AsiaCel
shalom goyim
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2017
- Posts
- 30,123
- Online time
- 15h 39m
Almost no other nations fought like the Russians did; throughout 19th-21st century, it has fought with extreme brutality.
This isn't how it works in China, which was also a Mongol colony, which followed Russia closely as a 'big brother' before 1970s. In China, there was a doctrine called People's War — it was designed to support guerilla actions via winning hearts and minds in rural areas.
The funny thing is that, our countries were supposed to have limitless ties, but the behavior and the institutionalized brutality, if acknowledged in full, would be viewed with horror and contempt.
Garbage equipment designed to drive from point A to point B and die:
Man-eating BTRs, ultracramped tanks, blind radar warning receivers aka SPO-15 even when they had digital computers (MiG-29/Su-27)
Meat assaults:
Russia uses its men as disposable cannon fodder by putting them on donkeys, unarmored golf carts, bikes, and finally sending the men on a one way trip as a reconnaissance device for more experienced troops behind.
Retreating is punished by barrier troops.
Terror bombing as a tactic:
Russian forces put Circassian heads on poles during the Circassian war, slaughtered central Asians, crushed China dongbei, treated its supposed allies with brutality (Poland in ww2), dropped toy-shaped mines into Afghanistan, leveled towns in Chechen wars, bombed hospitals and crowded apartments in Syria and Ukraine.
They do it repeatedly using highly accurate precision weapons, so these cannot be said to be accidents.
This doctrine is called Strategic Operation for the Destruction of Critically Important Targets (SODCIT).
Dedovshchina:
Internally, Russian soldiers are routinely abused by their superiors, with high rates of death and injury.
Glorifying war crimes:
Russians, unlike other people, do not operate with the "we did not do it, we HELP them" mindset but "we blow them" mindset to establish total dominance through sheer brutality; its civilians even have the Human Safari network where people cheer on civilians being bombed.
Many units are shameless about it, like the 155th Naval infantry unit, of which they recorded a video threatening Ukrainians by placing their heads on poles.
Grenade suicide:
Russians blow themselves up with grenades because they expect to be tortured (after what they did to others) or shot by their barrier troops.
Conclusion:
WTF is wrong with Russia? Even if you're a Russian nationalist, brutality destroys hearts and minds campaigns, destroys morale, and is very, very bad PR for little to no military gains.
The fact that Russian society does not try to justify their war crimes, and instead air them proudly, shows that they lack compassion and decency; they do not know that maiming civilians is morally bankrupt.
No nation is free of blood but they at least try to justify what they do, hide it, or have shifted to more rational, less brutal tactics, in the modern days.
I'm not entirely anti-Russia (they are a useful barrier against NATO), but these traits made it highly disturbing to have as a neighbor, at least in regards to civilian relations; these military tactics are a total joke in the era of high tech warfare (our country produces more than enough ammo that human waves are useless, and they can't fight without our chips).
This isn't how it works in China, which was also a Mongol colony, which followed Russia closely as a 'big brother' before 1970s. In China, there was a doctrine called People's War — it was designed to support guerilla actions via winning hearts and minds in rural areas.
The funny thing is that, our countries were supposed to have limitless ties, but the behavior and the institutionalized brutality, if acknowledged in full, would be viewed with horror and contempt.
Garbage equipment designed to drive from point A to point B and die:
Man-eating BTRs, ultracramped tanks, blind radar warning receivers aka SPO-15 even when they had digital computers (MiG-29/Su-27)
Meat assaults:
Russia uses its men as disposable cannon fodder by putting them on donkeys, unarmored golf carts, bikes, and finally sending the men on a one way trip as a reconnaissance device for more experienced troops behind.
Retreating is punished by barrier troops.
Terror bombing as a tactic:
Russian forces put Circassian heads on poles during the Circassian war, slaughtered central Asians, crushed China dongbei, treated its supposed allies with brutality (Poland in ww2), dropped toy-shaped mines into Afghanistan, leveled towns in Chechen wars, bombed hospitals and crowded apartments in Syria and Ukraine.
They do it repeatedly using highly accurate precision weapons, so these cannot be said to be accidents.
This doctrine is called Strategic Operation for the Destruction of Critically Important Targets (SODCIT).
Dedovshchina:
Internally, Russian soldiers are routinely abused by their superiors, with high rates of death and injury.
Glorifying war crimes:
Russians, unlike other people, do not operate with the "we did not do it, we HELP them" mindset but "we blow them" mindset to establish total dominance through sheer brutality; its civilians even have the Human Safari network where people cheer on civilians being bombed.
Many units are shameless about it, like the 155th Naval infantry unit, of which they recorded a video threatening Ukrainians by placing their heads on poles.
Grenade suicide:
Russians blow themselves up with grenades because they expect to be tortured (after what they did to others) or shot by their barrier troops.
Conclusion:
WTF is wrong with Russia? Even if you're a Russian nationalist, brutality destroys hearts and minds campaigns, destroys morale, and is very, very bad PR for little to no military gains.
The fact that Russian society does not try to justify their war crimes, and instead air them proudly, shows that they lack compassion and decency; they do not know that maiming civilians is morally bankrupt.
No nation is free of blood but they at least try to justify what they do, hide it, or have shifted to more rational, less brutal tactics, in the modern days.
I'm not entirely anti-Russia (they are a useful barrier against NATO), but these traits made it highly disturbing to have as a neighbor, at least in regards to civilian relations; these military tactics are a total joke in the era of high tech warfare (our country produces more than enough ammo that human waves are useless, and they can't fight without our chips).
Last edited:





