This is true but depressing as fuck. 
Italic text = my personal commentary
It is an anthropological fact that 60% of male homo sapiens who ever lived did not reproduce - considering that contraception is pretty new and rape is pretty old, these males who failed the evolutionary prime directive definitely never got close enough to a woman, and if they did they most certainly did not force themselves. (Many of the 40% that did reproduce might have only done so by raping women. The other 60% were too beta to rape even with no potential consequences.)
The number of all women who did not successfully reproduce is about 20% - and unlike men, women have hundreds of ways to fail to reproduce - the number of ways a pregnancy can go wrong is perhaps matched only by the bugs in Internet Explorer 4.0
So, it could be argued that they rarely failed to conceive.
Of 100 women who mated successfully, at least 80 of them chose only from 40 males per every hundred.
Consider these facts:
Every man of today can provide for his family in a way that hardly anyone could in the distant past - in those days it was a great achievement to not have your whole family die by the time your child reached puberty.
All men now are providers - in fact society goes out of its way to make sure men do not starve to death even if they have zero provision capability - unemployment benefits, charity, pension and so on. This is beta-heaven - never before in history has any man had to do so less effort to get so much to provide for his family.
The alpha has also softened - Most men in history died in conflicts with nature, wild animals and other men. Not being a dominant badass meant you wouldn't live for very long.
Now, most men will live their whole lives without ever engaging in physical combat or even moderately difficult physical labor. Signaling dominance has become more social - words, dance, sport, wealth, dress etc. - these are the dominance rituals that men engage in.
This combination of high quality betas and low quality alphas, means women’s selection strategies aim for even higher than they ever did. It’s not enough to be physically strong - there are thousands of guys a woman will meet who have decent physique.
It’s not enough to have intellectual capacity - thousands graduate college and understand stuff that Newton would find hard.
It’s not enough to have provisional capacity - everyone makes minimum wage at least. The bar for a “comfortable life” is much much higher. (So what's left? Face - the one genetic fitness indicator that can never be masked.)
So as betas and alphas evolve in some direction, women will continue to seek the top creamy layer from each - depending on whether they are in the “boyfriend” or “husband” phase.
It’s a never ending economic spiral. Who really wants a flagship iPhone from 2013? (5/10 normie?) The definition of “latest and greatest” shifts rapidly based on whats least available.
With a bursting population and a thinner and thinner creamy layer, the number of men who have access to mates rapidly diminishes.
This explains why that there are people like President Trump who have extremely attractive wives - or why battered women keep clinging to their abusive partners even if they have a choice (Rihanna). Donald Trump's life is a beta's dream - there's nothing like billions of dollars and fame to signal exceptional provisional capacities.
Similarly people who signal social dominance attract women regardless of what kind of people they are. Look at the number of rock star groupies. (Social dominance is highly dependent on good looks because of the halo effect, a scientifically-proven cognitive bias)
Incels are merely the lag end of a bell curve that gets more and more skewed. Most of the young guys I know who have had no success with women (and trust me there are millions in India) are not the woman-hating violent good-for-nothings that many people make them out to be. They are incels because they inherited and learned beta traits - they were indoctrinated that being a “nice guy”, accommodating, kind, humorous and generally shy would attract women - in fact most of them were indoctrinated to be that way before puberty.
A lot of them have nothing in their lives except their career or education, and no time, inclination or guidance to improve themselves beyond what it takes to work and earn. In India, most of them will get married to a girl in an arranged marriage and live out the rest of their lives as family men. Until then they swipe right endlessly, get friendzoned, fall into porn addiction, generally experience rock-bottom self-esteem and retreat into a shell.
I hear a lot of people say “No one deserves sex”, but people do fight for other people deserving things like burials, good roads, healthy food, jobs, electricity, running water and so on. Most people are never chastised for asking to be given something free. People whine all the time for trivial things like being addressed in a particular way or being allowed to dress in a particular way, but the moment you talk about a man needing sex, immediately it's supposedly “rape apology”.
Sex is a need. Any red-blooded male who doesn’t sexually release himself for a while will have his brain do it for him while he sleeps — masturbation is the equivalent of eating dog food to survive.
Needs are subjective - the need for food is felt most acutely by a hungry man. Incels are obsessed with sex, simply because they don’t get any.
The biggest mistake people do is to ostracize them, blame them and give them stupid advice like “be yourself” or “someone will come along” or “it’s your attitude”. That’s what leads to the dangerous side of this demographic. The moderate ones pay for sex, and some go MGTOW - eventually when they get older, they will get picked up by some beta-fishing female at least temporarily. The radicals become ticking time bombs. These are the marginalized section of society who are almost universally hated. Unlike other marginalized sections, they have almost no champions who can empathize with their condition.
Ultimately, when pushed far enough, they will resort to violence, or seek a patriarchal culture like ISIS-style Islam, where women are commodity. It’s not an accident that violent and low female to male ratio demographics tend to have honor culture and the treatment of women like chattel. It doesn’t help any that western culture “liberates” women by simultaneously demonstrating that they voluntarily objectify themselves (for cash).
Imagine you saw a store which sold candy online at cheap rates - you see everyone buying them, but when you login, it’s “Item out of stock” or worse “We do not serve your kind here”. If sex were never a commodity, things would be totally different - but sex is a commodity and society insists that women who trade sex are equal in all ways to women who don’t - a mysterious 180° turn from past societal morals.
Now what can we do about it? There are a couple of solutions. The non-solution is to ask women to reprogram their biological instincts and have lowered standards - this can’t ever happen.
The next solution is legalization and social acceptance of prostitution. If women won’t have sex with a guy because of his alleged repulsive nature, at least let him have the social and legal sanction to buy it from a willing woman.
The final solution is sex bots - this gets rid of the flawed ethical concern of whether prostitution is actually voluntary. If some feminists have their way though, they will actually make it illegal to stick your schlong into any vaguely female shaped object.
If you were ever a man, or knew one, who spent weeks and months after a relationship, suddenly stuck with loneliness and sexual frustration - you know how it feels to be an incel - just a little bit.
Italic text = my personal commentary
It is an anthropological fact that 60% of male homo sapiens who ever lived did not reproduce - considering that contraception is pretty new and rape is pretty old, these males who failed the evolutionary prime directive definitely never got close enough to a woman, and if they did they most certainly did not force themselves. (Many of the 40% that did reproduce might have only done so by raping women. The other 60% were too beta to rape even with no potential consequences.)
The number of all women who did not successfully reproduce is about 20% - and unlike men, women have hundreds of ways to fail to reproduce - the number of ways a pregnancy can go wrong is perhaps matched only by the bugs in Internet Explorer 4.0
So, it could be argued that they rarely failed to conceive.
Of 100 women who mated successfully, at least 80 of them chose only from 40 males per every hundred.
Consider these facts:
- The female of the human species has an evolutionary value that is several thousand times that of even the most dominant man. A woman can mother perhaps a maximum of 8 children. A man can father billions. If we got rid of all men today and for the next 100 years, the existing sperm banks would still have enough sperm to continue civilization for many centuries at least. (This is why men often do the most dangerous tasks such as fighting wars. The female-to-male ratio is very disproportionate to each gender's reproductive capabilities, so a civilization can afford to lose a lot more men than women.)
- Females have a dual mating strategy - the instinct to breed with the most dominant, aggressive and physically strong men, whilst also having the instinct to seek the most caring, protective, providing father for their children.
- Throughout history - females have often implemented both - mother the badass's (Chad's) child and get some softie (cuck) to help take care of it. Every civilization in the world has extreme distaste for cuckoldry - it is reflected in the nature of how insults to a man always question his mothers chastity, or fathers impotence. This is just the social reflection of what men always fear at some primal level. There are lots of statistical studies showing that this fear is not unfounded.
Every man of today can provide for his family in a way that hardly anyone could in the distant past - in those days it was a great achievement to not have your whole family die by the time your child reached puberty.
All men now are providers - in fact society goes out of its way to make sure men do not starve to death even if they have zero provision capability - unemployment benefits, charity, pension and so on. This is beta-heaven - never before in history has any man had to do so less effort to get so much to provide for his family.
The alpha has also softened - Most men in history died in conflicts with nature, wild animals and other men. Not being a dominant badass meant you wouldn't live for very long.
Now, most men will live their whole lives without ever engaging in physical combat or even moderately difficult physical labor. Signaling dominance has become more social - words, dance, sport, wealth, dress etc. - these are the dominance rituals that men engage in.
This combination of high quality betas and low quality alphas, means women’s selection strategies aim for even higher than they ever did. It’s not enough to be physically strong - there are thousands of guys a woman will meet who have decent physique.
It’s not enough to have intellectual capacity - thousands graduate college and understand stuff that Newton would find hard.
It’s not enough to have provisional capacity - everyone makes minimum wage at least. The bar for a “comfortable life” is much much higher. (So what's left? Face - the one genetic fitness indicator that can never be masked.)
So as betas and alphas evolve in some direction, women will continue to seek the top creamy layer from each - depending on whether they are in the “boyfriend” or “husband” phase.
It’s a never ending economic spiral. Who really wants a flagship iPhone from 2013? (5/10 normie?) The definition of “latest and greatest” shifts rapidly based on whats least available.
With a bursting population and a thinner and thinner creamy layer, the number of men who have access to mates rapidly diminishes.
This explains why that there are people like President Trump who have extremely attractive wives - or why battered women keep clinging to their abusive partners even if they have a choice (Rihanna). Donald Trump's life is a beta's dream - there's nothing like billions of dollars and fame to signal exceptional provisional capacities.
Similarly people who signal social dominance attract women regardless of what kind of people they are. Look at the number of rock star groupies. (Social dominance is highly dependent on good looks because of the halo effect, a scientifically-proven cognitive bias)
Incels are merely the lag end of a bell curve that gets more and more skewed. Most of the young guys I know who have had no success with women (and trust me there are millions in India) are not the woman-hating violent good-for-nothings that many people make them out to be. They are incels because they inherited and learned beta traits - they were indoctrinated that being a “nice guy”, accommodating, kind, humorous and generally shy would attract women - in fact most of them were indoctrinated to be that way before puberty.
A lot of them have nothing in their lives except their career or education, and no time, inclination or guidance to improve themselves beyond what it takes to work and earn. In India, most of them will get married to a girl in an arranged marriage and live out the rest of their lives as family men. Until then they swipe right endlessly, get friendzoned, fall into porn addiction, generally experience rock-bottom self-esteem and retreat into a shell.
I hear a lot of people say “No one deserves sex”, but people do fight for other people deserving things like burials, good roads, healthy food, jobs, electricity, running water and so on. Most people are never chastised for asking to be given something free. People whine all the time for trivial things like being addressed in a particular way or being allowed to dress in a particular way, but the moment you talk about a man needing sex, immediately it's supposedly “rape apology”.
Sex is a need. Any red-blooded male who doesn’t sexually release himself for a while will have his brain do it for him while he sleeps — masturbation is the equivalent of eating dog food to survive.
Needs are subjective - the need for food is felt most acutely by a hungry man. Incels are obsessed with sex, simply because they don’t get any.
The biggest mistake people do is to ostracize them, blame them and give them stupid advice like “be yourself” or “someone will come along” or “it’s your attitude”. That’s what leads to the dangerous side of this demographic. The moderate ones pay for sex, and some go MGTOW - eventually when they get older, they will get picked up by some beta-fishing female at least temporarily. The radicals become ticking time bombs. These are the marginalized section of society who are almost universally hated. Unlike other marginalized sections, they have almost no champions who can empathize with their condition.
Ultimately, when pushed far enough, they will resort to violence, or seek a patriarchal culture like ISIS-style Islam, where women are commodity. It’s not an accident that violent and low female to male ratio demographics tend to have honor culture and the treatment of women like chattel. It doesn’t help any that western culture “liberates” women by simultaneously demonstrating that they voluntarily objectify themselves (for cash).
Imagine you saw a store which sold candy online at cheap rates - you see everyone buying them, but when you login, it’s “Item out of stock” or worse “We do not serve your kind here”. If sex were never a commodity, things would be totally different - but sex is a commodity and society insists that women who trade sex are equal in all ways to women who don’t - a mysterious 180° turn from past societal morals.
Now what can we do about it? There are a couple of solutions. The non-solution is to ask women to reprogram their biological instincts and have lowered standards - this can’t ever happen.
The next solution is legalization and social acceptance of prostitution. If women won’t have sex with a guy because of his alleged repulsive nature, at least let him have the social and legal sanction to buy it from a willing woman.
The final solution is sex bots - this gets rid of the flawed ethical concern of whether prostitution is actually voluntary. If some feminists have their way though, they will actually make it illegal to stick your schlong into any vaguely female shaped object.
If you were ever a man, or knew one, who spent weeks and months after a relationship, suddenly stuck with loneliness and sexual frustration - you know how it feels to be an incel - just a little bit.
