Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious The biggest lie: "You have to be 100% content!"

L

Lebensmüder

Soon to be deleted account
★★★
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Posts
5,202
By spreading that filth you basically separated society into two castes:

A) The lucky/privileged ones like women/chads
- which were turned into spoiled children that are never satisfiable or content with anything they could get, no matter how good/satisfied they feel in one second - a tiny voice in the back of their head will always tell them they could do better and everything better that they get will always only increase their standards for what's considered acceptable, their partner could be a literal god and in the moment where they habituated to the relationship it would bore them, everywhere they would find a flaw just because they deliberately look for it or even construct it/make it up to justify their break-ups, cheating series and other shitty behavior - just because they cannot look the truth in the eyes which says that they are completely burnt out endorphin junkies that need so much more every single time to barely feel satisfied (this is the reason why choking or other disgusting depravities exist among them, they are so dulled out to normal sex that it doesn't excite them anymore in the slightest)

B) The underprivileged and completely lost rest - which were (due to not even being considered for a second as relationship material or even humans) turned into wretched individuals in their years of festering in loneliness, of course this loneliness provides then the ideal nourishment for further developments in adverse directions (without any control instance mental illness, violent ideation and sexual depravity can grow like a tumor), of course these people have neither the need nor any tangible reason to obey the laws of human society anymore because it doesn't give them any tangible reason to do so (apart from losing one's freedom which is for them hardly a difference - or in countries like Sweden/Norway/Finland even an improvement)

The middle class between those extremes is dying more and more. This is the consequence of total freedom, the freedom of everyone to degenerate to the absolute bottoms of the human existence with no interference. A literal hell: Love was rarely the foundation for relationships in the past, because it is an entirely ephemerous feeling, a bright star that soon burns out. Most people rather learned to tolerate each other after entering relationships for pragmatic reasons or a certain end goal in mind, most people didn't feel 100% incontent with it (unlike what was portrayed in retrospect) - and this produced stable results unlike the freedom we nowadays see which only produces depravity and which is virtually useless for most men because they have it on paper and nowhere else. What usage has this great freedom even when significant proportions of society cannot even use it? Due to the lie that people had to be 100% content you made most men completely incontent because they never see anything/cannot use their "great freedom" while even those whores and chads with the privilege to do something with their freedom remain incontent due to becoming unsatisfiable.
And of course, not everything was great under strict order, degeneracy of course existed, but there was a difference: The resonance it got. Prior to this cheaters were called out and adultery was frowned upon, nowadays not. In fact today it's almost the opposite, where a monogamous relationship gets portrayed as possessive/backwards/intolerant.
 
Satisfaction for men is castration
Never be content with what you have
Strive for more:redpill:
 
By spreading that filth you basically separated society into two castes:

A) The lucky/privileged ones like women/chads
- which were turned into spoiled children that are never satisfiable or content with anything they could get, no matter how good/satisfied they feel in one second - a tiny voice in the back of their head will always tell them they could do better and everything better that they get will always only increase their standards for what's considered acceptable, their partner could be a literal god and in the moment where they habituated to the relationship it would bore them, everywhere they would find a flaw just because they deliberately look for it or even construct it/make it up to justify their break-ups, cheating series and other shitty behavior - just because they cannot look the truth in the eyes which says that they are completely burnt out endorphin junkies that need so much more every single time to barely feel satisfied (this is the reason why choking or other disgusting depravities exist among them, they are so dulled out to normal sex that it doesn't excite them anymore in the slightest)

B) The underprivileged and completely lost rest - which were (due to not even being considered for a second as relationship material or even humans) turned into wretched individuals in their years of festering in loneliness, of course this loneliness provides then the ideal nourishment for further developments in adverse directions (without any control instance mental illness, violent ideation and sexual depravity can grow like a tumor), of course these people have neither the need nor any tangible reason to obey the laws of human society anymore because it doesn't give them any tangible reason to do so (apart from losing one's freedom which is for them hardly a difference - or in countries like Sweden/Norway/Finland even an improvement)

The middle class between those extremes is dying more and more. This is the consequence of total freedom, the freedom of everyone to degenerate to the absolute bottoms of the human existence with no interference. A literal hell: Love was rarely the foundation for relationships in the past, because it is an entirely ephemerous feeling, a bright star that soon burns out. Most people rather learned to tolerate each other after entering relationships for pragmatic reasons or a certain end goal in mind, most people didn't feel 100% incontent with it (unlike what was portrayed in retrospect) - and this produced stable results unlike the freedom we nowadays see which only produces depravity and which is virtually useless for most men because they have it on paper and nowhere else. What usage has this great freedom even when significant proportions of society cannot even use it? Due to the lie that people had to be 100% content you made most men completely incontent because they never see anything/cannot use their "great freedom" while even those whores and chads with the privilege to do something with their freedom remain incontent due to becoming unsatisfiable.
And of course, not everything was great under strict order, degeneracy of course existed, but there was a difference: The resonance it got. Prior to this cheaters were called out and adultery was frowned upon, nowadays not. In fact today it's almost the opposite, where a monogamous relationship gets portrayed as possessive/backwards/intolerant.
Very good summary of the situation.

What we should do now is try to understand how we came to gobble-up this idea that we need to be 100% happy.

It seems that this idea goes quite a while back. For example, the US declaration of independence of 1776 says that men are entitled to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". Once you have floated this idea of "the pursuit of happiness" you do not have to go far to turn it into "the pursuit of 100% happiness".

Before that, it was taken for granted that being human meant that you would not be happy. Suffering was considered as a normal and unavoidable part of life. I wonder how we forgot that.
 
Very good summary of the situation.

What we should do now is try to understand how we came to gobble-up this idea that we need to be 100% happy.

It seems that this idea goes quite a while back. For example, the US declaration of independence of 1776 says that men are entitled to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". Once you have floated this idea of "the pursuit of happiness" you do not have to go far to turn it into "the pursuit of 100% happiness".

Before that, it was taken for granted that being human meant that you would not be happy. Suffering was considered as a normal and unavoidable part of life. I wonder how we forgot that.
Yes. And nowadays if you say anything but "Life is fine and rainbow-filled joy" people look at you funny.
 

Similar threads

Moroccancel2-
Replies
4
Views
261
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
MisfitPerson
Replies
4
Views
224
RandomGuy
RandomGuy
gymcellragefuel
Replies
7
Views
241
Grodd
Grodd
samsamwin
Replies
54
Views
1K
baldcel123
B

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top