I advocate for eugenics, more specifically endorsing selective breeding through reproduction certificates/licenses for certain and less severe cases (e.g., mild Asperger’s or autism), funding research for the evolution of gene editing/genomic medicine, and other scientific advancements to enhance the gene pool in general. It is mandatory for the sustainment and improvement of any healthy society and to eradicate inceldom.
The only other option would be dysgenics, the degeneration of our gene pool, which is clearly not a viable and natural option.
I am, however, pro-euthanasia for the abnormal (i.e., those who carry any severe heritable disease). These absolute failures need to be sterilized or done away with for the betterment of the economy, society, and the victim's own sake. Ideally, I'd operate similar to the Aktion T4 and only resort to euthanizing people with severe conditions who are greatly suffering and are incurable.
As for race, race and eugenics/dysgenics are tightly linked to culture. The dysgenic trends harming Whites (e.g., political correctness, not enough talented, capable individuals having children, low-quality people having too many, miscegenation, adopting non-White children, etc.) are a result of our culture being corrupted from the top down.
If you change the culture, you change the race, and if you change the race, you change the culture. It's a cycle.
Nevertheless, all species in nature engage in selective breeding/eugenics to some extent. Not every individual is given a free pass to reproduce. Human eugenics is, however, controversial due to (((egalitarianism))), which rejects genetic inequality, but there's no rational reason, beyond "emotional objections," that humans can't operate under the same principles.
In your opinion, would it be in the best interest of your nation to adopt some form of eugenics/selective breeding to improve the gene pool for the betterment of the society? Discuss here.
The only other option would be dysgenics, the degeneration of our gene pool, which is clearly not a viable and natural option.
I am, however, pro-euthanasia for the abnormal (i.e., those who carry any severe heritable disease). These absolute failures need to be sterilized or done away with for the betterment of the economy, society, and the victim's own sake. Ideally, I'd operate similar to the Aktion T4 and only resort to euthanizing people with severe conditions who are greatly suffering and are incurable.
As for race, race and eugenics/dysgenics are tightly linked to culture. The dysgenic trends harming Whites (e.g., political correctness, not enough talented, capable individuals having children, low-quality people having too many, miscegenation, adopting non-White children, etc.) are a result of our culture being corrupted from the top down.
If you change the culture, you change the race, and if you change the race, you change the culture. It's a cycle.
Nevertheless, all species in nature engage in selective breeding/eugenics to some extent. Not every individual is given a free pass to reproduce. Human eugenics is, however, controversial due to (((egalitarianism))), which rejects genetic inequality, but there's no rational reason, beyond "emotional objections," that humans can't operate under the same principles.
In your opinion, would it be in the best interest of your nation to adopt some form of eugenics/selective breeding to improve the gene pool for the betterment of the society? Discuss here.
Last edited:
