Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

SuicideFuel [Survey] 40% of Australian zoomers aged 18-24 are virgins.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 22977
  • Start date
Deleted member 22977

Deleted member 22977

Self-banned
-
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Posts
1,116
Forget about the millenial 30% virginity rate, for zoomers it's even worse (just like we predicted).

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...en-zs-sex-recession-looks-more-like-an-upturn

The Australia Talks survey revealed that Gen Z Australians are about as sexually active as people aged 75 and over. Just 37% report having sex once a month or more.
:feelskek:
1312

This is for both men and women and as women lose virginity earlier than men and have sex more often it's not too big of a stretch to say that almost half of male zoomers are virgins.

The article also notes how researchers say that this doesn't mean that Australians are having less sex, but I'm guessing that this is because of women having even more sex even earlier to counter male sexlessness. In other words the poor get poorer and rich richer, but in this scenario it's chads and stacies having more sex than ever and more normies becoming incels than ever before. The article also says how more people are coming out as lgbthdufisnrkf and those degenerates fuck each other like rabbits.
In 2018, 39% of students said they were attracted to people of the same or multiple genders
39% is weirly big percentage.

I hoped those researchers would have given a bit more insight into specifically male data, but they probably didn't because they would have to adress sexual inequality. All in all the future doesn't look good for men, we are coming closer to 80/20 rule by the year.
 
Brutal. Just goes to show how everything is skewed in favor of foids and genetically privileged males. I hate society.
 
But women it'll be only 10%... Watch this space. While Men are 70%... Average over both sexes.
Brutal. Just goes to show how everything is skewed in favor of foids and genetically privileged males. I hate society.
 
Several zoomer foids flocking to Chad :kys:
 
Most of them are ethnics prolly.
 
If it's over in Chadstralia then it's over everywhere.
 
I've heard from Australians that Australians are the biggest sex havers tbh. Especially teens and early 20s
 
Straya sounds like some kind of bizzare hybrid between british isles and west coast united states culture.
 
Australia has many ricecels, I swear that more than half of the male Zoomer virgins demographic consists of ricecels and currycels.
 
53% are Incel = 40% Virgins, 6% "less than once a year" (WTAF = You either are having sex or you aren't which is it?), 7% Once a year.
15% are prospective Incel - Escortcellers/Simp Maxxers/Beta Buxxers = "At least once a month" (although Escortcelling there is bloody expensive)

As expected
21% = At least once a week (Foids & Chads)
1% = At least once a day (Stacy & Giga Chad)

Now tell me Inceldom isn't a problem.
 
Asian/Indian culture.

People don't really "hook up" until they get married.
 
Somehow this is men's fault.
 
Forget about the millenial 30% virginity rate, for zoomers it's even worse (just like we predicted).

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...en-zs-sex-recession-looks-more-like-an-upturn


:feelskek:
View attachment 252673
This is for both men and women and as women lose virginity earlier than men and have sex more often it's not too big of a stretch to say that almost half of male zoomers are virgins.

The article also notes how researchers say that this doesn't mean that Australians are having less sex, but I'm guessing that this is because of women having even more sex even earlier to counter male sexlessness. In other words the poor get poorer and rich richer, but in this scenario it's chads and stacies having more sex than ever and more normies becoming incels than ever before. The article also says how more people are coming out as lgbthdufisnrkf and those degenerates fuck each other like rabbits.

39% is weirly big percentage.

I hoped those researchers would have given a bit more insight into specifically male data, but they probably didn't because they would have to adress sexual inequality. All in all the future doesn't look good for men, we are coming closer to 80/20 rule by the year.

nice find. you can guarantee almost all of that is males.

the way normies organized into the 2000s is to have as many exclusive get-togethers as possible where only the right people are invited to begin with, that means GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM FAMILY / CLASSROOM / NEIGHBORHOOD.

you think simping or being friendzoned is bad, brah, for many as they entered the 2000s they've never even seen the exclusive alcohol-fueled get-togethers of chads and girls and the occasional "cool guy" who's there because he owns the house or the car. they don't even know what they look like or how easy/hard it may be to get laid there.

that's what it's looked like since 2000 if not the late 90s. like bane, zoomers didn't just adopt this, they are born into this and molded by it.
 
Last edited:
They don't have the balls to separate these things by sex.
 
This is a huge difference from the current sex habits of millennials: 62% of those aged 24-29 are having sex at least once a month, as are 67% of those in their 30s. But this isn’t proof of generational change. Australian millennials and Gen Xers were actually having slightly less sex in their teenage years than Gen Z is today.

So for Millennials its 38% unaccounted for. How convenient.
For Gen Xers it's 33% unaccounted for. How convenient.

Probably Gen X are counting Escortcelling/Simp Maxing & Beta Buxxing as "more positively" than that of millenials...

WTF Knows...
They don't have the balls to separate these things by sex.

Deliberate
 
Female hypergamy at its finest
 
Pure life fuel
Thanks, i needed this :feelsokman::feelsokman::feelsokman:

As far as i know, the problem is just getting bigger and bigger in every country, Japan leading the rankings of sexual inequality.
I hope sexual inequality begins to get addressed by society (instead of demonizing its victims), and governments at least acknowledges its existence as a social problem like any other. Political parties could begin to defend our interests without shame just for our votes, and more market would be dedicated to satisfy us (sexbots, AI, VR...). I doubt it will happen tbh.
Man, i actually would actually love to see what is going to happen in the next years, after sexual inequality is mantained as an evil incel tabu and eventually manifests itself as an obvious problem that threatens society and its economy and political estability. I bet its gonna be fun decade.
 
Pure life fuel
Thanks, i needed this :feelsokman::feelsokman::feelsokman:

As far as i know, the problem is just getting bigger and bigger in every country, Japan leading the rankings of sexual inequality.
I hope sexual inequality begins to get addressed by society (instead of demonizing its victims), and governments at least acknowledges its existence as a social problem like any other. Political parties could begin to defend our interests without shame just for our votes, and more market would be dedicated to satisfy us (sexbots, AI, VR...). I doubt it will happen tbh.
Man, i actually would actually love to see what is going to happen in the next years, after sexual inequality is mantained as an evil incel tabu and eventually manifests itself as an obvious problem that threatens society and its economy and politics. I bet its gonna be fun decade.
it's hilarious because you simply cannot force women to fuck more than the top 20% of men, not without completely destroying the political apparatus that's been built over the last 100 years.

definitely, seeing these pressures play out in the coming years is going to be some bizarre and funny shit
 
they all play video games and watch children anime that's why teehee
Guess technically it is. Our fault for not being born chad. Now foids have to be sluts to make up for low male numbers.

This is why we need feminism. :soy:
 
fallback-logo.png


"Uhhhhh maybe make eye contact with more than just the top 20% of men, women under 65? Just saying... not trying to force you or anything"
"Definitely ignore the bad cases and the hate-filled incels... but you know... the good ones that had a girlfriend in the last 10 years... give them a chance..."
 
Over for my kind
 
do that 40% really all have bad personalities?
 
21% = At least once a week (Foids & Chads)
1% = At least once a day (Stacy & Giga Chad)
80/20 Confirmed for the 921321312489874981738028th time.
 
40% of men and women, meaning 80% of men.

80/20

Just like the tinder results.
 
40% of men and women, meaning 80% of men.

80/20

Just like the tinder results.
Explain. I’m low IQ
Hig
53% are Incel = 40% Virgins, 6% "less than once a year" (WTAF = You either are having sex or you aren't which is it?), 7% Once a year.
15% are prospective Incel - Escortcellers/Simp Maxxers/Beta Buxxers = "At least once a month" (although Escortcelling there is bloody expensive)

As expected
21% = At least once a week (Foids & Chads)
1% = At least once a day (Stacy & Giga Chad)

Now tell me Inceldom isn't a problem.
high IQ. Wtf does less than once a year mean? JFL
 
Last edited:
If you bothered to look at the data you'll see that the rate of inceldom between females and males is comparable. Females are more likely to be sexually active but not by much. This isn't anything surprising, it's always been this way.

What's more alarming is the rise in homosexuality
 
If you bothered to look at the data you'll see that the rate of inceldom between females and males is comparable. Females are more likely to be sexually active but not by much. This isn't anything surprising, it's always been this way.

What's more alarming is the rise in homosexuality

Can you point to where it breaks down by gender please?
 
Can you point to where it breaks down by gender please?

The article doesn't use just use one source. It uses multiple sources. The first picture they use is from shit survey that doesn't even bother to show the gender. Ofcourse lowiqcels will use it to base their shit theories from.

The second graph is from the LaTrobe University’s 2018 sexual health survey

 

Attachments

  • graph.JPG
    graph.JPG
    46.9 KB · Views: 73
Add on top of that a further 13% are quasi incels, basically they only have sex once a year or less than that, who is that with; a girlfriend(?), drunken hook up presumably. These are men who are basically going to be failed normies and basically non-virgin incels into their late 20s and 30s and 40s with no relationships, kids, LVM's who have nothing going for them. It's only going to get worse.

do that 40% really all have bad personalities?

High IQ pill, answer that normies.
 
Last edited:
Forget about the millenial 30% virginity rate, for zoomers it's even worse (just like we predicted).

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...en-zs-sex-recession-looks-more-like-an-upturn


:feelskek:
View attachment 252673
This is for both men and women and as women lose virginity earlier than men and have sex more often it's not too big of a stretch to say that almost half of male zoomers are virgins.

The article also notes how researchers say that this doesn't mean that Australians are having less sex, but I'm guessing that this is because of women having even more sex even earlier to counter male sexlessness. In other words the poor get poorer and rich richer, but in this scenario it's chads and stacies having more sex than ever and more normies becoming incels than ever before. The article also says how more people are coming out as lgbthdufisnrkf and those degenerates fuck each other like rabbits.

39% is weirly big percentage.

I hoped those researchers would have given a bit more insight into specifically male data, but they probably didn't because they would have to adress sexual inequality. All in all the future doesn't look good for men, we are coming closer to 80/20 rule by the year.
Why didn't they have ask what gender they were holy shit that's what's relevant. Bad fucking shit study.
 
The article doesn't use just use one source. It uses multiple sources. The first picture they use is from shit survey that doesn't even bother to show the gender. Ofcourse lowiqcels will use it to base their shit theories from.

The second graph is from the LaTrobe University’s 2018 sexual health survey

Lol that same pdf says how only 4% of men had no partners in 2018. Even shittier survey.
 
the UKs prison aint doing too great ay?
 
Explain. I’m low IQ
Hig

Women aren't sexless so that 40% is all men. Women are 50% of the people in the study, sex having men are 10%, sexless men are 40%. So 20% of men are sex havers, 80% are sexless.

There was also a tinder study a few years back that supported the 80/20 rule.
 
Comparative data shows that a female Year 12 student in 2018 was 11.3% more likely to be having penetrative sex than a Year 12 student from 1992. She was also around 10% more likely to have received oral sex than a female student who graduated in 2002. The age of first sexual experience has also stayed pretty steady for decades. ’

From the actual article

proof from the article a blackpill that female year 12 students eg only girls aged 16 years old is 11.3% more likely to have sex and same aged girl from 1992, this black pill essentially girl are becoming whores even earlier engaging in even more sexual acts at a pretty early age a 11%jump is pretty big behavioural shift in 16 years.
(In 2018, 39% of students said they were attracted to people of the same or multiple genders). “Awareness of, and positivity towards diversity in sexuality has increased.”

This is also revealing
How pathetic are normans that they bandwagon jump onto the lgbttwqfwddwfdwh bandwagon and "confess" they want to be BISEXUAL
ITS PATHETIC 39% is an enormous figure this means 39% have the iq of a potato
lol at this part also

For Mia, 21, “sex is a crucial part of a relationship”. “I don’t need it all day every day, but I feel it’s necessary to create and build the bond I want with my partner.” She is in a predominantly monogamous relationship that has recently gone long-distance – which means she’s having less sex than usual.

"She is in a predominantly monogamous relationship "
what does that even mean its either monogomous or not lol its binary multiple partners or one there is nopredominantly.
THE SJW ANGLE IS PATHETIC THE NARRATIVE TRIES TO COVERTLY CONVERT PEOPLE INTO ACCEPTING IMMORALITY AS ACCEPTABLE AND MODERN BY SLIPPING IN THESE BULLSHIT PSEUDO TERM BLURRING OF THE LINES TERMS, LOL AT PREDOMINANTLY MONOGOMOUS WHEN ITS A BINARY STATE.
THEN THE BLACKPILL BOMB NEXT LINE
“I’d like to have sexual freedom while my partner is gone, but we don’t always see eye to eye or subscribe to the same sexual ethics,” she says.

AND THE PAPER PASSES NO MORAL JUDGEMENT AND GIVES THIS A FREE PASS
PATHETIC
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top