, and it's more psychologically damaging 54

Narcissism might also explain why if children don't meet their mothers' expectations are at risk of being murdered. 70% of mothers have “experienced explicit aggressive thoughts toward their infants, and over a quarter (26%) of them had infanticidal thoughts” when their babies are fussy over a period of time, with 8.0/100,000 for infants and 2.5/100,000 for preschool-age children fall under filicide in the US, despite not having “significant mental illness as technically required by the law” 55.

One could argue that fathers are much as a risk of child endangerment as mothers if they had the same amount of exposure, however, “8% of fathers and none of the mothers (p<0.005) reported constant quarrels as effective on the filicide and “fathers were more often intoxicated during their offense than were mothers.” these help to explain why “Fathers’ motives were more impulsive in nature.” In other words, without being under the influence of drugs, fathers are far less likely to commit filicide. Compare this to mothers who typically “used drowning, criminal negligence, and poisoning” as killing methods Fathers tend more to committed suicide at the crime scene, suggesting they felt guilt for their crime, meanwhile after the murder, mothers tend to try to get rid of their baby's body. 56 This disregard for human life out of convenience is mirrored for the motivations for abortion with 74-78% “Having a baby would dramatically change my [socioeconomic] life”, 28-38% “Have completed my childbearing” while only <1.5% is involved in rape or incest 57 This compulsion doesn't stop with infants:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/three-los-angeles-children-stabbed-to-death-saturday-morning
https://metro.co.uk/2020/07/15/moth...kids-demands-taxpayer-funded-lawyer-12993998/
https://archive.ph/1i66G
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osaka_child_abandonment_case
https://www.tiktok.com/@cathtatehypnotates/video/6997479130405063941?is_from_webapp=v1&item_id=6997479130405063941&lang=en
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ers-dead-mother-deliberately-crashed-car.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ohcb-v-zXqGhgN70H6Y27Eq7zHxm2stDxeL1Nct26MIuE
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...d-three-children-aged-12-killing-herself.html
https://www.tech-gate.org/usa/2021/...n-russia-for-telling-husband-she-was-a-cheat/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...l-contact-three-times-boy-14-avoids-jail.html
And so many more cases.
Regardless, it's unlikely that ex-moms feel any remorse for their killings. 58 Few are even willing to go as far to kill themselves than care for their infants 59.

Mothers' propensity for violence isn't as simply imitating male behavior either, rather perhaps a cyclical victimization from their own parental abuses 60 as “the person responsible was most often the mother” 61 and abused daughters reported that 62% of the perpetrators were mothers 62. This behaviour is reflective when scientists tried to demonstrate the sociological, neuroanatomical view that women are the emphatic sex, to find that the emphatic differences between the sexes were indistinguishable. 63

Based upon the research, maternal instincts, if it ever existed, only seem to last during natural pregnancy and breasting.
If we took an honest review of mothers -or generally women-, we would conclude that they're not perfect nor that innocent. Please listen to the maternally abused, the whole concept that mothers are as parentally loving as they're typically depicted is just a cultural conformation bias, which doesn't stand with scientific rigor or testimonies. Ignoring this blackpill will only continue such injustice.

TL;DR: The default idea of the doting mommy is largely a meme:feelsclown:, because of it, a plethora of mothers have gotten away with inflecting many atrocities towards their children, including torture and murder :f:.
Women (regardless of their place in life) in general hardly place their necessaries above someone else's, even for own children (especially if they don't have “exceptional attractiveness” :foidSoy::chad:). They might sacrifice temporary conveniences, but rarely, ever will sacrifice their own well being over another, and the sciences prove it.
bro i ain't reading allat
 
Didn't read. Sorry, my attention span is so bad that I can't even read one page of a book
women suck and their maternal instincts are worse than ever, also they aren't afraid to admit it
 
Read everything, good post and effort.
 
idk about this one tho, im uglier than my mother and she has always work for me and me brother even when we treat her like shit
 
So many low IQ dolts disregarding the damning scientific evidence tbh this is a great post and probably belongs in the Must-Read section
 
tbh, and as usual with bad things coming from women and fags and kikes, you see increasing honesty from increasingly confident agents

CasVqug.png
Nah glowcels haven't change. Thwey've just stopped pretending to be ignorant because trying to fool lonely guys funny anymore.
too long, didn't read + anime avi and banner
Didn't read. Sorry, my attention span is so bad that I can't even read one page of a book
bro i ain't reading allat
There's a TLDR in the OP. Basically, (new) mamas be bad bitches, but them kids get the stitches.
women suck and their maternal instincts are worse than ever, also they aren't afraid to admit it
↑↑↑
idk about this one tho, im uglier than my mother and she has always work for me and me brother even when we treat her like shit
That's why this is my longest and most citation heavy essay I've made yet. I needed to prove my case.
So many low IQ dolts disregarding the damning scientific evidence tbh this is a great post and probably belongs in the Must-Read section
Thanks you, but I did expect this post isn't going to be popular, since it's a pill even the most stoic objectivists can barely accept.
 
did you type this out or did you copy paste an article
 
Ok Sigmund Freud
 
This just further proves that foids are insufferable, even your own mother. This also contributes to AWALT theory where they seek for attractiveness, status, demeanor, and resources instead of their biological goals to reproduce and care their children.
As a c section non breastfed cel I wholeheartedly agree.
Same brocel
 
Last edited:
Good post OP. Possibly worthy of most-read section
 
What's typically seen as parental love is a mother holding her baby in her arms or a mother joyfully smiling with the company of her toddler. We even have a specific term for it: maternal instinct, but is it truly an instinct? Do mothers really love their children or is it conformation bias mixed cultural nuances and expectations?

It is certain whenever mothers give birth, then subsequently breastfeed their precious ones, they receive waves of oxytocin as a mean to deal with both birth pains and breast milk 1 that establishes relationships with their newborns. If those are the two hormonal revenues are (at least) the basis for maternal instincts, how is substituting going to affect the relationship? (Especially epigenetically).

This study shows that mothers experienced higher levels of oxytocin if they delivered vaginally, compared to C-sections. 2
However, caesarean sections (C-sections) is on the rise, in fact, it's been estimated that a third of childbirths by 2030 will undergo this method 3. It's also well known that using baby formula is becoming more common than breastfeeding. The problem is: baby formula consumption is contributed to compromised immunities and various metabolic disorders 4 while Breastfeeding improves IQ5, immunity (partly has to do with skin contact 6), and just suckling alone increases oxytocin which would help babies become more neurotypical 7.

If mothers really love their children, they won't trade their children's future and prosperity over anything trivial that'll return to haunt them evermore-of course, it's never that simple. You might be thinking this has to do with pain and time constraints, which is understandable to assume, however, there are temporary lifestyle choices that permanently effect the developed. For example, globally mothers are becoming overweight; and this dietary choice results in kids with lower IQ scores 420, slower processing speeds 8, premature 9 deliveries 10 (shortening potential lifespan of young girls 11), along with consuming fluoride-rich products 12. Women are also gradually postponing their childbearing years. This greatly, increases the probability that their children will develop autism 13, a condition that correlated with depression and suicide 14. Not to mention women's use of contraceptives (most of which are progesterone based) during their hoe phases, epigenetically proliferates their chances of baring children with homosexual tenancies 15, ending their genetic legacy.

This negligent behaviour doesn't seem to really be a reflection of one's relational circumstances.
In one study, 70% of 1,450 children were abandoned due to their appearance despite neither of them experienced life threatening conditions nor were they born with intellectual ailments 16. Experiments evince that babies' having undesirable aesthetic characteristics predicts potentially subjected to abuse and neglect by their mummies 17, even if they successfully reach into adulthood this maternal adversity shorten their telomeres 18. (Telomeres plays a factor in cancer prevention and longevity). Several mothers do this unintentionally or just in denial about it 19. It's already known that women 'hypergamously' yearn for more attractiveness on men, but researchers found that this carries over to their own children. Even if the women's kids look normal, they “prefer the luxury of exceptional attractiveness.” 20. In other words, even if most of you were spared from maternal abuse, you're not going to receive your mom's best.

Bluepillers love to object by asserting this partly has to do with men leaving the mothers of their child, but evidence suggests fathers (even unwed ones) don't normally abandon their offspring. 8 out of 10 single mothers who are involved with their children's fathers themselves leave the relationship afterwards, yet prior when their children enter into education 21. While new mothers initially favour traditional gender roles, after a year later, they typically reject them strongly regardless of the fathers' views. 22 (that's also the time recommended for mothers can -on average- to wean their babies 23 hence a decrease of oxytocin or an increase of serotonin 24. More studies are needed to show if there's a causation.) This shouldn't surprise anyone as women score lower in men regarding commitment, 6.68 and 7.27 respectively (with the only scores that women surpasses men are senses of Superiority/Arrogance and Exploitativeness/Entitlement) 25. It's even questionable if females are even monogamous 26. (BTW) Religious participates aren’t any better off 27.

We observe similar decision-making well into postpartumly as a survey reports that “The most common reason given by the fathers for not having more contact with their children was the mothers’ reluctance to let them” 28 with only 37% of women delaying divorce for the sake of their children (oppose to 58% of fathers) 29. It does without saying, women initiate >75% of all divorces and -likely- all non- marital breakups.

The same bluepillers love to also blame partners/fathers for a lack of involvement leading to divorce, when in reality its the result of the wives/mothers' 'temporary sexual cycle', described as “rotating polyandry”. This is when women find a new mate, reproduce, then about four years they become bored with their relationships, then subsequently attempt to “liberate” themselves from their mates (these would include Chads). After words their hormones prompt them to repeat their feral sexual cycle. 30 31
Women's subhuman, dual mating strategy is derived by their AVPR1 genes 32 but they're not that impactful during early maternity 33.

The maternal decision to amputate kids from their fathers is detrimental for children's upbringing. This kind of impact on pair bounding, however, isn't reflective found in parental death during development 34.
Research does suggests that children's biological (strong) father's guidance during adolescence is one of the strongest, if not the most potent, indicator of stability psychologically, otherwise steams a sense that father absence due to the feeling of worthlessness and lack of belonging (even if their mothers appears to be very nurturing) resulting the potential for self-harm and suicide 35. And indicator of success 36 (stepmothers had the lowest levels of involvement 37) for both sons and daughters 38. All the social benefits of career-orientated mothers seem to cease after 3 years of early development, peculiarly for sons 39 40 41.
Minors who primarily under the guidance of their single mothers are >50% more likely to be incarcerated, apposed to families with both parents 42. In situations where mothers and fathers may have similar ways of parenting, a youth’s interactions with his or her father (regardless if they were exposed to violence) plays a greater role in the emotional and behavioral development of the child during the early years of growth (Easterbrooks, et al.).

On a minor note, women, especially mothers, extract more taxes than they contribute 43 44 45 46, as well as increase their nation's debts 47 48 49. This increase of taxes can weaken their children for personal pursuits (related to finances), particularly building nuclear families, which negatively down-streams the incentives for sons to partake in society (especially in the labor force and education).

The research we've observe up to this point, most women seem adamant or undeterred to force their kids undergo some of the worse environmental experiences for childhood development. From this, we can extrapolate that women's choices appears to be an avenue of narcissism & being generally self serving. Maternal narcissism seem to be an emotional adaptation for attachment and shift in roles 50 This means, however, the child isn't seen as individual person rather an extension of the mother's self as a “love object” 51. In extreme cases mothers will become hostile once the child individually conflicts with narcissistic view of her “ love object”m which often results in a feedback loop of self identity and "child-parent shared phantasy" 52.

This fantasy had made many mothers feel secure enough to sexually abuse their children without much fear of consequences. One study reports that women, “primarily mothers,” are responsible for “25% (approximately 36000 children) of the sexually abused victims.” 53, although this compilation implies that Females are more than likely to sexually abuse their children in general, and it's more psychologically damaging 54

Narcissism might also explain why if children don't meet their mothers' expectations are at risk of being murdered. 70% of mothers have “experienced explicit aggressive thoughts toward their infants, and over a quarter (26%) of them had infanticidal thoughts” when their babies are fussy over a period of time, with 8.0/100,000 for infants and 2.5/100,000 for preschool-age children fall under filicide in the US, despite not having “significant mental illness as technically required by the law” 55.

One could argue that fathers are much as a risk of child endangerment as mothers if they had the same amount of exposure, however, “8% of fathers and none of the mothers (p<0.005) reported constant quarrels as effective on the filicide and “fathers were more often intoxicated during their offense than were mothers.” these help to explain why “Fathers’ motives were more impulsive in nature.” In other words, without being under the influence of drugs, fathers are far less likely to commit filicide. Compare this to mothers who typically “used drowning, criminal negligence, and poisoning” as killing methods Fathers tend more to committed suicide at the crime scene, suggesting they felt guilt for their crime, meanwhile after the murder, mothers tend to try to get rid of their baby's body. 56 This disregard for human life out of convenience is mirrored for the motivations for abortion with 74-78% “Having a baby would dramatically change my [socioeconomic] life”, 28-38% “Have completed my childbearing” while only <1.5% is involved in rape or incest 57 This compulsion doesn't stop with infants:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/three-los-angeles-children-stabbed-to-death-saturday-morning
https://metro.co.uk/2020/07/15/moth...kids-demands-taxpayer-funded-lawyer-12993998/
https://archive.ph/1i66G
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osaka_child_abandonment_case
https://www.tiktok.com/@cathtatehypnotates/video/6997479130405063941?is_from_webapp=v1&item_id=6997479130405063941&lang=en
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ers-dead-mother-deliberately-crashed-car.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ohcb-v-zXqGhgN70H6Y27Eq7zHxm2stDxeL1Nct26MIuE
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...d-three-children-aged-12-killing-herself.html
https://www.tech-gate.org/usa/2021/...n-russia-for-telling-husband-she-was-a-cheat/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...l-contact-three-times-boy-14-avoids-jail.html
And so many more cases.
Regardless, it's unlikely that ex-moms feel any remorse for their killings. 58 Few are even willing to go as far to kill themselves than care for their infants 59.

Mothers' propensity for violence isn't as simply imitating male behavior either, rather perhaps a cyclical victimization from their own parental abuses 60 as “the person responsible was most often the mother” 61 and abused daughters reported that 62% of the perpetrators were mothers 62. This behaviour is reflective when scientists tried to demonstrate the sociological, neuroanatomical view that women are the emphatic sex, to find that the emphatic differences between the sexes were indistinguishable. 63

Based upon the research, maternal instincts, if it ever existed, only seem to last during natural pregnancy and breasting.
If we took an honest review of mothers -or generally women-, we would conclude that they're not perfect nor that innocent. Please listen to the maternally abused, the whole concept that mothers are as parentally loving as they're typically depicted is just a cultural conformation bias, which doesn't stand with scientific rigor or testimonies. Ignoring this blackpill will only continue such injustice.

TL;DR: The default idea of the doting mommy is largely a meme:feelsclown:, because of it, a plethora of mothers have gotten away with inflecting many atrocities towards their children, including torture and murder :f:.
Women (regardless of their place in life) in general hardly place their necessaries above someone else's, even for own children (especially if they don't have “exceptional attractiveness” :foidSoy::chad:). They might sacrifice temporary conveniences, but rarely, ever will sacrifice their own well being over another, and the sciences prove it.
U know i read this giga essay, Chico :feelsEhh:
 
Read everything, good post and effort.
Thank you for the gold, stranger!
did you type this out or did you copy paste an article
Look at my other threads. This one isn't that different from the others. If not more citation heavy.
As a c section non breastfed cel I wholeheartedly agree.
Same brocel
C-section babies, made by C- mothers. It's science. All of you deserved better.
Good post OP. Possibly worthy of most-read section
Nah. My dick still hurts from trying to appeal to the mods for a spot.
This just further proves that foids are insufferable, even your own mother. This also contributes to AWALT theory where they seek for attractiveness, status, demeanor, and resources instead of their biological goals to reproduce and care their children.
That makes me wonder if the evolutionary psychologist are incorrect that women select anything based on for the betterment of their offspring, rather the "betterment" any offspring is simply a byproduct of women's selfishness. I remember one law that was proposed over in the USA that switches child support from the mother to the children once the kids reached ~15 yo. Mothers veto'd that proposal into the sand in a matter of hours, which speaks volumes.
 
I fucking hate my mom I wish she would kill herself, fat retarded crone
 
My mother told me she cried in the hospital when they took me away to have me circumcised because she was so scared for me. She was deathly afraid the nurse would butcher me.

Obviously she wasn’t scared enough to say, “Hey, let’s just not chop up Anon’s cock.” She made my dad watch though. He said it was gross.

Thanks mom, thanks dad. Can’t wait till you fucking die and I don’t have to pretend I care about you for money anymore.
 
Based. mothers see their children as retirement insurance, whereas fathers actually love their children. This is why children without fathers suffer a lot.
 
Read every word. I'm particularly invested in this subject as well because I'm sick to death of this myth of female nurturance and love, particularly to their children. Every "mother" I've ever known showed absolutely 0 hesitation to put their own selfish needs before their kids. It's fucking bluepilled to think that women are somehow these selfless, giving creatures. All the data shows that it's men that are actually like this if anything.

This is also one of the many reasons I never want kids. Especially in the West, where children and the family unit is left to the whims of an overgrown, infantile, narcissistic toilet. Why the fuck would I subject another soul to that?
 
Thank you for the gold, stranger!

Look at my other threads. This one isn't that different from the others. If not more citation heavy.


C-section babies, made by C- mothers. It's science. All of you deserved better.

Nah. My dick still hurts from trying to appeal to the mods for a spot.

That makes me wonder if the evolutionary psychologist are incorrect that women select anything based on for the betterment of their offspring, rather the "betterment" any offspring is simply a byproduct of women's selfishness. I remember one law that was proposed over in the USA that switches child support from the mother to the children once the kids reached ~15 yo. Mothers veto'd that proposal into the sand in a matter of hours, which speaks volumes.
Read every word. I'm particularly invested in this subject as well because I'm sick to death of this myth of female nurturance and love, particularly to their children. Every "mother" I've ever known showed absolutely 0 hesitation to put their own selfish needs before their kids. It's fucking bluepilled to think that women are somehow these selfless, giving creatures. All the data shows that it's men that are actually like this if anything.

This is also one of the many reasons I never want kids. Especially in the West, where children and the family unit is left to the whims of an overgrown, infantile, narcissistic toilet. Why the fuck would I subject another soul to that?
I would add on to this thread by saying it’s usually teen moms who are like this. I’m neutral towards my dad but my mom had absolutely no clue how to raise a child which is expected as she was a teenager when I came out. Honestly you should need to be 25+ to have kids.
 
I would add on to this thread by saying it’s usually teen moms who are like this. I’m neutral towards my dad but my mom had absolutely no clue how to raise a child which is expected as she was a teenager when I came out. Honestly you should need to be 25+ to have kids.
Yeah early twenties is the best time to have kids. Anything before or after produces fuck ups.
 
Read every word. I'm particularly invested in this subject as well because I'm sick to death of this myth of female nurturance and love, particularly to their children. Every "mother" I've ever known showed absolutely 0 hesitation to put their own selfish needs before their kids. It's fucking bluepilled to think that women are somehow these selfless, giving creatures. All the data shows that it's men that are actually like this if anything.

This is also one of the many reasons I never want kids. Especially in the West, where children and the family unit is left to the whims of an overgrown, infantile, narcissistic toilet. Why the fuck would I subject another soul to that?
14. On Maternal Love. The selfless maternal love of one woman resembles that of another woman to the point of confusion. Since every instinct has something of the "animal" soul in it, maternal love possesses a depth of soul; however, in no way does it have a depth of spirit. Maternal love belongs equally to the animal mother and to the human mother. (SW 3 p. 367)

--Ludwig Klages

In a soyciety in which there are no more values, only instincts and appetites, it is no wonder that the choice among instincts and appetites is simply one of convenience in the moment.

The dangers of the world around us in the modern technological age are so muted, furthermore, that the animal maternal instinct gets little use and grows anemic, standing alone.

Good mothers and fathers approach parenting with something more than an animal toolset. There is usually something spiritual supervening, animating, and guiding their actions, thoughts, and lives. Rare.
 
Then why is my mom caring for my shut in Ukrainian NEET ass then? Is she low IQ? Childhood trauma? Is she defective?
 
@Fat Link ding ding ding!!!

PIN IT.
 
I was born via C,-sectoon and I can confirm everything here. My body span the wrong way shortly before my mother should have given birth to have a chance of escaping birth. Even fetus me knew it was over before I was even born. I was also supposed to be twins and should have had a bigger brother but both died in my mother's stomach. It's over before it ever started
 
I was born via C,-sectoon and I can confirm everything here. My body span the wrong way shortly before my mother should have given birth to have a chance of escaping birth. Even fetus me knew it was over before I was even born. I was also supposed to be twins and should have had a bigger brother but both died in my mother's stomach. It's over before it ever started

View: https://youtu.be/lxbeFmoAHyM
 
Where men are products of their inner drive. That spark of life that one may call a soul. Women are products of their environments. Women value nothing but what their soyciety tells them to value. Women are nothing more than an AI program mimicking the behaviours of humanity. Why do you think almost every AI model has a woman's name? The researchers know this. If you want a woman to have a particular value, her culture must instill that value in her.
 
Oh yes I remember hearing from mine on a couple of occasions that she regretted birthing me
excellent reading brocel
 
tbh, and as usual with bad things coming from women and fags and kikes, you see increasing honesty from increasingly confident agents

CasVqug.png
Just don't be born theory
 
Wow. Just wow, this is awesome article, i didnt read something like this in ages... I am more amazed not by subject of it, i must admit, but more how you made it! Because i do similar stuff! (In russian, pardon me for my poor English vocabulary)

Heh, bunch of smart/sophisticated words and abundance of sophisticated links to various articles.. nothing too strong, but hell - not much people do even this nowadays! This is enough for general populace to be mesmerized, i see, just throw 'heavy' stuff, and people will believe you - because you will be seen as trustworthy scientist... I suppose that nobody really did read this essay fully - just skimmed externally - can see it in the replies. Some replies are just stating their own experiences with mothers

Hmmmm hmmm, interesting! Definitely something to think about. Can be useful

Ha, talk about local smartasses - not a single one is in here.. guess, at least one will be stung by this and will reply. Where are your smarts now, eh, boys?

Interesting. So.. you can just find semi-random scientific articles related to a subject, mash them into something that can be at least somehow be received by common Joe and be good... although, you also must understand the issue at least in basics. And know the language good enough to articulate)

Yeah. One big problem - i, honestly, dont know where to search for the good russian papers on economy! Well.. it is time to search.

Great job, man. Awesome. I mean it
 
I’ve lived this, mom sacrificed me for her relationshit
 

Similar threads

Lurkercel0
Replies
2
Views
112
Lurkercel0
Lurkercel0
FrenchSandNigger
Replies
4
Views
176
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel
sociology blackpill
Replies
8
Views
221
sociology blackpill
sociology blackpill
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
8
Views
247
lazy_gamer_423
lazy_gamer_423

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top