Serious Rape is eugenic, hypergamy is dysgenic [studies]

[cymbeline]

most niggas here can't rape

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

most niggas here can't rape

I doubt it.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

bump

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

bump

 

[hook-nosed trash]

IT in shambles

 

[EmperorCaligula]

There's for some reason a widespread belief that hypergamy is eugenic and seizing femoids is not. However, the order here is exactly opposite. Femoids' choces are ex definitione harmful not only for society, but also for a genepool. How, would you ask?

Due to Runaway Selection, mean of reproduction, when given freedom, will always select for traits which concentrations they're aiming for are dysgenic. This shall lead to extreme overgrown in these traits and degradation of specie; and, eventually, to its extinction. That's how R. A. Fisher, greatest biologist after Darwin, describe this process, although with some flaws:


Fisher's article „The evolution of sexual preference” in The Eugenics Review, p. 187, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2987134/?p

Species that are living (or not, on what we shall focus later) proofs of his thesis are to be infinitely counted. There are few examples, however, that portray this law the best.

View attachment 1621655
The most obvious bastard of sexual selection dysgenicity is, what's clear, a peacock. Its tail, longer than the animal itself, made of flashy, bright leathers, alarming every nearby predator of easy pray, finally making difficult not even merely flying, but every movement can cause only rightful disgust and reflection upon it in observer. Similar feelings to this, for Fisher's main object of observation were birds, were undoubtedly what impelled him to give his discovery a scientific grounding. It's also to be noted that Darwin shared similar opinion; "The sight of a feather in a peacock’s tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me feel sick", he said.



View attachment 1621658
View attachment 1621659
Yet another victim of runaway effect is Babirussa. Its tusks are what the tails is in peacock, that is, are the trait which is selected for. As one can see, due to this their growth is so big, that they at first become useless, then finally impale the skull of the animal. Such a wonder of hypergamy!



View attachment 1621664
View attachment 1621665
Next specie to be found most physically degenerated thanks to sexual selection is strap-toothed whale. Its tusks, like in babirussa, are caricaturally overgrown, but in other way; they're making it almost impossible for this beast to open its jaw.
Beaked whales show remarkable sexual dimorphism in that only the males retain functional teeth. Male strap-toothed beaked whales begin to develop a large flat tusk from each lower jaw as juveniles, growing at a 45° angle back towards the head and over the rostrum (beak). Reaching up to 34 cm in length,[6] the teeth may overlap at the tips, restricting the gape size of the animal. Two stranded adult male strap-toothed beaked whales were recorded as only being able to open their mouths 3.2 cm and 4 cm wide, compared to females and juveniles that had a gape size of 6.5 cm. It is thought male beaked whales use their teeth to compete for mating access to females, as evidenced by scars and scratches on the bodies of males. However it is unlikely the whale uses the whole tusk for such aggressive interactions, instead, it is probable that only a small denticle found upon the upper surface of the tooth is utilised.



View attachment 1621673
View attachment 1621674
And crème de la crème of sexual selection, showing what's its final effect; species that got extinct because of it. Fisher, as we saw in his quote, argued that this mechanism will regulate itself at some point. However, modern sciences have shown that there in fact are kinds that extincted because of it, thus proving him wrong. Sexual selection is against natural selection.


Irish elk, one of the Pleistocene's biggest land mammals, got doomed because of its extravagant features, which were the result of hypergamy.

Source: https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/artio/irishelk.html



Finally, ostracoda depicted on the picture above is prime example of it. Blue area, taking one third of animal's body, is overgrown genitals. Because of this extreme dimorphism, in the past many kinds of this crustacea went extinct; modern ones are seemingly following their path.

Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7482269/ (I cite abstract because it's not my goal to explain here smallest details to a reader, but to give him rather broad perspective.)



But — one could say — traits select for in these animals are particular and situation is different within our kind. I agree. It's truth that there's no singular trait in humans that foids desire as such. But it's the end of nuances; traits are always considered in relations to each other. So is a lenght of a leg in proportion to lenght of another leg, these are in proportion to hips, torso; these are to each other, etc. There's one proportion of human qualities, including proportions that include height and facial traits, considered the most attratictive. Every deviation from the ideal result in lower attractiveness. However, this ideal proportion can multiplie its attractivnes in eyes of femoids by incrasing actual numbers in its particular proportions. Therefore physical human traits as a whole are the same as peacock's tail. To make humans dysgenic, fragile-leged, unsupplied in blood giants, and ultimately to doom our kind – would be result of hyperamy.




Yet there's the soltion to this problem: rape, this philosophical stone, the panacea for cancer consuming humanity. By seizing means of reproduction, truecel reverse dysgenicity of hypergamy and implements eugenics. With his free will, man stops rot of his kind and negate femoids' want of its degeneracy. This negation of runaway effect is thus physical bettering of our kind.

Nice post, the people in the comments are too low IQ to comprehend

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Nice post, the people in the comments are too low IQ to comprehend

Nice to hear this.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

IT in shambles

Cucks always seethe at my posts.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

bump

 

[Mailercel]

There's for some reason a widespread belief that hypergamy is eugenic and seizing femoids is not. However, the order here is exactly opposite. Femoids' choces are ex definitione harmful not only for society, but also for a genepool. How, would you ask?

Due to Runaway Selection, mean of reproduction, when given freedom, will always select for traits which concentrations they're aiming for are dysgenic. This shall lead to extreme overgrown in these traits and degradation of specie; and, eventually, to its extinction. That's how R. A. Fisher, greatest biologist after Darwin, describe this process, although with some flaws:

True, It’s basically Twilight, you have the PSL god vampires getting laid and the sub-5 werewolves live in poverty, but the werewolves can just fraud as dogs to attract white foids to fuck them and secretly impregnate them with incelic werewolf babies.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

True, It’s basically Twilight, you have the PSL god vampires getting laid and the sub-5 werewolves live in poverty, but the werewolves can just fraud as dogs to attract white foids to fuck them and secretly impregnate them with incelic werewolf babies.

GrAY

 

[Mailercel]

GrAY

Can’t handle the truth nuke…..it’s truly over for werecels

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

bump

 

[SubhumanOldcel]

Shalom IT

 

[Thaway]

Women not reproducing with incels isn't what causes mankind to die out

Actually, it kinda is. It is atleast causing whole population groups to die out.

 

[stsaturn]

what a read

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

what a read

Elaborate.

 

[BeanChud88]

Is this in must read? If not add it in definitely gonna save this for debates

 

[BeanChud88]

I can’t wait for the human race to have debilitating back problems and for food to be more expensive in a few generations due to dysgenic female selection of height

 

[nihilist chud]

most niggas here can't rape

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Is this in must read? If not add it in definitely gonna save this for debates

Could you make this thread to mustread to save us from discussions with GrAYs and foid worshipers kind saars? I had put a lot of effort into this post so newcomers can get purified of bluepill superstitions.

@SlayerSlayer @Forum Hero @proudweeb @Todd’s Pay Pig

 

[kankercel]

There's for some reason a widespread belief that hypergamy is eugenic and seizing femoids is not. However, the order here is exactly opposite. Femoids' choces are ex definitione harmful not only for society, but also for a genepool. How, would you ask?

Due to Runaway Selection, mean of reproduction, when given freedom, will always select for traits which concentrations they're aiming for are dysgenic. This shall lead to extreme overgrown in these traits and degradation of specie; and, eventually, to its extinction. That's how R. A. Fisher, greatest biologist after Darwin, describe this process, although with some flaws:


Fisher's article „The evolution of sexual preference” in The Eugenics Review, p. 187, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2987134/?p

Species that are living (or not, on what we shall focus later) proofs of his thesis are to be infinitely counted. There are few examples, however, that portray this law the best.

View attachment 1621655
The most obvious bastard of sexual selection dysgenicity is, what's clear, a peacock. Its tail, longer than the animal itself, made of flashy, bright leathers, alarming every nearby predator of easy pray, finally making difficult not even merely flying, but every movement can cause only rightful disgust and reflection upon it in observer. Similar feelings to this, for Fisher's main object of observation were birds, were undoubtedly what impelled him to give his discovery a scientific grounding. It's also to be noted that Darwin shared similar opinion; "The sight of a feather in a peacock’s tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me feel sick", he said.



View attachment 1621658
View attachment 1621659
Yet another victim of runaway effect is Babirussa. Its tusks are what the tails is in peacock, that is, are the trait which is selected for. As one can see, due to this their growth is so big, that they at first become useless, then finally impale the skull of the animal. Such a wonder of hypergamy!



View attachment 1621664
View attachment 1621665
Next specie to be found most physically degenerated thanks to sexual selection is strap-toothed whale. Its tusks, like in babirussa, are caricaturally overgrown, but in other way; they're making it almost impossible for this beast to open its jaw.
Beaked whales show remarkable sexual dimorphism in that only the males retain functional teeth. Male strap-toothed beaked whales begin to develop a large flat tusk from each lower jaw as juveniles, growing at a 45° angle back towards the head and over the rostrum (beak). Reaching up to 34 cm in length,[6] the teeth may overlap at the tips, restricting the gape size of the animal. Two stranded adult male strap-toothed beaked whales were recorded as only being able to open their mouths 3.2 cm and 4 cm wide, compared to females and juveniles that had a gape size of 6.5 cm. It is thought male beaked whales use their teeth to compete for mating access to females, as evidenced by scars and scratches on the bodies of males. However it is unlikely the whale uses the whole tusk for such aggressive interactions, instead, it is probable that only a small denticle found upon the upper surface of the tooth is utilised.



View attachment 1621673
View attachment 1621674
And crème de la crème of sexual selection, showing what's its final effect; species that got extinct because of it. Fisher, as we saw in his quote, argued that this mechanism will regulate itself at some point. However, modern sciences have shown that there in fact are kinds that extincted because of it, thus proving him wrong. Sexual selection is against natural selection.


Irish elk, one of the Pleistocene's biggest land mammals, got doomed because of its extravagant features, which were the result of hypergamy.

Source: https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/artio/irishelk.html



Finally, ostracoda depicted on the picture above is prime example of it. Blue area, taking one third of animal's body, is overgrown genitals. Because of this extreme dimorphism, in the past many kinds of this crustacea went extinct; modern ones are seemingly following their path.

Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7482269/ (I cite abstract because it's not my goal to explain here smallest details to a reader, but to give him rather broad perspective.)



But — one could say — traits select for in these animals are particular and situation is different within our kind. I agree. It's truth that there's no singular trait in humans that foids desire as such. But it's the end of nuances; traits are always considered in relations to each other. So is a lenght of a leg in proportion to lenght of another leg, these are in proportion to hips, torso; these are to each other, etc. There's one proportion of human qualities, including proportions that include height and facial traits, considered the most attratictive. Every deviation from the ideal result in lower attractiveness. However, this ideal proportion can multiplie its attractivnes in eyes of femoids by incrasing actual numbers in its particular proportions. Therefore physical human traits as a whole are the same as peacock's tail. To make humans dysgenic, fragile-leged, unsupplied in blood giants, and ultimately to doom our kind – would be result of hyperamy.




Yet there's the soltion to this problem: rape, this philosophical stone, the panacea for cancer consuming humanity. By seizing means of reproduction, truecel reverse dysgenicity of hypergamy and implements eugenics. With his free will, man stops rot of his kind and negate femoids' want of its degeneracy. This negation of runaway effect is thus physical bettering of our kind.

Dnr im not reading a book

 

[GrAYnigger]

Nobody should play by the foid's rules. Only your own.

Consent based on sexual selection is inherently cucked.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Consent based on sexual selection is inherently cucked.

Correct, although I assume you meant sexual selection based on consent.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Dnr im not reading a book

Kill yourself GrAY.

 

[polopolo]

Dnr but i agree

 

[stsaturn]

Elaborate.

delightful

 

[anon65]

"Noooo muh longest horned ram is actually good genetics inkwell!"

Tall people have higher chances of collapsed lungs (certain death in "muh nature".) among other risks of failing organs from a frame too large.

 

[Deco]

That's right, truly based. The jews won when they made men follow rules of self containment

 

[yeetbender_]

Trvklear thread:

 

[yeetbender_]

View attachment 1744783

"Noooo muh longest horned ram is actually good genetics inkwell!"

Tall people have higher chances of collapsed lungs (certain death in "muh nature".) among other risks of failing organs from a frame too large.

 

[yeetbender_]

There's for some reason a widespread belief that hypergamy is eugenic and seizing femoids is not. However, the order here is exactly opposite. Femoids' choces are ex definitione harmful not only for society, but also for a genepool. How, would you ask?

Due to Runaway Selection, mean of reproduction, when given freedom, will always select for traits which concentrations they're aiming for are dysgenic. This shall lead to extreme overgrown in these traits and degradation of specie; and, eventually, to its extinction. That's how R. A. Fisher, greatest biologist after Darwin, describe this process, although with some flaws:


Fisher's article „The evolution of sexual preference” in The Eugenics Review, p. 187, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2987134/?p

Species that are living (or not, on what we shall focus later) proofs of his thesis are to be infinitely counted. There are few examples, however, that portray this law the best.

View attachment 1621655
The most obvious bastard of sexual selection dysgenicity is, what's clear, a peacock. Its tail, longer than the animal itself, made of flashy, bright leathers, alarming every nearby predator of easy pray, finally making difficult not even merely flying, but every movement can cause only rightful disgust and reflection upon it in observer. Similar feelings to this, for Fisher's main object of observation were birds, were undoubtedly what impelled him to give his discovery a scientific grounding. It's also to be noted that Darwin shared similar opinion; "The sight of a feather in a peacock’s tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me feel sick", he said.



View attachment 1621658
View attachment 1621659
Yet another victim of runaway effect is Babirussa. Its tusks are what the tails is in peacock, that is, are the trait which is selected for. As one can see, due to this their growth is so big, that they at first become useless, then finally impale the skull of the animal. Such a wonder of hypergamy!



View attachment 1621664
View attachment 1621665
Next specie to be found most physically degenerated thanks to sexual selection is strap-toothed whale. Its tusks, like in babirussa, are caricaturally overgrown, but in other way; they're making it almost impossible for this beast to open its jaw.
Beaked whales show remarkable sexual dimorphism in that only the males retain functional teeth. Male strap-toothed beaked whales begin to develop a large flat tusk from each lower jaw as juveniles, growing at a 45° angle back towards the head and over the rostrum (beak). Reaching up to 34 cm in length,[6] the teeth may overlap at the tips, restricting the gape size of the animal. Two stranded adult male strap-toothed beaked whales were recorded as only being able to open their mouths 3.2 cm and 4 cm wide, compared to females and juveniles that had a gape size of 6.5 cm. It is thought male beaked whales use their teeth to compete for mating access to females, as evidenced by scars and scratches on the bodies of males. However it is unlikely the whale uses the whole tusk for such aggressive interactions, instead, it is probable that only a small denticle found upon the upper surface of the tooth is utilised.



View attachment 1621673
View attachment 1621674
And crème de la crème of sexual selection, showing what's its final effect; species that got extinct because of it. Fisher, as we saw in his quote, argued that this mechanism will regulate itself at some point. However, modern sciences have shown that there in fact are kinds that extincted because of it, thus proving him wrong. Sexual selection is against natural selection.


Irish elk, one of the Pleistocene's biggest land mammals, got doomed because of its extravagant features, which were the result of hypergamy.

Source: https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/artio/irishelk.html



Finally, ostracoda depicted on the picture above is prime example of it. Blue area, taking one third of animal's body, is overgrown genitals. Because of this extreme dimorphism, in the past many kinds of this crustacea went extinct; modern ones are seemingly following their path.

Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7482269/ (I cite abstract because it's not my goal to explain here smallest details to a reader, but to give him rather broad perspective.)



But — one could say — traits select for in these animals are particular and situation is different within our kind. I agree. It's truth that there's no singular trait in humans that foids desire as such. But it's the end of nuances; traits are always considered in relations to each other. So is a lenght of a leg in proportion to lenght of another leg, these are in proportion to hips, torso; these are to each other, etc. There's one proportion of human qualities, including proportions that include height and facial traits, considered the most attratictive. Every deviation from the ideal result in lower attractiveness. However, this ideal proportion can multiplie its attractivnes in eyes of femoids by incrasing actual numbers in its particular proportions. Therefore physical human traits as a whole are the same as peacock's tail. To make humans dysgenic, fragile-leged, unsupplied in blood giants, and ultimately to doom our kind – would be result of hyperamy.




Yet there's the soltion to this problem: rape, this philosophical stone, the panacea for cancer consuming humanity. By seizing means of reproduction, truecel reverse dysgenicity of hypergamy and implements eugenics. With his free will, man stops rot of his kind and negate femoids' want of its degeneracy. This negation of runaway effect is thus physical bettering of our kind.

Aryanposting:

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

I already made this thread 3 years ago but it ain't make it to must read @SlayerSlayer explain

How cucked a species is depends entirely on its ability to rape

look at this fucker has to impress some hole or won't fuck. the bigger the feathers the better :feelskek: most birds do some dance or some display to impress the entirely unremarkable looking female birds since they can just fly away if they don't want your dick. it's not worth looking like...

incels.is

 

[SlayerSlayer]

I already made this thread 3 years ago but it ain't make it to must read @SlayerSlayer explain

How cucked a species is depends entirely on its ability to rape

look at this fucker has to impress some hole or won't fuck. the bigger the feathers the better :feelskek: most birds do some dance or some display to impress the entirely unremarkable looking female birds since they can just fly away if they don't want your dick. it's not worth looking like...

incels.is

wasnt my call

 

[UndeadDeadMan]

And don't forget that women are very often attracted to basically pathologically tall man, i unironically saw foids glazing Robert Wadlow.

Robert Wadlow - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

>"Wadlow required leg braces when walking (...) a faulty brace irritated his ankle, leading to infection. He was treated with a blood transfusion and surgery, but his condition worsened and he died in his sleep on July 15"

Huh this is kinda hot I guess.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

I already made this thread 3 years ago but it ain't make it to must read @SlayerSlayer explain

How cucked a species is depends entirely on its ability to rape

look at this fucker has to impress some hole or won't fuck. the bigger the feathers the better :feelskek: most birds do some dance or some display to impress the entirely unremarkable looking female birds since they can just fly away if they don't want your dick. it's not worth looking like...

incels.is

My article is more complex

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

My article is more complex

you lobbied the mods, dishonorabru

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

you lobbied the mods, dishonorabru

Weren't you the one that invited them to the island tho?

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

Weren't you the one that invited them to the island tho?

wish I had an island

either way cool thread

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

wish I had an island

either way cool thread

Thanks boyo

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

delightful

Nice to hear this

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

That's right, truly based. The jews won when they made men follow rules of self containment

Jews have nothing to do with this. They are just ordinary merchants like other traders; not an almighty demiurge.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

View attachment 1744783

"Noooo muh longest horned ram is actually good genetics inkwell!"

Tall people have higher chances of collapsed lungs (certain death in "muh nature".) among other risks of failing organs from a frame too large.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Aryanposting:

Yet mongoloid.

 

[Deco]

Jews have nothing to do with this. They are just ordinary merchants like other traders; not an almighty demiurge.

Ordinary merchants just like Epstein, Rothschild, Sassoon, etc. am I right? KEK

 

[TellMomImGone]

careful

 

[hindercel]

There's for some reason a widespread belief that hypergamy is eugenic and seizing femoids is not. However, the order here is exactly opposite. Femoids' choces are ex definitione harmful not only for society, but also for a genepool. How, would you ask?

Due to Runaway Selection, mean of reproduction, when given freedom, will always select for traits which concentrations they're aiming for are dysgenic. This shall lead to extreme overgrown in these traits and degradation of specie; and, eventually, to its extinction. That's how R. A. Fisher, greatest biologist after Darwin, describe this process, although with some flaws:


Fisher's article „The evolution of sexual preference” in The Eugenics Review, p. 187, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2987134/?p

Species that are living (or not, on what we shall focus later) proofs of his thesis are to be infinitely counted. There are few examples, however, that portray this law the best.

View attachment 1621655
The most obvious bastard of sexual selection dysgenicity is, what's clear, a peacock. Its tail, longer than the animal itself, made of flashy, bright leathers, alarming every nearby predator of easy pray, finally making difficult not even merely flying, but every movement can cause only rightful disgust and reflection upon it in observer. Similar feelings to this, for Fisher's main object of observation were birds, were undoubtedly what impelled him to give his discovery a scientific grounding. It's also to be noted that Darwin shared similar opinion; "The sight of a feather in a peacock’s tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me feel sick", he said.



View attachment 1621658
View attachment 1621659
Yet another victim of runaway effect is Babirussa. Its tusks are what the tails is in peacock, that is, are the trait which is selected for. As one can see, due to this their growth is so big, that they at first become useless, then finally impale the skull of the animal. Such a wonder of hypergamy!



View attachment 1621664
View attachment 1621665
Next specie to be found most physically degenerated thanks to sexual selection is strap-toothed whale. Its tusks, like in babirussa, are caricaturally overgrown, but in other way; they're making it almost impossible for this beast to open its jaw.
Beaked whales show remarkable sexual dimorphism in that only the males retain functional teeth. Male strap-toothed beaked whales begin to develop a large flat tusk from each lower jaw as juveniles, growing at a 45° angle back towards the head and over the rostrum (beak). Reaching up to 34 cm in length,[6] the teeth may overlap at the tips, restricting the gape size of the animal. Two stranded adult male strap-toothed beaked whales were recorded as only being able to open their mouths 3.2 cm and 4 cm wide, compared to females and juveniles that had a gape size of 6.5 cm. It is thought male beaked whales use their teeth to compete for mating access to females, as evidenced by scars and scratches on the bodies of males. However it is unlikely the whale uses the whole tusk for such aggressive interactions, instead, it is probable that only a small denticle found upon the upper surface of the tooth is utilised.



View attachment 1621673
View attachment 1621674
And crème de la crème of sexual selection, showing what's its final effect; species that got extinct because of it. Fisher, as we saw in his quote, argued that this mechanism will regulate itself at some point. However, modern sciences have shown that there in fact are kinds that extincted because of it, thus proving him wrong. Sexual selection is against natural selection.


Irish elk, one of the Pleistocene's biggest land mammals, got doomed because of its extravagant features, which were the result of hypergamy.

Source: https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/artio/irishelk.html



Finally, ostracoda depicted on the picture above is prime example of it. Blue area, taking one third of animal's body, is overgrown genitals. Because of this extreme dimorphism, in the past many kinds of this crustacea went extinct; modern ones are seemingly following their path.

Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7482269/ (I cite abstract because it's not my goal to explain here smallest details to a reader, but to give him rather broad perspective.)



But — one could say — traits select for in these animals are particular and situation is different within our kind. I agree. It's truth that there's no singular trait in humans that foids desire as such. But it's the end of nuances; traits are always considered in relations to each other. So is a lenght of a leg in proportion to lenght of another leg, these are in proportion to hips, torso; these are to each other, etc. There's one proportion of human qualities, including proportions that include height and facial traits, considered the most attratictive. Every deviation from the ideal result in lower attractiveness. However, this ideal proportion can multiplie its attractivnes in eyes of femoids by incrasing actual numbers in its particular proportions. Therefore physical human traits as a whole are the same as peacock's tail. To make humans dysgenic, fragile-leged, unsupplied in blood giants, and ultimately to doom our kind – would be result of hyperamy.




Yet there's the soltion to this problem: rape, this philosophical stone, the panacea for cancer consuming humanity. By seizing means of reproduction, truecel reverse dysgenicity of hypergamy and implements eugenics. With his free will, man stops rot of his kind and negate femoids' want of its degeneracy. This negation of runaway effect is thus physical bettering of our kind.

I believe this can be true to an extent. Both are still immoral

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

I believe this can be true to an extent. Both are still immoral

Cope GrAYshit.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Ordinary merchants just like Epstein, Rothschild, Sassoon, etc. am I right?

Yes. Just like hundreds of others, mostly anglocucks.

 

[orthodox]

wow very interesting certainly wouldn't even be allowed to be discussed by normies