Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Media Star Wars: the racial-civilisational subtext

Redbeard7

Redbeard7

Banned
-
Joined
Feb 15, 2024
Posts
360
Online time
2h 56m
Many criticise modern films such as Disney’s post-Lucas Star Wars sequels for their overt "leftist" political messaging, claiming that Hollywood has been "infiltrated" by “woke” ideologues (who were in fact there from its inception). And there is no doubt that the Disney Star Wars films are thinly-veiled political allegory, regardless of what Bob Iger says:

“Please note that the Empire is a white supremacist (human) organization.” - Chris Weitz

“…Opposed by a multicultural group led by brave women.” - Gary Whitta

But from a pro-European perspective, the original Star Wars trilogy (1977-1983) was replete with ethno-suicidal themes; the symbolism was always much the same. This should not be surprising: George Lucas is one of Hollywood's most successful directors, he's been a "leftist" since his student days at the latest and has since married an African woman, with whom he had his first biological child.

The key collective conflict in Star Wars is between the Empire and the Rebel Alliance.

The Empire: totalitarian, inhuman (faceless "Stormtroopers", most iconic figure is a cyborg), homogeneous/uniform, cold/austere, dictatorial, ultra-technological, genocidal (destroys the planet which looks most similar to Earth, Alderaan), exclusively patriarchal (women are never seen among its ranks) and Northern European at core, a hybrid of Nazi Germany and the British Empire (the nation which opposed Nazism the longest, making the Empire a stand-in for the traditional Western order generally)

The Rebels: multiracial (Lando Calrissian), multispecies (Chewbacca), droid-inclusive (C-3P0, R2-D2), gender egalitarian (founded and led by a woman Mon Mothma and Leia is one of the three biggest heroes, implied to have Jedi potential similar to Luke's: "There is another" - Yoda), third worldist-coded coalition, the Empire’s symbolic inversion and antithesis

The primary philosophical battle is between the Jedi and the Sith. The Jedi are a monastic order led by Yoda; a humanoid midget alien and Asian-coded sage, whereas the Sith are led by a grotesque and seemingly decrepit British-accented Emperor.

Jedi: Christianity, Buddhism, Taoism, Stoicism

Sith: Darwinism, Nietzscheanism, Machiavellianism, Sadism

The former is a universalist metaphysical syncretism broadly aligned with liberalism while the latter is strongly aligned with anti-Christian European philosophy and Nazism.

On a more personal level, the conflict is between Aryan protagonist Luke Skywalker and his father Darth (a portmanteau of dark and death) Vader (an abbreviation of “invader”; a nod to Western colonialism). Jedi master and surrogate father figure Obi Wan deceived Luke, telling him that Vader “betrayed and murdered your father" (to add insult to injury we find out much later that Obi Wan mutilated and crippled Vader), manipulating “white saviour/white ally” Luke into fighting to destroy his father’s Empire. Ultimately, the corrupted chalk-white patriarch Vader finds redemption in death by destroying the Empire he built with Palpatine (a transparent allegory for Hitler/Satan) and killing his former master, resulting in Vader's ascension to immortality along with his former masters Obi Wan and Yoda.

While viewers (particularly in America) may feel that the Rebel Alliance solely represents America (the accents of the three primary heroes followed by the narrative are distinctly American, "The Empire" as Britain exclusively in their mind) based on a superficial reading which omits key facts (Lucas's claim that the primitive forest-dwelling Ewoks represent the Viet Cong, the heavy British-coded involvement in the Rebel Alliance), Star Wars trains the Western audience to see itself from the perspective of the third world, conditioned to feel exhilaration at their symbolic overthrowal and desiring to emulate Luke's example.

Had the Rebel Alliance been exclusively composed of European men, The Empire been a multicultural cesspool and the villain been a hooked-nosed Emperor with a Middle-Eastern accent, there would be no obscurantism about the political allegory.​
 
Nice copypasta...

Makes the empire look good.
 
Why are there always 2 spaces after every word, makes it impossible to read
 
This shit 99939325
 
Nice copypasta...

Makes the empire look good.
It’s a repost of my work.

It’s hard to make The Empire “look good” because they are villainised so heavily by the narrative. The destruction of Alderaan for instance emotionally precludes them ever being widely perceived as “the good guys”. They are a caricature of the traditional Western order; our symbolic representatives but demonised by Hollywood, George Lucas and the team behind him.
 
It’s a repost of my work.

It’s hard to make The Empire “look good” because they are villainised so heavily by the narrative. The destruction of Alderaan for instance emotionally precludes them ever being widely perceived as “the good guys”. They are a caricature of the traditional Western order; our symbolic representatives but demonised by Hollywood, George Lucas and the team behind him.
Fascinating observation bro
 
very interesting post
 
It’s a repost of my work.

It’s hard to make The Empire “look good” because they are villainised so heavily by the narrative. The destruction of Alderaan for instance emotionally precludes them ever being widely perceived as “the good guys”. They are a caricature of the traditional Western order; our symbolic representatives but demonised by Hollywood, George Lucas and the team behind him.
A very accurate observation, yes.

Still - in spite of being as charicaturized and villainized as that it is, the Empire still manages to appeal to people.

It shares the qualities that made the British Empire, Nazi Germany, and the major Western empires in general work - aesthetic, identity, collective action, militarism, in-group preference. Not to mention law and order, and the ability to exert power.

Aside from that, there's also the aspect that the Star Wars movies (as well as most of the additional media) tend to fail at maintaining willing suspension of disbelief. Egregious plot armour of the plucky Rebel heroes, poorly written Imperial atrocities - things like that can make you feel like you're looking at pro-Rebel propaganda rather than an honest story. And because of the reduced suspension of disbelief, things like those Imperial atrocities no longer have the emotional impact that they're supposed to have.

"Holy shit! A weapon that can make an entire planet go boom! That is so fuckin' cool!"

"Huh? The people of Alderaan? Who gives a shit?"

Then there's the occasional game or story with an Imperial perspective. Probably one of the most famous is that 90s game TIE Fighter,

In order to make the Imperial perspective work, the writers had to show the Empire as a functioning organisation. So, no comically over the top atrocities. And no skits where the Empire's military is just an incompetent punching bag, either.

Id est? TIE Fighter went all in on the law-and-order angle, as well as grey morality scenarios and plotlines that felt a lot more realistic than the simplistic black-or-white stories that you see in games and stories featuring Rebel protagonists.
 
why is the empire a bunch of incompetent britbongs?
aside from the blueskin, grandma toffkin and darth asthma
 

Similar threads

ryo
Replies
2
Views
302
tired as fuck
tired as fuck
Defetivecuckachu
Replies
17
Views
543
sultryloser
sultryloser

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top