Mulattocel
Admiral
★★★
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2019
- Posts
- 2,775
Imagine now a 5’10 white man born in the 21st century and comes of age in the modern times. Now the universal tenement of God is the forgiveness of all sin so long as you don’t harbor a spiteful nature or resentment against God when you die. This practice is subject to contradiction however as the circumstances that surround death varies greatly dependent on circumstances.
Lets take a party boy from an American institution like Duke (it doesn’t matter what university it is it only matters the circumstances). This man at Duke lives out his party years (early to mid twenties) in oblivious nature to God. “Does God exist?” He doesnt care all that mattered to him at the time is getting prime pussy and living with no regrets. This man fucks 10 women gets a few pregnant with no regrets.
This is a man that had very favorable circumstances. He got to live it up in his prime years fuck all the prime pussy he wanted no bother. This man eventually graduates from college and becomes more mature as he ages. “What I did when I was younger was degenerate I will admit. But the Lord forgives all!!!”. Just like that this man “repents” against his sins and is allowed into Heaven because he didn’t harbor any frustration or hated against God because he didn’t need to. Never mind this man faced unequal blessed treatment from “God” that would make it easier for him to get to Heaven because he “repented” against sins that weren’t too severe in the first place. All that matters is that he relented and he gets into Heaven hurray!!!
Now what about the African child that dies of hunger? This is an innocent child born into conditions he didn’t agree to. He dies of hunger and pain and as a result grows a contempt of God because of it. Now the narrative says if you die while having a contempt of God you go to hell for being “unrepentant” right” God is all living and universally forgiving to all souls right?
Then why did he unequally distribute circumstances that would make one life form more vulnerable to be condemn to Hell then the others? It’s a very good question that Blkpillpress has made very good threads about so why have the Mormon copers on here failed to answer this question? I’m waiting?
Lets take a party boy from an American institution like Duke (it doesn’t matter what university it is it only matters the circumstances). This man at Duke lives out his party years (early to mid twenties) in oblivious nature to God. “Does God exist?” He doesnt care all that mattered to him at the time is getting prime pussy and living with no regrets. This man fucks 10 women gets a few pregnant with no regrets.
This is a man that had very favorable circumstances. He got to live it up in his prime years fuck all the prime pussy he wanted no bother. This man eventually graduates from college and becomes more mature as he ages. “What I did when I was younger was degenerate I will admit. But the Lord forgives all!!!”. Just like that this man “repents” against his sins and is allowed into Heaven because he didn’t harbor any frustration or hated against God because he didn’t need to. Never mind this man faced unequal blessed treatment from “God” that would make it easier for him to get to Heaven because he “repented” against sins that weren’t too severe in the first place. All that matters is that he relented and he gets into Heaven hurray!!!
Now what about the African child that dies of hunger? This is an innocent child born into conditions he didn’t agree to. He dies of hunger and pain and as a result grows a contempt of God because of it. Now the narrative says if you die while having a contempt of God you go to hell for being “unrepentant” right” God is all living and universally forgiving to all souls right?
Then why did he unequally distribute circumstances that would make one life form more vulnerable to be condemn to Hell then the others? It’s a very good question that Blkpillpress has made very good threads about so why have the Mormon copers on here failed to answer this question? I’m waiting?