I guess the consensus on this forum agrees with the importance of neurotypicality > acquiring wide social circles... although he slipped on the survey shows men are favorable [...] argument.
What are your thoughts on his reply?
Brutal Redditor gave me two probable reasons about my zero success ratio with Online Dating...
I guess the consensus on this forum agrees with the importance of neurotypicality > acquiring wide social circles... although he slipped on the survey shows men are favorable [...] argument.
What are your thoughts on his reply?
If you're not intending to reply, simply delete your comment. Whore.
I
i think if ur avg ur just fucked online
Tendencies are seemingly shifting. I guess the bare minimum is increasing by the day. Thus, you're more pressured to interact with other people as a teenager.
If you're in your twenties with no friends whatsoever (lacking on social connections), you'll struggle in other areas besides dating — depending on what country you're living in.
I
Corrected my coment. Re-read it. Thank you.
"Studies show..."[Citation needed]
www.pewresearch.org
"While majorities across various demographic groups are more likely to describe their searches as easy, rather than difficult, there are some differences by gender. Among online daters, women are more likely than men to say it was at least somewhat difficult to find people they were physically attracted to (36% vs. 21%), while men were more likely than women to express that it was difficult to find others who shared their hobbies and interests (41% vs. 30%)."
"There are substantial gender differences in the amount of attention online daters say they received on dating sites or apps. Men who have online dated in the past five years are far more likely than women to feel as if they did not get enough messages (57% vs. 24%). On the other hand, women who have online dated in this time period are five times as likely as men to think they were sent too many messages (30% vs. 6%).
The Virtues and Downsides of Online Dating
30% of U.S. adults say they have used a dating site or app. A majority of online daters say their overall experience was positive, but many users – particularly younger women – report being harassed or sent explicit messages on these platforms
www.pewresearch.org
"While majorities across various demographic groups are more likely to describe their searches as easy, rather than difficult, there are some differences by gender. Among online daters, women are more likely than men to say it was at least somewhat difficult to find people they were physically attracted to (36% vs. 21%), while men were more likely than women to express that it was difficult to find others who shared their hobbies and interests (41% vs. 30%)."
"There are substantial gender differences in the amount of attention online daters say they received on dating sites or apps. Men who have online dated in the past five years are far more likely than women to feel as if they did not get enough messages (57% vs. 24%). On the other hand, women who have online dated in this time period are five times as likely as men to think they were sent too many messages (30% vs. 6%).
I
yea i suppose so
""Studies show..."[Citation needed]
The Virtues and Downsides of Online Dating
30% of U.S. adults say they have used a dating site or app. A majority of online daters say their overall experience was positive, but many users – particularly younger women – report being harassed or sent explicit messages on these platforms
"While majorities across various demographic groups are more likely to describe their searches as easy, rather than difficult, there are some differences by gender. Among online daters, women are more likely than men to say it was at least somewhat difficult to find people they were physically attracted to (36% vs. 21%), while men were more likely than women to express that it was difficult to find others who shared their hobbies and interests (41% vs. 30%)."
"There are substantial gender differences in the amount of attention online daters say they received on dating sites or apps. Men who have online dated in the past five years are far more likely than women to feel as if they did not get enough messages (57% vs. 24%). On the other hand, women who have online dated in this time period are five times as likely as men to think they were sent too many messages (30% vs. 6%).
What I was trying to see before accidentally hitting "Post reply" is that toilets are less satisfied because they have TOO MANY OPTIONS, there are too many men to choose from which creates choice stress. Men feel satisfied because unlike real life they sometimes interact with a toilet.
Men are happy like a nomad in the desert that finds a half eaten apple, toilets are unsatisfied because they're at an all you can eat with the chefs constantly asking them if they want more to eat.
"Satisfaction" here isn't even remotely comparable.
Yup, his survey claim has been rendered false... obviously."Studies show..."[Citation needed]
The Virtues and Downsides of Online Dating
30% of U.S. adults say they have used a dating site or app. A majority of online daters say their overall experience was positive, but many users – particularly younger women – report being harassed or sent explicit messages on these platforms
"While majorities across various demographic groups are more likely to describe their searches as easy, rather than difficult, there are some differences by gender. Among online daters, women are more likely than men to say it was at least somewhat difficult to find people they were physically attracted to (36% vs. 21%), while men were more likely than women to express that it was difficult to find others who shared their hobbies and interests (41% vs. 30%)."
"There are substantial gender differences in the amount of attention online daters say they received on dating sites or apps. Men who have online dated in the past five years are far more likely than women to feel as if they did not get enough messages (57% vs. 24%). On the other hand, women who have online dated in this time period are five times as likely as men to think they were sent too many messages (30% vs. 6%).
I think I overexaggerated my comment by stating I've been considered average most of the times. In fact, some Blackpill accounts over Instagram or reputable Looksmax users told me I look like shit (below-average?). Most indians over there say I'm average... but other fellow White people seemed too harsh about my leaked picture.
Anyways... women don't really give their time of the day for me, so I shouldn't really care about OD, ever again...
> I’m average-looking
Stopped reading and caring.
Stopped reading and caring.
H
I think we know enough about this topic and your cognitive dissonance is unnecessary.
Understandable.
Don't get me wrong, I think that the hierarchy is Looks (online) / Being social (offline) > Neurotypical > Status > Race > other phenotypical features (height, physiqué, Etc.) > money.
Neurotypicality is definitely high on the list, even a Chad will get ghosted if he appears Autistic (this is why a lot of Chadfishers get ghosted).
Most "creepy messages" are either from ugly men because they're ugly or Normies who don't know basic social conventions.
Neurotypicality is definitely high on the list, even a Chad will get ghosted if he appears Autistic (this is why a lot of Chadfishers get ghosted).
Most "creepy messages" are either from ugly men because they're ugly or Normies who don't know basic social conventions.
Jokes aside though, if you’re white and average-looking then why are you here? You should just unironically self-improve and move on from this community.
I get you're high IQ, and? I'm not being inconsistent with my content, in fact I am fed up with most of you who claim that LTNs are "fakecels" without further giving any reasonable argument.
You can't be fat and average-looking, pick one.
I've been rated 4.5 by WheatWaffles.
I'm below-average looking. I was rated 4.5 when I went down to 78-82 weight range (in kilograms).
A foid doens't need to know that Chad happens to have a dozen of sub8 male friends to eventually consider fucking him. Social circle is just a bonus when you're already in the sex haver pool. This cuck is coping hard that's all.
Plus surveys are utter bs. Only room temperature IQ fucktards believe you can scientifically grasp reality using something that can be fucked up by anyone lying / trolling / saying random stuffs.
Of course average men lied, because they are too proud to admit their loss or they believe that pretending they're successful using apps will somehow lead them to such success, the whole wealth manifestation bs paradigm.
However I don't understand your point. You literally need to be neurotypical in order to grow a real social circle. Both are somehow important when it comes to dating a foid, because for her being able to entertain a big social circle is somehow a hint about you being a safe partner or whatever, but you can't social max if you're not neurotypical anyway, so in the end being neurotypical is the condition to all this.
Plus surveys are utter bs. Only room temperature IQ fucktards believe you can scientifically grasp reality using something that can be fucked up by anyone lying / trolling / saying random stuffs.
Of course average men lied, because they are too proud to admit their loss or they believe that pretending they're successful using apps will somehow lead them to such success, the whole wealth manifestation bs paradigm.
However I don't understand your point. You literally need to be neurotypical in order to grow a real social circle. Both are somehow important when it comes to dating a foid, because for her being able to entertain a big social circle is somehow a hint about you being a safe partner or whatever, but you can't social max if you're not neurotypical anyway, so in the end being neurotypical is the condition to all this.
What do you consider creepy?
The fact that you paid that guy to rate you.
I’m starting to genuinely feel like some of you are lonely purely because of horrible life choices and now you’re constantly looking for a way to blame it all on your genetics and environment that have had nothing to do with your predicament.
My point is, there's nothing to debate about. Everything about blackpill has been discussed already.
His reply didn't make any sense to me, in fact. That's why I shared it over this echo-chamber hating forum.
I only partially blamed about my genetics. Not being neurotypical is what pushed me to isolate myself in a very young age.The fact that you paid that guy to rate you.
I’m starting to genuinely feel like some of you are lonely purely because of horrible life choices and now you’re constantly looking for a way to blame it all on your genetics and environment that have had nothing to do with your predicament.
And I could afford ratings because they're really dirty cheap... instead of spending it over my AIDungeon subscription amongst other commodities.
Seems like you have to have a heap of pictures doing normie stuff like hiking, sports, he token travel pic, laughing while at a pub and one with friends. photoshop your head on to a bunch and copy someones elses bio
That’s redeemable. Go outside and maybe hit the gym. In all honesty, if you’re not ugly or at least as genetic dead as you’re screeching to be then I have zero sympathy for you as an incel, since I can’t really relate to you in the slightest. “Not being neurotypical” is not the end of the world.
Nice try FBI
Could people tell the images are photoshopped? It's hard to replicate consistent lighting over other pictures. Maybe Roop (deep-fake) could work?
I'm not a federal agent, but whatever aids you with your hatred against me.
There are really obvious posters applying FBI-style deceiving techniques over this forum. It's not hard to spot such people.
Boring shit tbh. The whole dating lore shit is boring af. Never heard anything more boring in my entire life.
I literally have no feeling about your existence.
I never claimed you cared about me. Do you realize English isn't my first language? Anyways, I don't know why I reply on a language spoken by pirates and criminals.
If you are good at photoshop and have patience. The main things to concentrate on is dpi (the grain of the wo images has to match), colour (there are settings you can change this with), light (direction of light, warmth, contrast etc.. there are many settings to add a light source and alter this) and also blending in the image (this can take a bit of time but must be done properly using the eraser tool, bandaid tool, cloning tool etc). If you are new to Photoshop take some tutorials before you attempt it. You can always pay someone to do it for you also. If you give it ago I am happy to look for giveaways (people used to the app can usually pick them up easily)
Ignorant.
H
You say that you are "average" (ugly). In your situation, being charismatic, having friends, standing out and being impressive in any significant way could improve your results, but nothing of a value is guaranteed in your situation. But you allready know that. You are fakecel in a way that you probably could bang some bitch, if you try enough and get lucky, maybe some decent one, but most of the women (almost all) are going to have better options than you that they are going to choose (unless you are geniuinely a life beating larger than life outlier person apart from your face).
But if that is all you care about you can probably put your dick in some pussy at some point, even multiple ones in >1 life instances.
I think I'm not really interested in failing on online dating again. I fucking hate the kuffar around me, and I want to coldly kill them with my knife.
This forum is technically full of fakecels.
JoinedSep 6, 2023Posts254
Whatever works
Only in ROBLOX... since GTA 5 is almost >120 GB.
why you're bad with women: looks
long answer: loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooks
long answer: loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooks
Similar threads
Fancy Alcoholic
Discussion
Why I think inceldom has a space in the public debate and why that is important to prevent extremism
- Blackpincel
- Inceldom Discussion
blackraven
Users who are viewing this thread
