TheNEET
mentally crippled by sleepoverless teen years
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 27, 2018
- Posts
- 12,065
I understand why actual pedophilia is bad or why actual CP is wrong to watch and share. Sexual abuse is an obvious one, in the latter case it can obviously make you reexperience that abuse again etc. Just sharing pictures of someone without consent is very scummy and it's ironic how normies will scream against any kind of revenge porn or anything like that, while they support bullying (by saying it's not "that bad" or that we should "just get over it" and trying to tone-police and silence our pleas to actively fight against it) which often involves precisely that: getting photos (or short videos) of you taken (especially in awkward situations) and shared among normies thru like Snapchat (to avoid getting caught) and sheit. Every incel knows the pain of getting pictures of him taken by giggling normies only to be shared in group chats to become a laughing stock for the school/class -- apparently that's all fine and dandy according to IT.
Anyway, modern pedo hysteria leads to more and more behaviors being described as "pedo(like)". Normies will defend adult chads who dated my colleagues in middle school (I was just a jelly inkwell who got no bitches apparently) but seethe at age gaps, even if we're talking about adults.
Here's another funny case. Turns out the creator of the Boyfriends comics made a bunch of explicit art of BTS members when he was 14. The issue: some of the members of BTS were still underage at the time, namely 17. Apparently now the guy is accused of "creating child pornography".
It's silly because if you didn't know this insanely complicated context, you wouldn't know it's "child pornography" at all. 17 year old boys don't look any different to 21 year old boys, people grow up at different times, it's really a stretch. It feels dismissive to the victims of actual production of child pornography to compare their traumatizing experience to some kid drawing NSFW artwork of his idols who are pretty much adults in all sense (many people will never achieve the financial independence and mindset they've had at 17), but ackshually technically some of them are underage (in most countries, including South Korea afaik, they're still above the age of consent, so they can have actual sex, but sexual artwork of them is apparently very evil).
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KnbhdV1VzA
Anyway, modern pedo hysteria leads to more and more behaviors being described as "pedo(like)". Normies will defend adult chads who dated my colleagues in middle school (I was just a jelly inkwell who got no bitches apparently) but seethe at age gaps, even if we're talking about adults.
Here's another funny case. Turns out the creator of the Boyfriends comics made a bunch of explicit art of BTS members when he was 14. The issue: some of the members of BTS were still underage at the time, namely 17. Apparently now the guy is accused of "creating child pornography".
It's silly because if you didn't know this insanely complicated context, you wouldn't know it's "child pornography" at all. 17 year old boys don't look any different to 21 year old boys, people grow up at different times, it's really a stretch. It feels dismissive to the victims of actual production of child pornography to compare their traumatizing experience to some kid drawing NSFW artwork of his idols who are pretty much adults in all sense (many people will never achieve the financial independence and mindset they've had at 17), but ackshually technically some of them are underage (in most countries, including South Korea afaik, they're still above the age of consent, so they can have actual sex, but sexual artwork of them is apparently very evil).
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KnbhdV1VzA