Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion poor women seem to have realistic standards

  • Thread starter Deleted member 3385
  • Start date
Deleted member 3385

Deleted member 3385

awol
-
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Posts
2,371
in third wold countries as long as a guy has a job and doesn't beat his wife too much then women there consider that good enough husband material to marry a guy and stay with him.

as opposed to the pages of deal breakers women in western countries have, that's to even get a date.
 
:feelshehe: Maybe but they are very cheaters
 
:feelshehe: Maybe but they are very cheaters
Yes, cheating exists, always existed and will always exist.
But in the West women are celebrated for cheating and the man is blamed for the cheating (e.g. he didn't sexually perform well enough and the poor woman was forced to do it). Males are even shamed for leaving a cheating spouse.
In the 50s men got cheated on, but this happened rarely (as compared to nowadays) and if the whore got caught it was the end of her social life, nobody else would want to engage with her (unless he hit rock-bottom) and without a male that provided for her she was basically condemned to a life of poverty/misery, that risk existed. In Islamic countries or many other even more traditional countries it was even a matter of life or death.
Of course cheating existed, but it was rare/frowned upon. The same as sexual deviants/paraphiliacs - they always existed, but weren't a mass phenomenon. Comparing this state of the world with the modern one is like saying "Diseases always existed and people died due to them" during the middle of the pest outbreaks, not comparable due to case numbers alone.
 
Yes, cheating exists, always existed and will always exist.
But in the West women are celebrated for cheating and the man is blamed for the cheating (e.g. he didn't sexually perform well enough and the poor woman was forced to do it). Males are even shamed for leaving a cheating spouse.
In the 50s men got cheated on, but this happened rarely (as compared to nowadays) and if the whore got caught it was the end of her social life, nobody else would want to engage with her (unless he hit rock-bottom) and without a male that provided for her she was basically condemned to a life of poverty/misery, that risk existed. In Islamic countries or many other even more traditional countries it was even a matter of life or death.
Of course cheating existed, but it was rare/frowned upon. The same as sexual deviants/paraphiliacs - they always existed, but weren't a mass phenomenon. Comparing this state of the world with the modern one is like saying "Diseases always existed and people died due to them" during the middle of the pest outbreaks, not comparable due to case numbers alone.
Yes, but I mean that women will never be satisfied with men of low standard.
 
every country has a working class with somewhat less picky girls
however the working class girls typically want nothing to do with autistic men that didn't grow up in a working class environment, even if those men have money
 
Yes, but I mean that women will never be satisfied with men of low standard.
Who cares about the satisfaction of women?
In the end what matters is stability/tolerance.
The greatest lie is that people need to be 100% content/happy.
This leads to the ones being able to afford pickiness never being content with their lot in life (despite living in bliss) and to those without that privilege being unable to get anything. The attractive individuals become spoiled children that are unsatisfiable, the rest starves. Women wait for Prince Charming while Prince Charming fucks himself through thousands of them - and constantly they tell themselves that life will become serious in a few years and then in another few years until they lie dying in a hospital.

"Free love" was a concept that was seen as youthful/wishful/delusional thinking back then, pragmatism mattered, nowadays these infantile thought patterns are the norm, love is nothing more than something temporary, it's an ephemerous rush incapable of producing long-term stability/sustainability, the same as drug addiction in consequence/state of mind. Important is: Can you imagine yourself with a person in a few decades, when her tits become soggy, when his hair falls out and when a little bit of weight is gained/muscle is lost? With love you just see everything in the moment and cannot plan for the future.
Dating was something done by deviants back then, like homosexuals/fetishists/etc. - nowadays everyone does it. Only thanks to certain individuals this shit got normalized which led to the exclusion of subchads.
 
Last edited:
Who cares about the satisfaction of women?
In the end what matters is stability/tolerance.
The greatest lie is that people need to be 100% content/happy.
This leads to the ones being able to afford pickiness never being content with their lot in life (despite living in bliss) and to those without that privilege being unable to get anything. The attractive individuals become spoiled children that are unsatisfiable, the rest starves. Women wait for Prince Charming while Prince Charming fucks himself through thousands of them - and constantly they tell themselves that life will become serious in a few years and then in another few years until they lie dying in a hospital.

"Free love" was a concept that was seen as youthful/wishful/delusional thinking back then, pragmatism mattered, nowadays these infantile thought patterns are the norm, love is nothing more than something temporary, it's an ephemerous rush incapable of producing long-term stability/sustainability, the same as drug addiction in consequence/state of mind.
Dating was something done by deviants back then, like homosexuals/fetishists/etc. - nowadays everyone does it. Only thanks to certain individuals this shit got normalized which led to the exclusion of subchads.
so would you like to be cucked?
 
in latin america yes. heard latin american foids are notorious cheaters, more so than cumskin foids in the west and they dont feel the slighest shame in it for some reason. their brains must be wired different and probably latin american "culture" in general is crap tier :bigbrain:

You are right.
 
over for cookhusbandcel
 
so would you like to be cucked?
No. Therefore we would bring slut shaming and abolish certain other paragraphs. I don't care for love, compliance is all we need. And cruelty (to a certain limit) commands it. Of course some males would still be cucked, but their amount would be drastically reduced.
every country has a working class with somewhat less picky girls
however the working class girls typically want nothing to do with autistic men that didn't grow up in a working class environment, even if those men have money
This. Nothing is more universally hated than a male rising above his genetic caste system due to other means like a high job position.
 
No. Therefore we would bring slut shaming and abolish certain other paragraphs. I don't care for love, compliance is all we need. And cruelty (to a certain limit) commands it. Of course some males would still be cucked, but their amount would be drastically reduced.
I agree and I didn't say anything about "love"
 
You can obtain a date in a western country when you are rich and the foid needs the money. But only from time to time and you will be probably rejected at once as soon as the foid sees the incel face to face. Whatever his money is ....
 
@Lebensmüder
What is your avi?
 
every country has a working class with somewhat less picky girls
however the working class girls typically want nothing to do with autistic men that didn't grow up in a working class environment, even if those men have money
This
 
in third wold countries as long as a guy has a job and doesn't beat his wife too much then women there consider that good enough husband material to marry a guy and stay with him.

as opposed to the pages of deal breakers women in western countries have, that's to even get a date.
Framelets are still out of luck.
 
every country has a working class with somewhat less picky girls
however the working class girls typically want nothing to do with autistic men that didn't grow up in a working class environment, even if those men have money
 

Similar threads

earming
Replies
17
Views
1K
cathuluelitist
cathuluelitist
CursedMutantSoul
Replies
22
Views
1K
luciferiancel
luciferiancel
Mohamedömar
Replies
25
Views
2K
luciferiancel
luciferiancel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top