This post was inspired by another greycel post. Also this was their first post, which I thought was quite good for a first post:
incels.is
The demoralization of women's sexual choices is a core facet of the modern feminist movement and it's also related to the structured silencing of low-status men. By this I mean, detaching "sex" from "morality", which the modern feminist movement has done in a very specific manner
Any kind of sex that low-status men stand to benefit more than women is either demoralized or branded as "morally wrong". This moral reasoning helps the feminist to justify the plight of low-status men under a moral framework that aligns with the feminist ideal. In effect the feminist can regard her beliefs as "righteous", otherwise absolve her "conscience" of moral accountability, with respect to the frustration or misery that low-status men may experience as a direct result of being largely rejected or ignored by women in society
There are examples of sexual behaviours involving women that historically have been treated as "moral wrong" in society, such as when women are forced or coerced into sex against their wishes (rape, "blackmail sex" etc). Plus there are other types of sexual behaviours involving women that were treated as "moral wrong", but these types are now treated as "moral good" or detached from morality altogether under modern feminism (promiscuity, adultery, fornication, lesbianism etc)
Under the moral framework of modern feminism, females are absolved of moral accountability with respect to their sexual choices, where the female has control over her sexual choices as far as the sexual activities in which she partakes and with who she partakes in them
If women deciding not to have sex with another man, directly leads to a situation where a large share of men, mainly low-status men, become miserable and depressed as a result of collectively being denied sex and companionship by women --- How will those women morally come to terms with the fact that her sexual choices have directly led to the misery and exclusion of a relatively large share of (low-status) men?
Females cannot be "empowered" if they are to be held morally accountable for their freedom to sexual selection, because it would mean prioritizing a MORAL duty of providing sex, over their own true sexual wishes. Thus the structural silencing of low-status men in modern feminism has to be morally justified under a feminist framework in order for the feminist movement to actually work
Basically in order for the circumstances of low-status men to be undermined through the modus operandi of modern feminism, there has to be at least one of two beliefs among the followers of modern feminism which are listed below:
Prostitution for example, is seen as "moral bad" in modern feminism PURELY because the woman is being pimped - The woman has less freedom to choice than her boss in this sexual power dynamic. The prostitute can only have sex with whoever her boss allows her or tells her to have sex with. This is similar to how traditional marriage practices are seen as "moral bad" by modern feminists as it is rooted in the ancient culture of "male patriarchy" where women had less freedom to sexual choice. It is said that in historical times, many women married under the instruction or influence of their parents, rather than a sincere passion for the man to who she was betrothed. Escorting on the other hand, is either detached from morality (some feminists see it as neither good nor bad), or treated as "moral good" by feminists, PURELY because the woman has more freedom to sexual choice in this condition, rather than be sexually controlled by a pimp
In conclusion, POWER is the most important aspect of free sexual choice in modern feminism. It is only RIGHT that women have more POWER than men when it comes to free sexual choice, even if low-status men are rejected and miserable for being on the dominated end of this sexual power dynamic. Female sexual choice is not morally justified as a DUTY to others, but the POWER to do as she pleases
The Structural Silencing of Low-Status Men under Modern Feminism
Toxic modern feminism operates less as an equality movement and more as a gynocentric ideology that denies material reality while amplifying it for women and suppressing it for men, especially low-SMV ones. In a dating market already distorted by apps, algorithmic hypergamy, and the halo effect...
incels.is
The demoralization of women's sexual choices is a core facet of the modern feminist movement and it's also related to the structured silencing of low-status men. By this I mean, detaching "sex" from "morality", which the modern feminist movement has done in a very specific manner
Any kind of sex that low-status men stand to benefit more than women is either demoralized or branded as "morally wrong". This moral reasoning helps the feminist to justify the plight of low-status men under a moral framework that aligns with the feminist ideal. In effect the feminist can regard her beliefs as "righteous", otherwise absolve her "conscience" of moral accountability, with respect to the frustration or misery that low-status men may experience as a direct result of being largely rejected or ignored by women in society
There are examples of sexual behaviours involving women that historically have been treated as "moral wrong" in society, such as when women are forced or coerced into sex against their wishes (rape, "blackmail sex" etc). Plus there are other types of sexual behaviours involving women that were treated as "moral wrong", but these types are now treated as "moral good" or detached from morality altogether under modern feminism (promiscuity, adultery, fornication, lesbianism etc)
Under the moral framework of modern feminism, females are absolved of moral accountability with respect to their sexual choices, where the female has control over her sexual choices as far as the sexual activities in which she partakes and with who she partakes in them
If women deciding not to have sex with another man, directly leads to a situation where a large share of men, mainly low-status men, become miserable and depressed as a result of collectively being denied sex and companionship by women --- How will those women morally come to terms with the fact that her sexual choices have directly led to the misery and exclusion of a relatively large share of (low-status) men?
Females cannot be "empowered" if they are to be held morally accountable for their freedom to sexual selection, because it would mean prioritizing a MORAL duty of providing sex, over their own true sexual wishes. Thus the structural silencing of low-status men in modern feminism has to be morally justified under a feminist framework in order for the feminist movement to actually work
Basically in order for the circumstances of low-status men to be undermined through the modus operandi of modern feminism, there has to be at least one of two beliefs among the followers of modern feminism which are listed below:
(a) Status directly corresponds to morality. Low status represents MORAL BAD; high-status represents MORAL GOOD. Low-status men are the representation of MORAL BAD. As a feminist with "righteous" aspirations, the MORAL BAD must be avoided. Therefore rejecting or blocking low-status men from sexual access to women is the MORALLY RIGHT thing to do
(b) Sex is NOT A HUMAN RIGHT BUT A PRIVILEGE. There is no MORAL duty to deliver sex to others including low-status men. Thus IT WOULD BE A MISTAKE FOR FEMALES TO BE HELD TO A MORAL STANDARD for freely excersizing her sexual desires just because it would result in low-status men being largely rejected by women, or largely excluded from the prospect of long-term companionship with women
Prostitution for example, is seen as "moral bad" in modern feminism PURELY because the woman is being pimped - The woman has less freedom to choice than her boss in this sexual power dynamic. The prostitute can only have sex with whoever her boss allows her or tells her to have sex with. This is similar to how traditional marriage practices are seen as "moral bad" by modern feminists as it is rooted in the ancient culture of "male patriarchy" where women had less freedom to sexual choice. It is said that in historical times, many women married under the instruction or influence of their parents, rather than a sincere passion for the man to who she was betrothed. Escorting on the other hand, is either detached from morality (some feminists see it as neither good nor bad), or treated as "moral good" by feminists, PURELY because the woman has more freedom to sexual choice in this condition, rather than be sexually controlled by a pimp
In conclusion, POWER is the most important aspect of free sexual choice in modern feminism. It is only RIGHT that women have more POWER than men when it comes to free sexual choice, even if low-status men are rejected and miserable for being on the dominated end of this sexual power dynamic. Female sexual choice is not morally justified as a DUTY to others, but the POWER to do as she pleases
Last edited:
