I had a fascinating conversation with some normies the other day. Most of them agreed with each other in that death by boiling would be an excessive sentence for prosecutorial misconduct.
A couple of them suggested, however, that the death penalty would not be excessive in certain sexual assault cases even if the victim, or victims, did not die.
As far as I'm concerned, crimes involving moral injustice against institutions should be taken just as seriously as crimes involving injustice against individuals. The fact that someone who grabs a foid's butt receives a harsher punishment than someone who knowingly imprisoned an innocent person shows how little normies care about their civil liberties.
The biggest reason for this is probably the fact that the recipients of institutional injustice are men. Especially young men from disadvantaged backgrounds. If more femoids were wrongfully imprisoned, especially upper-middle-class white femoids, people would start to give a shit about the broken criminal justice system in many countries.
A couple of them suggested, however, that the death penalty would not be excessive in certain sexual assault cases even if the victim, or victims, did not die.
As far as I'm concerned, crimes involving moral injustice against institutions should be taken just as seriously as crimes involving injustice against individuals. The fact that someone who grabs a foid's butt receives a harsher punishment than someone who knowingly imprisoned an innocent person shows how little normies care about their civil liberties.
The biggest reason for this is probably the fact that the recipients of institutional injustice are men. Especially young men from disadvantaged backgrounds. If more femoids were wrongfully imprisoned, especially upper-middle-class white femoids, people would start to give a shit about the broken criminal justice system in many countries.
Last edited:
