This is a rhetorical question. I do not expect an answer. I’m only making a proposal for further investigation into why cucks believe the crime of rape constitutes an acceptable reason to deliver a death sentence to rapists in liberal societies that also allow women to be sluts and adulterers with no legal consequences
Does the tradcuck seriously believe that a woman’s emotional trauma from being involuntarily penetrated by a subChad male, is commensurate to the abrupt termination of a working-age man’s life? For what uncucked cause does chivalry serve in a society where women can party and sleep around as they please?
There is an ecological Justification for killing men who abuse women, and there is a moral justification for killing men who abuse women
The ecological justification for killing men in a woman’s defence is much less cucked than the moral justification
It can be ecologically justified in respect of sexual competition to kill a man in a woman’s defence ONLY IF:
Other than these reasons, I do not see the purpose of being a white knight in a society that allows women to fornicate and commit adultery without consequences
Personally I do not believe that it’s fair to hold a man to the standard of capital punishment for committing rape in a society that allows girls to get away with being adulterers and fornicators. It doesn’t make sense to have this kind of social order because it embodies the dynamic of a cuck-and-bull relationship, BUT ON AN INTERSOCIETAL SCALE. As a father to a daughter in a country with liberal social customs, you’re literally farming Chad / Tyrone’s future organic sex doll. But you think it’s OK to slaughter normies and sub5s for forcefully having their way with her, even though she’s gonna fornicate or become an adulterous whore anyway?
Unless the woman is your virgin daughter and you're protecting her virginity for the forseeable future, or she’s in a committed monogamous relationship with another man that you vetted personally for your daughter, how can you justify killing another man in defence of the woman's sex-related wishes, unless you are a cuckold or faggot? Answer: You cannot
This is not an attempt to justify the act of rape in any sense, although I do believe that raping women can be ecologically justified under very specific circumstances, but this is a subject of discussion for another post. I'm just highlighting the cucked act of morally justifying a man’s death sentence by reason that he’s a rapist or sexual offender SPECIFICALLY IN A LIBERAL SOCIETY WHERE WOMEN ARE ALLOWED TO FORNICATE AND ADULTERATE AS THEY PLEASE
TLDR The only non-cucked justification for killing men who rape women is the ecological justification (mate guarding, virginity protecting etc.)
The moral justification for killing men who rape woman (e.g. believing the female is a sacred, innocent being that deserves to be protected at the cost of other men’s lives, even if she’s a slut or adulterous whore) derives from a theory of justice inspired by faggots and cuckolds
The ecological justification for killing men who rape women derives from a concept of justice inspired by emotionally disciplined, non-homosexual men
Does the tradcuck seriously believe that a woman’s emotional trauma from being involuntarily penetrated by a subChad male, is commensurate to the abrupt termination of a working-age man’s life? For what uncucked cause does chivalry serve in a society where women can party and sleep around as they please?
There is an ecological Justification for killing men who abuse women, and there is a moral justification for killing men who abuse women
The ecological justification for killing men in a woman’s defence is much less cucked than the moral justification
It can be ecologically justified in respect of sexual competition to kill a man in a woman’s defence ONLY IF:
(a) YOU ARE MATE-GUARDING THAT WOMAN AND REGULARLY USING HER BODY FOR SEXUAL PURPOSES. The less men around, the less sexual competition. So it will favor certain subsets of heterosexual men if they eliminate other men that show a sexual interest in the same females as them, or;
(b) The woman is your virgin daughter and you're preserving her virginity for a specific purpose that is minimally cucked (e.g. MARRYING HER OFF TO ANOTHER MAN THAT YOU PERSONALLY VETTED AND SELECTED AS A SUITABLE LONG-TERM COHORT FOR YOUR DAUGHTER), or not cucked at all (e.g. either YOU WILL PERSONALLY UNVIRGINIZE YOUR DAUGHTER, or else SHE WILL BE VIRGIN FOR LIFE)
Other than these reasons, I do not see the purpose of being a white knight in a society that allows women to fornicate and commit adultery without consequences
Personally I do not believe that it’s fair to hold a man to the standard of capital punishment for committing rape in a society that allows girls to get away with being adulterers and fornicators. It doesn’t make sense to have this kind of social order because it embodies the dynamic of a cuck-and-bull relationship, BUT ON AN INTERSOCIETAL SCALE. As a father to a daughter in a country with liberal social customs, you’re literally farming Chad / Tyrone’s future organic sex doll. But you think it’s OK to slaughter normies and sub5s for forcefully having their way with her, even though she’s gonna fornicate or become an adulterous whore anyway?
Unless the woman is your virgin daughter and you're protecting her virginity for the forseeable future, or she’s in a committed monogamous relationship with another man that you vetted personally for your daughter, how can you justify killing another man in defence of the woman's sex-related wishes, unless you are a cuckold or faggot? Answer: You cannot
This is not an attempt to justify the act of rape in any sense, although I do believe that raping women can be ecologically justified under very specific circumstances, but this is a subject of discussion for another post. I'm just highlighting the cucked act of morally justifying a man’s death sentence by reason that he’s a rapist or sexual offender SPECIFICALLY IN A LIBERAL SOCIETY WHERE WOMEN ARE ALLOWED TO FORNICATE AND ADULTERATE AS THEY PLEASE
TLDR The only non-cucked justification for killing men who rape women is the ecological justification (mate guarding, virginity protecting etc.)
The moral justification for killing men who rape woman (e.g. believing the female is a sacred, innocent being that deserves to be protected at the cost of other men’s lives, even if she’s a slut or adulterous whore) derives from a theory of justice inspired by faggots and cuckolds
The ecological justification for killing men who rape women derives from a concept of justice inspired by emotionally disciplined, non-homosexual men
Last edited:
"
