JFL Polygamy being a natural state of humans?

insanus virginem

insanus virginem

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 17, 2020
Posts
381
Online
4d 18h 45m
There are several articles out there making such claims. They claim that up to 80% of early human societies were polygamous which is a really easy lie to make considering no writen records from those societies exist to prove that. On the other hand you will find monogamy being the norm in writen records going back a few thousand years. What escapes these shills is that the only one who would be polygamous under those conditions would be men. If any man was competent enough to provide for several women and their children he surely wouldn't let his women sleep with other men and raise children that arent his. And virgin men would be even less likely to spare their resources for a village whore who refuses to sleep with them.

Female based polygamy can only exist in the same world where contraception and social programs exist. Not only that female polygamy can only exist in unnatural society which empowers the weaker sex and elevates it to an equal or superior status of a man.

 
Subhuman Currycel

Subhuman Currycel

Admiral
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Posts
2,546
Online
47d 9h 32m
It isn't but polygny is probably the closest as thats what our ape cousins do the most
Its essentially a small % of males have access to majority of the women kinda parallel to the 80/20 rule.
 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
10,170
Online
122d 8h 30m
(((Psychology Today.)))

The article is trying to make people think that monogamy is unnatural so that they go around thinking it's the natural state to be a cuck and let hundreds of other men bust nuts in your wife, or to justify her whoring around.
 
AAAAAAAAAAAcel

AAAAAAAAAAAcel

Theorizer
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
16,114
Online
180d 3h 41m
Sadly yes, but a sane aociety should force non-serial monogamy
 
BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

卐 卍࿕࿖࿗࿘ꖦ
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
22,020
Online
282d 19h 2m
based_meme said:
(((Psychology Today.)))

The article is trying to make people think that monogamy is unnatural so that they go around thinking it's the natural state to be a cuck and let hundreds of other men bust nuts in your wife, or to justify her whoring around.
I fucking love science and science told me it’s natural for Tyrone laquavius to fuck my wife :soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
10,170
Online
122d 8h 30m
BummerDrummer said:
I fucking love science and science told me it’s natural for Tyrone laquavius to fuck my wife :soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:

Unironically, this is exactly what a soy NPC would think.
 
Golden Blue

Golden Blue

Officer
★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
671
Online
8d 17h 1m
Nope, natural among apes maybe
 
insanus virginem

insanus virginem

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 17, 2020
Posts
381
Online
4d 18h 45m
Subhuman Currycel said:
It isn't but polygny is probably the closest as thats what our ape cousins do the most
Its essentially a small % of males have access to majority of the women kinda parallel to the 80/20 rule.

Apes cannot be compared to humans my dude. On several accounts like shorter and less severe pregnancy and a far shorter time for their offspring to develop. A 6 month old chimp can swing from a tree but a 6 month old human can barely walk. Also humans populate far harsher, harder to survive in areas than apes do.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbiXCZM4-lE&ab_channel=TheBulindiChimpanzee%26CommunityProject
 
Subhuman Currycel

Subhuman Currycel

Admiral
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Posts
2,546
Online
47d 9h 32m
insanus virginem said:
Apes cannot be compared to humans my dude. On several accounts like shorter and less severe pregnancy and a far shorter time for their offspring to develop. A 6 month old chimp can swing from a tree but a 6 month old human can barely walk. Also humans populate far harsher, harder to survive in areas than apes do.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbiXCZM4-lE&ab_channel=TheBulindiChimpanzee%26CommunityProject
The more dependent and vulnerable the offspring the more an animal will tend towards monogamy.
But lifetime monogamy is bullshit and from anthropological data we know less men reproduced on average but they held majority mating.
 
ThoughtfulCel

ThoughtfulCel

G.O.R.I.L.L.A _M.A.X.I.N.G
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Posts
19,944
Online
336d 19h 29m
based_meme said:
Unironically, this is exactly what a soy CUMSKIN NPC would think.
 
insanus virginem

insanus virginem

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 17, 2020
Posts
381
Online
4d 18h 45m
Subhuman Currycel said:
The more dependent and vulnerable the offspring the more an animal will tend towards monogamy.
But lifetime monogamy is bullshit and from anthropological data we know less men reproduced on average but they held majority mating.

So what do you suggest? That women divorced men or cheated on them at the time when a man could legally murder his wife if he caught her cheating?
Do you even know how worthless women were at the time? A woman in her early 20's was considered to be too old to marry a decent man and any father was glad for some loser to take her off his hands.
 
Subhuman Currycel

Subhuman Currycel

Admiral
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Posts
2,546
Online
47d 9h 32m
insanus virginem said:
So what do you suggest? That women divorced men or cheated on them at the time when a man could legally murder his wife if he caught her cheating?
Do you even know how worthless women were at the time? A woman in her early 20's was considered to be too old to marry a decent man and any father was glad for some loser to take her off his hands.
Im talking hunter gatherer idc about civilsation if you wanna see where our true nature lies look pre civilisation.
 
mNFwTJ3wz9

mNFwTJ3wz9

Everyone except me is a Fed ﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽ :fuk:
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Posts
6,910
Online
93d 18h 12m
BummerDrummer said:
I fucking love science and science told me it’s natural for Tyrone laquavius to fuck my wife :soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
/thread
 
insanus virginem

insanus virginem

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 17, 2020
Posts
381
Online
4d 18h 45m
Subhuman Currycel said:
Im talking hunter gatherer idc about civilsation if you wanna see where our true nature lies look pre civilisation.

I sincerely doubt a hunter gatherer society would allow a 80/20 rule or anything similar on the account that men back then weren't pussy whipped and could just rise up and murder the minority of sex havers in their sleep. I doubt a tribe of 20 men and 20 women would have 4 men sleeping with most women while 16 men listen to their orgies and shed cuck tears in the corner of the cave.
 
soymonkcel

soymonkcel

Trying to reach longevity escape velocity.
★★★★
Joined
Jul 23, 2020
Posts
3,822
Online
31d 3h 46m
insanus virginem said:
There are several articles out there making such claims. They claim that up to 80% of early human societies were polygamous which is a really easy lie to make considering no writen records from those societies exist to prove that. On the other hand you will find monogamy being the norm in writen records going back a few thousand years. What escapes these shills is that the only one who would be polygamous under those conditions would be men. If any man was competent enough to provide for several women and their children he surely wouldn't let his women sleep with other men and raise children that arent his. And virgin men would be even less likely to spare their resources for a village whore who refuses to sleep with them.

Female based polygamy can only exist in the same world where contraception and social programs exist. Not only that female polygamy can only exist in unnatural society which empowers the weaker sex and elevates it to an equal or superior status of a man.


It isn't just "several articles". Read Sex at Dawn by Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jetha, and The Origin of the Family, Marriage, Private Property and the State by F. Engels.

I think there are (or were) cases of polyandry (a woman with several men) in the Tibet and Mongolia, if my memory isn't betraying me. And, according to the first book I recommended you, there are (or were) several polygynandric (totally non monogamous, it's basically hypergamy without closed polygamous relationships) societies/races spread over the world, and, in fact, they were the majority before the agricultural revolution.

An example of polygynandric society would be The Mosuo.

The supposed reason monogamy went "viral" was because we became sedentary, we had to dispute land. To do so you have to be a warrior. Men are better warriors, so they are the only ones doing so. But you won't be alive forever. You need a heir of your private property. But before monogamy, people only knew who was the mother (matrilineality), not the father, because women usually slept with several men. How do you make sure as a man that your boyos are yours so you can establish patrilineal heritage (a.k.a. technically a patriarchy)? The answer is monogamy. And because monogamous civilizations usually were more militarized and belligerents, they usually conquered more land. Monogamy didn't establish itself throughout the world because people started choosing it. It was because it was imposed by force.
 
Neggr

Neggr

Kebabcel in western europe, it never began.
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Posts
11,402
Online
29d 7h 18m
yea but just because its natural doesnt mean its right, rape is natural aswell.
 
Michinomiya Hirohit

Michinomiya Hirohit

emperor
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Posts
11,494
Online
119d 14h 7m
Subhuman Currycel said:
It isn't but polygny is probably the closest as thats what our ape cousins do the most
Its essentially a small % of males have access to majority of the women kinda parallel to the 80/20 rule.
 
kampman

kampman

Wizard
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Posts
5,456
Online
149d 19h 35m
Polygamy is natural from a biological standpoint, but a civlized culture can only be based on monogamy, because if foids are restricted to 20% of males and the other 80% is denied sex and relationships, the males left out will become desperate and destructive. They will stop contributing to society and will become liabilities.

The best case scenario is that they become incels who prefer LDAR and NEETdom if they can afford it. The worst case scenario is that they organize themselves in the form of an extremist group. It's not a coincidence that the most infamous terrorist groups are from the Muslim world.
 
Shin no Shi

Shin no Shi

What is the Devil if not a Avatar of God
-
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Posts
3,762
Online
41d 23h 56m
insanus virginem said:
There are several articles out there making such claims. They claim that up to 80% of early human societies were polygamous which is a really easy lie to make considering no writen records from those societies exist to prove that. On the other hand you will find monogamy being the norm in writen records going back a few thousand years. What escapes these shills is that the only one who would be polygamous under those conditions would be men. If any man was competent enough to provide for several women and their children he surely wouldn't let his women sleep with other men and raise children that arent his. And virgin men would be even less likely to spare their resources for a village whore who refuses to sleep with them.

Female based polygamy can only exist in the same world where contraception and social programs exist. Not only that female polygamy can only exist in unnatural society which empowers the weaker sex and elevates it to an equal or superior status of a man.

I would rather have whores orbit me than me orbiting whores period. If anyone wants pussy I will give to them for free or the cunt gets mutilated.
 
Billowel

Billowel

Ed junior
★★
Joined
May 28, 2019
Posts
5,137
Online
86d 8h 33m
polygamy is something that befits dogs and other animals,not man.
 
Dregster666

Dregster666

Take the ChudurBudur Pill
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 26, 2018
Posts
26,925
Online
234d 16h 27m
insanus virginem said:
So what do you suggest? That women divorced men or cheated on them at the time when a man could legally murder his wife if he caught her cheating?
Do you even know how worthless women were at the time? A woman in her early 20's was considered to be too old to marry a decent man and any father was glad for some loser to take her off his hands.
Brutal History Pill

Holes aged like shit then, still do now.
 
micropenis29

micropenis29

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 28, 2018
Posts
4,270
Online
31d 3h 49m
Bumping this masterpiece.

All hail the king.

And free him, obviously.