Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

SuicideFuel [Survey] 40% of Australian zoomers aged 18-24 are virgins.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 22977
  • Start date
"She is in a predominantly monogamous relationship "
what does that even mean its either monogomous or not lol its binary multiple partners or one there is nopredominantly.
THE SJW ANGLE IS PATHETIC THE NARRATIVE TRIES TO COVERTLY CONVERT PEOPLE INTO ACCEPTING IMMORALITY AS ACCEPTABLE AND MODERN BY SLIPPING IN THESE BULLSHIT PSEUDO TERM BLURRING OF THE LINES TERMS, LOL AT PREDOMINANTLY MONOGOMOUS WHEN ITS A BINARY STATE.
THEN THE BLACKPILL BOMB NEXT LINE
“I’d like to have sexual freedom while my partner is gone, but we don’t always see eye to eye or subscribe to the same sexual ethics,” she says.
I kekd when i read that :lul: :lul:
This, just look at tik tok for examples of it, zoomers are absolutely fucked
We are bro :feelsrope:
 
39% is weirly big percentage.

I think those are mostly women, as a zoomer I’ve seen this myself, girls non-chalantly admit being atttracted to other girls even though they wouldn’t date them and likely not mess around either.
 
Because they are talking about everyone. Out of everyone 30% haven't had sex in a year.

Out of people that are currently sexually active, only 4% haven't had a sexual partner in the last year.
But they are talking about everyone here as well. This 61% refers to those who had exactly one partner AMONG those sexually active, not among everyone.

Look at 54.2% in '92 and 61.3% in 2018, which is what says in table description and it matches the table data in those years. They are talking about everyone.
 
It should be known that they do these kind of studies by ASKING a sample size of people. They obviously are not scientifically somehow proving that one has had sex and how often, they are just ASKING the participants.
So if they ask generic 20 year old loser blue pillers, how likely is it that they are actually admitting that they are incel virgins? Probably not that likely. Normans don't want to admit that they are losers, they're not confident enough to accept the blackpill.

How likely is it when they ask a 16 year old foid that she actually admits that she has a bodycount of like 20? Unlikely yet again.

I personally do not know a single femoid who is a virgin (at least not IRL), while I know plenty normans who are either straight up incel or close enough to incel.
:feelsrope: :feelsrope: :feelsrope: :feelsrope: :feelsrope:
 
I'm actually right, idiot. It's the same source the article used. Holy fuck the brainlets on this website. The hilarious part is you pat yourselves on the back for being High IQ. You can't even interpret data correctly from a study.

It seems you are a "Femcel" with the way you are trying to defend "Femcels"?

 
But they are talking about everyone here as well. This 61% refers to those who had exactly one partner AMONG those sexually active, not among everyone.

Look at 54.2% in '92 and 61.3% in 2018, which is what says in table description and it matches the table data in those years. They are talking about everyone.

Because you didn't look at the previous page (25) were it says that 50% of people are having sex. 51% of males, and 57% of females.

Of those who are sexually active, only 4% had no sex in the previous year.
It seems you are a "Femcel" with the way you are trying to defend "Femcels"?

No retard I'm just someone who is arguing against the 80/20 rule, if you don't like than argue back instead of using response bias as a fucking copout that just invalidates any data you have as well.
 
Using response bias as copout just invalidates any data you have as well idoit.




It seems like you are throwing in red herrings rather than challenging the figures drawn from that article.

Apples & Oranges technique.
 
Last edited:



It seems like you are throwing in red herrings rather than challenging the figures drawn from that article.

Apples & Oranges technique.


I literally provided data from the source the article uses. You already called me out on that and you were wrong than and you're wrong now. Of course you know you're wrong which is why you cop out with response bias.
 
Because you didn't look at the previous page (25) were it says that 50% of people are having sex. 51% of males, and 57% of females.
51% for year 12 male students, but you forgot to mention that it's 31% for year 10. That data doesn't tell me much either way.
Of those who are sexually active, only 4% had no sex in the previous year.
How the fuck can someone be sexually active and have no partner in a year? :feelskek: :feelskek:
 
Last edited:
How the fuck can someone be sexually active and have no partner in a year? :feelskek: :feelskek:


You are currently in a sexual relationship now, but last year you werent. Really?
 
I literally provided data from the source the article uses. You already called me out on that and you were wrong than and you're wrong now. Of course you know you're wrong which is why you cop out with response bias.

I believe the sample size is up to the age of 20. The graph makes mention of up to 24.

Also from page 33 onwards regarding sexual behaviour the data shows that Women engage in more heterosexual sex than men.

Men engage in prospectively more homosexual sex ONLY because females aren't accepting of their bodily flaws which is discriminatory & engineered faggotry.

There are lies, more lies & damned statistics. The devil is in the detail.
 
I believe the sample size is up to the age of 20. The graph makes mention of up to 24.

I said the article uses multiple sources. Post. The first source the article provided doesn't distinguish between the genders so it's useless. The second source I sscreenscapped a segment that showed that 33% of the males and 42% of the females have had sex in the last 3 weeks. Proof that females and males both have comparable rates of inceldom. That was my original arguement.

Men engage in prospectively more homosexual sex ONLY because females aren't accepting of their bodily flaws which is discriminatory & engineered faggotry.

I don't have a good answer for this. I will say that I've always believed men are more likely to engage in homosexual activity than women. But the increase in homosexuality amongst zoomers is disturbing. Maybe pornography plays a role. Or the homosexual agenda. High rates of singlemother hood and no good male roles models. There's alot of factors at play.
 
Last edited:
I said the article uses multiple sources. Post. The first source the article provided doesn't distinguish between the genders so it's useless. The second source I sscreenscapped a segment that showed that 33% of the males and 42% of the females have had sex in the last 3 weeks. Proof that females and males both have comparable rates of inceldom. That was my original arguement.



I don't have a good answer for this. I will say that I've always believed men are more likely to engage in homosexual activity than women. But the increase in homosexuality amongst zoomers is disturbing. Maybe pornography plays a role. Or the homosexual agenda. High rates of singlemother hood and no good male roles models. There's alot of factors at play.
Have you figured out with your extremely high IQ how can a sexually active person be sexless for a year?
 
In future 90% will be incel , remember this , its Chad or nothing
 
FaKe NeWzzZZ !!!!1!1! :soy: :soy:
 
Have you figured out with your extremely high IQ how can a sexually active person be sexless for a year?

If by some miracle you managed to lose your virginity and have sex today, how many sexual partners did you have last year?
 
If by some miracle you managed to lose your virginity and have sex today, how many sexual partners did you have last year?
I'm still not sexually active if I had sex once, and I sure as hell wasn't sexually active last year so why would I say that I am/was?
 
I'm still not sexually active if I had sex once, and I sure as hell wasn't sexually active last year so why would I say that I am/was?

Anyone who has recently had sex is sexually active. Do you think that teenagers who are sexually active are just having sex one time? The majority of them are in relationships. Furthermore, sexual activity isn't exclusive to penetrative sex but I already pointed that out. I don't have the patience to go into that with you.
 
Anyone who has recently had sex is sexually active.
I wouldn't say that if you just lost your virginity that you're sexually active. The average american has sex 54 times a year and me having it once would apparently make me eligible to complete a survey on my sexual activity last year as a sexually active person lmao it just doesn't make sense.
Furthermore, sexual activity isn't exclusive to penetrative sex but I already pointed that out. I don't have the patience to go into that with you.
That table applies for penetrative only.
 
So that's what they mean by saying "being virgin is totally ok and normal". That kind of scientific norm, ok.
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
4
Views
239
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel
Stupid Clown
Replies
21
Views
508
Lurkercel_678
Lurkercel_678
ParasiteToSociety
Replies
12
Views
174
JustanotherKanga
JustanotherKanga
Anarcho Nihilist
Replies
22
Views
453
XDFLAMEBOY
XDFLAMEBOY
L
Replies
24
Views
428
lost soul
L

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top