Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Study says that women's looks don't matter when it comes to dating

Balding Subhuman

Balding Subhuman

If you're ugly, women want you dead
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 4, 2021
Posts
8,306

Even studies refute the existence of femcels.

"Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating (Table 4). There were no statistically significant differences between them in terms of their attractiveness. Level of attractiveness did matter, however, depending on the social class of origin. This will be discussed later. In general, these results corroborated the first hypothesis for males, but not for women. Less attractive males were less likely to find a partner than the rest; but these differences were not found among women."

"The study highlighted some important facts. First, that physical attractiveness matters for males to find a partner and for the type of partner they find. The less attractive are less likely to find a partner who is a graduate, or someone with a higher education level. This phenomenon did not happen in women. They all formed partnerships equally."
 

Attachments

  • being unattractive.png
    being unattractive.png
    107.9 KB · Views: 43

Even studies refute the existence of femcels.

"Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating (Table 4). There were no statistically significant differences between them in terms of their attractiveness. Level of attractiveness did matter, however, depending on the social class of origin. This will be discussed later. In general, these results corroborated the first hypothesis for males, but not for women. Less attractive males were less likely to find a partner than the rest; but these differences were not found among women."

"The study highlighted some important facts. First, that physical attractiveness matters for males to find a partner and for the type of partner they find. The less attractive are less likely to find a partner who is a graduate, or someone with a higher education level. This phenomenon did not happen in women. They all formed partnerships equally."
I wonder how feminists will twist that to mean that they are only valued for their looks :feelskek:
 
Just exist mode strikes again
 

Even studies refute the existence of femcels.

"Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating (Table 4). There were no statistically significant differences between them in terms of their attractiveness. Level of attractiveness did matter, however, depending on the social class of origin. This will be discussed later. In general, these results corroborated the first hypothesis for males, but not for women. Less attractive males were less likely to find a partner than the rest; but these differences were not found among women."

"The study highlighted some important facts. First, that physical attractiveness matters for males to find a partner and for the type of partner they find. The less attractive are less likely to find a partner who is a graduate, or someone with a higher education level. This phenomenon did not happen in women. They all formed partnerships equally."
The power of Sandbox mode. Nothing you can do but laugh at this point.
 
CREATIVE MODE
CHEATS ACTIVATED
 
Things a female has to do in order to find a mate:

- Exist.
- Have holes.
 
it's true. my oneitis is old and ugly as shit
 
Men: need looks, college degree, money, status, everything

Women: just exist :feelsokman:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top