Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Question to curries. Did you prefer muslim rule or european rule?

I

islamicincel

Banned
-
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Posts
1,776
Which one was the lesser of the two evils for you?
 
What exactly is "European rule"? Everything what is happening now is forced upon us. I will not choose between two bad options. I want to go back to the roots.
 
I live underwater so I wouldn't know
 
What exactly is "European rule"? Everything what is happening now is forced upon us. I will not choose between two bad options. I want to go back to the roots.
Question to sauerkrauts. Did you prefer Habsburg rule or Hohenzollern rule?
 
What exactly is "European rule"? Everything what is happening now is forced upon us. I will not choose between two bad options. I want to go back to the roots.

The british, Portuguese, french and dutch that came over.
 
Which one was the lesser of the two evils for you?
Muslim myself so biased.

There’s many stages of Islamic rule in India.

The Arabs didn’t really rule India because Indo-Arab wars eventually lead to Arabs being sent back and halted at Sindh.

The Turks like Tughlaqs, Mamluks and Sayids were beyond brutal and destroyed too many libraries and killed too much. I don’t like this period barring the fact that we BTFO’d Mongols.

MUGHALS, on the other hand were based. They ruled through Islam, but also gave massive importance to Indian culture and even translated many Sanskrit works of knowledge into Persian and Urdu. They even developed a modernised army and navy, and even defeated the British when they were at their peak. They also built palaces, forts, gardens and revised the taxation economy, established cities and redistributed land to Farmers.

And the Mughals by the 3rd emperor were largely genetically Indian. Only Babur was full Perso-Mongol and didn’t give a fuck about race. Oh, and did you know the first legislation against widow burning was passed by Aurangzeb not the English. The English passed it after Raja Ram Mohan Roy and his Arya Samaj forced the company to criminalise it. Yet, you will see the Brits claim credit for it.

The British on the other hand were OBSESSED with race. They started classifying Indians into “sub-races”, some favourable, some not. Caused massive famines which were largely not there during Mughal era and ran a shitty administration for $$$. Fuck them.

Let’s not forget, the Mughal Empire conquered India by bravery and strength of force, while the English did by deceit and corruption.

India’s urbanisation rate was HIGHER in 1671 than in 1947. Take that into perspective.
 
Last edited:
I am an Islamic curry, but I'm not an Indian. Can I answer the question as well, or not? It seems to be geared towards non-Islamic incels of India. For which I know the answer: European rule. After all, those hindu dindus are the biggest bootlickers of white people; especially those white people whom are anti-Islam. That is how cucked they are.
 
I am an Islamic curry, but I'm not an Indian. Can I answer the question as well, or not? It seems to be geared towards non-Islamic incels of India. For which I know the answer: European rule. After all, those hindu dindus are the biggest bootlickers of white people; especially those white people whom are anti-Islam. That is how cucked they are.
Which is funny cuz the British actually preferred Muslims over Hindus because their thought was that “Islam was more Bibilical”. Read “Mother India”, it’s basically a white woman praising Islam and hating on Hinduism. Then you’ve a group of Hindu dindu ultranationalists sucking off cracker boots today in 2020.
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelsPop::feelsPop:
 
Which is funny cuz the British actually preferred Muslims over Hindus because their thought was that “Islam was more Bibilical”. Read “Mother India”, it’s basically a white woman praising Islam and hating on Hinduism. Then you’ve a group of Hindu dindu ultranationalists sucking off cracker boots today in 2020.
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelsPop::feelsPop:
:feelskek: Brutal for hindu dindus; the people that they look up to were the same ones calling them barbaric, backwards and uncultured hahaha. I know about that, brother. Churchill hated them too.
 
If you value your foreskin or like a pork sandwich you'll pick European.
 
I prefer European rule. Not this current cucked version though. I'm talking about White rule of the 50s to the 70s. Things were a lot more stable back then.

Lol really. Muslims at least treated you nice if you converted to Islam. British were extremely racist and and viewed all non - whites as subhumans.
 
Lol really. Muslims at least treated you nice if you converted to Islam. British were extremely racist and and viewed all non - whites as subhumans.
@wereqryan is a certified cuckold. He would probably kiss cracker boots if it meant getting a cracker hoe to show him her bobs. At this point the only based curries in this shithole forum are @chudur-budur and @RREEEEEEEEE.:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
@wereqryan is a certified cuckold. He would probably kiss cracker boots if it meant getting a cracker hoe to show him her bobs. At this point the only based curries in this shithole forum are @chudur-budur and @RREEEEEEEEE.:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek: well said, he's pathetic lol.
 
@wereqryan is a certified cuckold. He would probably kiss cracker boots if it meant getting a cracker hoe to show him her bobs. At this point the only based curries in this shithole forum are @chudur-budur and @RREEEEEEEEE.:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
Absolutely brutal and you are most likely correct. JFL, the currycoping is real here so I am glad to have you here. BTW, chudur is gone. Don't know if he will come back.
 
Not cuckold. Just honest. @RREEEEEEEEE and @chudur-budur are copers. They haven't swallowed or digested the blackpill. I have.
Blackpill is now being the white man's slave, apparently. :feelskek: No buddy boyo that's your inferiority complex just acting up once again.
 
Yes credit to Babur, who was a descendant Ghengiz Khan. They were high T, but that deteriorated once they started race mixing with the native low people of the Indian subcontinent. And Europeans were brave to cross the oceans and establish trade routes. Many died in their journeys. They were also brave to take on large native populations with their small numbers. They did engage in a fair number of conflicts. However, because their numbers were slim compared to the invading Muslim armies, they had to engage in division and deceit to establish conquest.

Ok but what about overall urbanization levels? For example, in contemporary times, they say that the developing world is growing at a faster pace than the west, but overall the west is still much more industrialized and developed. So cumulative numbers matter, not just rates.
By urbanisation rate, I literally mean the overall urbanisation levels. When I say the urbanisation rate of a country is 40%, 40% of inhabitants in a country live in urban zones.
That's because non-whites ARE subhumans. Racism is justified. Gene pools must be upgraded by mass importation of white sperms and eggs. Check this post I made long ago, where I go into detail about my vision and plan:

He unironically is a cuck. Thanks for proving to us JFL. Curries like you make us look even more pathetic than the actual situation which is already not very good.
 
You don't have to be a simp. You don't have to be a cuck. You don't have to serve white people. But to be properly blackpilled, you do have to recognize the racial inequality that exists. Otherwise, you're coping.
Racial inequality exists, so you have to fight it. JFL, not try to impregnate your own women with cracker sperm. That’s some cuck shit.

Actually, why not go ahead and import Nilotic BBCs. Their average height is literally 6’1” even when Sudan is a malnourished shithole, their peak averages are probably 6 inches above aka 6’7” and probably have massive dicks. Even scientific reports show that blacks faces are rated more masculine and attractive than white faces. And with the rise of BLM across the world we actually might see a racial uprising or at least that blacks will be viewed on the same cultural level as whites (let’s not forget, Hollywood shills them hard) Why not go be a full on cuck for BBC? :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek:
 
I am an Islamic curry, but I'm not an Indian. Can I answer the question as well, or not? It seems to be geared towards non-Islamic incels of India. For which I know the answer: European rule. After all, those hindu dindus are the biggest bootlickers of white people; especially those white people whom are anti-Islam. That is how cucked they are.



Your hypocrisy shines high you will moena at me for being self hating yet you will suck sand nigger dick even though they literally named an entire mountain after your dead grand fathers this is why I cant stand the hypocracy.
:feelskek: Brutal for hindu dindus; the people that they look up to were the same ones calling them barbaric, backwards and uncultured hahaha. I know about that, brother. Churchill hated them too.



Who cares what anglos thought the nordics followed a similar faith before sand nigger if cation
 
Question to sauerkrauts. Did you prefer Habsburg rule or Hohenzollern rule?

At one point in history, Habsburg let in a bunch of gipsies and back then German men had to hand over cattle and they even got a place to live in.
 
Muslim genocide best day of my life.
 
Which one was the lesser of the two evils for you?


That's like asking weather we would like to get ass raped or shot in the head both are bad i chose neither i'd rather the spanish
That's because non-whites ARE subhumans. Racism is justified. Gene pools must be upgraded by mass importation of white sperms and eggs. Check this post I made long ago, where I go into detail about my vision and plan:


Blackpill is acknowledging the tremendous inequality that exists in nature due to geographical variations imprinted into our evolution and physiology, and our utter helplessness against it. Its about biological determinism, where some races have greater concentrations of good genes than others. This is why those races excelled and conquered and subjugated lesser peoples of other countries.



Thing is With us bro do you support ethnic replacement like i do ? like i feel on 1 hand this is racial mongeralzation but then i realized were already like half western Eurasian derived on average in terms of Genes with us i feel like it wouldn't be a waste do you feel like this ?
 
Last edited:
Your hypocrisy shines high you will moena at me for being self hating yet you will suck sand nigger dick even though they literally named an entire mountain after your dead grand fathers this is why I cant stand the hypocracy.




Who cares what anglos thought the nordics followed a similar faith before sand nigger if cation
What are you talking about? By the time Islamization had happened in Afghanistan, my ancestors were already Islamic. Therefore the fact it's called hindu kush doesn't matter at all. Nobody in my family at that time was a hindu. If they were, I would have relatives in India which I have zero of. In fact, I take great pleasure in the name hindu kush (the hindu killer) especially after the intense Islamophobia from the hindu dindus and the atrocities they have committed. Same goes for Islamophobic sikhs.
 
:feelskek: Brutal for hindu dindus; the people that they look up to were the same ones calling them barbaric, backwards and uncultured hahaha. I know about that, brother. Churchill hated them too.
Hindu Dindu’s are a meme, I’ve never met one in real life but everyone I know mocks them for being cucked
 
Hindu Dindu’s are a meme, I’ve never met one in real life but everyone I know mocks them for being cucked
JFL, yeah they are extremely cucked. Even white people see through their bullshit. I will show you a funny tweet if you respond to this post. I don't have it on this phone.
 
JFL, yeah they are extremely cucked. Even white people see through their bullshit. I will show you a funny tweet if you respond to this post. I don't have it on this phone.
sure
 
Mughal rule was the most based period for india.
 
@wereqryan is a certified cuckold. He would probably kiss cracker boots if it meant getting a cracker hoe to show him her bobs. At this point the only based curries in this shithole forum are @chudur-budur and @RREEEEEEEEE.:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
massive cope me and @ryhan are msot based curries
 
@wereqryan is a certified cuckold. He would probably kiss cracker boots if it meant getting a cracker hoe to show him her bobs. At this point the only based curries in this shithole forum are @chudur-budur and @RREEEEEEEEE.:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Cope
What are you talking about? By the time Islamization had happened in Afghanistan, my ancestors were already Islamic. Therefore the fact it's called hindu kush doesn't matter at all. Nobody in my family at that time was a hindu. If they were, I would have relatives in India which I have zero of. In fact, I take great pleasure in the name hindu kush (the hindu killer) especially after the intense Islamophobia from the hindu dindus and the atrocities they have committed. Same goes for Islamophobic sikhs.

Most Indian muslims were forcefully converted from hinduism by invading sandniggers. You prolly have sandnigger DNA tbh ngl.
Mughal rule was the most based period for india.

JFL if you think goat fuckers could rule any country. Look at all the islamic nations in the world today. Major shitholes.
 
Muslim myself so biased.

There’s many stages of Islamic rule in India.

The Arabs didn’t really rule India because Indo-Arab wars eventually lead to Arabs being sent back and halted at Sindh.

The Turks like Tughlaqs, Mamluks and Sayids were beyond brutal and destroyed too many libraries and killed too much. I don’t like this period barring the fact that we BTFO’d Mongols.

MUGHALS, on the other hand were based. They ruled through Islam, but also gave massive importance to Indian culture and even translated many Sanskrit works of knowledge into Persian and Urdu. They even developed a modernised army and navy, and even defeated the British when they were at their peak. They also built palaces, forts, gardens and revised the taxation economy, established cities and redistributed land to Farmers.

And the Mughals by the 3rd emperor were largely genetically Indian. Only Babur was full Perso-Mongol and didn’t give a fuck about race. Oh, and did you know the first legislation against widow burning was passed by Aurangzeb not the English. The English passed it after Raja Ram Mohan Roy and his Arya Samaj forced the company to criminalise it. Yet, you will see the Brits claim credit for it.

The British on the other hand were OBSESSED with race. They started classifying Indians into “sub-races”, some favourable, some not. Caused massive famines which were largely not there during Mughal era and ran a shitty administration for $$$. Fuck them.

Let’s not forget, the Mughal Empire conquered India by bravery and strength of force, while the English did by deceit and corruption.

India’s urbanisation rate was HIGHER in 1671 than in 1947. Take that into perspective.
What about great Mullah Aurangzeb?
 
JFL if you think goat fuckers could rule any country. Look at all the islamic nations in the world today. Major shitholes.
That's a pretty bad argument considering all of Europe(ESPECIALLY Scandinavia) were complete ratholes at one point or another in history and have suffered the same as the middle east does today.
 
Period of Akbar was the best. Apart from that it is equally bad.
 
Muslim myself so biased.

There’s many stages of Islamic rule in India.

The Arabs didn’t really rule India because Indo-Arab wars eventually lead to Arabs being sent back and halted at Sindh.

The Turks like Tughlaqs, Mamluks and Sayids were beyond brutal and destroyed too many libraries and killed too much. I don’t like this period barring the fact that we BTFO’d Mongols.

MUGHALS, on the other hand were based. They ruled through Islam, but also gave massive importance to Indian culture and even translated many Sanskrit works of knowledge into Persian and Urdu. They even developed a modernised army and navy, and even defeated the British when they were at their peak. They also built palaces, forts, gardens and revised the taxation economy, established cities and redistributed land to Farmers.

And the Mughals by the 3rd emperor were largely genetically Indian. Only Babur was full Perso-Mongol and didn’t give a fuck about race. Oh, and did you know the first legislation against widow burning was passed by Aurangzeb not the English. The English passed it after Raja Ram Mohan Roy and his Arya Samaj forced the company to criminalise it. Yet, you will see the Brits claim credit for it.

The British on the other hand were OBSESSED with race. They started classifying Indians into “sub-races”, some favourable, some not. Caused massive famines which were largely not there during Mughal era and ran a shitty administration for $$$. Fuck them.

Let’s not forget, the Mughal Empire conquered India by bravery and strength of force, while the English did by deceit and corruption.

India’s urbanisation rate was HIGHER in 1671 than in 1947. Take that into perspective.
Babur defeated Rana Sangha by deceit as well.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silhadi#:~:text=He gained everlasting notoriety by,Silah-al-din".
 
That's a pretty bad argument considering all of Europe(ESPECIALLY Scandinavia) were complete ratholes at one point or another in history and have suffered the same as the middle east does today.
Islam invasion halted all scientific progress in curryland.
 
Citation? Links? Something?

Pretty common knowledge tbh. Ancient hindhus made substantial progress in astronomy and mathematics. Goat fuckers came and fucked it all up.
 
Pretty common knowledge tbh. Ancient hindhus made substantial progress in astronomy and mathematics. Goat fuckers came and fucked it all up.
Common knowledge but not a citation.
 
Common knowledge but not a citation.
He’s referring to the Turkic invasion of Nalanda. The University was burnt in 1193 by Bakhtiyar Khilji. I’m Muslim but I have to admit that was a dick move. The library kept burning for three months destroying a lot of knowledge that could’ve been used.

This is why I dislike the Turkic period in India entirely. Turks were savages and brutal and did not take the country forward.
 
Common knowledge but not a citation.

If not for around 800 years of Islamic rule, curryland wouldnt be this much of a shit hole. Wherever goat fuckers go, they destroy all scientific progress.
 
He’s referring to the Turkic invasion of Nalanda. The University was burnt in 1193 by Bakhtiyar Khilji. I’m Muslim but I have to admit that was a dick move. The library kept burning for three months destroying a lot of knowledge that could’ve been used.

This is why I dislike the Turkic period in India entirely. Turks were savages and brutal and did not take the country forward.
Makes sense, turkic tribes and people like Timur were more like raiders, rather then any holy warriors really.
 
@wereqryan is a certified cuckold. He would probably kiss cracker boots if it meant getting a cracker hoe to show him her bobs. At this point the only based curries in this shithole forum are @chudur-budur and @RREEEEEEEEE.:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
You probably need to look through my posts, I'd argue I'm the most based and blackpilled curry here, becauze I live it every single day
 
Cope


Most Indian muslims were forcefully converted from hinduism by invading sandniggers. You prolly have sandnigger DNA tbh ngl.


JFL if you think goat fuckers could rule any country. Look at all the islamic nations in the world today. Major shitholes.
Thats why stinky hindoos rush to go to the gulf to work

Cant do that in their nutsack where they get paid 2 rupees and hour
 
Lol really. Muslims at least treated you nice if you converted to Islam. British were extremely racist and and viewed all non - whites as subhumans.
The aristocratic elite also deemed the white working class as sub human. Plenty of massacres against whites wanting the vote or better working conditions. Just have to look at Britain's involvement in Ireland to see how much they cared about their fellow man. It's all about class an that stuck up elitism is still active today.
 
Which is funny cuz the British actually preferred Muslims over Hindus because their thought was that “Islam was more Bibilical”. Read “Mother India”, it’s basically a white woman praising Islam and hating on Hinduism. Then you’ve a group of Hindu dindu ultranationalists sucking off cracker boots today in 2020.
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelsPop::feelsPop:
It's funny you selectively quoted mother India and that to out of context , do you need me to quote another British white womens from British Raj and what they have to say about chad subcontinent Muslims. Ok here's from one of them.

.We are amused at the universal praise of the wild Muslim's (Afridis and Afghans) of these parts. Everyone says they are fine fellows, far superior to the Hindoos! [then a common spelling for the Hindu]. We learn on cross-examination they are cruel and treacherous, shockingly addicted to unnatural vice and habitually given to stealing each other’s wives; that murder and robbery are so common as not to be deemed crimes; that the men do little work, leaving the agriculture and the care of their goats mostly to the women and boys; and that the only occupation considered worthy of manhood is the promiscuous shooting at each other, taken unawares, which they call war. When we ask why a people is admired which breaks nearly every Commandment, and is apparently of no earthly use in the universe, we are told they are fine manly fellows, ‘good sportsmen’, with a sense of humour! Verily our English standards are peculiar. The fact is that the British officer likes them because (1) they admire and respect him and his special qualities; (2) they make good soldiers under him; and (3) they in no way compete with him or ‘claim equality’, or excel in directions in which he feels himself deficient. When we ask a thoughtful Civilian whether he sees any reason to believe that, even in a couple of centuries, the Pathan will have developed into anything like a civilized people, or into anything else of use in the world, he is bound to admit that there is no sign of any such a Possibility.
British specially Churchill hated Hindus cause they were the most rebellious and the brain and force behind India freedom movement before and after 1857 untill subcontinent achieved freedom.
If not for around 800 years of Islamic rule, curryland wouldnt be this much of a shit hole. Wherever goat fuckers go, they destroy all scientific progress.
Muslim total rule over subcontinent was not even 500 years....rest I agree
 
Last edited:
European rule.
 
European rule.
In Islamic rule all you get is a bunch of temples destroyed cuz "muh idol worshipping."

The European rule is the reason we have 4K and HDMI.

Simply put, we have better copes under european rule. Under Islamic rule, we'll be stuck in the 16th century, technology wise, and we won't have money for copes, cuz Muh Jizyah. Unless ofc, the rulers 'go native', as they often did whenever someone invaded india, and then we're left with plain old curry rule. Still no HDMI or copes.

The only difference is the industrial revolution wouldn't happen. And I'd be working at a farm. But boi... I HATE FARMS!
 

Similar threads

DoomThreeKoala
Replies
14
Views
1K
nihilum
nihilum
PPEcel
Replies
91
Views
4K
ColderManTruce
ColderManTruce
WizardInTraining
Replies
29
Views
1K
jo_yugislayer08
jo_yugislayer08
BlackPilledNormi
Replies
49
Views
2K
Peroz Shapur
Peroz Shapur
trrrrrsarescary
Replies
16
Views
2K
Rapistcel
Rapistcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top