Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy The catholic church should change the image of jesus

  • Thread starter Deleted member 18193
  • Start date
Deleted member 18193

Deleted member 18193

incel on incels.is
-
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Posts
18,316
The church were/are cucks for making depictions of him as a white blue eyed guy. halo effect + appeal to aesthetics to draw suckers in.

99.9999% of supposed christians would reject him if they met him.

"He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him." Isaiah 53:2
109276

the poor guy would be posting here if he was alive today.

I propose the catholic church change his image to the most accurate depiction of him as possible. THEN we'll see who the true followers are.
 
lol @catholic church
they're pathetic degenerate child molesters with a bit too much love for black people's feet
109281
109280

But yeah man, Jesus will stay hot because a good looking dude will be loved by people
The average person would think Jesus is disgusting, dirty and "impure" if he was represented in a way similar to the pic you posted
Looks»»»»»all
 
The church were/are cucks for making depictions of him as a white blue eyed guy. halo effect + appeal to aesthetics to draw suckers in.

99.9999% of supposed christians would reject him if they met him.

"He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him." Isaiah 53:2
View attachment 109276
the poor guy would be posting here if he was alive today.

I propose the catholic church change his image to the most accurate depiction of him as possible. THEN we'll see who the true followers are.
Samuel 17:42
When the Philistine looked and saw David, he disdained him; for he was but a youth, and ruddy, with a handsome appearance.

109286
 
He could still be beautiful, if Jesus existed and was not raised by Romans.
 
He doesnt deserve to have his legacy ruined .
He sacrificied his Life for his Philosophy and all he got is misrepresentation , made up Fairy Tales and Lies .
 
There have been different depictions of Jesus.

In the middle ages and earlier, you can't really tell if Jesus was good looking or not, and he wasn't blonde blue-eyed.

For example this is one of the most famous depictions of Jesus, from Ravenna around 500

1024px-Christ_treading_the_beasts_-_Chapel_of_Saint_Andrew_-_Ravenna_2016.jpg


Christ as representing some beauty ideal only became popular in late middle ages and in the renaissance where painters followed the ideals of classical beauty and made him look much more "whiter", Michelangelo even made him look like Apollo. Protestants followed this that's why you get to see blonde blue eyed beautiful Jesus in American culture. But historically, it wasn't always like this and it's not some sort of dogma. You see different depictions of Jesus nowadays again. The modern Church tries to imitate early Christians a lot, so you see more of the brown haired Jesus.
 
Some should paint Jesus with chad features for the lols.

I pray to thee oh gigajesus.
 
Good thing he was statusmaxed.
 
The modern day International Jews are of European Khazarian origins, and this is why they have to make Jesus look as blonde eyed and white as possible.
 

Similar threads

Shay Patrick Cormac
Replies
25
Views
300
LWii
L
AsiaCel
Replies
20
Views
2K
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
The Judge
Replies
63
Views
4K
nullterror
nullterror

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top