Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Venting Talking to girls is pointless?

BlackPilledNormi

BlackPilledNormi

Cynic - Raised by Two and a half men
Joined
Sep 19, 2024
Posts
3,034
Online time
1d 5m
Talking to a foid about anything meaningful us absolutly pointless, because women dont have an own opinion:
Is she's single she will either support the current thing or whatever her sociology-"professor" told her
If she's in an relationship she will either repeat whatever her boyfriend sais or if her bf is a cuck its the same as single.
If you want the chance of having an interesting and conversation you have to talk to a men amd even here there is a big chance that you will simply hear the current thing, but thats the cas all tgmhe time for women.
 
Talking to a foid about anything meaningful us absolutly pointless, because women dont have an own opinion:
Is she's single she will either support the current thing or whatever her sociology-"professor" told her
If she's in an relationship she will either repeat whatever her boyfriend sais or if her bf is a cuck its the same as single.
If you want the chance of having an interesting and conversation you have to talk to a men amd even here there is a big chance that you will simply hear the current thing, but thats the cas all tgmhe time for women.
They won't talk to me anyway.
 
people will think you're boring if you don't hold any subjective opinions
they want drama, not truth
 
I'd rather talk with a brick wall.
 
people will think you're boring if you don't hold any subjective opinions
they want drama, not truth
you sound like you have some good experience talking with people IRL.
 
you sound like you have some good experience talking with people IRL.
Well thats actually true when Im at work and I listen to whatvthe people are talkin about its either work or pure drama, who fucks with who, who said this and that, only shit like this. Try and talk to them about anything meaningful, its impossible
 
you sound like you have some good experience talking with people IRL.
Well thats actually true when Im at work and I listen to whatvthe people are talkin about its either work or pure drama, who fucks with who, who said this and that, only shit like this. Try and talk to them about anything meaningful, its impossible
yeah I have experienced being mocked and being called a wannabe intellectual for talking about things above yeast level IQ
 
They always follow the popular, majority opinion on everything, for them the most important thing is to fit in
I dont think its just important to them, I think they cant go otherwise without a men
 
It is pointless

If they don't consider you as a possible sex partner the second their eyes meet yours it's over
 
It is pointless

If they don't consider you as a possible sex partner the second their eyes meet yours it's over
And you can't override the first impression. You get put in one of three categories: fuck, invisible, kill
 
And you can't override the first impression. You get put in one of three categories: fuck, invisible, kill
And we'll never be in the first one
 
And you can't override the first impression. You get put in one of three categories: fuck, invisible, kill
I would add moneybag and psychologist
 
Foid's opinion = the opinion of the Chad she is currently fucking
 
The only purpose of talking to women as a sub5 is to terrorize them
 
Talking to a foid about anything meaningful us absolutly pointless, because women dont have an own opinion:
Is she's single she will either support the current thing or whatever her sociology-"professor" told her
If she's in an relationship she will either repeat whatever her boyfriend sais or if her bf is a cuck its the same as single.
If you want the chance of having an interesting and conversation you have to talk to a men amd even here there is a big chance that you will simply hear the current thing, but thats the cas all tgmhe time for women.
If is
 
Talking to a foid about anything meaningful us absolutly pointless, because women dont have an own opinion:
Is she's single she will either support the current thing or whatever her sociology-"professor" told her
If she's in an relationship she will either repeat whatever her boyfriend sais or if her bf is a cuck its the same as single.
If you want the chance of having an interesting and conversation you have to talk to a men amd even here there is a big chance that you will simply hear the current thing, but thats the cas all tgmhe time for women.
Find a not retarded girl or someone that have same interests almost impossible, better just not torture yourself and trying coping and thinking about that relationship is not perfect
 
they only come to you to waste your time and rip the soul out of you and then give the victim card.
 
I don't understand how a man can be just friends with a foid. I am not interested in the garbage they talk about. All those guys are playing the long game. Waiting for the opportunity to try to sleep with her.
 
I don't understand how a man can be just friends with a foid. I am not interested in the garbage they talk about. All those guys are playing the long game. Waiting for the opportunity to try to sleep with her.
Yes Idiots all of them, all they will possibly get is a used up hole and 2 kids that arent their.
And all that for a 2 nights a month and watchin her gettin railed by Chad
 
fully agreeable, based post. foids are where conversations go to die. and there are so many normies that will either agree with you and add nothing to the discussion, or will disagree with you, using the most baseless, repetitive talking points. there's no substance to anything most people say anymore.
 
I don't disagree but i think it's cope to believe men or even incel men are better, namely a superiority cope (something that makes you superior)

The main reason why is I don't see anything genuinely 'better' in a discussion had by two people who hold similar life experiences or internet habits to me. They're just practicing the same obscurities. It's why when you're 15 you go on 4chan and think that all the people on normie social media are NPCs until you be there for a few years and realize it's the exact same shit with different topics and in-group awareness, and all the people there are just as boring. It all comes down to aligning lives, and the inherent, impossible to understate tendency for people to superiority cope and inflate themselves.

i see this in how a lot of users think this (a surprising amount) about men in general, and more think it but exclude normie men.

Yet again it's not a point that compliments us or makes us look good so I think it'll just get rage from people whose identity is tied to 'having better conversation topics'. Many will believe it, because it feels good and we know that those inflators are defended with bias.

it makes us feel good that we are different but not only can what's 'different' be learned in about 3 months, with the only people who fail it being literal outsiders or day 1 participants, we're literally forced by exclusion to pursue it our entire lives, forced to go on the internet, forced to be different. We then pride ourselves on that, but I don't see how it's 'better' than someone who never was, talking about sports.

I've never thought that to be good conversation, never thought that here, and every single time I see it claimed that we're better at talking here, it's because of the topics we discuss and that alone. everyone I've met here has been pretty fucking standard, if not outright just as much of a dog brained egotist. But there's this mystical coolness that we all pretend exists. All the interests and topics are swapped out and we just cope that it's 'superior conversation'.

How much credit would you give someone for having based political opinions, and how much of it is actual 'conversation' as opposed to agreeing with one another?

The simplest cope of all of these is simply to gain some form of comradery by being ''team man''. Sexhaving men are ladbible consuming, ego driven, unfunny sports fans and I sincerely believe a glimpse into their conversations would just be a mix of dude beer, I fucked a chick bro, and filling the dead air with american football debate.

Sucks but it's true.
 
Last edited:
I don't disagree but i think it's cope to believe men or even incel men are better, namely a superiority cope (something that makes you superior)

The main reason why is I don't see anything genuinely 'better' in a discussion had by two people who hold similar life experiences or internet habits to me. They're just practicing the same obscurities. It's why when you're 15 you go on 4chan and think that all the people on normie social media are NPCs until you be there for a few years and realize it's the exact same shit with different topics and in-group awareness, and all the people there are just as boring. It all comes down to aligning lives, and the inherent, impossible to understate tendency for people to superiority cope and inflate themselves.

i see this in how a lot of users think this (a surprising amount) about men in general, and more think it but exclude normie men.

Yet again it's not a point that compliments us or makes us look good so I think it'll just get rage from people whose identity is tied to 'having better conversation topics'

It's cope. We're all boring.
it makes us feel good that we are different but not only can what's 'different' be learned in about 3 months, with the only people who fail it being literal outsiders or day 1 participants, we're literally forced by exclusion to pursue it our entire lives, forced to go on the internet, forced to be different. We then pride ourselves on that, but I don't see how it's 'better' than someone who never was, talking about sports.

I've never thought that to be good conversation, never thought that here, and every single time I see it claimed that we're better at talking here, it's because of the topics we discuss and that alone. everyone I've met here has been pretty fucking standard, if not outright just as much of a dog brained egotist. But there's this mystical coolness that we all pretend exists. All the interests and topics are swapped out and we just cope that it's 'superior conversation'.

How much credit would you give someone for having based political opinions, and how much of it is actual 'conversation' as opposed to agreeing with one another?

The simplest cope of all of these is simply to gain some form of comradery by being ''team man''. Sexhaving men are ladbible consuming, ego driven, unfunny sports fans and I sincerely believe a glimpse into their conversations would just be a mix of dude beer, I fucked a chick bro, and filling the dead air with american football debate.

Sucks but it's true.
You put in words some things i never managed to coherently express before, but was always on my mind. Well done :feelsokman:.
 
slight clarification, women are absolutely worse at all of this than men are, and they're more impossible to convince when they're wrong

but it doesn't matter, I'd hate 99% of people for their human nature alone
 
I don't disagree but i think it's cope to believe men or even incel men are better, namely a superiority cope (something that makes you superior)

The main reason why is I don't see anything genuinely 'better' in a discussion had by two people who hold similar life experiences or internet habits to me. They're just practicing the same obscurities. It's why when you're 15 you go on 4chan and think that all the people on normie social media are NPCs until you be there for a few years and realize it's the exact same shit with different topics and in-group awareness, and all the people there are just as boring. It all comes down to aligning lives, and the inherent, impossible to understate tendency for people to superiority cope and inflate themselves.

i see this in how a lot of users think this (a surprising amount) about men in general, and more think it but exclude normie men.

Yet again it's not a point that compliments us or makes us look good so I think it'll just get rage from people whose identity is tied to 'having better conversation topics'. Many will believe it, because it feels good and we know that those inflators are defended with bias.

it makes us feel good that we are different but not only can what's 'different' be learned in about 3 months, with the only people who fail it being literal outsiders or day 1 participants, we're literally forced by exclusion to pursue it our entire lives, forced to go on the internet, forced to be different. We then pride ourselves on that, but I don't see how it's 'better' than someone who never was, talking about sports.

I've never thought that to be good conversation, never thought that here, and every single time I see it claimed that we're better at talking here, it's because of the topics we discuss and that alone. everyone I've met here has been pretty fucking standard, if not outright just as much of a dog brained egotist. But there's this mystical coolness that we all pretend exists. All the interests and topics are swapped out and we just cope that it's 'superior conversation'.

How much credit would you give someone for having based political opinions, and how much of it is actual 'conversation' as opposed to agreeing with one another?

The simplest cope of all of these is simply to gain some form of comradery by being ''team man''. Sexhaving men are ladbible consuming, ego driven, unfunny sports fans and I sincerely believe a glimpse into their conversations would just be a mix of dude beer, I fucked a chick bro, and filling the dead air with american football debate.

Sucks but it's true.
slight clarification, women are absolutely worse at all of this than men are, and they're more impossible to convince when they're wrong

but it doesn't matter, I'd hate 99% of people for their human nature alone
So if I get you right in this post your critic about my post summarized, is that we in our community arent better then other communities in havin meaningful conversation since most of our "discusions" etc mostly as deep as those of normies are and we just make a great circle jerk here while thinkin that we are superior.
And your second point is that women are ,mostly, indeed worse then males in terms of havin a conversation, thinkin on her own and disagreeing to the "current thing".
The second point were I think I can say we agree on was my main point.
Your main critic that we arent better then normies, I can understand and maybe I exagerated there and overestimate our community, but still there are way more normies on this planet than us, they are the majority of people and still I would say we have more diversite oppertunities in our threads. (atleast by what I learned when hanging around with normies irl, which I know is subjective) For example normies never discuss basic "truths" of their world view. I would say that happens here atleats from time to time (alone the discussions for whom its more over/ if face is more important height/frame or height/frame> face and so on - now ask any normie he will say beein nice, tolerant and respectful is the most important thing) You can say that we are narrow minded and I agree with you, but I think that our community is more diverse in opions and believes then normie culture and so you will have a way higher chance to have an actual discussion with someone
 

Similar threads

Peroz Shapur
Replies
54
Views
2K
Ellsworth
Ellsworth
Clownworldcell
Replies
18
Views
1K
David1033
David1033
Renegade#1
Replies
99
Views
3K
Renegade#1
Renegade#1
Fo4idhater
Replies
23
Views
3K
trevorkid
T

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →