Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel "From the ‘boysober’ trend in the US to the 4B movement in South Korea, more and more heterosexual women are giving up sex"

  • Thread starter WorthlessSlavicShit
  • Start date
WorthlessSlavicShit

WorthlessSlavicShit

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 30, 2022
Posts
9,780

REEEEEEEEE:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee:. I fucking wish I was in a position to "give up", on sex, rather than sex giving up on me before I even had a chance to try it out:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree:.

Get thee to a nunnery! Apparently it’s the hottest place to be. While we still very much live in a sex-saturated world, voluntary celibacy is having something of a moment.
Yeah, sure, voluntary celibacy is what is having its moment now:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.

Evidence of this is everywhere. TikTok, for example, is full of videos of young people extolling the virtues of abstaining from sex.
"Muh Tiktok":foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:.

Jfl at writing "people" in an article meant for women, in a place where it obviously means women. Yeah, some volcel females are probably boasting about the fact that they are so sexually privileged that they can choose to not have sex, because they could get sex any time they wanted and are freely choosing not to, while a bunch of young guys are probably desperately explaining there how they aren't incels despite not being able to have sex whether they want it or not.

Meanwhile, a new Lithuanian romcom called Slow has brought asexuality to the big screen.
A woke feminist journalist conflating asexuality with normal, sexual heteros simply not having sex:feelsbaton::feelsbaton:? I'm shocked, yikes sweaty, those stereotypes are not very progressive.

In South Korea there is a viral “4B” movement, which gets its name from the four types of bi or “no”: bihon, no heterosexual marriage; bichulsan, no childbirth; biyeonae, no dating; and bisekseu, no heterosexual sexual relationships.
Yeah, we are aware of them.


Also, as much as I cometimes can shit on JBW pushers, I'm definitely tempted to add "...until a white Chad steps out of the immigration office" to that description:feelskek::feelskek:.

In the US, generation Z comedian Hope Woodward has started a “boysober” trend, which involves straight young women eschewing dating.
I haven't been this happy to not have any idea what something was for quite some time. Also, not to be too lookist on an incel forum, but is this """comedian""" Amy Schumer-sized by any chance?

Multiple studies show that, around the world, more and more young people seem to be – quite happily – opting out of sex.
"You see all those virginity lines going up?:foidSoy::foidSoy: The same thing we were telling you wasn't happening? Well guess what inkwells, a new script just dropped, not only is it happening but it's actually good and everyone not having sex is happy, checkmate:foidSoy::foidSoy:!"

Thousands of words have been written about the great sex recession. It’s hardly some sort of underground trend.
Oh, so now it isn't:feelsgah::feelsahh:?

Nevertheless, Bumble, the dating app which once styled itself as a beacon of women’s empowerment because heterosexual women had to make the first move, appears to have missed the memo. A few weeks ago the company launched a global advertising campaign the point of which seemed to be to make casual sex great again. “A vow of celibacy is not the answer,” one billboard read. “Thou shalt not give up on dating and become a nun,” proclaimed another.
Oh so now, now, after years of endless repeating of the opposite, suddenly it's bad for women to be encouraged to be promiscuous and enjoy casual sex? Suddenly it's unfeminist?:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::feelsree:

And I love the barely disguised dislike of what Bumble is doing. Just a few years after endless MeToo drama, with women endlessly moaning how unsafe they feel around literally all men, suddenly an app which makes sure that it's women who initiate conversations so those supposed "creeps", who always just dare to exist and try talking to women while being under-average looks-wise, is somehow bad and unfeminist:feelsclown::feelsclown::feelsclown::feelsclown::feelsclown:.

The campaign – which Fast Company described as “eyebrow-raising”, “controversial” and “tone-deaf” – did not land well. Some critics pointed out that celibacy can be a response to trauma.
Gigamogs me if your "celibacy" is a response to drama, rather than just a continuing of it in a lifelong script of social exclusion:feelsseriously::feelsseriously::feelsseriously:.

“An intriguing 2011 study by Marie-Aude Boislard, François Poulin, and Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck offer more tantalizing clues. The researcher found that there is no singular route to adulthood virginity. While media attention has focused on young people purposefully choosing sexual abstinence, others seem to remain a virgin due to a lack of choice. And indeed this is an accurate description of the men that I have worked with. The study found that, during late childhood, individuals who matured into involuntary virgins were: more victimized and ridiculed by peers as children, socially withdrawn (preferred to play alone), and also less liked and accepted by their peers.


Others noted that abstaining from sex might be a smart move in a post-Roe US, where one accident could mean you are forced by repressive laws to give birth to a child you are not ready for and can’t possibly afford.
Of course, more "muh abortions:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:". Meanwhile, this is happening worldwide:feelsUgh::feelsUgh:.

“In a world fighting for respect and autonomy over our bodies, it’s appalling to see a dating platform undermine women’s choices,” tweeted Jordan Emanuel, a former Playboy model who made headlines after taking a vow of celibacy for a year.
The actor Julia Fox was similarly unimpressed. “2.5 years of celibacy and never been better tbh,” she commented on a post about Bumble. Fox hasn’t talked much about her celibacy but last year she told Elle that she just wanted to be left alone and was sick of men. “I feel like knowingly engaging in a heterosexual relationship, you are signing yourself up for an unhealthy dynamic,” she mused.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEE:reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee:. Fuck, this shit is making me so irrationally angry, fuck!

This shit is like when some rich Westerners come to dirt-poor third world countries, take a bunch of pics of the "beautiful, natural scenery" and post some bullshit "spiritual" quotes talking about how "liberating" it is to be away from their depressive work lives or whatever, while knowing full well that the underdeveloped, the so-called "natural" scenery they took pics of, with no modern technology or wealth in sight, is exactly the reason why the locals are so poor and underprivileged in comparison to their overprivileged Western asses.

Yet, while people will at least sometimes call out the Western rich kids dabbing on the locals in whatever LDC shithole they are spending their gap year in, nobody will react to rich, privileged and attractive women who can never have a problem getting sex whenever they'd want dabbing on the people suffering due to being unwanted and ostracized their entire lives by talking about how "great" celibacy is:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee:.

That said, the brouhaha over the “great Bumble fumble” (as the controversy is being termed), does point to a fascinating change in culture. Sex-positive feminism, which was all about unapologetically celebrating female sexuality, has been on the way out for a few years now, and this feels like its final death knell. To be fair, some sort of correction was probably due. Sex-positive feminism went from “hey, women shouldn’t feel ashamed about enjoying sex” to “it’s feminist to enjoy being choked while having lots of casual sex” alarmingly quickly.
And why was that:feelshmm::feelshmm:? Who was pushing and saying that stuff, which gender was that:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:?

It wasn't men saying that they felt empowered when they could choke women while fucking them, it was the empowered women themselves claiming that it's empowering to be in touch with their sexuality by being roughly fucked like whores while being choked and spat on, and that the submissives are the ones with true power in BDSM relationships anyway:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:. "Well yeah, the dominant can do whatever they want with their sub, but the moment the sub says it's over then it's over, the subs are the ones with the true power there:foidSoy::foidSoy::soy::soy:."

Reminds me of that Reddit experiment where they asked men and women what their ultimate sexual fantasy was. For men, it was pretty much just vanilla sex with a really hot, cute girl that liked them, the sex itself and what happened during it barely mattered as long as it was with an attractive, cute, kind girl who had true feelings for them. Meanwhile for women, the highest rated comment was some fucking objectification gangbang with multiple commenters replying to disbelieving males, saying that it indeed was hot to be treated like an object:feelskek::feelskek:.

What was meant to liberate women turned into a repackaging of the patriarchy. “It feels like we were tricked into exploiting ourselves,” one twentysomething told BuzzFeed, summing up the general vibe. A new passion for celibacy among young women feels like a natural way of putting that chapter of feminism to bed.
"W-w-w-w-we were tricked:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:." Tricked into WHAT you fucking cunt?! It was the feminists who ruthlessly rallied against anything that could curtail female sexuality, and you've gotten just that. After you did so, you freely shared, by the millions, what exactly you consider to be hot and what you are looking for. Which gender were the majority of people buying and reading 50 Shades of Gray again? Which gender were most people reading and watching 365 Dni?

The people who "tricked" you were other women and the only thing you were "tricked" into was revealing your collective desires, and now you don't like that, so you cry that this wasn't supposed to happen and that your choices and actions are men's fault:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.

Love how most feminists shit on TERFs, but when it comes to stuff they don't like, they can't deny their gender and act exactly like TERFs do. It's women who are more pro-trans than men, by a massive margin, it's women pushing for trans rights while men are disgusted by them (can personally confirm, saw two trannies today and I wish I didn't have to), it's overwhelmingly women who protest whenever some antisocial and criminal men kill a tranny, it's feminism that was pushing the LGBT (yes, T as well) bullshit for years, and then TERFs turn around and say that akshually, it's men who are pushing trannies and transgenderism and all of those pro-trans women, who are the clear, overwhelming majority of pro-trans people, are just manipulated victims puppettered by evil male masterminds to fight against their rights and interests:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.

Literally the exact same dynamic here, except with kinky sex and sex in general in place of trannies:lul::lul::lul:.
 
Yet, while people will at least sometimes call out the Western rich kids dabbing on the locals in whatever LDC shithole they are spending their gap year in, nobody will react to rich, privileged and attractive women who can never have a problem getting sex whenever they'd want dabbing on the people suffering due to being unwanted and ostracized their entire lives by talking about how "great" celibacy is:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee:.
We need to create a term for this shit. Sexhavers taking on a celibate identity to, if indirectly, mock our issues due to the fact that they are just performing it. Blacks have blackface, TERFs and tradcucks are pushing "womanface" for MtF trannies, since nobody gives a flying fuck about FtMs, is "celface" already taken?

Seems not, fucking celfacers:lasereyes::lasereyes::lasereyes:.
 
Women will always have promiscuous sex with Chads so its not like this changes anything. And its not like ugly incels were going to get any affection from women anyway
 
When they see chad theyll gladly leave 4b
 
Korea and shitmerica are the worst countries on earth
 
Giving up sex with sub8 (nothing has changed)
 
Tf is a terf
1716310569469
 
read every pixel... this shit pisses me the fuck off too the hypocrisy and absurdity of normies acting like voluntary celibacy is super fucking cool all of a sudden in enraging and laughable. celfacing is maddening
 
Let them be darwinned out of existence. Speed it up by Saint Ellioting
 
"W-w-w-w-we were tricked:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:." Tricked into WHAT you fucking cunt?! It was the feminists who ruthlessly rallied against anything that could curtail female sexuality, and you've gotten just that. After you did so, you freely shared, by the millions, what exactly you consider to be hot and what you are looking for. Which gender were the majority of people buying and reading 50 Shades of Gray again? Which gender were most people reading and watching 365 Dni?

The people who "tricked" you were other women and the only thing you were "tricked" into was revealing your collective desires, and now you don't like that, so you cry that this wasn't supposed to happen and that your choices and actions are men's fault:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.
Women claim that they get tricked and manipulated by basically everyone. Yet, they are supposed to be girl bosses at the same time?

They can't take responsibility for their actions. It is always that they were manipulated or tricked. They take advantage of the women are wonderful effect.
 
We need to create a term for this shit. Sexhavers taking on a celibate identity to, if indirectly, mock our issues due to the fact that they are just performing it. Blacks have blackface, TERFs and tradcucks are pushing "womanface" for MtF trannies, since nobody gives a flying fuck about FtMs, is "celface" already taken?

Seems not, fucking celfacers:lasereyes::lasereyes::lasereyes:.
Those are called fakecels
 
They're lying for attention.
 
while knowing full well that the underdeveloped, the so-called "natural" scenery they took pics of, with no modern technology or wealth in sight, is exactly the reason why the locals are so poor and underprivileged in comparison to their overprivileged Western asses.
Nah they’re just retarded 3rd worlders (they eat mud lmao)
 
They’re probably just bored of sex because they’ve been fucked a 100000000000000+ times
 
Women will always have promiscuous sex with Chads so its not like this changes anything. And its not like ugly incels were going to get any affection from women anyway
 
At this point it's only right to go ER on all Chads and torture Stacies for their hypocrisy and degeneracy. I cant anymore :feelsrope:
 
Then, have the sexhavers more difficult now?
 
This is all such a load of bullshit. Like the saying goes, "watch what they do, not what they say."
 
Good, the more women go on these panty whining type sex strikes the more male normalfags will be inclined to help us develop sex androids, We will replace you.
 
Oh no, the livestock are revolting again. Snore
 
I think toilets and society architects already know the discomfort of millions of men so they are doing damage control doing a diversion to center the problem on them while men rot in silence.
 

REEEEEEEEE:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee:. I fucking wish I was in a position to "give up", on sex, rather than sex giving up on me before I even had a chance to try it out:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree:.


Yeah, sure, voluntary celibacy is what is having its moment now:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.


"Muh Tiktok":foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:.

Jfl at writing "people" in an article meant for women, in a place where it obviously means women. Yeah, some volcel females are probably boasting about the fact that they are so sexually privileged that they can choose to not have sex, because they could get sex any time they wanted and are freely choosing not to, while a bunch of young guys are probably desperately explaining there how they aren't incels despite not being able to have sex whether they want it or not.


A woke feminist journalist conflating asexuality with normal, sexual heteros simply not having sex:feelsbaton::feelsbaton:? I'm shocked, yikes sweaty, those stereotypes are not very progressive.


Yeah, we are aware of them.


Also, as much as I cometimes can shit on JBW pushers, I'm definitely tempted to add "...until a white Chad steps out of the immigration office" to that description:feelskek::feelskek:.


I haven't been this happy to not have any idea what something was for quite some time. Also, not to be too lookist on an incel forum, but is this """comedian""" Amy Schumer-sized by any chance?


"You see all those virginity lines going up?:foidSoy::foidSoy: The same thing we were telling you wasn't happening? Well guess what inkwells, a new script just dropped, not only is it happening but it's actually good and everyone not having sex is happy, checkmate:foidSoy::foidSoy:!"


Oh, so now it isn't:feelsgah::feelsahh:?


Oh so now, now, after years of endless repeating of the opposite, suddenly it's bad for women to be encouraged to be promiscuous and enjoy casual sex? Suddenly it's unfeminist?:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::feelsree:

And I love the barely disguised dislike of what Bumble is doing. Just a few years after endless MeToo drama, with women endlessly moaning how unsafe they feel around literally all men, suddenly an app which makes sure that it's women who initiate conversations so those supposed "creeps", who always just dare to exist and try talking to women while being under-average looks-wise, is somehow bad and unfeminist:feelsclown::feelsclown::feelsclown::feelsclown::feelsclown:.


Gigamogs me if your "celibacy" is a response to drama, rather than just a continuing of it in a lifelong script of social exclusion:feelsseriously::feelsseriously::feelsseriously:.





Of course, more "muh abortions:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:". Meanwhile, this is happening worldwide:feelsUgh::feelsUgh:.



REEEEEEEEEEEEEE:reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee:. Fuck, this shit is making me so irrationally angry, fuck!

This shit is like when some rich Westerners come to dirt-poor third world countries, take a bunch of pics of the "beautiful, natural scenery" and post some bullshit "spiritual" quotes talking about how "liberating" it is to be away from their depressive work lives or whatever, while knowing full well that the underdeveloped, the so-called "natural" scenery they took pics of, with no modern technology or wealth in sight, is exactly the reason why the locals are so poor and underprivileged in comparison to their overprivileged Western asses.

Yet, while people will at least sometimes call out the Western rich kids dabbing on the locals in whatever LDC shithole they are spending their gap year in, nobody will react to rich, privileged and attractive women who can never have a problem getting sex whenever they'd want dabbing on the people suffering due to being unwanted and ostracized their entire lives by talking about how "great" celibacy is:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee:.


And why was that:feelshmm::feelshmm:? Who was pushing and saying that stuff, which gender was that:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:?

It wasn't men saying that they felt empowered when they could choke women while fucking them, it was the empowered women themselves claiming that it's empowering to be in touch with their sexuality by being roughly fucked like whores while being choked and spat on, and that the submissives are the ones with true power in BDSM relationships anyway:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:. "Well yeah, the dominant can do whatever they want with their sub, but the moment the sub says it's over then it's over, the subs are the ones with the true power there:foidSoy::foidSoy::soy::soy:."

Reminds me of that Reddit experiment where they asked men and women what their ultimate sexual fantasy was. For men, it was pretty much just vanilla sex with a really hot, cute girl that liked them, the sex itself and what happened during it barely mattered as long as it was with an attractive, cute, kind girl who had true feelings for them. Meanwhile for women, the highest rated comment was some fucking objectification gangbang with multiple commenters replying to disbelieving males, saying that it indeed was hot to be treated like an object:feelskek::feelskek:.


"W-w-w-w-we were tricked:foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy::foidSoy:." Tricked into WHAT you fucking cunt?! It was the feminists who ruthlessly rallied against anything that could curtail female sexuality, and you've gotten just that. After you did so, you freely shared, by the millions, what exactly you consider to be hot and what you are looking for. Which gender were the majority of people buying and reading 50 Shades of Gray again? Which gender were most people reading and watching 365 Dni?

The people who "tricked" you were other women and the only thing you were "tricked" into was revealing your collective desires, and now you don't like that, so you cry that this wasn't supposed to happen and that your choices and actions are men's fault:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.

Love how most feminists shit on TERFs, but when it comes to stuff they don't like, they can't deny their gender and act exactly like TERFs do. It's women who are more pro-trans than men, by a massive margin, it's women pushing for trans rights while men are disgusted by them (can personally confirm, saw two trannies today and I wish I didn't have to), it's overwhelmingly women who protest whenever some antisocial and criminal men kill a tranny, it's feminism that was pushing the LGBT (yes, T as well) bullshit for years, and then TERFs turn around and say that akshually, it's men who are pushing trannies and transgenderism and all of those pro-trans women, who are the clear, overwhelming majority of pro-trans people, are just manipulated victims puppettered by evil male masterminds to fight against their rights and interests:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:.

Literally the exact same dynamic here, except with kinky sex and sex in general in place of trannies:lul::lul::lul:.
We now know what will happen if hypothetically all htn+ men die. Women would become asexual altogether
 
Imagine believing titles like that

“Giving up on sex” means not being in a relationship while having casual sex with chad on the week end
 
We now know what will happen if hypothetically all htn+ men die. Women would become asexual altogether
Foids would have with each other if all else fails. They can always have easy access to sex even WITHOUT men. Swearing off men forever doesn't necessarily make them asexual or chaste.
 
Foids would have with each other if all else fails. They can always have easy access to sex even WITHOUT men. Swearing off men forever doesn't necessarily make them asexual or chaste.
and dogs and bears
 
15 inches even bigger than Tyrones 13 inches
 
Oh yeah them horses got bhc (big horse cock)
Submissiveness inherently comes a need to be degraded on some level and on most kink/fetish sites, according to the data and by every metric, the vast majority of sluts are sexually submissive in bed. So they get turned on by getting degraded and the more degrading the sexual act they're made to perform and forced to put into action, the more horny they become.
Coitus with animals is the height of degradation of them because submitting to an animal is far humiliating than submitting to a human male, so submissive womeme will always find the thought of sex with animals as innately more sexually appealing than submitting to degrading acts by a human. And since most foids are subs, this means most girls will prefer hardcore sex acts with an animal that degrades them over having sex with a guy.
 
Last edited:
Submissiveness inherently comes a need to be degraded on some level and on most kink/fetish sites, according to the data and by every metric, the vast majority of sluts are sexually submissive in bed. So they get turned on by getting degraded and the more degrading the sexual act they're made to perform and forced to put into action, the more horny they become.
Coitus with animals is the height of degradation of them because submitting to an animal is far humiliating than submitting to a human male, so submissive womeme will always find the thought of sex with animals as innately more sexually appealing than submitting to degrading by a human. And since most foids are subs, this means most girls will prefer hardcore sex acts with an animal that degrades them over having sex with a guy.
Unless it’s a chad on tyrone
 
I wonder how many time it would take for western soyciety to realize they have to solve the foid question in Minecraft in not-so-liberal way.
 
Here women get articles for not having sex for one year, meanwhile I am a 35 year old virgin.

In one hand, it is actually positive that women refuse to have sex so even normie men gets pissed off. It means more and more men get angry, and it means the higher the chance that women will lose their right one day in world of warcraft.
 
Well there you go, South Korea is about to become leaders in the android gf revolution, good job korean roasties :feelshaha:
 
is foids werent so addicted to chad theyd stop getting fucked over. im sure theyll just use instathots more to continue being whores
 

Similar threads

fukurou
Replies
15
Views
259
HomicidalSuicidal88
HomicidalSuicidal88
Gorogorogoro-chan
Replies
5
Views
129
Lonelyus
Lonelyus
packardD
Replies
5
Views
173
BlueCore
BlueCore
Balding Subhuman
Replies
1
Views
116
Balding Subhuman
Balding Subhuman

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top