Short men need to earn more to compensate for their height but in fact earn less

[Angry_runt]

It's a double whammy.

If you're 5'6", you need to earn about $150k more than a 6' guy to be as competitive in dating (actually to be able to betabux), so the 6" difference is worth $150k a year.

http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf

However, if you're short you are in fact likely to earn less money than someone who's tall.

Short men and heavier women earn less, can blame DNA | CNN

If you're aren't as happy with your paycheck as your thinner and taller colleagues, the reason may lurk in your genes.

edition.cnn.com

Life plan for short guys: work extra hard to have a lucrative career and then move someplace with a lower average height and escortmaxx/sugardaddymaxx or if you want a family find a girl from a poor family and put as many babies into her as quickly as possible.

 

[racoon4]

Short men and heavier women earn less, blame DNA​

bullshit. dna can only be blamed for the height, not the fucking body fat %. God damned toilets can't take responsibility for anything

 

[Balding Subhuman]

Inceltear will cope and say "b-b-b-but lookism isn't r-r-real!!!1! you just can't understand the data!!"

 

[tulasdanslos]

Short men and heavier women earn less, blame DNA​

bullshit. dna can only be blamed for the height, not the fucking body fat %. God damned toilets can't take responsibility for anything

Imma break a lance in favor of foids just this once and say that satiety, metabolism and food pickiness are genetically determined. Bird eaters and binge eaters exist. Ectomorphs, mesomorphs and endomorphs exist. Normal people and food autists exist.

Of course, if you're a fatcel you're a volcel and being a fat woman is fucking inexcusable. But if you were skinny and now you're fat then there was no softmaxxing for your inceldom.

 

[spaceb0ss619]

Inceltear will cope and say "b-b-b-but lookism isn't r-r-real!!!1! you just can't understand the data!!"

 

[crestfallencel]

manlet reparations when?

 

[CountBleck]

so even if 6 foot tallfag makes a shitty ass 40k a year, me, as a 5'6 RICECEL, needs to be making at LEAST 190k a year just to have the same chances.

that's like in the top 5% of income for people.

it's not even same chances, as girls will go for the tall guy for much different and genuine reasons than if they go for a manlet 150k income jfl

 

[racoon4]

that satiety, metabolism and food pickiness are genetically determined.

yes they are but at the end of the day, you choose to eat. you don't have to eat if you're hungry

 

[erenyeager]

It's a double whammy.

If you're 5'6", you need to earn about $150k more than a 6' guy to be as competitive in dating (actually to be able to betabux), so the 6" difference is worth $150k a year.

http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf

However, if you're short you are in fact likely to earn less money than someone who's tall.

Short men and heavier women earn less, can blame DNA | CNN

If you're aren't as happy with your paycheck as your thinner and taller colleagues, the reason may lurk in your genes.

edition.cnn.com

Life plan for short guys: work extra hard to have a lucrative career and then move someplace with a lower average height and escortmaxx/sugardaddymaxx or if you want a family find a girl from a poor family and put as many babies into her as quickly as possible.

Genes genes jeans JEAN JEAN JEAN JEANN jraaannn JEAAANANSNSNSN JEAANANANSNBSNSNSNAMANSIEJSNSMMDNDJDDDDDDDDDD