maybe ill save up for the $1200 one and then a $5000 one
The torso one is enough for me. I never knew they had shit like this out there. Prior to this post, all I knew about were fleshlights and shitty-looking sex dolls and the like.
best thread ever on this forum
One of the best forums on this site in quite some time. Now this is a subject from which REAL discussions can happen
Last one is crazy 
Great thread btw. If i had my own place, i would wageslave to buy a decent fullsize cute looking doll.
I own one like this:
I bought it years ago though, in 2018. I paid around $150-180 and I had it shipped from Japan, I even ordered it with the box but they gave me the option to ship it without the box which I didn't. I was worried it would get stuck in customs and then I'd get the glowies knocking on my door, but surprisingly it went through without any issues. I haven't been using it a lot though.
I bought it years ago though, in 2018. I paid around $150-180 and I had it shipped from Japan, I even ordered it with the box but they gave me the option to ship it without the box which I didn't. I was worried it would get stuck in customs and then I'd get the glowies knocking on my door
, but surprisingly it went through without any issues. I haven't been using it a lot though.
Last edited:
Ok, but how do I sneak a 45lb + 5'6 silicon corpse with a pussy attached into my bedroom without nobody noticing...
This one seems like a more viable choice for me in regards of the limited space I have to keep one of these things.I own one like this:
View attachment 1366298
View attachment 1366299
View attachment 1366301
I bought it years ago though, in 2018. I paid around $150-180 and I had it shipped from Japan, I even ordered it with the box but they gave me the option to ship it without the box which I didn't. I was worried it would get stuck in customs and then I'd get the glowies knocking on my door
How do the holes feel like?
Pussy feels nice and tight but I'm an escortmaxxer so for me dolls will never feel real but the pussy has nice vaccuum suction that clings onto your dick. Anal is kind of a let down tbh, not as good.
Cleaning can be a bit difficult, you will have to finger the pussy to get the remains out of the hole.
Either way it's discontinued now, I recommend buying this one instead: https://www.otonajp.com/puni-ana-dx
This was quite a read. I had no idea about the extent of this, because I never looked into it. Insane.
O
For the cheap 15$ amazon fleshlights, how often would you say i need to replace them? I’ve had mine for 3 months still feels pretty good
I bought an Alice stage onahole long time ago, the company is defunct but it was the best hole I ever used and I miss it so bad. It was perfect for my 11cm micro dick. It had a really good end where it felt like you were penetrating the womb. Felt great raping the fuck out of Alice.I own one like this:
View attachment 1366298
View attachment 1366299
View attachment 1366301
I bought it years ago though, in 2018. I paid around $150-180 and I had it shipped from Japan, I even ordered it with the box but they gave me the option to ship it without the box which I didn't. I was worried it would get stuck in customs and then I'd get the glowies knocking on my door
I have a anime doll now but it’s hard to get a good trust considering the lack of length.
Rape Alice
A
Funny thing, I had two sex dolls and still lived with my parents from 2020 til now, one was lower torso and other flesh light. I was lucky to order both when my parents weren't around. Both are thrown out by me without them knowing but I was able to have my way with them for time. I able to hide it under my bed and only my bro knew but I think he forgot. I was able to hold torso for a year til I went on a trip and I didn't want my dad to be in my room so I threw it out ahead of time.
why do you wanna hide? is your mother such a cunt where you can't even own a sex doll?
Try to imagine a world, where a brocel might feel ashamed if his mother saw he had a sex doll.
Oh plenty of parents are this evil, make no mistake. "I brought you into a shit world with shit genes/and/or circumstances, but I won't even permit you to cope with it." There's no end to insult-to-injury when it comes to some parents. I hate parents in general tbh.
Child sex dolls are banned in Australia, punishable up to 15 years in jail. (Apparently all sex dolls are banned in India, makes sense given what a cucked/conservative country it is.)
As if these punishments actually stop pedophilia or prevent child sex abuse. Actually this sort of thing is completely counterproductive toward that end and makes the problem worse. If you want to help prevent pedophiles from abusing children (many pedophiles never have harmed a child and never would, by the way; and most people who sexually abuse minors are not diagnosed pedophiles) allow them to have harmless outlets and avoid driving them underground about their condition, which makes them more likely to commit abuses instead of seeking help for their condition and ways to avoid acting on it. (no child is harmed in the making/use of a sex doll or animated pornography, so it's quite distinct from the use of real pornography)
I almost didn't bother mentioning this but remembered someone himself here posted about a child sex doll he recommended, (if it wasn't clear the site reads: "a dream come true for all Loli lovers") so it's quite relevant, the discussion evidently includes adult and child sex dolls. (I'm not saying he's a pedo, he just described a product.)
I wish it went without saying I have no interest in any of this, I am only attracted to adult women. Pedos aren't allowed on this forum just as LGBT aren't. I'm just interested in the truth, and forums where I have the freedom of speech to write it. The rule "Do not sexualize minors in any way, shape, or form" doesn't apply here because I am not exalting this at all, I just believe in describing objective reality clearly and soberly. If anything, I regard all this negatively across the board. If I was God and could make it so no humans were pedophiles, I obviously would. (Besides, who wants to be a pedophile? That's the point.) But that's not the case. My critique of the legal system and society and how it treats these unfortunate people with a desire not in their control is consistent with my critique of how we're cast to the side because it's the same society and terrible Liberals/Conservatives doing it and supporting it.
Of course it's more logical to recognize the very existence of pedophiles is a further blow to the argument there is a God in the first place, instead of using the concept of God to justify counterproductive measures justified with flimsy morality against them. But most people these days who think this way are irreligious Liberals anyway.
Last edited:
I wish that women were non sentient sexdolls
Transhumanism actually makes this possible. But I don't think we'll see it in our lifetimes. And I don't believe the ethical implications of this would be any worse than anyone having a child to begin with. The reason it would be opposed is obviously because women would be against it because it would remove their monopoly on sex, the one thing they have that is at the root of their privilege, power, and protection in society, and most men would just follow suit, for obvious reasons. (most men aren't like us)
If not for that, we'd see it much sooner. Because transhumanism will eventually develop to unbelievable levels, perhaps it is inevitable anyway, but that sucks for the people who have to wait in the mean time. Also, capitalism at once will regress the progress it would otherwise make, while gatekeeping access to it behind pricetags prohibitively expensive for most people, while using it against most people (who aren't wealthy, capitalists, or in roles to manage the system and its technology) to enforce its rule.
Actually every problem in society comes down to what I just said. Women are the most regressive force in society, and for the reason I just said.
Read this.
And this.
Last edited:
It's funny that their only form of value gets them so far in life. The human design is just retarded.
My mother isn't evil! I like my parents.
But I still wouldn't want them to know if I had a sex doll.
This ^^
I believe incels should love and respect their mothers unless their mothers are truly awful people.
why? just goon
Then they're shitty, if they truly had a decent perspective, they'd have pure sympathy to you for whatever harmless paths you took to cope, it wouldn't occur to them to feel anything else. It's obvious your parents are typical normies, so they'd have judgement or whatever instead. Even just feeling sad that their son is an incel is not warranted and is a condescending, dismissive, and abominable attitude. They should completely turn the mirror on themselves because it's their genetics that are the reason you are an incel, if they were more attractive or tall you obviously would be more attractive/taller as well and hence would have found a woman willing to be with you by now. In a sense parents are totally the problem, it's their genetics and choice to breed us that is the entire source of the problem.
This is why I can't stand parents. They decided to have a child (or if the children were an accident they chose to have sex and are still 100% responsible) and have the audacity to victim-blame them for their life circumstances that are the result of their genetics. Parents are consistently selfish, unaware, aloof hypocrites.
In my case, I'm not even ugly but I'm 5'5 so in a real sense it's over unless I shoot for short girls or get very lucky with one the same height as me. I've already chosen to move out of the U.S.A. And my circumstances are also a consequence of my parents, this is not "blaming them and not taking responsibility," it goes without saying that my life is now in my hands, I'm just describing reality. (they divorced, do not support me, and there are other severe aspects of my circumstances interfering with my ability to get a job and live on my own beyond the scope of this reply) My mother chose a manlet, and now I have to suffer. The truth is no one takes guys shorter than 5'8 seriously in general.
My mother is a truly awful person, lol. As is my father, who abandoned me and my brother when we were 7 and 10, leaving us with her to suffer. My mother was our parent in the legal sense but utterly neglected us. Of course this is not only legal but sanctioned and legitimized by society. I'm an example of a guy who had an abusive/neglectful single mother.
This doesn't make me biased, I'm not projecting or assuming all parents are as bad as mine. (and in fact plenty of parents are significantly worse) I see everything neutrally and objectively, nothing tinged by the personal, so I don't hyperbolically make parents worse than they are, the plain fact is they are very bad. Even parents who stuck around for their children are selfish elitist aloof assholes, consistently, especially when said children face dejection from society. And we are the most dejected members of society. Even the internet won't tolerate us, that's why we're here and not on reddit. And who knows, I often wonder if the U.S. government will just ban this website one day. At that point maybe Discord itself will come for us.
Who has parents here that admitted that it's their fault for producing a child with the genes they had, instead of dismissing or blaming them for their inceldom? Exactly, I rest my case.
Last edited:
Yes. But nothing is more retarded than modern society. Remember that for most of the time humans existed on earth we just lived like other animals. Civilization is very recent, just around 6,500 years old.
That's where the retardation started, which explains a lot of things, like why history for the last 2,000 years with religion was more retarded and regressive than civilization before that. (consider how much more rational, intelligent, and enlightened the Ancient Greeks obviously were to not insist on literal belief in God, like the Christians and Muslims who ruled the most powerful empires in recent history did, so all history is monumentally regressive. Nietzsche wrote about this. Have you ever wondered why Christian Europe repressed atheists and scientists so much, despite this flourishing in Ancient Greece centuries prior?)
After much thinking, I've come to the conclusion this is basically because religion is social organization, so was essential for people belonging to groups as empires conquered territory; you have to belong to the same religion as your spouse to marry and have children with them, and it supersedes ethnic/racial distinctions. It interpolated with mating patterns of ethnicity and evolution as societies developed and went through changes. So as civilization expanded, you had a need for dumber, more monolithic, literalist, theological belief systems (Christianity and Islam) to triumph over "paganism" (the ancient polytheistic systems of Greece, Egypt, the Near East, Persia, pagan Europe and Rome — Zoroastrianism is monotheistic, but I include it as it preserved the spirit of ancient Persian religion) which is far more multi-faceted, open-ended, rich, and in tune with nature. (of course, Christianity and Islam wouldn't exist if not for Judaism which they ripped off from, and Judaism itself never would have existed without the ancient polytheistic religions from the Near East it's based on and took the stories that comprise the Old Testament from.) This is observable in Egypt where the Copts, the minority who resisted conversion to Islam, retain Ancient Egypt more purely in ethnicity and language, and face discrimination from many retarded Muslims for this reason. (Notably, India retained paganism, the only civilization descended from the Aryans to do so that lasted to the present, and is a unique example for this reason.) What I wrote also explains why only a handful of European dorks in modern times feel the need to revive paganism as well. That will never be anything other than fringe.
In the present, the West is secular and irreligious. Christians who actually care about the religion or any other religious group are a fringe minority, rightfully considered irrational by most people. Nothing is more retarded than modern society, because of the changes wrought on by industrialism, technology, and capitalism make things more abstract, inverted, skewed and indirect than ever. This explains why modern Western society is the way it is and women are more retarded than ever while men are treated and construed with more abstract, horrible, contradictory and hypocritical morality than ever. This explains everything, like the insanity of Woke and its unprecedented influence, and why Feminists and racial moralizers are actually regressive and conservative in every sense. As many have observed, Liberal-Progressivism has replaced Christianity as the dominant mindset and "religion" in the West, and has predominance and influence on the entire world.
So opposition to sex bots, transhumanism etc. while certainly based in morality need not be justified with actual religion, it just has a religious character. As does the witch-hunting to those who disagree with Liberal-Progressivism and its ideals in general.
Of course industrialism and technology (which I put transhumanism under, but of course it extends beyond most technological developments, it could go as far as allowing humans to transcend themselves as the name implies) this allows humans to hypothetically live better than we ever had, which is the most damnable thing about all of this. When you can produce enough food to feed everyone, there's no reason anyone has to go without food or any other basic necessities. And war can be a thing of the past. All wars throughout history are fought because rulers compete over territory, power, wealth, resources, and human capital, using humans as soldiers/cannon-fodder to die for them. (in the past this was due to empires wanting to expand, now it's due to the contradictions of capitalism, such as the crisis of overproduction demanding conquering markets only to destroy them and build them again.) An interconnected industrially developed world allows this to be a thing of the past for the first time in history. Capitalism was necessary to build industry initially but has long outlived its historically progressive phase, it's just continued because the capitalists in power want to keep their power. Communism is historically necessary, either it happens or capitalism drags modern human society down with it. It's not ideological or political at all, it is against these things. It doesn't happen because people advocate for it or identify with it. I'm not trying to convert people, just interested in describing the truth across all domains. This explains why women are anti-intellectual and against it.
I also explained why this foid mass-shooter did it, I just realized, something that was unconscious to her herself. In her manifesto, she mainly talks about (her distorted confused false conception of) "religion" and "evolution."
Last edited:
This thread made me seriously consider buying one lmao i found some really good looking and not creepy ones at https://www.yourdoll.com/ anyone knows if they are legit?
Giga High IQ read brother
Thank you for taking the time to write all that. It does make sense in the grand scheme of things, man does not want to be an animal and so it copes by creating society.
More proof that the material is what's foreign to our consciousness because we can not escape it.
Giga High IQ read brother
Thank you for taking the time to write all that. It does make sense in the grand scheme of things, man does not want to be an animal and so it copes by creating society.
More proof that the material is what's foreign to our consciousness because we can not escape it.
Yes, everything circles back to the human condition. And I appreciate that you read all of it.
I was going to mention the human condition there, but it's the kind of thing that goes without saying. I suppose part of why I didn't is that there's this pervasive tendency to simply dismiss religion as a product of the human condition, whereas I emphasized religion as social organization. That it's a product of the human condition goes without saying, so it does less than nothing to really clarify things, as if people just came up with it to comfort themselves one day. (Liberal anti-theist atheist critics of religion like Dawkins and Sagan give this impression, even if they understand otherwise. I am not anti-theist, I am merely atheist. Religion is not the problem, but the society around it that religion justifies. That's what Marx wrote.) How religion is a product of society, how it operates within society and changes with it, how the predominant religions differ from the historic ones. (this is again what makes Hinduism unique, because it's the most ancient that preserved paganism.) My point was to touch on that. Joseph Campbell acknowledged no religions were actually true but should've gone further in elucidating the class dynamics behind them. (rulers insisting they're true while knowing they're not yet imposing them on everyone else to control them.)
I reject all religions. I discovered that the valid aspects of them are to be found only in some strands of gnosticism, non-dualistic Hinduism and Buddhism. (Sufism touches on these things in that some writers associated do so, but is generally so marred by the stupidity of Islam and its modern-day adherents, it's hard to recommend as a source to find it.) The Gospel of Thomas lines exactly with them while also containing material from the canonical gospels, making it an invaluable resource. Of course, the founders of Christianity as we know it today suppressed this, burning its texts and killing its adherents. All Christians without exception derive their understanding from them and condemn gnosticism because it utterly negates the institutional basis for the religion which it can't be meaningfully separated from. The Gospel of Thomas should be read with this in mind, and having read the New Testament. With that in mind, it becomes profound. Jesus is talking about all Christians and all religions when he says in verses 39 and 102: "Jesus said, the Pharisees and the scholars have taken the keys of knowledge and have hidden them. They have not entered, nor have they allowed those who want to enter to go inside. Shame on the Pharisees. They are like a dog sleeping in the cattle manger. It does not eat or let the cattle eat."
This is the most clear text on the subject I have yet found, more than any text of Buddhism. It expounds the essence non-dualistic Hinduism better than any other book. Keyword: the essence, there is no "Hinduism" here, it completely negates all beliefs, religions, identities. Even figures like U.G. Krishnamurti, who also rejected all religion and spirituality, acknowledged the person behind these words (Ramana Maharshi) was enlightened. (while maintaining healthy skepticism to him and complete skepticism to his followers.) He rejected all religious practices such as prayer and beliefs such in God or reincarnation, while respecting them as valid insofar as he was aware not everyone would shake them off. (just not only unnecessary, but almost always a hindrance to understanding.) I hesitate to even refer to him as a "guru" due to the baggage of that word. He never touched money and there was no formal institution, much less an enterprise. He allowed followers and a building to be built around him, and he spent his life humbly serving by chopping vegetables for visitors to the center. (U.G. himself also recommended the Gospel of Thomas, the only spiritual text I am aware he did.)
I wrote about all this here.
Also, I recommend Pier Pasolini's adaptation of the Gospel According to Matthew. Like many others, including film critics and religious Catholics, I consider it the best adaptation of the story of Jesus brought to film. This is because it was made by an atheist intellectual maverick, of course. Yet, he made the film in such a way simple-minded true-believing Christians could enjoy it, as much as people who think like himself who of course are able to have a deeper understanding and appreciation. Somehow he grounds and humanizes everything in such a way as to be universally appealing to both, without alienating true-believing Christians at the same time that he's clearly not coming from the place of literal belief, a fact obvious to people who can think seriously about it.
These are not fully formed thoughts. I eventually plan to be a serious writer, writing articles as well as making videos on Youtube to share my views. What I just wrote covers topics including the history of civilization, religion, transhumanism, the thought of Nietzsche, Marx, their conceptions on history, as well as the origin of conflicts religious, ethnic, or both at the same time and the relation between both. And how this all relates to mate selection, dating dynamics and the blackpill of course. The overwhelming majority of people confuse and misunderstand these things to the extent they talk about them, especially in academic contexts, because they are biased and not actually motivated for the reasons they say they are. The contexts outside academia (much of Leftism/progressivism and Redpill thought) also do of course. Read this comment where I explain why they're both wrong.
Most writers are normies who are biased to defend foids and to have a less than objective understanding of various groups of people in accordance to country-of-origin, religion, culture, race, etc. Needless to say, my serious writing will not talk like this. (although there is room for the use of the word "retarded" in the sense of regressive)
But I am serious about foids being regressive, I just don't agree with him about them being the origin of most of humanity's woes as he said, because that is too simplistic. This essay (which I first heard of through the Incel Wiki) remains the best single piece of writing on the subject. It's just a must-read, and a short read.
The problem is I will get banned from reddit for writing things like this, and subreddit mods ban you if you show any sympathy to incels, so much as bring us up or use "incel related terms." (which can be anything they need it to be, of course) Regardless, I need to make a new account there, (the old one was banned for reasons related to what I just said) I've just been putting it off. Yet, at any time I could be banned for so much elucidating thoughts in clearly worthwhile texts such as this, just because they're so controversial for challenging the fundamental premises of society. (the consruct of childhood in this case.) It is worth mentioning that the popular Leftist streamer Vaush said positive sexual relationships between adults and children are possible, (a position I don't even really hold) and he's still doing just fine.
I also can understand and explain Neo-Ludditeism, that is the thought of Ted Kaczynski, and why this has had a resurgence lately and the online subculture that is responsible for it. Mike Krumplar here argues that there is "overlap" between us and Neo-Luddites. I question this to a large extent. I think many Neo-Luddites hate us. I wish Mike Krumplar would bring up other examples, like the words of the aforementioned U.G., for alternative thought that is genuinely fringe (most "alternative" people are just nerds for a particular interest or dumb punks or hipsters) internet communities embrace. This is a uniquely interesting place on the internet. By filtering out all women and exclusively being for the most unfortunate men in society.
Thomas Ligotti, author of The Conspiracy Against the Human Race, wrote about U.G. and gnosticism in the book.
Speaking of Mike Krumplar. Here are his other two articles about incels: this interview, and this article that also focuses on Elliot Rodger's manifesto. They're all must-reads. This post from DetectiveCuckachu is also a fantastic break-down of not only Elliot Rodger's Manifesto, but Wilkes McDermid and Christopher Swanson. As he says, all very different cases that different things can be learned from. If I'm lucky, I may be able to meet Mike Krumplar, by the way. I live close to NYC and go there all the time. I know someone IRL who knows someone who knows him. I'll report back here if I do ever meet him. I'm planning on doing a lot with his work on incels, hopefully I will have accomplished this and done work of my own by the time I meet him if it ever happens. Because I am a 29 year old NEET KHHV, I am purely driven by the ideas here. I hate money, society, and don't have any hope of getting a foid in the near future.
I will conclude this collection of recommended texts and thoughts with this fantastic review and summary of Sex and Character by Otto Weininger. I will make an entire post about the book and its applicability to the relevant subjects here and modern times once I've read it.
Last edited:
Please do brocel, and tag me when you do. I look forward to reading more.
Also in regards to Gnostism and Christianity I saw this great YouTube Video talking about a few things that you may find interesting. As it relates to the many translations of the Bible (specifically the greek iteration), and how Chemicals and drugs play a huge role in its construction.
View: https://youtu.be/2dY-roDpHWI?si=QEWWlZHRb1uU7bna
WT the fuck is wrong with you mang
Thats the one that cought my eye lmao
148cm (4ft10) B-cup Silicone Blonde Sex Doll Sora, Head #70 - Your Doll
[html_block id="168811"][html_block id="169641"]
www.yourdoll.com
Watch prices slowly start to drop off over the years because digital technology exponentially gets better over time. If you have ever seen "animatrix" or "blade runner 2049," the robots are incredibly realistic coomfuel and **the** concept end goal of sex robots.
Here is the retrospect of a piece of technology that is continuously improving - phones. The end goal for phones is to merge them with the human body.
India has banned sex dolls I know India sucks. But you could take one of the many turds in the street and use it as a fleshlight
India has banned sex for unattractive men as well. They are worse than the west.
I feel really bad for curries in India.
need to get that 15k one
M
If you have 400k dollars you can just buy property in US, fly to afghanistan, buy actual females there, and live there from single rent from west due to currency difference.
And if you buy them young, like before they went puberty, they can actually love you since you are the hottest male they saw in their lives (ofcourse you are not gonna let them out of the house)
And if you buy them young, like before they went puberty, they can actually love you since you are the hottest male they saw in their lives (ofcourse you are not gonna let them out of the house)
To be fair there are some good sex dolls
1 dollar sexdoll vs 1 million dollar sex sexdoll
At 100.000€ you can just buy a sex slave
3k i would say
Depends on where you live tbh
The way you kept labeling the size of the assess by age.
They are so heavy. I prefer pocket pussy + VR
Man of cultureI own one like this:
View attachment 1366298
View attachment 1366299
View attachment 1366301
I bought it years ago though, in 2018. I paid around $150-180 and I had it shipped from Japan, I even ordered it with the box but they gave me the option to ship it without the box which I didn't. I was worried it would get stuck in customs and then I'd get the glowies knocking on my door
Me now: Not horny for this
Me later: Now horny for this
Me later: Now horny for this
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
