Scientist on TV--"mens attractiveness to do with HIS STATUS IN THE WORLD OF MEN"

[Broke Nepo Baby]

Shit !!!! All I needed was some status in my job ! Who knew??

Trying harder WAS the way. Its SCIENCE he says ! Not face! Not genetics!

So lets rate the highest status among men, to find the most attrtactive:

1. King Jun Il. North Korea. In north korea, hes a shitlord dictator! The
girls think he's dreamy.

2. Stephen Hawking. He was a close second. High status among men.
Angelina Jolie tried to bang him in his chair.

3. Peter Dinklage. High status among dwarves. Hes dreamy.

 

[endoftheskies]

Shit !!!! All I needed was some status in my job ! Who knew??

Trying harder WAS the way. Its SCIENCE he says ! Not face! Not genetics!

So lets rate the highest status among men, to find the most attrtactive:

1. King Jun Il. North Korea. In north korea, hes a shitlord dictator! The
girls think he's dreamy.

2. Stephen Hawking. He was a close second. High status among men.
Angelina Jolie tried to bang him in his chair.

3. Peter Dinklage. High status among dwarves. Hes dreamy.

No status for your genetics. Literally, impossible.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

Basically the reason why I often bring up examples of lookism outside of the dating sphere as well, and especially if it's directly related to money and status. Boomers have it simply set in stone in their operating system that men's looks don't matter in dating, so I try to show people that since it matters in other areas of life, it obviously could matter in dating as well.

Cross-country evidence on the wage of people with above and below-average looks

https://wol.iza.org/articles/does-it-pay-to-be-beautiful/long Jfl. Every single time women get reminded of how much they benefit from their gender, the number one retort is that they are just seen as sex objects and that's horrible and men can never understand it and bla bla bla. Yet, despite...

incels.is

Also:

Showing money and wealth apparently had the lowest effect of all of those for both genders. Brutally over for "just make money" provider bros:

Basically, if you have a good face, you don't need to show how social, popular or whatever you are and are just wasting time doing so, because you already have what people want. Anything more is just diminishing returns.

"facial attractiveness increases match rates—by 200% for men and 155% for women"

You don't say:feelsahh:. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5191741 Using data from 45,399 users on a major dating application in South Korea, we measure five dimensions of profile photos: facial attractiveness, overall mood, and indicators of social, economic, and cultural...

incels.is

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

No status for your genetics. Literally, impossible.

 

[Broke Nepo Baby]

Amazing, a scientist thinks modern feminists are sexually attracted to muú job

 

[Erenincel]

To get Status you need a good genetic or being different enough to be a genius in some way. Just be lucky theory

 

[160cmbloop]

another cope for rajesh to betabux for an ugly pajeeta

 

[Broke Nepo Baby]

I bet the scientist was 75

 

[Todd Thundercock]

To get Status you need a good genetic or being different enough to be a genius in some way. Just be lucky theory

No, 99% of high status talents, it's entirely about connecting with the right Jew to give you the opportunity. Exactly what happened with Dinklage who was nobody until he was 30.

 

[PersonalityChad]

Trust the soyience bro

 

[Erenincel]

No, 99% of high status talents, it's entirely about connecting with the right Jew to give you the opportunity. Exactly what happened with Dinklage who was nobody until he was 30.

You're partly right, but not entirely. If you're pretty and someone from the elite notices you, even accidentally, you'll go from being a hobo to a global model. That was a coincidence.