Copexodius Maximus
Mentally destroyed by reality
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2020
- Posts
- 50,973
Overview of the study:
1) Women use competitor manipulation as a form of intrasexual competition.
2) Highly competitive women advised hypothetical salon clients to cut off more hair.
3) Women told clients of similar attractiveness as themselves to cut off the most hair.
4) Female intrasexual competition may be assortative with respect to mate quality.
5) Female intrasexual competition manifests without any contextual cues to mating
Now why would they do all this? I thought it was the evil patriarchy holding women down, and women all looked out for one another? Well the inteoduction gets to the point.
But as the first line of the introduction says, women don’t physically attack their competition, and that “intrasexual competition between women is often covert, and targets rivals' appearance.” Maybe this is why so many women look like ugly dykes these days: widespread competition removal at a societal level.
This study also has many other damning blackpills in it that people would claim the paper was written by some incel jfl. When talking about behaviours through which it is done, the introduction says:
When talking about female aggression:
And if you though it couldn’t get any more misogynistic, the study says something so misogynistic that it might actually even shock some of you on this forum.
This not only explains why women hate sluts (while being one themselves) in our society, but also in religious orthodox societies as well. It’s artificial market inflation no different than a wallstreet investor artificially raising the price of stocks to steal money from working class people.
1) Women use competitor manipulation as a form of intrasexual competition.
2) Highly competitive women advised hypothetical salon clients to cut off more hair.
3) Women told clients of similar attractiveness as themselves to cut off the most hair.
4) Female intrasexual competition may be assortative with respect to mate quality.
5) Female intrasexual competition manifests without any contextual cues to mating
Now why would they do all this? I thought it was the evil patriarchy holding women down, and women all looked out for one another? Well the inteoduction gets to the point.
What this boils down to is this: mogging is relative. If you want a mate, women have to either mog their competition or wipe them out.Reproductive success is ultimately relative. Individuals can therefore improve their own net reproductive success by negatively impacting the reproductive success of same sex rivals. For females, reproductive success hinges on gaining access to the highest quality males, while preventing rivals from doing the same (Rosvall, 2011). To this end, women engage in intrasexual competition to reduce their female rivals' mate value, and to influence males' mate choices, to ultimately maximise their own net reproductive success.
But as the first line of the introduction says, women don’t physically attack their competition, and that “intrasexual competition between women is often covert, and targets rivals' appearance.” Maybe this is why so many women look like ugly dykes these days: widespread competition removal at a societal level.
This study also has many other damning blackpills in it that people would claim the paper was written by some incel jfl. When talking about behaviours through which it is done, the introduction says:
Wow, this sounds just like how women treat incels. I guess maybe their female competition also just happens to have bad personalities who need to take showers.It may include gossiping, derogation, and exclusion (Buss, 1988; Reynolds et al., 2018)
This sound exactly like when women online gaslight incels by saying things like “you’re not ugly, it’s just your personality” or by saying “women don’t even care about looks”. This is to make sure we keep running after them, and maximizes their relative mate value when we don’t artificially decrease demand by LDAR.as well as rival manipulation via dishonest or disingenuous advice (such as telling another woman that her clothing is flattering when it is not, Fisher & Cox, 2011)
When talking about female aggression:
Wait, did these pedophiles just say competition is the highest for young women in their adolescence and early adulthood? Clearly this study was funded by the National Association of Misogynist Incel Studies.It tends to peak around adolescence and early adulthood, when competition for mates is high (Archer, 2004; Hess & Hagen, 2006; Verona et al., 2008)
And if you though it couldn’t get any more misogynistic, the study says something so misogynistic that it might actually even shock some of you on this forum.
These crypto-incel scientists are saying that women aren’t just damaging a woman’s long term prospects by accusations of being promiscuous, but artificially inflating the price of sex so actual sluts stand down or hide that shit so other females won’t have those expectations from their future beta-husbands. Chad sex for me, but not for thee.Female indirect aggression frequently targets aspects of rivals that men prize in prospective long-term partners: attractiveness (Fisher, 2004) and chastity (Campbell, 1995, although indirect aggression in response to promiscuity may be less about damaging a promiscuous rival's reputation, and more about policing the price of sex to keep it high, see Ayers & Goetz, 2022; Regnerus, 2012; Vaillancourt, 2013).
This not only explains why women hate sluts (while being one themselves) in our society, but also in religious orthodox societies as well. It’s artificial market inflation no different than a wallstreet investor artificially raising the price of stocks to steal money from working class people.
Last edited: