Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The Czechs acted wisely during World War II.

Anarcho Nihilist

Anarcho Nihilist

Generalfeldmarschall
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 12, 2024
Posts
6,291
Online time
4h 58m
When I read the comments under historical videos, I keep coming across claims that the Czechs were cowards and disgraced themselves by not resisting and fighting against the Wehrmacht and the German Reich. In their opinion, the Czechs should have become cannon fodder for the ZOG and joined the war, where they would suffer huge human losses for the sake of someone's approval.
As a result, the Czechs spent the Second World War in comfortable conditions, while the Poles were bleeding out in the fight against the Germans. In the end, both Poland and the Czech Republic became Soviet vassal states, and the fact that the Poles resisted more did not save them from being abandoned by the West when they were given over to Stalin.
But the Czechs lost far fewer people, and their country was less destroyed.
And the result is the same.
 
@WorthlessSlavicShit
@Castaway
@SilentShadow
 
The Czechs were also seen as racially superior to Poles by the Nazis.
 
Isn't Hitler a Czech name I heard that somewhere it's not normally Austrian
 
Isn't Hitler a Czech name I heard that somewhere it's not normally Austrian
During the Weimar period, these rumors about Hitler being a Czech were used by the Social Democrats in their election campaigns.
 
Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Ireland :bigbrain:
 
Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Ireland, France :bigbrain:
Just be cannon fodder for the zog, so that 80 years later, your Jewish masters will praise you for how hard your country fought against the Germans in World War II.
 
Just be cannon fodder for the zog, so that 80 years later, your Jewish masters will praise you for how hard your country fought against the Germans in World War II.
They didn't suffer any significant losses or destruction by war.
 
They didn't suffer any significant losses or destruction by war.
I mean, everyone praises the Poles and the USSR for their tenacity against the Germans, but it cost millions of lives and the total destruction of their countries.
The Czechs spent the entire war in comfortable conditions.
 
I mean, everyone praises the Poles and the USSR for their tenacity against the Germans, but it cost millions of lives and the total destruction of their countries.
The Czechs spent the entire war in comfortable conditions.
Even now, all the casualties vatniks have in Ukraine will be in vain in the short-term historical perspective.
 
Idk, on one hand, yeah, I think it was wise. In both world wars Czech lands were pretty unscathed. In 1st world war, czechs were mass betraying Austria-Hungary and they got an entire country for that. In 2nd world war, they've done nothing and ended up pretty well of except some minor bombing of industrial areas like Plzen and Prague by allies and few exterminated villages by Germans. And even then, the Prague got bombed only because Allies got lost and mistook Prague for Dresden. And after war Czech came out on top as winners too, got back Slovakia and it was Slovakia, that had to pay reparations and give up Zakarpattia to Ukrainian SSR.

But take a look on the other hand. Poles suffered, but at least Poles kept their spines and now their country looks like it too. It's country with future, clear goals and strength to go for them. And Czechs and their land? Many people, czechs included, says that it's a shithole in the middle of mountains where nothing happens. And the defeatist mentality still stays in there too. Bunch of people are either nothing will happen anyway, it's not my problem, why should I care or it's people that would betray their allies for the other countries so that they wouldn't have to fight.

Idk, I guess it's up to You to pick Your poison.
 
Idk, on one hand, yeah, I think it was wise. In both world wars Czech lands were pretty unscathed. In 1st world war, czechs were mass betraying Austria-Hungary and they got an entire country for that. In 2nd world war, they've done nothing and ended up pretty well of except some minor bombing of industrial areas like Plzen and Prague by allies and few exterminated villages by Germans. And even then, the Prague got bombed only because Allies got lost and mistook Prague for Dresden. And after war Czech came out on top as winners too, got back Slovakia and it was Slovakia, that had to pay reparations and give up Zakarpattia to Ukrainian SSR.

But take a look on the other hand. Poles suffered, but at least Poles kept their spines and now their country looks like it too. It's country with future, clear goals and strength to go for them. And Czechs and their land? Many people, czechs included, says that it's a shithole in the middle of mountains where nothing happens. And the defeatist mentality still stays in there too. Bunch of people are either nothing will happen anyway, it's not my problem, why should I care or it's people that would betray their allies for the other countries so that they wouldn't have to fight.

Idk, I guess it's up to You to pick Your poison.
Doesn't Poland suffer from low birth rates, high housing prices, and other problems that the entire developed world faces?
 
Doesn't Poland suffer from low birth rates, high housing prices, and other problems that the entire developed world faces?
I dont know, but I think that Yes, they are. They have the same problems like any other 1st and 2nd world liberal democracies. What I had mainly in mind was that Poland isnt afraid of taking sides in foreign affairs, hold their line and invest in army. Unlike the other west slavic countries that just flipflops from one side to the other each elections .
 
I dont know, but I think that Yes, they are. They have the same problems like any other 1st and 2nd world liberal democracies. What I had mainly in mind was that Poland isnt afraid of taking sides in foreign affairs, hold their line and invest in army. Unlike the other west slavic countries that just flipflops from one side to the other each elections .
Yes, I know that, thank you for the interesting conversation. I've always been interested in understanding why different nations behave differently in politics.
 
When I read the comments under historical videos, I keep coming across claims that the Czechs were cowards and disgraced themselves by not resisting and fighting against the Wehrmacht and the German Reich. In their opinion, the Czechs should have become cannon fodder for the ZOG and joined the war, where they would suffer huge human losses for the sake of someone's approval.
As a result, the Czechs spent the Second World War in comfortable conditions, while the Poles were bleeding out in the fight against the Germans. In the end, both Poland and the Czech Republic became Soviet vassal states, and the fact that the Poles resisted more did not save them from being abandoned by the West when they were given over to Stalin.
But the Czechs lost far fewer people, and their country was less destroyed.
And the result is the same.
It’s insane how the allies fought for polish sovereignty but threw them under the bus after the war. Says a lot about them
 
It’s insane how the allies fought for polish sovereignty but threw them under the bus after the war. Says a lot about them
Despite the fact that the Poles resisted and shed rivers of blood during their struggle against the Germans, they achieved the same result as the Czechs, who spent the war in comfortable conditions. During World War II, the Czech Republic was probably the safest and most prosperous country affected by the war. Both countries became Soviet communist satellites, but the Czech Republic was less destroyed and suffered fewer casualties.
It's fucking crazy.
 
Poles are the niggers of Europe; their women make that clear
1000015076
 
Would you expect anything different from a Nation that has and always being a nation of drunks .
 
Isn't Hitler a Czech name I heard that somewhere it's not normally Austrian
That’s a myth. He was Austrian (ethnically German), his surname being a misspelling or corruption of Hiedler, which means hut dweller in German
 
Czechs are racially and socially germanic but only linguistically slavic.That is why the Nazis preferred them over poles
 
Czechs are racially and socially germanic but only linguistically slavic.
Austrian has less common with Icelanders despite being germanic than with southron Poles ( phenotypical wise )
Same with bulgars having more common with greeks than with northwestern Russians
 
Czechs are racially and socially germanic but only linguistically slavic.
What 1,400-1,500 years of Slavic migrations does to a mf:
1755983288563


Just like with Germanics Celtics, etc., if your culture is Slavic, your language is Slavic, your ethnogenesis traces to Slavs, and you have significant Slavic ancestry, then you are Slavic. End of story.

That is why the Nazis preferred them over poles
It was Poland's Communist and Jewish leadership and the murder of Germans that caused him to hate Poles. The Nazis preferred literally any other slavic nation over poles because of this.
 
Last edited:
What 1,400-1,500 years of Slavic migrations does to a mf:
View attachment 1529960

Just like with Germanics Celtics, etc., if your culture is Slavic, your language is Slavic, your ethnogenesis traces to Slavs, and you have significant Slavic ancestry, then you are Slavic. End of story.


It was Poland's Communist and Jewish leadership and the murder of Germans that caused him to hate Poles. The Nazis preferred literally any other slavic nation over poles because of this.
bosniaks follow islam and speak a slavic language but that doesnt mean they are not european white people.

Eastern Poland was part of the Mongol empire for some brief period of time and those mongols defintely put some asiatic genes inside them during that time.
 
Last edited:
No the czechs, like nearly all slavs, are complete untrustworthy trash. They are an inherintly jewish people and many people don't realize, that the support of these small hostile groups and the creation of their artificial states by the (((allies))) after ww1 was what really set the stage to destroy all order in europe and turn it into the shit it is today. But zoomers and normies in general will never even come close to grasping that, their brains are too brainwashed by jewmedia.
 
bosniaks follow islam and speak a slavic language but that doesnt mean they are not european white people.
Maybe not culturally, no. Sadly a lot of Slavic nations got some of their cultural "whiteness" erased thanks to heavy Jewish subversion. In the case of the Bosniaks it was the Ottoman Empire that conquered and subverted the medieval Bosnian Kingdom.

Eastern Poland was part of the Mongol empire for some brief period of time and those mongols defintely put some asiatic genes inside them during that time.
Why target Slavic or Polish people specifically for a minoritarian Siberian-like ancestry? All of Northern Europe has a bit of it due to an Iron Age migration associated with the Uralic languages.
1756055276569


The amount is laughably small anyway. it’s irrelevant.
 
Maybe not culturally, no. Sadly a lot of Slavic nations got some of their cultural "whiteness" erased thanks to heavy Jewish subversion. In the case of the Bosniaks it was the Ottoman Empire that conquered and subverted the medieval Bosnian Kingdom.
show me a example of any bosniak that looks non white
 
I'm dedicating my first post to say that Anarcho-Nihilism is based af.
 

Similar threads

Sir Silentium
Replies
16
Views
2K
AmadeusCelibatus
AmadeusCelibatus
AsiaCel
Replies
29
Views
2K
Excalibur
Excalibur
Nithingr
Replies
79
Views
8K
M12Comic
M12Comic
AsiaCel
Replies
12
Views
1K
Saigon Depression
S

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top