J
lol this is the most dumbest shit ive ever read, projecting real hard arent you
The biggest reason we end up ugly is because of how we were raised when we were young
J
lol you are retarded arent ya
are u autistic its sarcasm
J
nah, people unironically believe diet has no effect on our faces, so cant take your sarcasm seriously, just like that nigger with the camel pfp
Stronger jaws has nothing to do with the food being solid or hard to chew. It has to do with the nutrient density of the food.
J
it is not cope, hurry up and reply, so i can shut you up with millions of sources already proving our ancestors had chad esque jaws on average
J
thats why central asian tribes such as wakhi and kalash have giga strong massive jaws despite being peasent class on average? LOL there it is, the rich=higher chance of chad coper
J
There are tribes who literally swallow raw meat whole without chewing and they have broad jaws. You can't just make assumptions on one tribe who probably also eats mostly plant based, peasant diet.the weakest jawed peasent from modern day tribe of wakhi LMAO
W
Yea i joined today what about it?
J
not shallow raw meat you buffoon, you think these niggas live in caves and chase animals naked? they have their own fire cooking pots and of course i make the "assumption" you dimwit
here is a study from a post neolithic society that is strongly related to modern scandanivan/germanic peoples who used ANIMAL husbandry LMAO
i have many many more cases, keep in mind this is a academically proven standpoint im coming from, while your just some pseudo maniac
"Such a massive skeleton is typical of other Corded Ware/Boat Axe culture people (see also Table 2). This very specific phenotype of the Corded Ware/ Boat Axe bearers (extreme hypermorphy, pronounced dolichocrany, a high, broad and strongly profiled face, and robust body build), is characteristic of Spiginas 2, Plinkaigalis 241 and 242 individuals, (Česnys 1985a), and similar to those found in sweden (Mark 1956), ( summary, see Česnys 1991a, 1991b, 1991c), and later Fatyanovo people. This type has no precedent in this area (Early Neolithic Kretuonas 1B male average stature is only 157.9 cm, and Early and Late Bronze Age from Kirsna-Turlojiškės is 165.8"
J
ALSO THERE IS ZERO TRIBE LIKE THAT!!! HA
P
I think it is more about growning up with the right mindset. If you have loving supportive stable parents who teach you motivation and self respect, you are more likely to grow up confident and happy.
Can parents raise a good looking child or can a person will themselves to good looks? Not really.
But you can dress better, exercise, and give a crap about your hair. I have commented many times how much I hate seeing Asian guys who just comb their hair straight down over their foreheads.
Can parents raise a good looking child or can a person will themselves to good looks? Not really.
But you can dress better, exercise, and give a crap about your hair. I have commented many times how much I hate seeing Asian guys who just comb their hair straight down over their foreheads.
J
only reply when they have nothing to reply with and are cornered or angry, they end up saying obscene shit lol
not really, nurturing is bs theory, people living in harsher conditions especially war like states end up with ten times more rugged facial structure
or nomadic tribal people
P
A good loving nurturing upbringing won't make a person good looking, but it will make a person confident, happy, and self respecting. I certainly did not have that, so I grew up miserable and am trying to undo that damage.
you're spewing bullshit out of your gray colored ass that you don't even comprehend, you have two options either to sit down and be lectured or keep on coping with the diet shit on a blackpill forum while everyone keeps dunking on your liverking type low iq bullshit
first of all know that eugenics could be an ancient practice but facial profiling is not an ancient one, actually relatively new within the expansion of homo sapiens. there is and of course will be a bias in showing facial superiority to a period where sculpture, writing and documenting was trendy compared to an epoch where none of that even existed yet.
"the case was the stronggest in people livimg in 3000bce"
see straight through your bsJFL fuck off with that steppe milk chugging cope shit. you gray summer redpill niggers and cuckzynski drones migrating from BB forums or 4cuck are so lowiq it's unbelievable. the largest humans with the best build and the most bone development weren't herders and sheperds or some goatfucker in the middle of steppe they were actually mamoth hunters from caucaus and west europe preceding those milk chugging goatfuckers by entire thousands of years while being unrelated to them who didn't even knew what milk fucking tastes like
World's Tallest Men Trace Back to Paleolithic Mammoth Hunters
A prehistoric population of mammoth hunters gave rise to some of the tallest men on the planet, new research suggests.
you have absolutely fucking nothing. go back to your jungle and jack off to pics of cuckzynski how about you actually lurk moar instead of being a poserfag who thinks he got basic glossary from wiki? not a dig at you but a genuine advice
Frontiers | Facial Genetics: A Brief Overview
Historically, craniofacial genetic research has understandably focused on identifying the causes of craniofacial anomalies and it has only been within the la...
www.frontiersin.org
"Facial morphology refers to a series of many different complex traits, each influenced by genetic and environmental factors. In particular, the strong effects that genetic variation can have on facial appearance are highlighted by historical portraits of the European royal family, the Habsburgs (1438–1740). Presumably because of frequent consanguineous marriages, later Habsburg rulers often had extreme facial phenotypes such as the characteristic “Habsburg” jaw (mandibular prognathism). Indeed, the last Habsburg King of Spain, Charles II, was reported to have had difficulties eating and speaking because of facial deformities. The influence of genetic variation is also evident in non-consanguineous families, where dental and facial characteristics are common among siblings and passed on from parents to their offspring (Hughes et al., 2014). Twin studies have historically been employed to explore the relative genetic and environment influence on facial shape exploiting the genetic differences between monozygotic and dizygotic twins (Visscher et al., 2008). Twin studies suggest that 72–81% of the variation of height in boys and 65–86% in girls is due to genetic differences with the environment
The craniofacial region is made up of a series of complex structures which contribute to overall facial shape. Twin studies have indicated that facial shape is mainly due to genetic influences (≈75%) although the percentage variance explained in GWAS studies is extremely low generally explaining less than 2% of the total variance. GWAS may be underestimating and twin and family studies overestimating the levels of heritability. Facial shape and features are the result of mutations, genetic drift, recombination and natural selection. "
see this is why you redpill faggots will always be the cow that never dries out or the dead horse than never stops getting beaten. you think the truth blackpill presents should be ignored merely because is pessimistic and doesn't align with your bullshit copes. this forum will never be for faggots like you. go back to 4cuck or cuckddit and have fun with your mutilated shilling buddies, shill scum
"we have multiple truths
" spoken like a true soy chugging bug eating tough cookie wanna be redpill faggot. "muh soyience about milk" JFL man you guys are utterly pathetic " b-b-b-ut you must've consooomed junk food" so we're both coping and projecting here aren't we? look nigger no need to project your shit. if you consoomed soy just whisper it. I won't tell anyone else
"U UGLY YOU DRINK DA RAW MILK UNLIKE ME DEN U BASED U SHOULD B CHAD"
far from it infact I doubt that even dr. eppley will be unable your fugly nigger face
I know because that amount of copium has to come from someone who's truecel tier or physically deformed rotting on hamza discord servers
Last edited:
W
What?View attachment 1110556
you're spewing bullshit out of your gray colored ass that you don't even comprehend, you have two options either to sit down and be lectured or keep on coping with the diet shit on a blackpill forum while everyone keeps dunking on your liverking type low iq bullshit
first of all know that eugenics could be an ancient practice but facial profiling is not an ancient one, actually relatively new within the expansion of homo sapiens. there is and of course will be a bias in showing facial superiority to a period where sculpture, writing and documenting was trendy compared to an epoch where none of that even existed yet.
"the case was the stronggest in people livimg in 3000bce"
View attachment 1110558
JFL fuck off with that steppe milk chugging cope shit. you gray summer redpill niggers and cuckzynski drones migrating from BB forums or 4cuck are so lowiq it's unbelievable. the largest humans with the best build and the most bone development weren't herders and sheperds or some goatfucker in the middle of steppe they were actually mamoth hunters from caucaus and west europe preceding those milk chugging goatfuckers by entire thousands of years while being unrelated to them who didn't even knew what milk fucking tastes like
so sit the fuck down and be humble GrAY nigger. don't think a gray ass shill like you can impress me I've been talking with niggers 10 times more stubborn than you. you think you have shit on me or can catch me dumbfounded with your redpill chimp bullshittery?World's Tallest Men Trace Back to Paleolithic Mammoth Hunters
A prehistoric population of mammoth hunters gave rise to some of the tallest men on the planet, new research suggests.www.livescience.com
how about you actually lurk moar instead of being a poserfag who thinks he got basic glossary from wiki? not a dig at you but a genuine advice
Frontiers | Facial Genetics: A Brief Overview
Historically, craniofacial genetic research has understandably focused on identifying the causes of craniofacial anomalies and it has only been within the la...
"Facial morphology refers to a series of many different complex traits, each influenced by genetic and environmental factors. In particular, the strong effects that genetic variation can have on facial appearance are highlighted by historical portraits of the European royal family, the Habsburgs (1438–1740). Presumably because of frequent consanguineous marriages, later Habsburg rulers often had extreme facial phenotypes such as the characteristic “Habsburg” jaw (mandibular prognathism). Indeed, the last Habsburg King of Spain, Charles II, was reported to have had difficulties eating and speaking because of facial deformities. The influence of genetic variation is also evident in non-consanguineous families, where dental and facial characteristics are common among siblings and passed on from parents to their offspring (Hughes et al., 2014). Twin studies have historically been employed to explore the relative genetic and environment influence on facial shape exploiting the genetic differences between monozygotic and dizygotic twins (Visscher et al., 2008). Twin studies suggest that 72–81% of the variation of height in boys and 65–86% in girls is due to genetic differences with the environment
The craniofacial region is made up of a series of complex structures which contribute to overall facial shape. Twin studies have indicated that facial shape is mainly due to genetic influences (≈75%) although the percentage variance explained in GWAS studies is extremely low generally explaining less than 2% of the total variance. GWAS may be underestimating and twin and family studies overestimating the levels of heritability. Facial shape and features are the result of mutations, genetic drift, recombination and natural selection. "
see this is why you redpill faggots will always be the cow that never dries out or the dead horse than never stops getting beaten. you think the truth blackpill presents should be ignored merely because is pessimistic and doesn't align with your bullshit copes. this forum will never be for faggots like you. go back to 4cuck or cuckddit and have fun with your mutilated shilling buddies, shill scum
"we have multiple truths
"YOU UGLY YOU DRINK DA RAW MILK YO BASED" far from it infact I doubt that even dr. epply will be unable your fugly nigger face
Nenets, Masai, Samburu to name a few. There's also other nomadic tribes who eats raw meat occasionally. Ultimately it's the nutrition of the food, not the solidness or whatever. You can go to any random country, some people have wide jaws and some people have narrow jaws.
it's called drilling a zoomer summer newfag who thinks he can lecture us about the blackpill and lookism
J
everything youev said is so fucking funn HAHAHAHHAHAView attachment 1110556
you're spewing bullshit out of your gray colored ass that you don't even comprehend, you have two options either to sit down and be lectured or keep on coping with the diet shit on a blackpill forum while everyone keeps dunking on your liverking type low iq bullshit
first of all know that eugenics could be an ancient practice but facial profiling is not an ancient one, actually relatively new within the expansion of homo sapiens. there is and of course will be a bias in showing facial superiority to a period where sculpture, writing and documenting was trendy compared to an epoch where none of that even existed yet.
"the case was the stronggest in people livimg in 3000bce"
View attachment 1110558
JFL fuck off with that steppe milk chugging cope shit. you gray summer redpill niggers and cuckzynski drones migrating from BB forums or 4cuck are so lowiq it's unbelievable. the largest humans with the best build and the most bone development weren't herders and sheperds or some goatfucker in the middle of steppe they were actually mamoth hunters from caucaus and west europe preceding those milk chugging goatfuckers by entire thousands of years while being unrelated to them who didn't even knew what milk fucking tastes like
so sit the fuck down and be humble GrAY nigger. don't think a gray ass shill like you can impress me I've been talking with niggers 10 times more stubborn than you. you think you have shit on me or can catch me dumbfounded with your redpill chimp bullshittery?World's Tallest Men Trace Back to Paleolithic Mammoth Hunters
A prehistoric population of mammoth hunters gave rise to some of the tallest men on the planet, new research suggests.
how about you actually lurk moar instead of being a poserfag who thinks he got basic glossary from wiki? not a dig at you but a genuine advice
Frontiers | Facial Genetics: A Brief Overview
Historically, craniofacial genetic research has understandably focused on identifying the causes of craniofacial anomalies and it has only been within the la...
"Facial morphology refers to a series of many different complex traits, each influenced by genetic and environmental factors. In particular, the strong effects that genetic variation can have on facial appearance are highlighted by historical portraits of the European royal family, the Habsburgs (1438–1740). Presumably because of frequent consanguineous marriages, later Habsburg rulers often had extreme facial phenotypes such as the characteristic “Habsburg” jaw (mandibular prognathism). Indeed, the last Habsburg King of Spain, Charles II, was reported to have had difficulties eating and speaking because of facial deformities. The influence of genetic variation is also evident in non-consanguineous families, where dental and facial characteristics are common among siblings and passed on from parents to their offspring (Hughes et al., 2014). Twin studies have historically been employed to explore the relative genetic and environment influence on facial shape exploiting the genetic differences between monozygotic and dizygotic twins (Visscher et al., 2008). Twin studies suggest that 72–81% of the variation of height in boys and 65–86% in girls is due to genetic differences with the environment
The craniofacial region is made up of a series of complex structures which contribute to overall facial shape. Twin studies have indicated that facial shape is mainly due to genetic influences (≈75%) although the percentage variance explained in GWAS studies is extremely low generally explaining less than 2% of the total variance. GWAS may be underestimating and twin and family studies overestimating the levels of heritability. Facial shape and features are the result of mutations, genetic drift, recombination and natural selection. "
see this is why you redpill faggots will always be the cow that never dries out or the dead horse than never stops getting beaten. you think the truth blackpill presents should be ignored merely because is pessimistic and doesn't align with your bullshit copes. this forum will never be for faggots like you. go back to 4cuck or cuckddit and have fun with your mutilated shilling buddies, shill scum
"we have multiple truths
"YOU UGLY YOU DRINK DA RAW MILK YO BASED" far from it infact I doubt that even dr. epply will be unable your fugly nigger face
anyways, starting off with your actual propositions, the charles example, thats one example and that is only refering to periods in later periods where the trend that i said was common was common in, stick to to 3000bce-early medieval age please. anyhow, here is it, the skull anthropology of scandanvian-corded ware indo european society, also intertwining with viking age, you have nothing on me kek
"The most extensive Iron Age series from Norway is that of Schreiner, which contains 27 male crania.73 (See Appendix I, col. 41.). They are larger and much more rugged, with heavy browridges and strong muscular markings. Metrically, they approach the Upper Palaeolithic series of Morant; and they could fit easily into the range of the central European Aurignacian group. The Mesolithic crania of Stĺngenäs and MacArthur's Cave would not be out of place here. Yet in most dimensions, they fall a little short of the Upper Palaeolithic mean."
"Such a massive skeleton is typical of other Corded Ware/Boat Axe culture people (see also Table 2). This very specific phenotype of the Corded Ware/ Boat Axe bearers (extreme hypermorphy, pronounced dolichocrany, a high, broad and strongly profiled face, and robust body build), is characteristic of Spiginas 2, Plinkaigalis 241 and 242 individuals, (Česnys 1985a), and similar to those found in sweden (Mark 1956), ( summary, see Česnys 1991a, 1991b, 1991c), and later Fatyanovo people. This type has no precedent in this area (Early Neolithic Kretuonas 1B male average stature is only 157.9 cm, and Early and Late Bronze Age from Kirsna-Turlojiškės is 165.8"
The Korsør find (Brøste, 1945) includes an unusually well preserved skeleton of an adult man. The cranium (Fig. 4) is very large and massive. C 1640 cc, L 197, B 144, H’ 143, G’H 77, and J 150 mm. The skull is dolichocranial (73.1), orthocranial (72.6), akrocranial (99.3), mesene (51.3), leptorhine (38.6) and mesoconch (81.8). In the norma temporalis the glabella and the brownridges protrude above the deepset nasion, the forehead slopes evenly, the crown is slightly arched and proceeds to the sloping occiput which has a lambdoid depression. The facial profile shows a powerful, protruding chin and an end-to-end bite. In the norma verticalis the skull has an almost ovoid form, its phaenozygosis is clear, in the norma occipitalis it, **especially the Korsör skull in their entire form approach our Germanic type. The points of similarity between the Korsör skull and several of our Norwegian skulls from the Iron Age**
"Conclusion Results suggest that our medieval ancestors had more prominent faces and smaller cranial vaults than modern man."
did medieval skeletons have wider faces than modern - Bing
Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.
"A Swedish study based on 124 skulls from the 500 years preceding the seventeenth century found that the medieval skulls had somewhat smaller teeth and brain cases but larger jaws and wider dental arches than those of a modern population.4 Other trends that have been reported include a reduction in palatal width between the Romano-British period and the nineteenth century5,6 and reductions in bi-zygomatic and maxillary widths between the twelfth and nineteenth centuries.7"
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Time changes modern human's face
news.bbc.co.uk
also
visual viking age skulls reconstructions
but anyhow, 80 percent of what youev said is just basic obscenity, you cant win
Last edited:
J
no it has to do with solidness of the food, you have zero sources btw, also why did you ignore the quote i posted again? evading much?
J
wow, arent you a dogmatic one lol
Another day another infiltrator
J
oh btw though, that example you used of that pelolithic specimen is false, im mainly focusing on facial development here, not stature or bone density etc, learn how to speak plainly, the biggest, strongest jawed man was from the dniper Donets culture, filled with r1b men? essentially a integral substrate to later yamnaya-like raceView attachment 1110556
you're spewing bullshit out of your gray colored ass that you don't even comprehend, you have two options either to sit down and be lectured or keep on coping with the diet shit on a blackpill forum while everyone keeps dunking on your liverking type low iq bullshit
first of all know that eugenics could be an ancient practice but facial profiling is not an ancient one, actually relatively new within the expansion of homo sapiens. there is and of course will be a bias in showing facial superiority to a period where sculpture, writing and documenting was trendy compared to an epoch where none of that even existed yet.
"the case was the stronggest in people livimg in 3000bce"
View attachment 1110558
JFL fuck off with that steppe milk chugging cope shit. you gray summer redpill niggers and cuckzynski drones migrating from BB forums or 4cuck are so lowiq it's unbelievable. the largest humans with the best build and the most bone development weren't herders and sheperds or some goatfucker in the middle of steppe they were actually mamoth hunters from caucaus and west europe preceding those milk chugging goatfuckers by entire thousands of years while being unrelated to them who didn't even knew what milk fucking tastes like
so sit the fuck down and be humble GrAY nigger. don't think a gray ass shill like you can impress me I've been talking with niggers 10 times more stubborn than you. you think you have shit on me or can catch me dumbfounded with your redpill chimp bullshittery?World's Tallest Men Trace Back to Paleolithic Mammoth Hunters
A prehistoric population of mammoth hunters gave rise to some of the tallest men on the planet, new research suggests.
how about you actually lurk moar instead of being a poserfag who thinks he got basic glossary from wiki? not a dig at you but a genuine advice
Frontiers | Facial Genetics: A Brief Overview
Historically, craniofacial genetic research has understandably focused on identifying the causes of craniofacial anomalies and it has only been within the la...
"Facial morphology refers to a series of many different complex traits, each influenced by genetic and environmental factors. In particular, the strong effects that genetic variation can have on facial appearance are highlighted by historical portraits of the European royal family, the Habsburgs (1438–1740). Presumably because of frequent consanguineous marriages, later Habsburg rulers often had extreme facial phenotypes such as the characteristic “Habsburg” jaw (mandibular prognathism). Indeed, the last Habsburg King of Spain, Charles II, was reported to have had difficulties eating and speaking because of facial deformities. The influence of genetic variation is also evident in non-consanguineous families, where dental and facial characteristics are common among siblings and passed on from parents to their offspring (Hughes et al., 2014). Twin studies have historically been employed to explore the relative genetic and environment influence on facial shape exploiting the genetic differences between monozygotic and dizygotic twins (Visscher et al., 2008). Twin studies suggest that 72–81% of the variation of height in boys and 65–86% in girls is due to genetic differences with the environment
The craniofacial region is made up of a series of complex structures which contribute to overall facial shape. Twin studies have indicated that facial shape is mainly due to genetic influences (≈75%) although the percentage variance explained in GWAS studies is extremely low generally explaining less than 2% of the total variance. GWAS may be underestimating and twin and family studies overestimating the levels of heritability. Facial shape and features are the result of mutations, genetic drift, recombination and natural selection. "
see this is why you redpill faggots will always be the cow that never dries out or the dead horse than never stops getting beaten. you think the truth blackpill presents should be ignored merely because is pessimistic and doesn't align with your bullshit copes. this forum will never be for faggots like you. go back to 4cuck or cuckddit and have fun with your mutilated shilling buddies, shill scum
"we have multiple truths
" b-b-b-ut you must've consooomed junk food" so we're both coping and projecting here aren't we? look nigger no need to project your shit. if you consoomed soy just whisper it. I won't tell anyone else
"U UGLY YOU DRINK DA RAW MILK UNLIKE ME DEN U BASED U SHOULD B CHAD"
far from it infact I doubt that even dr. eppley will be unable your fugly nigger face
here is his skull
here are more skull from same racial cluster
oh and for a modern human skull reference, refer to the skull of phinease p gage please and then visually scrutinize on the width when comapring
i can also show you more studies on similar yamnaya-esque races with massive jaws, well profiled faces etc
hit me up if you want more
It's called knowledge. I don't have to blindly follow some Harvard study or come with sources like a slave.
I already know about the corded ware battle axe survivors. If these european tribes were to eat raw meat, minimally chew and drink their raw dairy they would still develop broad jaws because of the nutrition of the food. Food were also more nutritious back then.
Let me give you an example. If a baby grows up with soy formula he will have a poor development (unless he have Chad genetics) but if he were breast fed from a healthy mother or were fed raw milk or blood then he would have better facial development and become taller, it's as simple as that.
J
@kay' JFL at this GrAYfag
grays surprise me everyday with their copes and stupidity it's unbelievable
facial development and bone growth are related as much as 50% you fucking dunce gray faggot you're not making your way around this by giving pics of an estimated generated face of a subtype
everybody can do this and generate ancestral model based on the most optimal descendant and end up with pics of gigachads. this is the paleothic gravettian man for example. and his people are taller than any shitty muttified grain munching farmer haplogroup you will throw at me. he mogs you and your coping shitty curry or mutt midget mongol ancestory all the way to the caucaus mountains you pathetic nigger faggot but I know that very well that's why the difference is the proof I sent is based on actual remains so take those pics and shove it up your mutilated hole you fucking soy farms milk chugging gym tranny shill
come on redpiller buying a rope is easy and cheap. stop coping it's over. what matters is you're fugly like me and you're here, no raw milk and farming for your fucking ugly face, period
Last edited:
I was healthy and went outdoors a lot (+ lot of swimming) growing up and i’m still subhuman manlet. It’s genetics.
everyone put this dumbass coping GrAY nigger on ignoreeverything youev said is so fucking funn HAHAHAHHAHA
anyways, starting off with your actual propositions, the charles example, thats one example and that is only refering to periods in later periods where the trend that i said was common was common in, stick to to 3000bce-early medieval age please. anyhow, here is it, the skull anthropology of scandanvian-corded ware indo european society, also intertwining with viking age, you have nothing on me kek
"The most extensive Iron Age series from Norway is that of Schreiner, which contains 27 male crania.73 (See Appendix I, col. 41.). They are larger and much more rugged, with heavy browridges and strong muscular markings. Metrically, they approach the Upper Palaeolithic series of Morant; and they could fit easily into the range of the central European Aurignacian group. The Mesolithic crania of Stĺngenäs and MacArthur's Cave would not be out of place here. Yet in most dimensions, they fall a little short of the Upper Palaeolithic mean."
"Such a massive skeleton is typical of other Corded Ware/Boat Axe culture people (see also Table 2). This very specific phenotype of the Corded Ware/ Boat Axe bearers (extreme hypermorphy, pronounced dolichocrany, a high, broad and strongly profiled face, and robust body build), is characteristic of Spiginas 2, Plinkaigalis 241 and 242 individuals, (Česnys 1985a), and similar to those found in sweden (Mark 1956), ( summary, see Česnys 1991a, 1991b, 1991c), and later Fatyanovo people. This type has no precedent in this area (Early Neolithic Kretuonas 1B male average stature is only 157.9 cm, and Early and Late Bronze Age from Kirsna-Turlojiškės is 165.8"
The Korsør find (Brøste, 1945) includes an unusually well preserved skeleton of an adult man. The cranium (Fig. 4) is very large and massive. C 1640 cc, L 197, B 144, H’ 143, G’H 77, and J 150 mm. The skull is dolichocranial (73.1), orthocranial (72.6), akrocranial (99.3), mesene (51.3), leptorhine (38.6) and mesoconch (81.8). In the norma temporalis the glabella and the brownridges protrude above the deepset nasion, the forehead slopes evenly, the crown is slightly arched and proceeds to the sloping occiput which has a lambdoid depression. The facial profile shows a powerful, protruding chin and an end-to-end bite. In the norma verticalis the skull has an almost ovoid form, its phaenozygosis is clear, in the norma occipitalis it, **especially the Korsör skull in their entire form approach our Germanic type. The points of similarity between the Korsör skull and several of our Norwegian skulls from the Iron Age**
"Conclusion Results suggest that our medieval ancestors had more prominent faces and smaller cranial vaults than modern man."
did medieval skeletons have wider faces than modern - Bing
Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.www.bing.com
"A Swedish study based on 124 skulls from the 500 years preceding the seventeenth century found that the medieval skulls had somewhat smaller teeth and brain cases but larger jaws and wider dental arches than those of a modern population.4 Other trends that have been reported include a reduction in palatal width between the Romano-British period and the nineteenth century5,6 and reductions in bi-zygomatic and maxillary widths between the twelfth and nineteenth centuries.7"
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Time changes modern human's face
news.bbc.co.uk
also
visual viking age skulls reconstructions
but anyhow, 80 percent of what youev said is just basic obscenity, you cant win
he came all the way from redpill, bb forums tRanny9k and cuckditt to preach about how diet can make you get pussy JFL
Last edited:
I can't make this up. you can't make this up someone literally disproving himself and be so confident about it JFL
nigger seriously thought here that it's going to prove that milk chugging mutified steppe fags were bigger than proto europeanshere's something for you because I know you like your milk chugging goatfucker tribe mutt ancestory so much
View: https://youtu.be/6WlI24rv__g
you don't even read the fucking shit you link JFL at grayfags
J
that is not a pic of an "estimated generated face" its done by a professional called ancestral whisper, who uses the well known method such the as Gerasimov method to facially reconstruct the skulls by calculating the flesh (COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM THE AI GENERATED BS YOURE TALKING ABOUT), which you do not know about at all, also, that skull is clearly 10000 bigger than any other prehistoric skull ive seen ever in life LMAO, all youev been posting as of now is completely obscenity and rage filled paragraphs dawg@kay' JFL at this GrAYfag
grays surprise me everyday with their copes and stupidity it's unbelievable
facial development and bone growth are related as much as 50% you fucking dunce gray faggot you're not making your way around this by giving pics of an estimated generated face of a subtype
View attachment 1110605
but I know that very well that's why the difference is the proof I sent is based on actual remains so take those pics and shove it up your mutilated hole you fucking soy farms milk chugging gym tranny shill
come on redpiller buying a rope is easy and cheap. stop coping it's over. what matters is you're fugly like me and you're here, no raw milk and farming for your fucking ugly face, period
also any proof my skulls arent actual remains , also fact check: yamnaya or indo europeans werent just milk drinking people, they were mostly nomadic and steppe herders, meaning their diet was filled predominantly of meat, not wheat LMAO, i think the people you are reffering to are the globular amphora, linear band pottery or the funnelbeaker peoples, who were indeed narrow faced which coincides with their diet which was all wheat based diet LMAO, what are you even arguing at this point sperg? why tf did you even bring up the farming shit from??? i was againts it not with it you fucking sperg, barely is also a hardy diet aswell
joejutish
Greycel ★
JoinedMar 31, 2024
Posts20
Greycel ★
JoinedMar 31, 2024
Posts20
J
I can't make this up. you can't make this up someone literally disproving himself and be so confident about it JFL
here's something for you because I know you like your milk chugging goatfucker tribe mutt ancestory so much
View: https://youtu.be/6WlI24rv__g
you don't even read the fucking shit you link JFL at grayfags
View attachment 1110607
more obscenity, milk chugging and meat eating is more probable, also you have zero proof of anything youre saying, you legit just respond with basic obscenity, find better sources as to how im wrong (make sure its comprhensive and how it disproves the sources i POSTED, thanks)
J
I can't make this up. you can't make this up someone literally disproving himself and be so confident about it JFL
here's something for you because I know you like your milk chugging goatfucker tribe mutt ancestory so much
View: https://youtu.be/6WlI24rv__g
you don't even read the fucking shit you link JFL at grayfags
View attachment 1110607
ive also posted more sources, why didnt you just read through it entirely dumb fuck, all youev done is read the tittle and dismissed it like a low iq braindead punk face, LMAO, explain to me how and why that is false, after reading the craniometry anyalisis made BETWEEN FUCKING MODERN SKULLS and SKULLS FROM 500 YEARS AGO showing MASSIVE CONTRAST
I presented all the evidence I have. the biggest men are still hunter gatherers who didn't even knew the taste of milk. you can chug your raw milk like the coping faggot you are thinking it will fix your face and height or fucking rope because it would be much better for a redpilled zoomer summer newfaggot like you. everything you posted disproves your very own claims infact as I proved you didn't even skim over half the shit you posted. you're a soy cuck driven by his rages over having his copes exposed first time on a forum you're completely alien to and absolutely doesn't belong to. gtfoh
Last edited:
[/URL]
"A Swedish study based on 124 skulls from the 500 years preceding the seventeenth century found that the medieval skulls had somewhat smaller teeth and brain cases but larger jaws and wider dental arches than those of a modern population.4 Other trends that have been reported include a reduction in palatal width between the Romano-British period and the nineteenth century5,6 and reductions in bi-zygomatic and maxillary widths between the twelfth and nineteenth centuries.7"
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Time changes modern human's face
news.bbc.co.uk
also
visual viking age skulls reconstructions
who the actual fuck has mentioned any viking haplogroup
this zoomer is fucking hilarious"you can't win" why? are you going to call your gay bb and reddit bros for support?
Last edited:
undo yourself (ded srs) @joejutish
tl;dr computer generated you fucking soy faggot. keep seething your tears are delicious
at least I don't spam unrelated redundant studies that I did not even skim like a "muh science" soycuck and speak like an actual nigger unironically, "DAWG"
J
and how does that disporve the overall method, lol, you just bantering and laughing tactic of reciprocation isnt gonna do you jack, im still disprovedtl;dr computer generated you fucking soy faggot. keep seething your tears are delicious
J
ok but when did i ever say that milk is the only leading factor for fucking developing height or face kek, also just because a neolithic revolution happend you think animal husbandry/meat based products fucking went bye bye right away?? lmao, post neolithic societies, especially under the corded ware culture umbrella, were all robust on average, because they were primary MEAT EATERS YOU ASS HAT, you only presented one btw, vs mine, most of those arent even from the so called "science soy cuck" you fucking dunking on "Science" makes whatever you stand for also redundant since you are deriving your sources from the same departmentI presented all the evidence I have. the biggest men are still hunter gatherers who didn't even knew the taste of milk. you can chug your raw milk like the coping faggot you are thinking it will fix your face and height or fucking rope because it would be much better for a redpilled zoomer summer newfaggot like you. everything you posted disproves your very own claims infact as I proved you didn't even skim over half the shit you posted. you're a soy cuck driven by his rages over having his copes exposed first time on a forum you're completely alien to and absolutely doesn't belong to. gtfoh
If I was you and had one ounce of dignity or one braincel I would've killed myself after the first rebuke I gave you. but you zoomer summer faggots have the nerves to be here, talk shit about our theories and keep posting like that
if you think the blackpill is just so flawed and incels problem is all about food. get the fuck out and breed the uberman and chug raw cum or milk in his mouth as you like faggot
Get the fuck out of here
J
how is it unrelated?? BHAHAHA, i proved that faces were ten times more rugged and prominent even just 500 years ago, remember, this dispute isnt over milk you sperg, but the part where you said industrialization or diet doesnt effect your face, which it does, massively.at least I don't spam unrelated redundant studies that I did not even skim like a "muh science" soycuck and speak like an actual nigger unironically, "DAWG"
J
dude im more trucel than you fucking camel fucking nigger, you dont even know how to argue properly, all youev been doing is being presumptuous and pontificating, thats your tactic to cope, me and you arent different, i use similar tactics but since this is a topic that i have years of experience in through reading literature dating from modern to early 1900s, i have to use passion, but your a fucking sperg lol
JFL at this cuckzynski worshipper
join the club and put on a chimp avi, only then I will reply and shit down your neck
J
why are you bringing up viking haplogroup for? tf, lol, it only accounts for like 20 percent of your total genomics, please stop acting like you know shit, i was using vikings as a basic exemplar of humans during contemporary timeswho the actual fuck has mentioned any viking haplogroup
"you can't win" why? are you going to call your gay bb and reddit bros for support?
J
you have zero proof that those things doesnt effect your face, refer to my sources and skull posts, you havent countered those with a proper academic proofJFL at this cuckzynski worshipper
join the club and put on a chimp avi, only then I will reply and shit down your neck
Similar threads
SuicideFuel
My first 2 weeks in college as a blackcell
- Qwertyuiop99
- Inceldom Discussion
Adolf Kitler
Users who are viewing this thread
