A Social Darwinist and Vitalist to the core.
Last edited:
A Social Darwinist and Vitalist to the core.
Partly true, but it is difficult to call it social Darwinism in its full form, nevertheless the NSDAP was quite diverse and there was a left wing of the party, some of which even survived the night of the long knives.
View: https://youtu.be/Ymi3umIo-sM?si=7_274pS3Y6OKiVqY
Social Darwinism as a development of political thought is more characteristic of the British. Britain was a world empire and a lot of income from the colonies, and at the same time a huge mass of British workers lived in total unsanitary conditions and poverty.
Even Bismarck, although he was a supporter of the privileges of the nobility and in general was a man of the old pre-capitalist society, when everything was determined by the estate, and then he was generous and introduced pensions and social insurance.If we exclude the T4 program, then the Nazis were rather devoid of elitism and in fact they were despised by the nobles for the fact that the entire top of the NSDAP were commoners, and Hitler was literally a Gefreiter in the First World War (this is something like a private first class), not even a sergeant, and even more so not an officer.
Last edited:
Hitler was an Anglophile and wanted to preserve the British Empire.
The NSDAP reversed many of the Weimar Republic's extensive welfare programs because, like most social democratic welfare programs, they were inefficient and consumed state resources that could instead be used to wage war (Hitler viewed war as the engine of human history and the natural state of existence). The Nazis created a new welfare system that favored those who were willing to work and were loyal to the state.
Exactly, Social Darwinism in its truest form is meritocratic. Hitler believed that the strongest and most worthy could rise in the hierarchy of the Reich and encouraged competition between his subordinates.
Yes, but I just wanted to emphasize that the German ruling class treated its workers more compassionately than the British ruling class treated the British worker.
Yes, but it's still a welfare state that you can only dream of today, so I know and read that a German family after the birth of a child could take out a loan and with the birth of each new child, the payment amount decreased by 25% and after the birth of 4 children it was reset and you didn't have to pay anything at all.
Social Darwinism was initially hierarchical, at least in its first form in Britain.Francis Galton (1822-1911) actively contributed to the development of the theoretical foundations of social Darwinism. In the book "Hereditary Genius" (1869), he transferred the methods and data of biological science to the knowledge of society.
Galton argued that socially significant traits, such as intellectual potential, are genetically encoded and can be the subject of natural and artificial selection. He proved this by the fact that among the relatives of "outstanding personalities", the percentage of "outstanding", according to his calculations, was significantly higher than the average.
The scientist created an applied section of social Darwinism, laying the foundations for the science of eugenics, which is engaged in improving the human breed.
Yeah but who cares, he lost.
Then British Empire dissolved.
Then Soviet Union fell.
It's now America dominating, led by the Jews.
Then British Empire dissolved.
Then Soviet Union fell.
It's now America dominating, led by the Jews.
Normie-brained perspective
Even Hitler believed that winning was what mattered.
Retarded comment. In the context of a war, obviously winning is what matters. That’s something everyone can agree on.
The retardation comes in writing off the political & cultural philosophy of a person or group just because they lost a crucial conflict. “Muhhh who cares he lost”
Obviously the audience for this post and posts like it isn’t you. It’s people that care about the NS ideology and hope to bring it back
Retarded comment. In the context of a war, obviously winning is what matters. That’s something everyone can agree on.
The retardation comes in writing off the political & cultural philosophy of a person or group just because they lost a crucial conflict. “Muhhh who cares he lost”
Good luck with that.
Nearly a century after WW2, race/ethnicity remains the king of how people identify themselves. That’s all I really need to say
O
Similar threads
VanGobbel
Users who are viewing this thread
