Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Notice how all notable female philosophers only talk about one topic...

Nordicel94

Nordicel94

Pancake-faced viking-cel
★★★★
Joined
Oct 5, 2022
Posts
1,816
Female philosophers like Simone de Beauvoir and Mary Stone Wollencraft along with all the others only talk about one thing: women and women's rights, their own interests.

Male philosophers like Kant, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Sartre were pioneers in basically constructing new ways of looking at society and the world, pioneering new ways of thinking about the Universe and all of humanity. Their works weren't about promoting the interests of themselves.

I think this is a perfect reflection of the genders. Females are narrow minded and all about ME, ME, ME! Men try to advance all of society with their ideas. Females can't even grasp higher concepts, they want immediate satisfaction.
 
female philosophers is a hilarious paradox
 
it's the only thing they have knowledge in except getting fucked by chad
 
Doesnt surprise me
 
dog hump GIF
 
I don't even bother wasting my time reading or listening to "female philosophy."
 
Women can't philosophize. They only steal the ideas of men.
 
notable? who the fuck noted them

oxymoron
 
No foid ever was, is or will be a philosopher. They aren't capable of it.
 
Got to say, despite having read a few things written by very well-educated and intelligent women, I have never once been impressed by anything big-picture-related they had to say.
 
I wouldnt call them "philosophers" tbh, thats kind of a stretch
 
Foids are pragmatic when it comes to their own interests, they are more down to earth, whereas men are more idealistic and fond of useless abstractions. The men that are no strangers to productive thinking, that is, philosophers.
 
I don't know a single female philosopher.
 
This infographic explains the phenomenon you are talking about quite well

For myself, the only times I have admired with and agreed with female philosophers is when the topic they are talking about renders them unable to pull the sex card, so they have to limit themselves to things that actually matter.

For example, catholic female theologians can be good and have some unique insights, because deep theology as a topic is above such concerns, so if women want to delve into it they have to be as well.
 

Attachments

  • arguing with women females foids holes.jpg
    arguing with women females foids holes.jpg
    111.7 KB · Views: 73
Good observation
 
I didn't know those even existed jfl :feelskek:
 
>female
>philosopher

:feelsjuice: the two don't go together
 
Physiologically, everything ugly weakens and saddens man. It reminds him of decay, danger, impotence; it actually deprives him of strength. Whenever man is depressed at all, he senses the proximity of something 'ugly.

- Nietzsche
 
That's the most annoying thing about them tbh. If only, if only they were able to take a "higher perspective" so to speak, if only they were able to look beyond societal shit and talk about metaphysics or other purely philosophical topics from any point of view untethered to "I'm a whaman and here's that this means for whamans:foidSoy:," but they can't:feelsugh:.
 

Similar threads

GoyimLivesMatter
Replies
21
Views
783
toijweoiwjdoi
T
parbate2025
Replies
10
Views
602
parbate2025
parbate2025
Passion
Replies
18
Views
1K
Jack-The-Ripper
Jack-The-Ripper
cathuluelitist
Replies
13
Views
848
Takuji Mamiya
Takuji Mamiya

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top