Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Brutal [RICEPILL] East Asian women marry white men over their own

Q

Quagmire

Greycel
Joined
Mar 27, 2026
Posts
12
Among all "Asian" groups (Arabs not included since they're termed as white in the US) only the Indians (the only non mongolid group) show more male exogamy.

It's even more brutal when you look at birth rate states, WMAF usually has 2x-3x the births than AMWF.
The only exception here is also Indians where Indian men produce more kids with white women than vice versa (CDC birth data for preliminary 2026).

If you only look at US born women it becomes even more brutal as US born East Asian women produce more kids with white men than with their male counterparts.
Again, in here Indian men produce nearly 2.5x times the kids with US born white woman than vice versa, although that's probably also due to the lack of US born Indians.
G_8iU78bEAEQ2H0
 
Last edited:
Noodlewhores are scum
 
Whenever an Asian woman marries an Asian man, it's invariably a grudging attachment to siphon resources she couldn't acquire herself. But whenever an Asian woman marries a White man, she starts breeding like a rabbit in a desperate attempt to white out her genes down to the last chromosome.

Given that, and also that Asian men face ten times the exogamy and have a tenth of the response of any other race, I think it's pretty fair to say the Asian race doesn't deserve to exist at all at this point.
 
Last edited:
The birthrates of China, Japan and both Koreas are so low cause noodlewhores want to breed with whites and not with ricemen
 
The birthrates of China, Japan and both Koreas are so low cause noodlewhores want to breed with whites and not with ricemen
In Singapore and Malaysia the ratio of WMAF vs AMWF is 5:1. The ratio of IMAF vs AMIF is also 5:1 lol. Asian here usually means Chinese Singaporean/Malaysian. Malaysian women are more religious so they don't cuck their men as hard, this still doesn't stop muslim Indian men from marrying them though.

Noodlewhores are ridiculously traitorous.
 
Whenever an Asian woman marries an Asian man, it's invariably a grudging attachment to siphon resources she couldn't acquire herself. But whenever an Asian woman marries a White man, she starts breeding like a rabbit in a desperate attempt to white out her genes down to the last chromosome.

Given that Asian men face ten times the exogamy and have a tenth of the response of any other race, I think it's pretty fair to say the Asian race doesn't deserve to exist at all at this point.
It's time for ricecels to go back to hunting Western Europe on horseback, or else they're finished
 
noodlewhores are so racist they even hate their own race
 
Despite half a century of jewish brainwashing, 88% of white women still marry WM, based. Nobody wants stinkin niggers.
 
Laotian stats are crazy, is that the new hotspot for passport bros? This guy got married because "he has air conditioning", that's a pretty low bar for finding a wife.
1774692960026
 
Laotian stats are crazy, is that the new hotspot for passport bros? This guy got married because "he has air conditioning", that's a pretty low bar for finding a wife.
View attachment 1700279
Buying an overseas hole doesn't work with no-fault divorce. They also need to be groomed from a younger age than is legally allowed to marry.
 
Despite half a century of jewish brainwashing, 88% of white women still marry WM, based. Nobody wants stinkin niggers.
There's still 50-70K BMWF vs 16-20K WMBF babies being born every year in the US, larger than WMAF. Black men don't marry a lot. That's why birth data is also important, this graph basically just gives an overview of which relationships are more common but it doesn't really tell you who is fucking who.
 
Last edited:
There's still 50-70K BMWF babies being born every year in the US, larger than WMAF. Black men don't marry a lot
The interracial mixing for whites should be checked in multiracial cities instead of the entire country. A substantial amount of whites in the US are segregated.

White women race mix a lot and this trend has increased from 2016 is what I'm trying to convey. Imagine if Korea had 1 out of 10 women in it's country having white babies, that would be pretty ridiculous.
 
There's still 50-70K BMWF babies being born every year in the US, larger than WMAF. Black men don't marry a lot
still only 22% of WW dated a black guy, the rest are racist, reee
 
still only 22% of WW dated a black guy, the rest are racist, reee
Generally white women won't publicly date black guys due to status (opposite in cuck west Europe because they worship black ballers and rappers there). It's basically betabuxx alpha fuxx jfl
 
But whenever an Asian woman marries a White man, she starts breeding like a rabbit in a desperate attempt to white out her genes down to the last chromosome.
:lul::lul::lul:
 
Bump. TND = Total noodlewhore death
 
Bump. TND = Total noodlewhore death
 
The birthrates of China, Japan and both Koreas are so low cause noodlewhores want to breed with whites and not with ricemen
I wish nigress where the same so African birth rates would fall as low
 
Among all "Asian" groups (Arabs not included since they're termed as white in the US) only the Indians (the only non mongolid group) show more male exogamy.

It's even more brutal when you look at birth rate states, WMAF usually has 2x-3x the births than AMWF.
The only exception here is also Indians where Indian men produce more kids with white women than vice versa (CDC birth data for preliminary 2026).

If you only look at US born women it becomes even more brutal as US born East Asian women produce more kids with white men than with their male counterparts.
Again, in here Indian men produce nearly 2.5x times the kids with US born white woman than vice versa, although that's probably also due to the lack of US born Indians.
G_8iU78bEAEQ2H0

Among all "Asian" groups (Arabs not included since they're termed as white in the US) only the Indians (the only non mongolid group) show more male exogamy.

It's even more brutal when you look at birth rate states, WMAF usually has 2x-3x the births than AMWF.
The only exception here is also Indians where Indian men produce more kids with white women than vice versa (CDC birth data for preliminary 2026).

If you only look at US born women it becomes even more brutal as US born East Asian women produce more kids with white men than with their male counterparts.
Again, in here Indian men produce nearly 2.5x times the kids with US born white woman than vice versa, although that's probably also due to the lack of US born Indians.
G_8iU78bEAEQ2H0
1774717922580-166a7ef7-a88c-4fe0-ab47-91d7542083ca.jpeg

JBW
 
still only 22% of WW dated a black guy, the rest are racist, reee
Thats a huge fucking number JFL. And the number for WW in multicultural melting pot metrocities dating ethnic guys is prolly even higher.

Unfathomable amount of cope from wignats thinking their foids have any semblance of loyalty :feelskek:
 
Thats a huge fucking number JFL. And the number for WW in multicultural melting pot metrocities dating ethnic guys is prolly even higher.

Unfathomable amount of cope from wignats thinking their foids have any semblance of loyalty :feelskek:
They're the most loyal despite being the most targeted by jewish propaganda. Remove the jew and racemixers will drop to under 10%.
1775215884895
 
They're the most loyal despite being the most targeted by jewish propaganda. Remove the jew and racemixers will drop to under 10%.
View attachment 1703690
I dount they're the most loyal when you isolate for melting pots instead of including redneck shitholes which are exclusively by whites and so WW and WM just date each other and constitute the majority of USA but whatever helps you sleep at night ig.
 
I dount they're the most loyal when you isolate for melting pots instead of including redneck shitholes which are exclusively by whites and so WW and WM just date each other and constitute the majority of USA but whatever helps you sleep at night ig.
You can doubt all you want, but until you can show us data that shows some other race is more loyal, you're just speculating. The closest to loyal are black and indian foids, but that's because nobody else wants shitskin foids.
 
The birthrates of China, Japan and both Koreas are so low cause noodlewhores want to breed with whites and not with ricemen
The birthrates in Mediterranean and Eastern Europe are similarly low though. It’s mostly a result of noodles being Chang-only, just like white foids are Chad-only
 
Among all "Asian" groups (Arabs not included since they're termed as white in the US) only the Indians (the only non mongolid group) show more male exogamy.

It's even more brutal when you look at birth rate states, WMAF usually has 2x-3x the births than AMWF.
The only exception here is also Indians where Indian men produce more kids with white women than vice versa (CDC birth data for preliminary 2026).

If you only look at US born women it becomes even more brutal as US born East Asian women produce more kids with white men than with their male counterparts.
Again, in here Indian men produce nearly 2.5x times the kids with US born white woman than vice versa, although that's probably also due to the lack of US born Indians.
G_8iU78bEAEQ2H0
Water
 
Thats a huge fucking number JFL. And the number for WW in multicultural melting pot metrocities dating ethnic guys is prolly even higher.
The only ethnics that get white foids are nigs, sands (who are a small minority in the US), and castizos (also a relatively small minority), so the percentage of WW mixing with nigs likely captures the vast majority of white female ethnic male mixing
 
It's even more brutal when you look at birth rate states, WMAF usually has 2x-3x the births than AMWF.
Interesting, but I guess that's only total numbers and not per capita? Since that's the only way I can see both those numbers and the ones from this study I found being true at the same time:

Of these racial pairings, fertility was lowest among White husband/Asian American wife couples (12.7%), a figure lower than among White wife/Asian American husband couples (14.9%). Both pairings have lower fertility than endogamous Asian American couples (16.8%). In each case, non-White husband/White wife couples had a higher percentage of past-year fertility compared to non-White wife/White husband couples. In other words, White/non-White couples had a higher percentage of past-year fertility if the non-White spouse was male rather than female. This descriptive finding is consistent with our hypotheses.


There's still 50-70K BMWF vs 16-20K WMBF babies being born every year in the US, larger than WMAF. Black men don't marry a lot. That's why birth data is also important, this graph basically just gives an overview of which relationships are more common but it doesn't really tell you who is fucking who.
True, that's why it's annoying how little birth data there is compared to marriage data, especially anywhere outside of the US (which is the case for a lot of sociological data in general:forcedsmile:). Though, in defense of the latter, it's still a decent proxy for this as your own example shows, black men don't marry much, but white-black marriages are still about twice as likely to be BMWF than the opposite, which isn't that far away from the birth ratio.

noodlewhores are so racist they even hate their own race
Depends. NEA countries (China, South Korea and Japan) still have much more men than women outmarrying, it's just that when it comes to marrying non-Slavic whites, their men tend to do rather poorly and that holds among their diasporas as well, but you'll nevertheless still see more of their men outmarrying than women overall. The only places that consistently lose more women to outmarriage than they gain are SEA and post-Soviet countries.

The birthrates in Mediterranean and Eastern Europe are similarly low though. It’s mostly a result of noodles being Chang-only, just like white foids are Chad-only
Cratering in LatAm and SEA as well. We are at most five years away from everything except Africa and some parts of Central Asia (plus Afghanistan) having that level of fertility, and even that might be an optimistic estimate.
 
The only ethnics that get white foids are nigs, sands (who are a small minority in the US), and castizos (also a relatively small minority), so the percentage of WW mixing with nigs likely captures the vast majority of white female ethnic male mixing
Castizos are white, sands are basically white or white adjacent enough
 
Buying an overseas hole doesn't work with no-fault divorce. They also need to be groomed from a younger age than is legally allowed to marry.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top