Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

LifeFuel [Poll included] UK normie who raped and murdered two teenage femoids has life sentence paroled. Roasties seethe.

Check all the statements you agree with.


  • Total voters
    37
PPEcel

PPEcel

cope and seethe
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Posts
29,087
News:


The crime:

In 1983, Colin Pitchfork savagely raped a 15-year-old femoid who was walking home alone before strangling her to death with her own scarf. In 1986 he also raped and murdered another 15-year-old. In between both murders, Pitchfork had also orally raped a 16-year-old at knifepoint in 1985, though he decided not to kill her.

This is how a pathologist described the 1986 killing:
When she was found, she was naked from the waist down. She had died of manual strangulation. It was clear that this was a particularly violent rape and probable buggery, and the girl herself had put up a considerable struggle. There was substantial bruising consistent with at least 2 punches to the side of her face, and another to the front. There were large grip marks bruises to her upper arms. The pathologist described a "brutal sexual attack". The perineum was substantially split. The anal ring was spread with three fissures. He concluded that the rape and strangulation were coexistent with and, because no bruising associated with the torn perineum was found, may well have continued after death.

In solving the cases, the police sought blood samples of over 5,000 men living in the area. He was the first person in the UK to be convicted of rape using DNA profiling; the forensic technique of reliably extracting DNA from semen left in a victim's vagina was still relatively new in the 1980s.

Pitchfork was not an incel; indeed, he was a normie father of two. During one of the murders, Pitchfork's infant son was sleeping in the back seat of his car, parked nearby.

The law:

Back in the 1980s and 1990s, the minimum term that a murderer must serve as part of a life sentence before being considered for parole ("tariff"), was allowed to be determined by the Home Secretary. Trial judges would, however, make sentencing recommendations. Justice Sir Philip Otton simply said Pitchfork "should only be released when the authorities are satisfied that he is no longer a danger to women. In any event, in view of the serious, callous and cunning conduct the actual length should be not less than 20 years." The Lord Chief Justice, Geoffrey Lane, recommended "25 years minimum, but from the point of view of the safety of the public I doubt if he should ever be released." The Home Secretary set a tariff of 30 years.

In 2002, in R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex Parte Anderson, the House of Lords* ruled that the practice of allowing the Home Secretary to set the tariff for convicted murderers contravened Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). Tariffs for life sentences are now set by judges. This also led to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, which set recommended minimum tariffs. Had Pitchfork committed both murders today, he would almost certainly be sentenced to a "whole life order", i.e. life without parole, given that he had committed multiple murders of a sexual nature.

In 2009, Pitchfork appealed his sentence, and the Court of Appeal reduced the tariff to 28 years (see R v. Pitchfork). The Court also ruled that increasing Pitchfork's tariff to a whole life order under the terms of the 2003 Act would contravene Article 7 of the ECHR's prohibition of ex post facto, or retroactive, laws.

The outrage:

In 2021, the Parole Board determined that Pitchfork, now in his 60s, was a "model prisoner" and decided to release him, despite a motion by the Justice Secretary for them to reconsider. The Parole Board noted that "Legislation dictates that a panel's decision must be solely focused on what risk a prisoner may pose on release and whether that risk can be managed in the community." In other words, it is not the Board's place to impose their own sentencing recommendations over that of a judge.

The tabloids started to whine.

Julie Bindel, a radical feminazi cow, had this to say on the Spectator:

You know, I'm not one for rooting for normalfags, but I am indeed glad that he's managed to piss off other normalfags and femoids, all thanks to based lawcels. :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:


________________________________________________________
*The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 created a Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that took over the functions of the Law Lords; the House of Lords no longer has appellate jurisdiction.
 
The guy shouldve rotted for life or better yet killed. Imagine losing your child and reading the coroner's description. You would want to murder him yourself.
 
Absolutely based.

I hope he kills more foids now that he's out. :feelsohh:
 
Hey you are unbanned :feelsLightsaber:
 
The guy shouldve rotted for life or better yet killed. Imagine losing your child and reading the coroner's description. You would want to murder him yourself.
 
I am having a great time reading triggered roasties comments on reddit :feelskek:
 
Respectfully I think humblebrag richfags should fuck off instead of shilling BBC news
 
It's so surreal how in Western democracies the most protected people are murderers, pedophiles, rapists, thieves, etc.
 
It's a shame the UK no longer has the death penalty. Guys like him deserve it.
 
It's so surreal how in Western democracies the most protected people are murderers, pedophiles, rapists, thieves, etc.
Why do normies and some incels keep implying that civil liberties and the rule of law are some sort of "afterthought" as opposed to an essential element of any legal system?
 
You would let him do this to your daughter?
I won't ever have a daughter anyway, asking an incel whether he'd let someone rape his daughter is like asking a homelesscel what he would do if someone keyed his Lamborghini.
 
He should have got death penalty, that bitch that shaked the baby should also get death penalty.
 
Lets assume you have one. What would be your reaction?
@PPEcel say you decided to use your money and have a surrogate child. You now have a daughter. You have raised her for 13 years and this was hard work, but you had good times together. You have given affection and recieved it, forming a familial bond with your child. This experience was lifefuel for you. Then one day on the way from school this guy brutally rapes and kills your daughter.

What would you like to happen? Come on, im sure all of you edge lords have the mental capacity to put yourself in someone else's shoes.
 
You would let him do this to your daughter?
You're thinking like a normie. Incels are never going to have daughters, therefore this falls under the category of "normie problems are not our problems." I don't give a fuck about this guy one way or the other since he was a normie, although I do think it's funny how butthurt the roasties are getting over his release. (If this guy was an incel, I'd consider him a hERo.)

One of the funniest things about this whole shitshow is that this guy was essentially released on a technicality - the same technicalities that libtards, feminists, and other "soft on crime/fuck da police" types put into law in the first place. Now that their own rule has backfired on them, they're crying like the faggot bitchboys they are, and I'm laughing at their tears.
 
@Robtical @JosefMengelecel look at these replies sympathizing with a bunch of teenage victims like who cares they aren’t 5. I couldn’t give two shits about violent criminals in minecraft
 
why did you get banned?
 
@Robtical @JosefMengelecel look at these replies sympathizing with a bunch of teenage victims like who cares they aren’t 5. I couldn’t give two shits about violent criminals in minecraft
You would let him do this to your daughter?
If they were rosties he did the father a favor.
 
Lets assume you have one. What would be your reaction?
@PPEcel say you decided to use your money and have a surrogate child. You now have a daughter. You have raised her for 13 years and this was hard work, but you had good times together. You have given affection and recieved it, forming a familial bond with your child. This experience was lifefuel for you. Then one day on the way from school this guy brutally rapes and kills your daughter.
I would be mildly disappointed.

My position in this case, however, is not about the brutality of the murder or about the victims or the perpetrator. Don't give a shit about foids or the normalfag.

To me it's simple. I think the House of Lords ruled correctly that it was a violation of a defendant's right to a fair trial for his or her sentencing to be determined directly by an elected politician and not by an independent member of the judiciary. I also think that it would be a human rights violation for an individual to be convicted or sentenced ex post facto.

One of the funniest things about this whole shitshow is that this guy was essentially released on a technicality - the same technicalities that libtards, feminists, and other "soft on crime/fuck da police" types put into law in the first place. Now that their own rule has backfired on them, they're crying like the faggot bitchboys they are, and I'm laughing at their tears.
I don't understand why normies love using the word "technicality". Due process is not a technicality, it is a cornerstone of Western jurisprudence. People think it's a horrible thing when a criminal "gets off on a technicality". I don't. If the state can't prove an individual is guilty of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt in a fair trial, he is presumed innocent. If a man possesses two terabytes of child pornography but the evidence was suppressed because the warrant lacked probable cause and he walks free, that's just the price that society should pay should the government fail the respect a defendant's rights.

The vast majority of those "libtards, feminists, soft on crime" types you describe are not committed civil libertarians. If someone says, in the comment section of a news article describing a horrific crime, "I don't believe in the death penalty but I'm willing to make an exception for this child rapist," then he or she is full of shit; they clearly believe in the death penalty. Cases set precedents, precedents set habits.

It is better that ten guilty persons escape than one innocent person suffer.
 
I own a pitchfork
 
Women are against cruel and unusual punishment (read: the death penalty/solitary confinement) until a man commits a crime that goes against their moral code of conduct. Why can't they make up their fucking mind?
 
Bruh, whatsup with wypipo letting out murderers and mass murderers (anders breivik) out early without death sentences.

Shit like that only encourages more heinous crime.
 
Women are against cruel and unusual punishment (read: the death penalty/solitary confinement) until a man commits a crime that goes against their moral code of conduct. Why can't they make up their fucking mind?
You're assuming these people have minds.
 
Bruh, whatsup with wypipo letting out murderers and mass murderers (anders breivik) out early without death sentences.

Shit like that only encourages more heinous crime.
[UWSL]1. Who's letting Breivik out early lmao[/UWSL]
[UWSL][/UWSL]
2. No it doesn't JFL
 
I wish Bundy was still here. What a loss to the world.
 
I won't ever have a daughter anyway, asking an incel whether he'd let someone rape his daughter is like asking a homelesscel what he would do if someone keyed his Lamborghini.
:lul::lul::lul:
 
[UWSL]1. Who's letting Breivik out early lmao[/UWSL]

2. No it doesn't JFL
Killed: 77 (8 in Oslo‎, 69 on Utøya)‎
Date: 22 July 2011; Oslo‎: 15:25 CEST; Utøya: ...‎
Criminal penalty: 22 years' preventive detention

22 years is nothing.‎ Thats what I meant by early. Any sane society would have hung Breivik high with piano wire and without a hood.

Crime has been skyrocketing here where I live because the criminals know that they can get away with crime. Even if theyre caught, they will be released immediately or given really light sentences.
 
Last edited:
Killed: 77 (8 in Oslo‎, 69 on Utøya)‎
Date: 22 July 2011; Oslo‎: 15:25 CEST; Utøya: ...‎
Criminal penalty: 22 years' preventive detention

22 years is nothing.‎ Thats what I meant by early. Any sane society would have hung Breivik high with piano wire and without a hood.

Crime has been skyrocketing here where I live because the criminals know that they can get away with crime. Even if theyre caught, they will be released immediately or given really light sentences.
You clearly don't understand how preventive detention works in Norway, he won't be automatically released after 21 years. I highly doubt he will ever be released.

You point to Norway as an example of lenient sentencing and "heinous crime", yet Norway has a significantly lower homicide rate than the U.S., where you live.
 
You would let him do this to your daughter?
Moralfags always forget the number 1 rule of being an incel in society
 
It's so surreal how in Western democracies the most protected people are murderers, pedophiles, rapists, thieves, etc.
Because females love them.
 
I wonder what odds the bookies have on him reoffending
 
Norway has a significantly lower homicide rate than the U.S
is some one going to tell him?
1626638318435

1626638336388

1626638353997
 

OK, let's do the math.

The FBI counted 16,245 homicides in 2019. 4,752 cases did not have any racial data. 4,728 offenders were white, 6,425 were black, 340 were of other races. If we extrapolate that the 4,752 homicides that had no offender information fit the distribution of the 11,493 cases in which we did have offender information, we arrive at 6,683 murders committed by cumskins in the U.S. in 2019.

I'd imagine that if you tabulated the murder rates by race and adjusted for age the numbers would be more balanced, considering that the median age of an American cumskin is higher than the median age of an American non-cumskin, and propensity towards criminal behaviour decreases with age in individuals of all races. But let's say I give you the benefit of the doubt on this matter and don't adjust for age.

There were approximately 236,475,000 cumskins in the U.S. in 2019. Crunch the numbers and you arrive at the conclusion that in 2019, the homicide rate of white Americans is 2.83 per 100,000 population. Significantly lower than when compared to black Americans, but still significantly higher than Norway's homicide rate, which is 0.6.

Even when you remove nonwhite Americans from the equation, American cumskins are still over four times as likely to commit a homicide than a Norwegian, the numbers aren't even close.
 
Even when you remove nonwhite Americans from the equation, American cumskins are still over four times as likely to commit a homicide than a Norwegian, the numbers aren't even close.
huh that's interesting but not surprising, it's more then likely most of those are opioid addicted whites because our medical industry loves to over prescribe that shit.
Significantly lower than when compared to black Americans
that's all I needed to know.
 
huh that's interesting but not surprising, it's more then likely most of those are opioid addicted whites because our medical industry loves to over prescribe that shit.
Of course.

Well, Norway is uniquely safe even by European standards, they have half the homicide rate that Sweden does, and it's not like Sweden is a shithole. Among large countries (i.e. not city-states like Monaco or Singapore) I think Japan and Qatar might be the only ones with a homicide rate lower than Norway, but I'll have to double check.
 
How can a criminal system be so broken :feelskek:
 
Killed: 77 (8 in Oslo‎, 69 on Utøya)‎
Date: 22 July 2011; Oslo‎: 15:25 CEST; Utøya: ...‎
Criminal penalty: 22 years' preventive detention

22 years is nothing.‎ Thats what I meant by early. Any sane society would have hung Breivik high with piano wire and without a hood.

Crime has been skyrocketing here where I live because the criminals know that they can get away with crime. Even if theyre caught, they will be released immediately or given really light sentences.
Violent crimes and theft are the only crimes that matter, but even breaking cucked laws means you're a criminal according to cucks and whores. Not all laws should be followed, especially because rosties and soys are the majority of voters who voted for them.
 
Violent crimes and theft are the only crimes that matter, but even breaking cucked laws means you're a criminal according to cucks and whores. Not all laws should be followed, especially because rosties and soys are the majority of voters who voted for them.
what was your take on the op
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top