I don't disagree but i think it's cope to believe men or even incel men are better, namely a superiority cope (something that makes you superior)
The main reason why is I don't see anything genuinely 'better' in a discussion had by two people who hold similar life experiences or internet habits to me. They're just practicing the same obscurities. It's why when you're 15 you go on 4chan and think that all the people on normie social media are NPCs until you be there for a few years and realize it's the exact same shit with different topics and in-group awareness, and all the people there are just as boring. It all comes down to aligning lives, and the inherent, impossible to understate tendency for people to superiority cope and inflate themselves.
i see this in how a lot of users think this (a surprising amount) about men in general, and more think it but exclude normie men.
Yet again it's not a point that compliments us or makes us look good so I think it'll just get rage from people whose identity is tied to 'having better conversation topics'. Many will believe it, because it feels good and we know that those inflators are defended with bias.
it makes us feel good that we are different but not only can what's 'different' be learned in about 3 months, with the only people who fail it being literal outsiders or day 1 participants, we're literally forced by exclusion to pursue it our entire lives, forced to go on the internet, forced to be different. We then pride ourselves on that, but I don't see how it's 'better' than someone who never was, talking about sports.
I've never thought that to be good conversation, never thought that here, and every single time I see it claimed that we're better at talking here, it's because of the topics we discuss and that alone. everyone I've met here has been pretty fucking standard, if not outright just as much of a dog brained egotist. But there's this mystical coolness that we all pretend exists. All the interests and topics are swapped out and we just cope that it's 'superior conversation'.
How much credit would you give someone for having based political opinions, and how much of it is actual 'conversation' as opposed to agreeing with one another?
The simplest cope of all of these is simply to gain some form of comradery by being ''team man''. Sexhaving men are ladbible consuming, ego driven, unfunny sports fans and I sincerely believe a glimpse into their conversations would just be a mix of dude beer, I fucked a chick bro, and filling the dead air with american football debate.
Sucks but it's true.