They just want an attractive guy they can possibly get, not a normie.
If they cheat on a normie then they never liked him in the first place
If they cheat on a normie then they never liked him in the first place
They arent humans and they should be murdered
Nonchads are always seen by them as means to a chad.
in minecraft
In CS2
I completely disagree, if this were true my mother would have stabbed me in the back a long time ago but she continues to be the only person in my life to support me, This reads a lot like ITbait GrAYslop and it's quite surprising that's this is in the must read section. What the fuck were the mods thinking.
Mods have recognized superiority of my writing over common delusional dogmatism. Anecdotes, which are nothing other than misinterpreted empirics, are the source of bluepill madness you seem to follow. There are no exceptions from universal laws driving femoids, for every single one of them has the very same reaction to chad; which is swarming around him and trying to get impregnated. They act in many ways when not directly interacting with chad. Yet the said universality proves that these actions are nothing but means for reaching that goal. You could not get backstabbed, but this only lead to the conclusion that your birthvessel didn't thought it will most optimally the final goal of hers; which is, as said previously, universal for foids. Your aggressive defeatism cannot contain rightful rage and hatred of foid scum one shall embrace after realizing these truths.
Last edited:
it worked , it baited the ITfags
There absolutely is no reason for my mom to keep caring for me at 25 outside of genuine love, "Birthvessel" don't call my mother that again. Just because there are many women who are cruel to ugly men doesn't mean all of them are. The Absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence just because your mother may not have loved you doesn't mean that all mothers do not love their children. I am not Bluepilled for not believing that all women are same, I recognize that most women are cruel to us but not all of them.
Cope as much as you want boyo, I won't forcefully enlighten you. All empirics prove universality of their drive. Only unreliable gossips mention exceptations from it, alongside with mythical indian janitors with harems.
"Marxism Rodgerism"
Yes, base an entire incel moment off of a guy who killed more incels than normies. And also the same man who would've spat in your face had he met you irl.
Incels worshipping Elliot, are the same as blacks worshipping Hitler. Keep guzzling his cum faggot. You know he would've hated you with as much scorn as he would've hated the average woman. What's the point of these dumbass ideologies? To suck off that fag even further beyond his grave?
He couldn't have given a single shit about you or me.
He was essentially the bourgeoisie you claim to hate. He had money. He was, even during his father's financial crisis, a guy with a decent status and solid amounts of cash to use to afford for weapons and whatnot. I find it ironic how your core principle is based around this supposed class struggle, while also using a guy who would've 100% acted like those rich assholes you claim to hate. His whole core personality was flexing his inherent status and money at every opportunity. From buying expensive glasses to expensive clothing, to flexing his BMW to gloating about his parents meeting Hollywood actors. The whole concept of Elliot Rodgers, if you were to break it down, is someone who wants to be bigger than whole world and have as much power as possible, which is why he wants a blonde Stacy in the first place. He doesn't care for the poor, nor for anyone sexless besides him.
Also, I'm pretty sure he bullied or at least annoyed the shit out of other fellow users of PUA Hate, which makes it even funnier for you to set him up to be this mystical figure for your imaginary action hero power fantasy. If Elliot was alive and entered this forum(prior to the attack), he wouldn't have been seen as this righteous, wise , intelligent ,heroic figure who stood up for the common man(even though he was richer than many of us), but as an annoying bragging fakecel faggot who would've been banned a minimum week later after infighting and bullying other incels for their appearances. If he never did what he did, people would've just sucked up to the faggot next to him with the most kills and fame and kissed his feet as if it were God's, even if he did it for his own personal game, rather than for true virtue of helping the "incel cause".
Why not use other killers like Marc Lèpine or Alex or Jake or any other moron at that point? Because it's a meme ideology on point with satanism larpers and so called anarchists who cry like bitches and call the cops over every minor inconvenience.
Last edited:
"Marxism Rodgerism"
Yes, base an entire incel moment off of a guy who killed more incels than normies. And also the same man who would've spat in your face had he met you irl.
Incels worshipping Elliot, are the same as blacks worshipping Hitler. Keep guzzling his cum faggot. You know he would've hated you with as much scorn as he would've hated the average woman. What's the point of these dumbass ideologies? To suck off that fag even further beyond his grave?
He couldn't have given a single shit about you or me.
He was essentially the bourgeoisie you claim to hate. He had money. He was, even during his father's financial crisis, a guy with a decent status and solid amounts of cash to use to afford for weapons and whatnot. I find it ironic how your core principle is based around this supposed class struggle, while also using a guy who would've 100% acted like those rich assholes you claim to hate. His whole core personality was flexing his inherent status and money at every opportunity. From buying expensive glasses to expensive clothing, to flexing his BMW to gloating about his parents meeting Hollywood actors. The whole concept of Elliot Rodgers, if you were to break it down, is someone who wants to be bigger than whole world and have as much power as possible, which is why he wants a blonde Stacy in the first place. He doesn't care for the poor, nor for anyone sexless besides him.
Also, I'm pretty sure he bullied or at least annoyed the shit out of other fellow users of PUA Hate, which makes it even funnier for you to set him up to be this mystical figure for your imaginary action hero power fantasy. If Elliot was alive and entered this forum, he wouldn't have been seen as this righteous, heroic figure who stood up for the common man(even though he was richer than many of us), but as an annoying bragging fakecel faggot who would've been banned a minimum week later after infighting and bullying other incels for their appearance.
Why not use other killers like Marc Lèpine or Alex or Jake or any other moron at that point?
I wasn't aware of all of ER actions back then when I made this post, I already damned his cult and praised Lepine
Also I resigned from naming movement after ER and simply renamed it to scientific blackpillism
Last edited:
I read the whole post you made in op. Some things I agree with, plenty of I absolutely don't but either ways it's forum discussion so it's bound to happen.
You should read into their lives and what they've done prior to any attack alongside motives, especially if you're planning to form a movement or anything with them as your inspiration. Even if I don't like concept of killer worshipping. Otherwise, you're basically making yourself look retarded for preaching shit not even your own hero is aligned with.
The name sounds better. Would I use it as a moment name? No. But I don't have any better names so do whatever.
I don't see the purpose of keeping women alive, even if castrated or with their rights removed. I find it stupid because I believe main desire for a man, besides sex, is to be loved and truly adored for who they are, even with their limitations(looks, height, whatnot). Also pointlessly cruel and edgy. It reads on the same level as a 30 posts newfag who just made his first IT bait .
For my "ideal" utopia, I'd simply replace the whole female gender with artificial ones who could be molded into whatever the user craves. I find women repulsive personality wise and as human beings, so to me the female question is the same as Jewish one.
Last edited:
I agree that foids will be artificaly replaced in the future and thus eradicated. However, in my investigations I came to the conclusion that ultimate desire humans are born with (although it's possible for sapient ones to change it through philosphy; and that capability of changing the imperative is what I mean by free will, which is the only valid separator of humans from nonhumans) is to have as many living children as it's possible, what extends only to lifetime, that is: life is necessary condition of having them (their existence is relation to subject). And therefore solutions I proposed, although here i only sketched them and on some I had changed mind, are necessary for state to exist without revolution arising from men striving to realize their natural imperative. For in hypergamism almost all of children are chads' bastrads; what's contradictory to imperative of most humans. Once they realize it, the burning of hypergamist system shall happen.
Also I don't understand why are you so allergic to radicalism. Bastille wasn't stormed by defeatists.
Last edited:
Whilst foids especially dont have free will in modern society freedom isnt real and everyone is stuck in a mental cage made by the media
I cannot agree. Existence of site is refutation of your thesis.
Yes but im talking about the majority of the population the same info thats the input in someones mind is just repeated in there output also sorry if this reply is poorly written im kinda drunk right now
Well said. Foids are no more than animals that are bound to their animalistic instincts and desires.
That is true and always has been true for the vast majority of humanity; both male and female, since the dawn of time.Well said. Foids are no more than animals that are bound to their animalistic instincts and desires.
Some individuals get a glimpse of self-awareness occasionally, and perhaps we are more painfully cognizant of certain human realities than other demographics, but the vast majority of people operate on biological autopilot.
The only qualitative and not just quantitative, and thus the only not arbitrary, difference between humans and nonhumans is ability to change natural imperative, that is free will; hypergamous animals lack it.
Last edited:
final solution to foid question is utterly destroy and replace them with artificial wombs and robowives,no need to have to do anything with these vermins,just kill them all and be done with it,no need to make them slaves,mutilate etc. Commie tier kike faggotry,also no point and sometimes it's not good to even spread and speak about blackpill to normgroid males.They will only attack you for the pathetic simpcuck kike slaves they are and will go out of their way to destroy blackpill truths for muh foids and their lord elites.
This is pretty much spot on. The only woman who will ever genuinely love you especially if you are sub 7 is your mom becuase you are her progeny. Other women if you are sub 7 will just see you as a wrench, wallet or emotional tampon if they even see you at all.
We need to gather all the TerenceTao level IQcels, and put them in a lab, and create Eve 2.0. a much more obedient, loyal and less hypergamous version of foids. We need a new foid breed basically. That would be the invention of the millenium... .
facts. a loving mother is the truecel's only cope. you can thank their own genetic solipsism and huge oxytoxin surge during your birth for that unprecedented foid love that breaks their usual hypergamous standards. (IF you are lucky and she's not an indifferent psycho... ),
I agree that they need to be destroyed and replaced. But currently there's no technology to achieve this goal; thus this is the only solution.
This is unachievable in our times fantasy. While political revolt is not impossible, and further, necessary, relaying on imagined technology is utopism.
Last edited:
we should reach the possibility of the tech being made,then we can surely go on with ending foids and all cuckfags,we can't go any longer with just what our ancestors did,having foids enslaved....this is not just with foids and races alone...slavery of our enemies and letting them live around only leads to more problems,the present world is a good example of where that leads to and how it's a big mistake.And the pandora box is open and no way you can put muh foids in the place and just simply revoke rights and be done with it.They will definitely never go along with this and surely just make subversive brainwashing and creating new golems and simpcucks and still will bring back the world to the matriarchal gynocemtric mess again and again....just put a final end to it all....our ancestors didn't had any way to do itwhile we have the ideas and the tech now, despite realizing foids need to be gone( the quote from a roman emperor who basically said we can happily go along with life if foids simply vanish,but alas nature has made it that way that we can't exist without wombs,which is in the hands of foids) ....our ancestors were left with no choice but to just keep these bitches in check and deal with their insufferable existence....all so that we might put an end to this gay faggotry of dealing with these bitches,we can't simply just go on and apply plaster to the wound,while we have the opportunity(not even an opportunity, we have no fucking choice and another chance to even deal and fucking survive with foids).
Last edited:
also JFL alot of bluepillcucks are viewing the thread right now.
11 blue pillers damn.
11 blue pillers damn.
Si sine uxore pati possemus, Quirites, omnes ea molestia careremus; set quoniam ita natura tradidit, ut nec cum illis satis commode, nec sine illis ullo modo vivi possit, saluti perpetuae potius quam brevi voluptati consulendum est.
yea this quote,I don't have the time now to dig up the quote picture I first came across,also don't know how to upload here too.Brootal newcel pain.
already trying to learn german(using duolingo though),need to learn languages.
interesting read
only reason she keeps helping him is her delusional hope that dutchcel will become a success one way or the other. it's all about status and leaving a good legacy behind so that narc bitch mom of his can be called a great mom when she finally passes away. No such thing as true love and care from women
basically create new clones that will substitute them eventually. hornier, more obedient, more monogamous, less hypergamous, and more hardworking/bigger stamina. and their period lasts like half a day. and eventually noone will buy the original foids. and the viltrumite hyperfoids will take over. and the human species will improve overall as well.. .
thats foid nature summary
Females naturally value quality, whilst men naturally value quantity.
When these females start to go for both quality and quantity, we get pushed even further down.
When these females start to go for both quality and quantity, we get pushed even further down.
Quality jfl. Read on fisherian runaway boyo.
Last edited:
T
yes human nature doesn't change wherever you go in the world
But foids aren't human.
D
this might not be the place to ask this question because im trying to actually improve my mindset and maybe start thinking critically of the information i take in but is there any evidence of this? like do we have different brains to foid is this proven scientific fact bc i dont ever rememeber learning about major brain differences in school but i also never really paid much attention
have you ever spoken with a woman niggathis might not be the place to ask this question because im trying to actually improve my mindset and maybe start thinking critically of the information i take in but is there any evidence of this? like do we have different brains to foid is this proven scientific fact bc i dont ever rememeber learning about major brain differences in school but i also never really paid much attention
Last edited:
Empirical sciences serves the philosophy; and philosophy serves the blackpill. Imperative of foids is derived from the fact, that their reaction to chad, which is swarming around him and trying to get impregnated, always occurs. And since this is the only universal reaction of them which cannot be derived from other such reactions, it has to be their imperative.this might not be the place to ask this question because im trying to actually improve my mindset and maybe start thinking critically of the information i take in but is there any evidence of this? like do we have different brains to foid is this proven scientific fact bc i dont ever rememeber learning about major brain differences in school but i also never really paid much attention
In humans, on other hand, you cannot point a single universal attitude; for one can always point at exceptions. Yet there's undoubtedly an inherent imperative: for infants very first reaction to empirics cannot be gained from experience, since they didn't got any at that moment. Thus it exist. Reactions of very young boyos are universal; avoiding physical pain, drive to consuming sugars, avoiding death etc. Therefore the imperative they're born with has to be universal for humans. And since there's no universal attitude in humans as a whole, from necessity a change of imperative occurs in some of them. Thus, humans has ability of changing the imperative under some conditions. And this positive determination of quality of possibility of change of imperative, is what I name free will.
Last edited:
D
but what about lesbians and asexuals? they wouldnt swarm a chad theyd probs swarm a stacy or just no one at all if its universal surely gay people wouldnt exist? or asexual people?
Even though femoids can intercourse with dogs or other foids, they won't be goals-in-themselves, but just a means to reach chad; to bypass his countless harem. Such acts occur in them only pragmatically.
Last edited:
D
So foids who lets say marry their lesbian foid or never even date a chad is this beause they've failed? or they've like accepted their situation?
You seem to not understand. They perform such actions thinking it will lead them to chad. The fact that these aren't effective comes from differentness of intentions of their actions and their effects; and such distinction comes from their stupidity.
Last edited:
Put a chad near them and you shall see their deeds.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
