First, I'd like to say I'm not some SJW cuck who denies the physical realities of race. I acknowledge that there are inherent differences between racial groups that reflect themselves in the mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis of an array of vital character traits; including but not limited to: intelligence, civility, height, immunity, aggressiveness, criminality, consciousness, integrity, etc. I'm also aware that given the collective aggregation of these traits amongst particular races, we can even distinguish between superior and inferior, at least within certain parameters. Europeans and Asians are objectively better at constructing and advancing civilizations, Kenyans are objectively better runners, and Meds are objectively better at tanning.
However, when I condemn racism, I am not condemning the acknowledgement of these facts, I am condemning the normative response to the facts. I can acknowledge differences in averages across racial types without hating, discriminating, or behaving prejudicially towards an ethnic type. I can accept objective reality without becoming a genuine white nationalist. How one believes reality is and how one believes reality ought to be are two entirely different domains and can vary immensely depending on moral framework.
I find it ironic to see so much racism in a community notorious for being judged based on looks. How do you think blacks felt in the pre-Civil-Rights era? They likely felt exactly as you do when you are judged harshly for something you have no control over. "A little extra melonin" sounds a lot like "a few millimetres of bone". You can throw statistics at me all you want about how blacks are all subhuman savages because they commit X higher percentage of the total crime. Whilst there has been too little research to make a concrete judgement call, I'm willing to wager that ugly men commit a disproportionate amount of total crime. They have less opportunities in life and thus turn to more illicit, high-risk/high-reward mechanisms for wealth accumulation.
The moral of the story: don't judge, if you do not wish to be judged, especially for things outside of your control
However, when I condemn racism, I am not condemning the acknowledgement of these facts, I am condemning the normative response to the facts. I can acknowledge differences in averages across racial types without hating, discriminating, or behaving prejudicially towards an ethnic type. I can accept objective reality without becoming a genuine white nationalist. How one believes reality is and how one believes reality ought to be are two entirely different domains and can vary immensely depending on moral framework.
I find it ironic to see so much racism in a community notorious for being judged based on looks. How do you think blacks felt in the pre-Civil-Rights era? They likely felt exactly as you do when you are judged harshly for something you have no control over. "A little extra melonin" sounds a lot like "a few millimetres of bone". You can throw statistics at me all you want about how blacks are all subhuman savages because they commit X higher percentage of the total crime. Whilst there has been too little research to make a concrete judgement call, I'm willing to wager that ugly men commit a disproportionate amount of total crime. They have less opportunities in life and thus turn to more illicit, high-risk/high-reward mechanisms for wealth accumulation.
The moral of the story: don't judge, if you do not wish to be judged, especially for things outside of your control
