NSFW Tanya makes me feel so confused guys

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Very conflicted feelings. Physically there's no surprise package waiting for me, the anatomy is correct, but just knowing how she thinks of herself and about the reincarnation would probably fuck with me head in weird ways over time.



You couldn't really blame yourself if you were one of her soldiers, she never reveals her fully identity, you let her have her way and then find out about later.

At that point you'd prob be addicted and then there's no going back.

@SerCel what do you think, if Tanya doesn't tell her sex partners about her past-life memories is she effectively raping them by having consensual sex?

It's like a lie of omission which would interfere with informed consent if she waits until after to tell you.

I don't equate Tanya with modern frankenstein atrocities of surgery since there was a literal rebirth with 100% physical validity. Literally the correct chromozones.

What is there difference here between having those memories vs say a loli telepathy who steals memories from men like Rogue or Jean Gray can do in X-Men?

 

[BlackPilledG]

I thought this was a incels forum?

Why is this website so flush with legitimate pedophilia now

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Tanya von Degurechaff is a 30 yr old man in a young girl’s body so it’s technically legal

I don't really think he fully exists though, that has to have mostly faded, just like Aang mostly faded when he reincarnated into Korra so that I don't think it's gay to fuck Korra.

It's just like the faintest of echoes, and the literal brain chem is female in both cases since they were reborn XX.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

I don't care what age her "artist" declared her, that mf doesn't even look 10 and it's intentional

I checked the biological age of the blonde loli bod, apparently goes from 9 to 13 throughout series, I think she's 11 by ep 6 of anime, which I don't think has adapted all the LNs yet

I find it hilariously ironic I'm the one getting called a pedo frequently for suggesting 14yo foids aren't children

by who, greycels?

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Why not just go link up with the rest of the MAP community on twitter? You're a pedophile not an incel jfl

not mutually exclusive categories Az

that said, Tanya is clearly Tanner stage 2 so it's not pedophilia to be attracted to her look

 

[Wilfred]

This is a cartoon. (And a shitty one, at that.)

 

[Dregster]

Why is this website so flush with legitimate pedophilia now

A recurring issue with this silly obsession for anime

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

This is a cartoon. (And a shitty one, at that.)

You're a spammer if you don't tell us a better cartoon to watch.

You're like a normy who would insult ANY toon unless you make a paired recommendation to your insult.

your avatar image is smiling that means ur laffing

this silly obsession for anime

sorry bro here have some more of that live-action TV that you love

 

[Rhaast]

Tanya von Degurechaff is a 30 yr old man in a young girl’s body so it’s technically legal.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

bet you wouldn’t be this skeptic if op decided to post
a boy being skinned alive
instead of a drawing of a nude young girl

Thinking loli can't coexist w/ male torture = false dichotomy



having fun imagining IT trying to make sense of my M side now

 

[GhostedPhantom]

Regardless if loli or not, I'd never be into a foid who acts like a man and wants to dominate me.

 

[Rhaast]

[UWSL]le innocnet angels [/UWSL]

View: https://youtu.be/kBSrveuqoHo

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Regardless if loli or not, I'd never be into a foid who acts like a man and wants to dominate me.

nice LARP

 

[GhostedPhantom]

nice LARP

View attachment 565596View attachment 565597View attachment 565598View attachment 565599

You're projecting. For me to find it hot, the ones who are pinned down or bound should be the foids.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

You're projecting. For me to find it hot, the ones who are pinned down or bound should be the foids.

you seem a bit narrow-minded bro

like yeah that's workable too



but what's wrong abuot confident loli having her way with you?

shows she's legit interested and accepts you as her partner



you have middle ground where she might seem aroused or into it, but might also just be embarassed/scared

 

[12 Years a Rotter]

Scaphisism for weebs

 

[GhostedPhantom]

but what's wrong abuot confident loli having her way with you?

It's emasculating to me. Also, I'm not into lolis, but that's a separate thing.

 

[nazianime]

I consider Tanya a girls based on how only in the beginning we are told about his past life. You forget about that part after 2-3 episodes.

 

[fast_curry]

the anatomy is correct, but just knowing how she thinks of herself and about the reincarnation would probably fuck with me head in weird ways over time.

That's where I draw the line. Didn't watch the anime because deep down Tanya is a man (or at least the way Tanya's mind works is identical to a man).

I recently dropped a book that had a similar issue. It's a fantasy fiction where transition kind of works like respec'ing a character in RPGs. You get the right chromosomes and even get to change your looks. The gods in this world can fuck up someone's gender at birth and as a remedy, they offer people a way to fix their gender later on in a flawless way.
I couldn't accept that, likely because it reminds me of how it works irl. The revelation about the MC came when I was 50% through the book and that made me really upset.

 

[XerxesAzrael]

Why is this website so flush with legitimate pedophilia now

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

That's where I draw the line. Didn't watch the anime because deep down Tanya is a man (or at least the way Tanya's mind works is identical to a man).

You get something similar in Slime Isekai except he's a slime for the first half of the show and only experiments with a loli persona in the 2nd half for pretty sad reasons tbh that kinda hits you in the feels and you need to watch it to understand.

If you don't view Tanya as a loli (in the show she's in armor 99% of the time anyway, the fanservice is mostly in the manga) then you can still enjoy the Saga the same way you might Overlord or Shield Hero.

I recently dropped a book that had a similar issue. It's a fantasy fiction where transition kind of works like respec'ing a character in RPGs. You get the right chromosomes and even get to change your looks. The gods in this world can fuck up someone's gender at birth and as a remedy, they offer people a way to fix their gender later on in a flawless way.
I couldn't accept that, likely because it reminds me of how it works irl. The revelation about the MC came when I was 50% through the book and that made me really upset.

title? wondering if you dropped book

not idea what respec'ing means

by "reminds me of how it works IRL" did you mean how DIFFERENT it is IRL? obviously not "flawless" with present science

 

[GhostedPhantom]

You get something similar in Slime Isekai except he's a slime for the first half of the show and only experiments with a loli persona in the 2nd half for pretty sad reasons tbh that kinda hits you in the feels and you need to watch it to understand.

If you don't view Tanya as a loli (in the show she's in armor 99% of the time anyway, the fanservice is mostly in the manga) then you can still enjoy the Saga the same way you might Overlord or Shield Hero.


title? wondering if you dropped book

not idea what respec'ing means

by "reminds me of how it works IRL" did you mean how DIFFERENT it is IRL? obviously not "flawless" with present science

Strange, you replied to me instead of to @fast_curry .

talk about putting words in my mouth

you're either a complicit pedophile yourself, or just incredibly naïve.

"MUH ITS JUST A DRAWIN BROOOOO"

Yes, a pornographic drawing, of a prepubescent child that's meant to be masturbated to. What a retarded strawman

His point is that it isn't an actual real-life child because unlike drawing a bunch of pixels on the screen, the process of making porn (including nude photos) of actual children is sexual abuse. There's nothing wrong with someone jacking off to an image if the process of making it didn't cause anyone to suffer.

The only problem would be if someone becomes even more of a pedo as a result of being surrounded by such content and people, but I don't know how much that is the case. I do know that fetishes can form as a result of what porn you watch, so maybe.

 

[Iwanttolive]

I watched n liked it but only one season.

Tanya is so cutr

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Strange, you replied to me instead of to @fast_curry .

ugh sorry I don't know WTF happened with the quote brackets there

the process of making porn (including nude photos) of actual children is sexual abuse

IMO isn't not sexual abuse unless you touch someone's genitals without their (informed, uncoerced) consent.

IE it's not "abuse" to photograph someone without their permission. The media does this all the time and don't get called abusers, so let's go by that standard, in all fairness.

I'm not "abusing" Hunter Biden by circulating pics of him and his hookers.

 

[GhostedPhantom]

IMO isn't not sexual abuse unless you touch someone's genitals without their (informed, uncoerced) consent.

IE it's not "abuse" to photograph someone without their permission. The media does this all the time and don't get called abusers, so let's go by that standard, in all fairness.

I'm not "abusing" Hunter Biden by circulating pics of him and his hookers.

I disagree. Imagine you're a kid doing your own thing and then you're told to take your clothes off and pose for photos by someone who claims they can ruin your life if you disobey them. You may not be harmed physically but it's terrifying knowing how your privacy has been violated or how you're doing something that your intuition tells you is wrong but you can't understand fully.

It's a lot easier to prevent, handle or cope with a privacy violation when you're an adult. Not so much when you're a kid. Hunter Biden made the decision to become a public figure, he made the decision to pay whores and he didn't take good measures to prevent himself from being exposed. And if the urinalists dug too deep into his private life, he should be able to sue them, but I'm assuming they didn't even have to do that in order to find that info.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

I disagree. Imagine you're a kid doing your own thing and then you're told to take your clothes off and pose for photos by someone who claims they can ruin your life if you disobey them.

This is "coerced stripping" which is not a guaranteed prerequisite of photographing someone nude.
It's the difference between posed vs "candid photography".

You may not be harmed physically but it's terrifying knowing how your privacy has been violated

Is it a violation of privacy to be forced to strip via threats, correct.

But you're using a stereotype here to imply that any possible stripping happens as a result of threats and coercion.

how you're doing something that your intuition tells you is wrong but you can't understand fully.

I doubt you need to rely on intuition to understand that coercion like "I'll ruin your life if you don't do what I say" is wrong.

That said: I don't accept the premise that the coerced victim is "doing something wrong" here. It is the coercer threatening them who is doing something wrong.

It's a lot easier to prevent, handle or cope with a privacy violation when you're an adult. Not so much when you're a kid.
Hunter Biden made the decision to become a public figure, he made the decision to pay whores and he didn't take good measures to prevent himself from being exposed.

True, though deciding to become a celebrity via acting/business and deciding to have sex with someone doesn't IMO mean it's fair game to leak their nudes.
It was rough for Paige / Xavier Woods / Brad Maddox when that got leaked, for example.
That's not going to actually stop me from looking at Paige's sex tape though, because IMO that doesn't harm her.
It's just if I had exclusive access to the tape, I wouldn't share it with others so long as I respected her, which even though she got blacked and abuse the Diva's Championship, I still kinda do.

Hunter Biden OTOH there is evidence implying he may have sexually abused his niece, and is guilty of other crimes (selling access to his father for Burisma awards, drug use, illegal disposal of a firearm) which are not being prosecuted, so I am okay with violating his privacy as a public service because the public needs to be paying more attention to him and those who shelter him.

And if the urinalists dug too deep into his private life, he should be able to sue them, but I'm assuming they didn't even have to do that in order to find that info.

I guess, but I don't think any suits he files should be brought to court until they properly charge him for all the previous crimes we have evidence of him doing.

 

[GhostedPhantom]

This is "coerced stripping" which is not a guaranteed prerequisite of photographing someone nude.
It's the difference between posed vs "candid photography".

If it's just a normal photo where the kid happens to be nude and someone takes it and jacks off to it, then it's still disgusting but yes, no one was harmed as long as the kid never finds out.

That said: I don't accept the premise that the coerced victim is "doing something wrong" here. It is the coercer threatening them who is doing something wrong.

To clarify, by wrong I mean not immoral, but self-harmful.

True, though deciding to become a celebrity via acting/business and deciding to have sex with someone doesn't IMO mean it's fair game to leak their nudes.

I still don't get it. If he was visible nude from outside, then he should have pulled the curtains (as should all sexhavers anyway). If he was visible from the inside, then whoever placed a camera there was trespassing on his property. And if he was filmed by himself, then he's just retarded. The only exception is if he was secretly filmed by the whore; in that case, I don't know if he can hold her responsible unless the privacy laws state that she can't do that to him.

Hunter Biden OTOH there is evidence implying he may have sexually abused his niece, and is guilty of other crimes (selling access to his father for Burisma awards, drug use, illegal disposal of a firearm) which are not being prosecuted, so I am okay with violating his privacy as a public service because the public needs to be paying more attention to him and those who shelter him.

I guess, but I don't think any suits he files should be brought to court until they properly charge him for all the previous crimes we have evidence of him doing.

I think even a criminal should have the opportunity to prosecute other criminals who have wronged him but the court would be heavily biased against him at best so he really wouldn't have much of a chance.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

If it's just a normal photo where the kid happens to be nude and someone takes it and jacks off to it, then it's still disgusting but yes, no one was harmed as long as the kid never finds out.

what's disgusting about jacking off to a pic of a 17 year old nude girl GP ?

what if they only find out 20 years later?
IMO the biggest prob with finding out is either "people will get obsessed with me and want to kidnap me from seeing this" or "mean girls will use this to bully me"

If they made nudes of underage girls legal IMO it wouldn't be major problem having adult men bully girls for being a 'slut' or whatev for being in them
because for every bully like this they would prob have twelve orbiters who would harass the shit out of that guy for bullying their waifu

To clarify, by wrong I mean not immoral, but self-harmful.

Undressing is not self-harm.
Being photographed is not self-harm.

I still don't get it. If he was visible nude from outside, then he should have pulled the curtains (as should all sexhavers anyway). If he was visible from the inside, then whoever placed a camera there was trespassing on his property. And if he was filmed by himself, then he's just retarded. T

He filmed himself, the videos were on his laptop and then laptop became property of computer repair guy who repaired it for him when he didn't show up and pay the repair fee.

In other cases though you have private photo storage cloud accounts which get hacked and private nudes get spread w/o consent.

 

[Sadtavious VII]

 

[GhostedPhantom]

what's disgusting about jacking off to a pic of a 17 year old nude girl GP ?

17?! I thought we were talking about actual kids - ones that haven't even been to primary school yet. By the age of 17, the average foid already has a higher body count than the average man does in his whole life.

Undressing is not self-harm.
Being photographed is not self-harm.

It's psychological self-harm. And yes, technically, it's the one coercing the kid who's doing the harming, but that's my point anyway.

He filmed himself, the videos were on his laptop and then laptop became property of computer repair guy who repaired it for him when he didn't show up and pay the repair fee.

In other cases though you have private photo storage cloud accounts which get hacked and private nudes get spread w/o consent.

Yep, it's his fault then, although the repairman is an asshole for yoinking all of that data. And yes, "private" cloud storage is never actually private unless it's encrypted. This is why no one should ever store their sensitive files online. And if I had photos of myself naked, let alone videos, I would encrypt them even if stored locally because of shit like that repairman thing.

 

[Michinomiya Hirohit]

Why not just go link up with the rest of the MAP community on twitter? You're a pedophile not an incel jfl

Kys

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

17?! I thought we were talking about actual kids - ones that haven't even been to primary school yet

You started off saying "porn (including nude photos) of actual children" which in legal terms is anything under 18 because child and minor are equivalent in legal terms.

So you're only referring to nude photographs of girls aged five or younger in kindergarten or preschool when you talk about this being unethical? 6yos are in 1st grade, no concerns there?

It's psychological self-harm.

Not sure what you mean. How is "I was being threatened by someone so I acquiesced to their demands" self-harming?

If a guy holds me up at gunpoint and I give him cash from my wallet, is that psychological self-harm?

I think however cucked that would feel I'd get over it because I could empathize with the traumatic state my aggressor put me in, and also realized I was in fear for my life.

Like should we say that a rape victim who doesn't fight back hard enough is "harming herself" by not risking death by fighting a superior opponent?

If you mean in the sense "you're harming your own pride by not resisting an abuser to the utmost" it seems like excessive expectations.

And yes, technically, it's the one coercing the kid who's doing the harming, but that's my point anyway.

Correct, but the actual harm comes from the threats, not the photographing.

IE there's a big diff between "hey you're cute, want to take a naked bubble bath together? It's okay if you don't" and "I'll murder your parents if you don't take naked bubble bath with me" psychologically.

Seems like you're only acknowledging the 2nd kind exists.

Yep, it's his fault then, although the repairman is an asshole for yoinking all of that data.

In fairness to him, he actually turned it over to the FBI and only because he was concerned that it depicted Hunter molesting children.

Even if Hunter did not overtly threaten Natalie Biden to give him a footjob, there's a huge power imbalance not just because he's older but because he's wealthier, more connected, etc.

And yes, "private" cloud storage is never actually private unless it's encrypted. This is why no one should ever store their sensitive files online. And if I had photos of myself naked, let alone videos, I would encrypt them even if stored locally because of shit like that repairman thing.

True, but even if there's not a "reasonable" expectation of privacy, it still exhibits some intent of it.

Like buying a shitty lock for your front door.

Also even if you didn't lock your front door it doesn't make it okay for people to rob you.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Get aids and die gay pedo shitfuck

it tends to be adults who are HIV+ though so fucking younger girls is probably less likely to give you AIDS or other STDs compared to fucking roasties like you prefer

 

[GhostedPhantom]

You started off saying "porn (including nude photos) of actual children" which in legal terms is anything under 18 because child and minor are equivalent in legal terms.

The legal system is defined by agecucks and I don't care about their definitions and opinions.

So you're only referring to nude photographs of girls aged five or younger in kindergarten or preschool when you talk about this being unethical? 6yos are in 1st grade, no concerns there?

No, I used the beginning of primary school as an arbitrary cutoff point. In reality, it's rather anyone who hasn't reached puberty yet, so I should have included the whole of primary and maybe middle school too.

IE there's a big diff between "hey you're cute, want to take a naked bubble bath together? It's okay if you don't" and "I'll murder your parents if you don't take naked bubble bath with me" psychologically.

Kids would surely decline in the first case unless they're misled into thinking it's not about sex. And they don't understand what sex even is so it's very easy to mislead them even if you don't mean to, let alone if you do. This is why I'm assuming only the second case actually happens (although rarely with threats of that severity).

 

[Rhaast]

Of course I care, you fuckers are the reason faggots, trannies, and other queers EXIST.

Yet another retarded strawman from you

 

[GhostedPhantom]

you fuckers are the reason faggots, trannies, and other queers EXIST

That's a bold claim. Only the ones who traumatize children cause them to become fags.

 

[Idotms]

Because you know 100% for fact that at any point in your life this won't escalate into you abusing some real life kid that'll grow up to be a queer.

I bet you'll end up being that creepy uncle that touches other peoples kids

Bold?????? Most sodomites are products of child abuse. This is common knowledge

Also pedophilia and homosexuality are heavily intertwined, anyone who is a pedophile has a very high chance of being gay or bi

Ratio

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

The legal system is defined by agecucks and I don't care about their definitions and opinions.

right but the implications are ones you recognize thus the importance of clarification

I used the beginning of primary school as an arbitrary cutoff point. In reality, it's rather anyone who hasn't reached puberty yet,

Puberty is also an arbitrary cutoff point IMO, there's no automatic switch at any point where you gain competency of dealing w/ abuse just a gradual progression in capacity.

I should have included the whole of primary and maybe middle school too.
Kids would surely decline in the first case unless they're misled into thinking it's not about sex.

SURELY
or perhaps there are middle-schoolers who actually want to do sexual things

And they don't understand what sex even is

You done with normy talking points yet?

Sex isn't even being had in the bubble bath we're just talking about "wants to have naked non-penetrative cuddles"

Why would you need to understand how ovulation works to make a judgment call about this?

it's very easy to mislead them even if you don't mean to, let alone if you do.
This is why I'm assuming only the second case actually happens (although rarely with threats of that severity).

Accidental and intentional "misleading" as you put it is deception, not coercion.

It's like the difference between a guy raping his twin brother's wife by impersonating him and she's consenting and loving it the entire time and only pissed later on, vs. tying her up and fucking her while screaming "I'm not your husband I'm his brother raping you" and she hates it the whole time.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

90% of Pedophiles are male
30% of the victims are male
this GREATLY elevates a pedophile's odds of being a faggot

Interesting stat manipulation. Let me try.


31/50 men were gay, as opposed to only 17/50 women who were gay
being male GREATLY elevates someone's odds of being homosexual

 

[Idotms]

View attachment 566105

L + YB better

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

hopefully you realize that there are faggot hebephiles out there who actively seek sex with 14yo boys

No, hebephilia is attraction to teen girls, attraction to teen boys is "ephebophilia"
Please don't push the bigender nonsense Blanchard invented

you call me out for finding foids that menstruate and are capable of giving birth attractive

Can you quote where Zensfy did this?

I don't see any reference to it in the post you quoted, was it earlier in this thread or some other thread?

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

finding foids that menstruate and are capable of giving birth attractive
pornographic drawings of CHILDREN

Women stop menstruating at age 51 on average.
"Children" in legal terms is 17.
So you are saying wanting to fuck 50yo foids is better than wanting to fuck 17yo foids

 

[Rhaast]

View attachment 566105

Saving this

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

i can only bring my self to fap to drawings of 10-11yo girls who have visible tits, i don’t like completely flat bodies

bodies are never 'completely' flat, even prior to puberty there is slight convex shape and breast tissue compared to boys.
Let's just talk in tanner terms, when can you begin to fap bro?

 

[Tjaldur]

Spoiler

@Azaylias Take the fucking shotapill you fucking inkwell

you sound like one of those feminists who claim all men who are addicted to violent porn are potential rapists, you make it seem like controlling your urges is such a difficult thing, projection maybe?

Because he is.
@Wizard32 @Michinomiya Hirohit tired of these fags telling us we can't touch our dicks to X and Y. Imagine thinking the friction of graphite and fibre complicit the harm of others.

 

[Michinomiya Hirohit]

Spoiler

@Azaylias Take the fucking shotapill you fucking inkwell

Because he is.
@Wizard32 @Michinomiya Hirohit tired of these fags telling us we can't touch our dicks to X and Y. Imagine thinking the friction of graphite and fibre complicit the harm of others.

imagine being called a pedo for like 2d art created by old incels lmao

 

[Rhaast]

View attachment 566137

"WE CAN TOUCH OUR DICK TO WHATEVER"

"WHY DO YOU CARE?"

"STOP BEING AN AGECUCK"

"ITS NOT AFFECTING ANYONE ELSE"

imagine being called a pedo for like 2d art created by old incels lmao

nigga how is that bait?

Niggers this been going for 4 hours

 

[iamsubhuman]

Why is this website so flush with legitimate pedophilia now

this place used to be something like "teen girls have sex, they aren't innocent angels" but now it's just "mmm minors"

 

[GhostedPhantom]

90% of Pedophiles are male, 30% of the victims are male, this GREATLY elevates a pedophile's odds of being a faggot, including yours

Just because a pedo is more likely to be a fag due to correlation doesn't mean he is one.

Accidental and intentional "misleading" as you put it is deception, not coercion.

It's like the difference between a guy raping his twin brother's wife by impersonating him and she's consenting and loving it the entire time and only pissed later on, vs. tying her up and fucking her while screaming "I'm not your husband I'm his brother raping you" and she hates it the whole time.

Yeah, deception is less harmful than coercion. Still a bad thing to do, though, because the kid is bound to grow up and realize what has happened, or partially realize it even back then and agree to do it but feel nervous and doubtful. If there's any harm, then it's wrong.

 

[Rhaast]

View attachment 566151

There is no strawman to be found in any of what he said tbh