Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [STUDY] Inexperienced men have lower standards than experienced men

Edmund_Kemper

Edmund_Kemper

Disregard my username. I can’t change it.
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Posts
25,338
Online
294d 13h 10m
You know how bluepilled cuckfags tell involuntary celibates to lower their standards and stop chasing women out of their league? Well, it turns out, that inexperienced men don't typically do that. they have lower physical standards. Link to study here.

110 volunteers with 47 male and 63 female (mean age=22.36 years, SD=3.64) (the vast majority of them were heterosexual) participated in this study.
In the framework of the “Tinder” task, participants indicated their romantic and sexual interest in a first step. Therefore, they were asked in which gender they are primarily interested in (opposite gender: Nmales = 45 and Nfemales = 61; same gender: Nmales = 2 and Nfemales = 2; notably, we avoided the terms hetero-, homo- and bisexual at this point since this item was to determine whether pictures of men or women were shown subsequently). Depending on their answer, they were then shown pictures of either 40 female or 40 male medium attractive faces. On 20 pictures, participants indicated their romantic interest. This involved three items to be answered on a 1 = not at all to 6 = very much response scale (“I would like to take up contact with this person to get to know her/him romantically”, “I would like to arrange a romantic date with this person”, “I would like to meet this person on a romantic date”; α = 0.95). On the other 20 pictures, participants indicated their sexual interest. Therefore, they responded to the same three items as before; however, the word “romantic” was replaced with the word “sexual” (α = 0.97). Which of the 40 pictures were shown for the romantic and sexual category was randomized across participants, as well as the order in which they were shown.

Next paragraph right below but read this: according to the methodology, they wanted to use average-looking people because it's the best way to measure how high a person's standards can be (because many people get attracted to conventionally attractive people but not many like ugly people. Apparently, women are more conventionally attractive than men on average:
The stimulus materials for the “Tinder” task was created as follows: A total of 271 pictures of friendly-looking faces was pretested for their level of attractivity. These pictures were obtained from a social media platform to appear as naturally as possible. Thirty-one participants indicated how attractive they experienced each of the depicted persons on a 1 = not at all to 8 = very much response scale. Those 80 pictures which ranged most closely around the mean were chosen for the OT study (male: M = 2.91, SD = 0.90, Min = 1.33, Max = 5.40; female: M = 3.63, SD = 0.90, Min = 1.81, Max = 5.63).

Screen Shot 2021 11 28 at 24454 PM
Screen Shot 2021 11 28 at 24505 PM


In the study, inexperienced men had more romantic/sexual interest in a woman with medium physical attractiveness. Oxytocin made inexperienced men more selective. Inexperienced men were more romantically interested in medium attractiveness women than experienced men. In other words, they were less selective than experienced men. With oxytocin, inexperienced men were only slightly less interested romantically in medium attractiveness women than experienced men (in other words: only slightly more selective). When it came to romantic interest, oxytocin made both experienced and inexperienced men more selective, especially inexperienced men. It reduced romantic interest for both types of men, especially inexperienced men. Inexperienced men had more sexual interest in medium attractiveness women than experienced men, but less sexual interest in medium attractiveness women than experienced men when the men all were taking oxytocin. Oxytocin reduced sexual interest in inexperienced men but did not affect sexual interest in experienced men. In short, inexperienced men are less selective than experienced men, but are slightly more selective and officially more selective than experienced men when it comes to oxytocin. Inexperienced men have their romantic/sexual interest reduced with oxytocin.

On the other hand, inexperienced women were slightly less romantically interested in medium-attractiveness men than experienced women, therefore slightly more picky than experienced women. Under oxytocin, however, they were officially more romantically interested in medium attractiveness men than experienced women (AKA less selective than experienced women). Oxytocin increased romantic interest in inexperienced women but decreased romantic interest in experienced women. When it came to sexual interest, they were a little less sexually interested in medium attractiveness men than experienced women (AKA a little pickier than experienced women), but officially more sexually interested in medium attractiveness men than experienced women when both were under oxytocin (AKA less picky than experienced women). Oxytocin reduced sexual interest in experienced women but slightly increased sexual interest in inexperienced women. In short, inexperienced women are a little pickier than experienced women romantically/sexually but less picky than experienced women romantically/sexually when it comes oxytocin. Oxytocin increased interest levels in inexperienced women but reduced interest levels in experienced women.

Men had more romantic interest in average looking women than women did in average looking men (although inexperienced women but not experienced women had just as much romantic interest as men in average-looking people of the opposite sex). When it came to sexual interest, both experienced men and inexperienced men were both more sexually interested in the opposite sex's average looking women than women (both experienced and inexperienced) were sexually interested in average-looking men regardless of oxytocin.

TL;DR SUMMARY

In short, inexperienced men have lower physical standards than experienced men (both sexually and romantically), but when under oxytocin, their romantic physical standards were slightly higher than experienced men's when it came to romantic interest and officially higher than experienced men's when it came to sexual interest. Oxytocin raised inexperienced men's physical standards romantically and sexually, but only raised experienced men's romantic physical standards (although it raised inexperienced men's romantic physical standards even more). Inexperienced women had slightly higher physically standards romantically/sexually than experienced women but are less picky with their physical standards romantically/sexually than experienced women under oxytocin. Oxytocin reduced inexperienced women's romantic standards but only slightly reduced her sexual standards, whereas it increased experienced women's both sexual and romantic standards.

So this idea that male involuntary celibates chase women outta their league? It's a myth. Quite the opposite actually.

MORE IMPORTANT DATA

Screen Shot 2021 11 28 at 61110 PM

Men show more romantic interest and sexual interest in average looking people of the opposite sex than women, regardless of oxytocin. This is shown in this table right here above.

The sample size might not be big, but this study's results are noteworthy, especially given this quote:
Promoting an appropriate form of selectiveness might be particularly adaptive for the inexperienced (men). Experienced and inexperienced individuals vary in their expectations in romantic and sexual relationships and corresponding behaviors Due to fear of failure, inexperienced individuals are especially non-selective in their dating strategy. This, however, is not adaptive to find a suitable partner, particularly in more demanding courtships in which males must discriminate between those to be courted and those to be ignored. Since OT promotes a more adaptive pair-bonding strategy, we hypothesized OT to increase selectivity particularly among the inexperienced men.

And people here, contrary to what IT say, have low physical standards.

"Stop chasing girls outta your league. Lower your standards.:soy:"DEBUNKED

@SergeantIncel pin this
 
Last edited:
N

NikRebi

Fuck this gay forum, find me in the sewers.
-
Joined
Nov 18, 2021
Posts
3,689
Online
5d 15h 49m
Havent read but @SergeantIncel pin this
Also holy fuck you need 8 different phds to understand a single fucking sentence ngl
 
Edmund_Kemper

Edmund_Kemper

Disregard my username. I can’t change it.
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Posts
25,338
Online
294d 13h 10m
Havent read but @SergeantIncel pin this
Also holy fuck you need 8 different phds to understand a single fucking sentence ngl
when people say that we only chase girls out of their league. its a myth. standardcels are an exception instead of the rule.

Besides, people here have low physical standards contrary to what IT will tell you (don't beLIEve anything IT says. they think we only want gigastacies which is self-evidently BS).
 
N

NikRebi

Fuck this gay forum, find me in the sewers.
-
Joined
Nov 18, 2021
Posts
3,689
Online
5d 15h 49m
when people say that we only chase girls out of their league. its a myth. standardcels are an exception instead of the rule.

Besides, people here have low physical standards contrary to what IT will tell you (don't beLIEve anything IT says. they think we only want gigastacies which is self-evidently BS).
Yeah i read it. Must read section worthy ngl :feelswhere:
 
Z

Zer0/∞

Only the ugly and autistic can be incel!
-
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Posts
14,461
Online
183d 13h 44m
when people say that we only chase girls out of their league. its a myth. standardcels are an exception instead of the rule.

Besides, people here have low physical standards contrary to what IT will tell you (don't beLIEve anything IT says. they think we only want gigastacies which is self-evidently BS).
Self-Proclaimed "Standardcels" don't exist: they would fuck a 300lb single mother if it meant they could finally experience love and escape loneliness.
:yes:, most men here think they are not desperate unlike simps, but the fact is if a woman gave them any chance, they would do everything to keep her.

These threads about standards are all for show.
 
nice_try

nice_try

Chad always wins
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Posts
11,851
Online
102d 41m
i don't know why you would make such a thread just to proof that I don't have standards.
you could've just posted the following
1638144672672
 
Oroborus

Oroborus

Day Gaming
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 14, 2020
Posts
6,417
Online
120d 2h 19m
Oxitocyn pill destroyed me
 
Edmund_Kemper

Edmund_Kemper

Disregard my username. I can’t change it.
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Posts
25,338
Online
294d 13h 10m
i don't know why you would make such a thread just to proof that I don't have standards.
you could've just posted the following
View attachment 538248
because people unironically think that incels are all standardcels which is a myth. using statistics and research papers to debunk them is useful.
 
Broly

Broly

ARYAN DARK N HANDSOME R1A MOGGER SAVIOR OF WHITES
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Posts
32,342
Online
207d 7h 27m
Self-Proclaimed "Standardcels" don't exist: they would fuck a 300lb single mother if it meant they could finally experience love and escape loneliness.
I would reject her as I have no attraction to women like that. I will not go for women far below my looks level and be a contributor to the already rampant hypergamy in society. While I am not making a claim that those women want me in the first place, I’m speaking about a hypothetical situation. Before any accusations are made, I can’t be called “fakecel” or “volcel” because of a made-up situation.
 
Edmund_Kemper

Edmund_Kemper

Disregard my username. I can’t change it.
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Posts
25,338
Online
294d 13h 10m
@Shigechi you made a thread about how people think we only want gigastacies.
 
Shigechi

Shigechi

MSTOW for life
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 16, 2019
Posts
5,466
Online
233d 23h 18m
@Shigechi you made a thread about how people think we only want gigastacies.
Brutal, like always the soytards only know to project and deny reality.
 
Edmund_Kemper

Edmund_Kemper

Disregard my username. I can’t change it.
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Posts
25,338
Online
294d 13h 10m
Brutal, like always the soytards only know to project and deny reality.
incels don't struggle with getting girls because their standards are too high, they struggle because they never got the attention of a woman for all kinds of possible reasons.
 
0Energy0Happyness

0Energy0Happyness

Everything is a consequence of looks
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Posts
6,191
Online
55d 2h 12m
One more bluepill being destroyed, BLACKPILL only gets stronger every day
 
D

Deleted member 16484

Self-banned
-
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Posts
14,077
Online
89d 1h 46m
IT won't touch this
 
AutisticMonstrosity

AutisticMonstrosity

32 years old kissless virgin
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Posts
2,958
Online
80d 14h 55m
I will not go for women far below my looks level
You are a big liar. You should be banned for lying. You have said numerous times that you are the biggest truecel here (while posting your photo elsewhere showing that you have above average face). How can anyone be below your looks level, not to mention "far below", IF you have NOT lied?

You are fakecel and only 17.

You have posted "mogs me" multiple times to the pictures of really ugly or/and deformed faces. Those are lies also. When I have written "mogs me", I mean it 100 % and have made a careful analysis.

You are comparable to the Legendarywristcel who was very attractive while claiming big truecel status.

(of course this is just a one user I hate here, I think the average user here is more attractive than the average man in the world while there are some actual users here who are actual truecels)
 
Snowman888

Snowman888

Veteran
Joined
May 7, 2018
Posts
1,072
Online
13d 5h 22m
ITS CALLED BLUEPILL :bluepill::bluepill::bluepill:
 
S

Shuttlescoff

Greycel
Joined
Nov 25, 2021
Posts
28
Online
7h 12m
Yeah...no I'm inexperienced and I'm not going near a foid with a body count over 0, i have 0 body count and so should my significant other
Self-Proclaimed "Standardcels" don't exist: they would fuck a 300lb single mother if it meant they could finally experience love and escape loneliness.
Hahaha wake up, I'm mental Purcell virgin and my standard is unachievable because most foids have had their fucking fun(became a roastie). I want balance but that doesn't exist, I will die a virgin:blackpill:
 
Last edited:
Michinomiya Hirohit

Michinomiya Hirohit

emperor
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Posts
11,465
Online
124d 9h 29m
when people say that we only chase girls out of their league. its a myth. standardcels are an exception instead of the rule.

Besides, people here have low physical standards contrary to what IT will tell you (don't beLIEve anything IT says. they think we only want gigastacies which is self-evidently BS).
 
Subhuman Niceguy

Subhuman Niceguy

Wizard
★★★
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Posts
4,248
Online
28d 17h 47m
My expectations for a foid
  • Don't be fat
  • Don't be a nigger
  • Don't post on IT
  • Don't fuck dogs (that might be too much to ask)
 
Loner94

Loner94

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 30, 2020
Posts
5,868
Online
82d 14h 41m
Spyisnotourspy

Spyisnotourspy

Gymcel
Joined
Jan 6, 2020
Posts
57
Online
14h 47m
If I were to lower my standards I’d just put my dick in the ground, can’t get any lower than were I’m at tbh
 
WTF?

WTF?

I am the only real doomer. All others are copy
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Posts
37
Online
22h 23m
No excuse for fucking fat and ugly bitches!
 
Liliputin

Liliputin

gymrat; drugcel
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Posts
44
Online
1d 8h 27m
high IQ post that proves the sole existence of pills
 
wasted12years

wasted12years

Legend
★★★★
Joined
Aug 15, 2018
Posts
3,894
Online
76d 4h 31m
Yes i have low standards tbh. I'd rather be with a chubby or fat foid with an average to below average face, than a skinny to almost anorexic foid with a pretty face.
 

Similar threads

idk125
Replies
14
Views
487
CursedFlesh
CursedFlesh
Edmund_Kemper
Replies
58
Views
5K
hondas2000cel
hondas2000cel
Pillow City Rev
Replies
13
Views
2K
imanuglysob
I
W
Replies
10
Views
574
living
living
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape7
shape8
Top