L
It's completely insane that overt sexualization of women who wear skimpy, revealing, explicitly 'sexy' labelled clothing in environments where they don't even have to ( Award shows, Oscars, Galas, Raves, Bars, College, whatever ) is delegitimized and demonized in the name of a convoluted western 'social norm' taboo which exists purely to cater to female fragility, high disgust and histrionics and serve as a blatant double standard which lacks any ethical validity.
But since diverting the attention of any sane human from the obvious is impossible, and since women still want to facilitate sexually charged attention from the *right* demographic of males and the recognition thereof from other women, a full Orwellian game has been invented wherein you are allowed to 'scratch the surface' and walk on eggshells regarding the feelings that everyone understands are transpiring and hope you won't fall off the tightrope to some livid woman while doing so.
You'll see a woman wearing an exposed open back dress with a low-cut dress turning around, and you might get away with a generalized comment that she's 'beautiful' or 'stunning'. But if you ever dare to delve into the actual graphical explanation of just *what* actually makes her 'beautiful or 'stunning' and arouses your attention, AKA the contours of her waist or her skin or the size of her thighs, suddenly you're in creepy 'wrong' territory. This is a patently Orwellian structure by which the underlying, pragmatic expression of an euphemistic statement is punishable even as the euphemistic statement itself somehow remains acceptable.
Now I am actually more favorable to etiquette which actually has some element of *fairness* or morality ( A-la The Golden Rule ) behind it than a lot of 'Sticks and stones may break my bones' or 'Unapologetic bros' or frankly most normies on the internet in general at least where *men* are concerned, because they only have a soft spot for women, but I understand in principle why you wouldn't want to yap about someone, at least without provocation, being fat or ugly, having a speech impediment, wearing rags, having weird features, etc, which a lot of whiteknights certainly couldn't care less about as long as it's a man.
Anything beyond someone's control, anything that I don't have a reason to bring up *except* for just verbal abuse, obviously there is a clear moral barrier here. Even, principally ( Because this social contract is no longer always adhered to ), the avoidance of sexualizing men or women who are actively trying to minimize physical distractions, that can be understandably respected if done consistently:
There is a reason why, *even* in Western culture - pussy-whipped and warped as it is, you still can't wear your slutty wardrobe fits which you might even use as your everyday college attire or while walking the dog when you are working as a doctor for example, or as a politician in Congress, or in government hearings. Because that wouldn't be the case if those were 'just normal clothes' that we all need to 'learn to control ourselves around'. The fact there are still some places where you are compelled to cover yourself up like a *man* would rather than deliberately baring your back, shoulders, stomach, legs, back and cleavage exemplifies pretty clearly why those women's outfits are available to women.
That's another instance where it makes sense - You're wearing a *proper* shirt and pants or suit or not showing off like every man in your position does, but you still have poking tits and an ass that you don't want to hear about, fine. At least until we catch you welcoming it from a hot guy or being a hypocrite and doing it yourself to the new hot male coworker.
But flaunting your body *and* imposing various rules for everyone about how to remark on it? Nah, that capricious bullshit enforced by armies of whiteknights and fear of wrongthink needs to disappear. It's already taken for granted that if I get Neon hair tomorrow, I shouldn't be taken seriously complaining people talked about my neon hair too much for my liking. If I wear a shirt full of holes either as a fashion statement or to show my skin in style or whatever the fuck, even if I wore a goddamn crop top as a man, nobody is going to give me sympathy that the public called out my body or appearance. Nobody gives a shit how many gay men are saying they want to slurp some posing bodybuilder's biceps or how many women are micro-analyzing male features ( Except they like to do it with faces too which you are born with ).
And if a woman is showing body parts in public, everyone should be free to say whatever they want about them for however long.
But since diverting the attention of any sane human from the obvious is impossible, and since women still want to facilitate sexually charged attention from the *right* demographic of males and the recognition thereof from other women, a full Orwellian game has been invented wherein you are allowed to 'scratch the surface' and walk on eggshells regarding the feelings that everyone understands are transpiring and hope you won't fall off the tightrope to some livid woman while doing so.
You'll see a woman wearing an exposed open back dress with a low-cut dress turning around, and you might get away with a generalized comment that she's 'beautiful' or 'stunning'. But if you ever dare to delve into the actual graphical explanation of just *what* actually makes her 'beautiful or 'stunning' and arouses your attention, AKA the contours of her waist or her skin or the size of her thighs, suddenly you're in creepy 'wrong' territory. This is a patently Orwellian structure by which the underlying, pragmatic expression of an euphemistic statement is punishable even as the euphemistic statement itself somehow remains acceptable.
Now I am actually more favorable to etiquette which actually has some element of *fairness* or morality ( A-la The Golden Rule ) behind it than a lot of 'Sticks and stones may break my bones' or 'Unapologetic bros' or frankly most normies on the internet in general at least where *men* are concerned, because they only have a soft spot for women, but I understand in principle why you wouldn't want to yap about someone, at least without provocation, being fat or ugly, having a speech impediment, wearing rags, having weird features, etc, which a lot of whiteknights certainly couldn't care less about as long as it's a man.
Anything beyond someone's control, anything that I don't have a reason to bring up *except* for just verbal abuse, obviously there is a clear moral barrier here. Even, principally ( Because this social contract is no longer always adhered to ), the avoidance of sexualizing men or women who are actively trying to minimize physical distractions, that can be understandably respected if done consistently:
There is a reason why, *even* in Western culture - pussy-whipped and warped as it is, you still can't wear your slutty wardrobe fits which you might even use as your everyday college attire or while walking the dog when you are working as a doctor for example, or as a politician in Congress, or in government hearings. Because that wouldn't be the case if those were 'just normal clothes' that we all need to 'learn to control ourselves around'. The fact there are still some places where you are compelled to cover yourself up like a *man* would rather than deliberately baring your back, shoulders, stomach, legs, back and cleavage exemplifies pretty clearly why those women's outfits are available to women.
That's another instance where it makes sense - You're wearing a *proper* shirt and pants or suit or not showing off like every man in your position does, but you still have poking tits and an ass that you don't want to hear about, fine. At least until we catch you welcoming it from a hot guy or being a hypocrite and doing it yourself to the new hot male coworker.
But flaunting your body *and* imposing various rules for everyone about how to remark on it? Nah, that capricious bullshit enforced by armies of whiteknights and fear of wrongthink needs to disappear. It's already taken for granted that if I get Neon hair tomorrow, I shouldn't be taken seriously complaining people talked about my neon hair too much for my liking. If I wear a shirt full of holes either as a fashion statement or to show my skin in style or whatever the fuck, even if I wore a goddamn crop top as a man, nobody is going to give me sympathy that the public called out my body or appearance. Nobody gives a shit how many gay men are saying they want to slurp some posing bodybuilder's biceps or how many women are micro-analyzing male features ( Except they like to do it with faces too which you are born with ).
And if a woman is showing body parts in public, everyone should be free to say whatever they want about them for however long.
Last edited:
.
