What's typically seen as parental love is a mother holding her baby in her arms or a mother joyfully smiling with the company of her toddler. We even have a specific term for it: maternal instinct, but is it truly an instinct? Do mothers really love their children or is it conformation bias mixed cultural nuances and expectations?
It is certain whenever mothers give birth, then subsequently breastfeed their precious ones, they receive waves of oxytocin as a mean to deal with both birth pains and breast milk 1 that establishes relationships with their newborns. If those are the two hormonal revenues are (at least) the basis for maternal instincts, how is substituting going to affect the relationship? (Especially epigenetically).
This study shows that mothers experienced higher levels of oxytocin if they delivered vaginally, compared to C-sections. 2
However, caesarean sections (C-sections) is on the rise, in fact, it's been estimated that a third of childbirths by 2030 will undergo this method 3. It's also well known that using baby formula is becoming more common than breastfeeding. The problem is: baby formula consumption is contributed to compromised immunities and various metabolic disorders 4 while Breastfeeding improves IQ5, immunity (partly has to do with skin contact 6), and just suckling alone increases oxytocin which would help babies become more neurotypical 7.
If mothers really love their children, they won't trade their children's future and prosperity over anything trivial that'll return to haunt them evermore-of course, it's never that simple. You might be thinking this has to do with pain and time constraints, which is understandable to assume, however, there are temporary lifestyle choices that permanently effect the developed. For example, globally mothers are becoming overweight; and this dietary choice results in kids with lower IQ scores 420, slower processing speeds 8, premature 9 deliveries 10 (shortening potential lifespan of young girls 11), along with consuming fluoride-rich products 12. Women are also gradually postponing their childbearing years. This greatly, increases the probability that their children will develop autism 13, a condition that correlated with depression and suicide 14. Not to mention women's use of contraceptives (most of which are progesterone based) during their hoe phases, epigenetically proliferates their chances of baring children with homosexual tenancies 15, ending their genetic legacy.
This negligent behaviour doesn't seem to really be a reflection of one's relational circumstances.
In one study, 70% of 1,450 children were abandoned due to their appearance despite neither of them experienced life threatening conditions nor were they born with intellectual ailments 16. Experiments evince that babies' having undesirable aesthetic characteristics predicts potentially subjected to abuse and neglect by their mummies 17, even if they successfully reach into adulthood this maternal adversity shorten their telomeres 18. (Telomeres plays a factor in cancer prevention and longevity). Several mothers do this unintentionally or just in denial about it 19. It's already known that women 'hypergamously' yearn for more attractiveness on men, but researchers found that this carries over to their own children. Even if the women's kids look normal, they “prefer the luxury of exceptional attractiveness.” 20. In other words, even if most of you were spared from maternal abuse, you're not going to receive your mom's best.
Bluepillers love to object by asserting this partly has to do with men leaving the mothers of their child, but evidence suggests fathers (even unwed ones) don't normally abandon their offspring. 8 out of 10 single mothers who are involved with their children's fathers themselves leave the relationship afterwards, yet prior when their children enter into education 21. While new mothers initially favour traditional gender roles, after a year later, they typically reject them strongly regardless of the fathers' views. 22 (that's also the time recommended for mothers can -on average- to wean their babies 23 hence a decrease of oxytocin or an increase of serotonin 24. More studies are needed to show if there's a causation.) This shouldn't surprise anyone as women score lower in men regarding commitment, 6.68 and 7.27 respectively (with the only scores that women surpasses men are senses of Superiority/Arrogance and Exploitativeness/Entitlement) 25. It's even questionable if females are even monogamous 26. (BTW) Religious participates aren’t any better off 27.
We observe similar decision-making well into postpartumly as a survey reports that “The most common reason given by the fathers for not having more contact with their children was the mothers’ reluctance to let them” 28 with only 37% of women delaying divorce for the sake of their children (oppose to 58% of fathers) 29. It does without saying, women initiate >75% of all divorces and -likely- all non- marital breakups.
The same bluepillers love to also blame partners/fathers for a lack of involvement leading to divorce, when in reality its the result of the wives/mothers' 'temporary sexual cycle', described as “rotating polyandry”. This is when women find a new mate, reproduce, then about four years they become bored with their relationships, then subsequently attempt to “liberate” themselves from their mates (these would include Chads). After words their hormones prompt them to repeat their feral sexual cycle. 30 31
Women's subhuman, dual mating strategy is derived by their AVPR1 genes 32 but they're not that impactful during early maternity 33.
The maternal decision to amputate kids from their fathers is detrimental for children's upbringing. This kind of impact on pair bounding, however, isn't reflective found in parental death during development 34.
Research does suggests that children's biological (strong) father's guidance during adolescence is one of the strongest, if not the most potent, indicator of stability psychologically, otherwise steams a sense that father absence due to the feeling of worthlessness and lack of belonging (even if their mothers appears to be very nurturing) resulting the potential for self-harm and suicide 35. And indicator of success 36 (stepmothers had the lowest levels of involvement 37) for both sons and daughters 38. All the social benefits of career-orientated mothers seem to cease after 3 years of early development, peculiarly for sons 39 40 41.
Minors who primarily under the guidance of their single mothers are >50% more likely to be incarcerated, apposed to families with both parents 42. In situations where mothers and fathers may have similar ways of parenting, a youth’s interactions with his or her father (regardless if they were exposed to violence) plays a greater role in the emotional and behavioral development of the child during the early years of growth (Easterbrooks, et al.).
On a minor note, women, especially mothers, extract more taxes than they contribute 43 44 45 46, as well as increase their nation's debts 47 48 49. This increase of taxes can weaken their children for personal pursuits (related to finances), particularly building nuclear families, which negatively down-streams the incentives for sons to partake in society (especially in the labor force and education).
The research we've observe up to this point, most women seem adamant or undeterred to force their kids undergo some of the worse environmental experiences for childhood development. From this, we can extrapolate that women's choices appears to be an avenue of narcissism & being generally self serving. Maternal narcissism seem to be an emotional adaptation for attachment and shift in roles 50 This means, however, the child isn't seen as individual person rather an extension of the mother's self as a “love object” 51. In extreme cases mothers will become hostile once the child individually conflicts with narcissistic view of her “ love object”m which often results in a feedback loop of self identity and "child-parent shared phantasy" 52.
This fantasy had made many mothers feel secure enough to sexually abuse their children without much fear of consequences. One study reports that women, “primarily mothers,” are responsible for “25% (approximately 36000 children) of the sexually abused victims.” 53, although this compilation implies that Females are more than likely to sexually abuse their children in general, and it's more psychologically damaging 54
Narcissism might also explain why if children don't meet their mothers' expectations are at risk of being murdered. 70% of mothers have “experienced explicit aggressive thoughts toward their infants, and over a quarter (26%) of them had infanticidal thoughts” when their babies are fussy over a period of time, with 8.0/100,000 for infants and 2.5/100,000 for preschool-age children fall under filicide in the US, despite not having “significant mental illness as technically required by the law” 55.
One could argue that fathers are much as a risk of child endangerment as mothers if they had the same amount of exposure, however, “8% of fathers and none of the mothers (p<0.005) reported constant quarrels as effective on the filicide and “fathers were more often intoxicated during their offense than were mothers.” these help to explain why “Fathers’ motives were more impulsive in nature.” In other words, without being under the influence of drugs, fathers are far less likely to commit filicide. Compare this to mothers who typically “used drowning, criminal negligence, and poisoning” as killing methods Fathers tend more to committed suicide at the crime scene, suggesting they felt guilt for their crime, meanwhile after the murder, mothers tend to try to get rid of their baby's body. 56 This disregard for human life out of convenience is mirrored for the motivations for abortion with 74-78% “Having a baby would dramatically change my [socioeconomic] life”, 28-38% “Have completed my childbearing” while only <1.5% is involved in rape or incest 57 This compulsion doesn't stop with infants:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/three-los-angeles-children-stabbed-to-death-saturday-morning
https://metro.co.uk/2020/07/15/moth...kids-demands-taxpayer-funded-lawyer-12993998/
https://archive.ph/1i66G
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osaka_child_abandonment_case
https://www.tiktok.com/@cathtatehypnotates/video/6997479130405063941?is_from_webapp=v1&item_id=6997479130405063941&lang=en
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ers-dead-mother-deliberately-crashed-car.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ohcb-v-zXqGhgN70H6Y27Eq7zHxm2stDxeL1Nct26MIuE
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...d-three-children-aged-12-killing-herself.html
https://www.tech-gate.org/usa/2021/...n-russia-for-telling-husband-she-was-a-cheat/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...l-contact-three-times-boy-14-avoids-jail.html
And so many more cases.
Regardless, it's unlikely that ex-moms feel any remorse for their killings. 58 Few are even willing to go as far to kill themselves than care for their infants 59.
Mothers' propensity for violence isn't as simply imitating male behavior either, rather perhaps a cyclical victimization from their own parental abuses 60 as “the person responsible was most often the mother” 61 and abused daughters reported that 62% of the perpetrators were mothers 62. This behaviour is reflective when scientists tried to demonstrate the sociological, neuroanatomical view that women are the emphatic sex, to find that the emphatic differences between the sexes were indistinguishable. 63
Based upon the research, maternal instincts, if it ever existed, only seem to last during natural pregnancy and breasting.
If we took an honest review of mothers -or generally women-, we would conclude that they're not perfect nor that innocent. Please listen to the maternally abused, the whole concept that mothers are as parentally loving as they're typically depicted is just a cultural conformation bias, which doesn't stand with scientific rigor or testimonies. Ignoring this blackpill will only continue such injustice.
TL;DR: The default idea of the doting mommy is largely a meme
, because of it, a plethora of mothers have gotten away with inflecting many atrocities towards their children, including torture and murder .
Women (regardless of their place in life) in general hardly place their necessaries above someone else's, even for own children (especially if they don't have “exceptional attractiveness”). They might sacrifice temporary conveniences, but rarely, ever will sacrifice their own well being over another, and the sciences prove it.
It is certain whenever mothers give birth, then subsequently breastfeed their precious ones, they receive waves of oxytocin as a mean to deal with both birth pains and breast milk 1 that establishes relationships with their newborns. If those are the two hormonal revenues are (at least) the basis for maternal instincts, how is substituting going to affect the relationship? (Especially epigenetically).
This study shows that mothers experienced higher levels of oxytocin if they delivered vaginally, compared to C-sections. 2
However, caesarean sections (C-sections) is on the rise, in fact, it's been estimated that a third of childbirths by 2030 will undergo this method 3. It's also well known that using baby formula is becoming more common than breastfeeding. The problem is: baby formula consumption is contributed to compromised immunities and various metabolic disorders 4 while Breastfeeding improves IQ5, immunity (partly has to do with skin contact 6), and just suckling alone increases oxytocin which would help babies become more neurotypical 7.
If mothers really love their children, they won't trade their children's future and prosperity over anything trivial that'll return to haunt them evermore-of course, it's never that simple. You might be thinking this has to do with pain and time constraints, which is understandable to assume, however, there are temporary lifestyle choices that permanently effect the developed. For example, globally mothers are becoming overweight; and this dietary choice results in kids with lower IQ scores 420, slower processing speeds 8, premature 9 deliveries 10 (shortening potential lifespan of young girls 11), along with consuming fluoride-rich products 12. Women are also gradually postponing their childbearing years. This greatly, increases the probability that their children will develop autism 13, a condition that correlated with depression and suicide 14. Not to mention women's use of contraceptives (most of which are progesterone based) during their hoe phases, epigenetically proliferates their chances of baring children with homosexual tenancies 15, ending their genetic legacy.
This negligent behaviour doesn't seem to really be a reflection of one's relational circumstances.
In one study, 70% of 1,450 children were abandoned due to their appearance despite neither of them experienced life threatening conditions nor were they born with intellectual ailments 16. Experiments evince that babies' having undesirable aesthetic characteristics predicts potentially subjected to abuse and neglect by their mummies 17, even if they successfully reach into adulthood this maternal adversity shorten their telomeres 18. (Telomeres plays a factor in cancer prevention and longevity). Several mothers do this unintentionally or just in denial about it 19. It's already known that women 'hypergamously' yearn for more attractiveness on men, but researchers found that this carries over to their own children. Even if the women's kids look normal, they “prefer the luxury of exceptional attractiveness.” 20. In other words, even if most of you were spared from maternal abuse, you're not going to receive your mom's best.
Bluepillers love to object by asserting this partly has to do with men leaving the mothers of their child, but evidence suggests fathers (even unwed ones) don't normally abandon their offspring. 8 out of 10 single mothers who are involved with their children's fathers themselves leave the relationship afterwards, yet prior when their children enter into education 21. While new mothers initially favour traditional gender roles, after a year later, they typically reject them strongly regardless of the fathers' views. 22 (that's also the time recommended for mothers can -on average- to wean their babies 23 hence a decrease of oxytocin or an increase of serotonin 24. More studies are needed to show if there's a causation.) This shouldn't surprise anyone as women score lower in men regarding commitment, 6.68 and 7.27 respectively (with the only scores that women surpasses men are senses of Superiority/Arrogance and Exploitativeness/Entitlement) 25. It's even questionable if females are even monogamous 26. (BTW) Religious participates aren’t any better off 27.
We observe similar decision-making well into postpartumly as a survey reports that “The most common reason given by the fathers for not having more contact with their children was the mothers’ reluctance to let them” 28 with only 37% of women delaying divorce for the sake of their children (oppose to 58% of fathers) 29. It does without saying, women initiate >75% of all divorces and -likely- all non- marital breakups.
The same bluepillers love to also blame partners/fathers for a lack of involvement leading to divorce, when in reality its the result of the wives/mothers' 'temporary sexual cycle', described as “rotating polyandry”. This is when women find a new mate, reproduce, then about four years they become bored with their relationships, then subsequently attempt to “liberate” themselves from their mates (these would include Chads). After words their hormones prompt them to repeat their feral sexual cycle. 30 31
Women's subhuman, dual mating strategy is derived by their AVPR1 genes 32 but they're not that impactful during early maternity 33.
The maternal decision to amputate kids from their fathers is detrimental for children's upbringing. This kind of impact on pair bounding, however, isn't reflective found in parental death during development 34.
Research does suggests that children's biological (strong) father's guidance during adolescence is one of the strongest, if not the most potent, indicator of stability psychologically, otherwise steams a sense that father absence due to the feeling of worthlessness and lack of belonging (even if their mothers appears to be very nurturing) resulting the potential for self-harm and suicide 35. And indicator of success 36 (stepmothers had the lowest levels of involvement 37) for both sons and daughters 38. All the social benefits of career-orientated mothers seem to cease after 3 years of early development, peculiarly for sons 39 40 41.
Minors who primarily under the guidance of their single mothers are >50% more likely to be incarcerated, apposed to families with both parents 42. In situations where mothers and fathers may have similar ways of parenting, a youth’s interactions with his or her father (regardless if they were exposed to violence) plays a greater role in the emotional and behavioral development of the child during the early years of growth (Easterbrooks, et al.).
On a minor note, women, especially mothers, extract more taxes than they contribute 43 44 45 46, as well as increase their nation's debts 47 48 49. This increase of taxes can weaken their children for personal pursuits (related to finances), particularly building nuclear families, which negatively down-streams the incentives for sons to partake in society (especially in the labor force and education).
The research we've observe up to this point, most women seem adamant or undeterred to force their kids undergo some of the worse environmental experiences for childhood development. From this, we can extrapolate that women's choices appears to be an avenue of narcissism & being generally self serving. Maternal narcissism seem to be an emotional adaptation for attachment and shift in roles 50 This means, however, the child isn't seen as individual person rather an extension of the mother's self as a “love object” 51. In extreme cases mothers will become hostile once the child individually conflicts with narcissistic view of her “ love object”m which often results in a feedback loop of self identity and "child-parent shared phantasy" 52.
This fantasy had made many mothers feel secure enough to sexually abuse their children without much fear of consequences. One study reports that women, “primarily mothers,” are responsible for “25% (approximately 36000 children) of the sexually abused victims.” 53, although this compilation implies that Females are more than likely to sexually abuse their children in general, and it's more psychologically damaging 54
Narcissism might also explain why if children don't meet their mothers' expectations are at risk of being murdered. 70% of mothers have “experienced explicit aggressive thoughts toward their infants, and over a quarter (26%) of them had infanticidal thoughts” when their babies are fussy over a period of time, with 8.0/100,000 for infants and 2.5/100,000 for preschool-age children fall under filicide in the US, despite not having “significant mental illness as technically required by the law” 55.
One could argue that fathers are much as a risk of child endangerment as mothers if they had the same amount of exposure, however, “8% of fathers and none of the mothers (p<0.005) reported constant quarrels as effective on the filicide and “fathers were more often intoxicated during their offense than were mothers.” these help to explain why “Fathers’ motives were more impulsive in nature.” In other words, without being under the influence of drugs, fathers are far less likely to commit filicide. Compare this to mothers who typically “used drowning, criminal negligence, and poisoning” as killing methods Fathers tend more to committed suicide at the crime scene, suggesting they felt guilt for their crime, meanwhile after the murder, mothers tend to try to get rid of their baby's body. 56 This disregard for human life out of convenience is mirrored for the motivations for abortion with 74-78% “Having a baby would dramatically change my [socioeconomic] life”, 28-38% “Have completed my childbearing” while only <1.5% is involved in rape or incest 57 This compulsion doesn't stop with infants:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/three-los-angeles-children-stabbed-to-death-saturday-morning
https://metro.co.uk/2020/07/15/moth...kids-demands-taxpayer-funded-lawyer-12993998/
https://archive.ph/1i66G
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osaka_child_abandonment_case
https://www.tiktok.com/@cathtatehypnotates/video/6997479130405063941?is_from_webapp=v1&item_id=6997479130405063941&lang=en
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ers-dead-mother-deliberately-crashed-car.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ohcb-v-zXqGhgN70H6Y27Eq7zHxm2stDxeL1Nct26MIuE
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...d-three-children-aged-12-killing-herself.html
https://www.tech-gate.org/usa/2021/...n-russia-for-telling-husband-she-was-a-cheat/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...l-contact-three-times-boy-14-avoids-jail.html
And so many more cases.
Regardless, it's unlikely that ex-moms feel any remorse for their killings. 58 Few are even willing to go as far to kill themselves than care for their infants 59.
Mothers' propensity for violence isn't as simply imitating male behavior either, rather perhaps a cyclical victimization from their own parental abuses 60 as “the person responsible was most often the mother” 61 and abused daughters reported that 62% of the perpetrators were mothers 62. This behaviour is reflective when scientists tried to demonstrate the sociological, neuroanatomical view that women are the emphatic sex, to find that the emphatic differences between the sexes were indistinguishable. 63
Based upon the research, maternal instincts, if it ever existed, only seem to last during natural pregnancy and breasting.
If we took an honest review of mothers -or generally women-, we would conclude that they're not perfect nor that innocent. Please listen to the maternally abused, the whole concept that mothers are as parentally loving as they're typically depicted is just a cultural conformation bias, which doesn't stand with scientific rigor or testimonies. Ignoring this blackpill will only continue such injustice.
TL;DR: The default idea of the doting mommy is largely a meme
, because of it, a plethora of mothers have gotten away with inflecting many atrocities towards their children, including torture and murder .Women (regardless of their place in life) in general hardly place their necessaries above someone else's, even for own children (especially if they don't have “exceptional attractiveness”
). They might sacrifice temporary conveniences, but rarely, ever will sacrifice their own well being over another, and the sciences prove it.
