D
Deleted member 34918
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- May 29, 2021
- Posts
- 66
I was looking at the money section of the scientific blackpill page and wondered if there's any information out there showing how effective moneymaxxing would be in a society where women are economically dependent on men? If women were economically dependent, then it seems women would at least have to marry their looks-match. The question is, would economic dependence change how effective your income would be in getting a woman who's a bit more attractive then your looks-match?
Let's say for an example that a 3 was to try and get a 5. Under modern feminism, it would seem that the 3 needs a salary of about $80,000 to pull that off (assuming he has any chance at all). I'd think though that if women were economically dependent on men that money might become equal or more important then looks are in consideration to your attractiveness?
Let's say for an example that a 3 was to try and get a 5. Under modern feminism, it would seem that the 3 needs a salary of about $80,000 to pull that off (assuming he has any chance at all). I'd think though that if women were economically dependent on men that money might become equal or more important then looks are in consideration to your attractiveness?
Last edited: