Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Toxic Femininity Regarding whether or not things were easier pre-Tinder...

FrothySolutions

FrothySolutions

Post like the FBI is watching.
★★★★★
Joined
May 6, 2018
Posts
19,899
Check out this diary from this 14 year old girl in the 1950s. She had no shortage of 6 fellas competing for her, all of whom she dated openly.

Now I'm starting to remember history differently. I'm pretty sure the way things actually went was, it was a man's job to impress a woman. And if he didn't, he just didn't. The woman had no obligation to lower her standards if a better man came along. That's why you have all these love rivals knocking dicks to get inside her.

 
It's possible but there's also the chance that all these guys also had 6 different options and they went back and forth between them before choosing one and same with the women.
 
It was definitely easier for men than it is now
 
things were nevER easyer for ugly men
 
Cope.

The only thing Tinder did is to reveal the real state of things to the mass of bluepilled normie pleb. Things have always been like that, a tiny minority of happy fews has always been sharing all the foids, and foids have always been glad to be a part of some great Khan's harem. Tinder is just making the spectacle of it more obscene to people who would have never thought of it otherwise.
 
The 50's was just an accidental occurence of sexual communism due to the toll of WW2 over the general male population. Now things are just back to normal.
 
It's possible but there's also the chance that all these guys also had 6 different options and they went back and forth between them before choosing one and same with the women.

So some kind of 42-way love superpolygon?
 
So some kind of 42-way love superpolygon?
Not to that extent but back then the average man wasn't as ugly and the schools were a bit more racially homogenous, so in some friend groups or communities it might be normal to just talk to a girl and be interested in multiple without fucking them all or considering yourself in a relationship with them all. This is all theoretical maybe stacies did have it easy back then and you just rarely hear from the truecels of that time it is hard to tell.
 
It's possible but there's also the chance that all these guys also had 6 different options and they went back and forth between them before choosing one and same with the women.
Also these bitches didn't have social media and clout to collect. At least they were actually devoted to sincerely finding a partner. Whereas now, it's more modern to view relationships as an after effect of the lifestyle you advertise to the internet.
 
Not to that extent but back then the average man wasn't as ugly and the schools were a bit more racially homogenous, so in some friend groups or communities it might be normal to just talk to a girl and be interested in multiple without fucking them all or considering yourself in a relationship with them all. This is all theoretical maybe stacies did have it easy back then and you just rarely hear from the truecels of that time it is hard to tell.
back then, bitches didn't even gossip that much. They just kept it in their diaries like this. So if there was cheating and no one got caught, nobody really cared. "Cuck" wasn't a thing really.
 
Also these bitches didn't have social media and clout to collect. At least they were actually devoted to sincerely finding a partner. Whereas now, it's more modern to view relationships as an after effect of the lifestyle you advertise to the internet.

Were they? She's open to the romantic advances of any man she deems fit. She's deliberately trying to be "heart-whole" and "fancy free."

Not to that extent but back then the average man wasn't as ugly and the schools were a bit more racially homogenous, so in some friend groups or communities it might be normal to just talk to a girl and be interested in multiple without fucking them all or considering yourself in a relationship with them all. This is all theoretical maybe stacies did have it easy back then and you just rarely hear from the truecels of that time it is hard to tell.

See, now we have to ask the question of "What counts as relationship-exclusive activity?" These are dates they're going on.
 
Cope.

The only thing Tinder did is to reveal the real state of things to the mass of bluepilled normie pleb. Things have always been like that, a tiny minority of happy fews has always been sharing all the foids, and foids have always been glad to be a part of some great Khan's harem. Tinder is just making the spectacle of it more obscene to people who would have never thought of it otherwise.

naw you're coping
things were way easier back then, foids actually weren't repulsed by any man like they are now days. also finding chad was much much harder and casual sex wasn't socially accepted. i know foids who got kicked out of their friend circles for fking around, that was a death sentence for a foid.

why do youngcel nigga think they know more :feelskek: you dont know shit
social media/smartphones and dating apps made things 1000000 times worse.
 
i know foids who got kicked out of their friend circles for fking around, that was a death sentence for a foid.
Making the point it was not only harder for us, but also for men who would have been casual sex havers.

Don't play the "ima oldest oldcel" card jfl
 
Check out this diary from this 14 year old girl in the 1950s. She had no shortage of 6 fellas competing for her, all of whom she dated openly.

Now I'm starting to remember history differently. I'm pretty sure the way things actually went was, it was a man's job to impress a woman. And if he didn't, he just didn't. The woman had no obligation to lower her standards if a better man came along. That's why you have all these love rivals knocking dicks to get inside her.


The religious society is also a factor to consider. Many retardcels are anti-Christian and atheist but, they don't realize that a traditional society that sets limits on FOID promiscuity ensures access to pussy by establishing monogamy. Ugly men a hundred years ago fucked infinitely more and could get away with it thanks to a patriarchal, Christian society. That's why FOIDS hate religion infinitely, why it didn't allow them polygamy with Chad and being filled with cum every weekend.
 
Cope.

The only thing Tinder did is to reveal the real state of things to the mass of bluepilled normie pleb. Things have always been like that, a tiny minority of happy fews has always been sharing all the foids, and foids have always been glad to be a part of some great Khan's harem. Tinder is just making the spectacle of it more obscene to people who would have never thought of it otherwise.
 
Making the point it was not only harder for us, but also for men who would have been casual sex havers.

Don't play the "ima oldest oldcel" card jfl

it was not harder :feelskek:
chad would get their asses beat back then cuz your avg male had decent T levels, they would jump any niggas/chad trying to sleep with every foid in the friend circle.
also sleeping around was much harder for not only chads but also foids. your high bodycount was considered 3-5 bodies which foids now are able to do in middle school.
only ones who didn't get bitches or pus were ugly mofos like us or mental weirdcels autists
 

Similar threads

edger0uter
Replies
37
Views
507
Rhinitis-cel
R
Q
Replies
75
Views
3K
Qwertyuiop99
Q
stalin22
Replies
16
Views
574
Drinkcel
Drinkcel
go2sleep
Replies
11
Views
507
go2sleep
go2sleep
stalin22
Replies
21
Views
2K
Emba
Emba

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top