Again, doninated isn’t a right term. Firstly many of those were Afghans who had acres to turkic horses.
Afghans are more Central Asian then curry. Afghans are way way above curries in the racial hierarchy.
They got close and they lost. Mongols too were halted in Hungary and Croatia too. Btw those same Mongols write a Russian script language now due to colonised by them.
LOL which is why rajputs were busy subjugating them right? Read about Qarachil expedition. Biggest defeat were 100k turks were sluaghtered
You are the one who’s busy ragebaiting on an incel forum.
Malik Kafur and Malik Nayak were local pajeet muslims
Doesn't change the fact that Mahmud of Ghazni conquered North India and slaughtered millions of pajeets. Even to this day Curries are seething about it kek.
Facts are not ragebaits.
Pajeet fantasies. The Taliban took way more casualities than the USSR.
Under the command of Alauddin KhaljiMalik Kafur and Malik Nayak were local pajeet muslims
Lol fucking lol? The only thing we have about his “conquests” are biased muslim sources. Not to mention there wasn’t any strong emperor during his time. Mahmoud of Ghazni also RAN AWAY when facing Raja Bhoja AS PER HIS OWN SOURCES. We also have inscriptional evidence of when he failed to conquer Kalinjar Fort.
Also facts that americunts deserve more 9/11 tupe attacks. I wish iraqis beheaded american soldiers.
Wronf. Communist afghan and USSR both took only 10k less than Mujahideen which didn’t even have the airforce.
Go ahead and deny history buddy. A simple wikipedia go through disproves all your claims. Mahmud of Ghazni and Muhammad of Ghor lead the foundation of Islamic conquests in India.
Bro go and check Wikipedia. You are legitimatel braindead.
Wikipedia is your source? JFL. Learn to read actual history books instead websites edited by brain dead mujeets.
Why is the Somnath Temple destroyed ? Indian historians themselves have claimed that the Islamic invasions caused massive damage to Hindus and Temples. It is claimed by your own people not me.
The somnath raid.
As I said small scale victories are nothing. This was Muhammad of Ghori's Empire.The somnath raid.
When a punch of fucking civilians held Mahmoud’s army at bay for 3 days.
Btw do read what happened after
Slaughter of Turushkas near Ajmer - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Vigraharaja IV's first war against the Ghazanvids - Wikipedia
He lost two battles and only beat one kingdom (Chahamanas of Ajmer).
Losing is losing. Doesn't matter if you lose by a mile or an inch.
Muh losing.
Off course. Turks were a singularly strong race. However even they weren't under the rule of foreigners like you were.
Motherfucker ever heard of the Byzantines ?
You defeated no one. Keep coping.
Because pajeets are weak and worthless.
Western Europeans were at the forefront of the Crusades retard.
This is what Hindu nationalist jeets do in MENA countries
incels.is
They had something called horses lmao. If they were so strong they wouldn’t have needed to perform night attacks on indian armies.
Same byzantine’s who lost half their empire to the arabs in 20 years
Leep coping lmao. It’s common knowledge.
Ahhh yes. You got to send crusades bexayse you never had to border them directly.
How many young mayowhore s were raped by paki groomers again?This is what Hindu nationalist jeets do in MENA countries
Subhuman Pajeet manlet oldcel gets a job in Saudi Arabia
Notice how his manlet height is actually a poor choice for the role yet the Saudis do not choose a tallfag who'd be better suited for this role. This is because a subhuman should be short, the tallfag CEO in the photo can easily spit on the top of the subhumans head after sanitizing his hands.
Muzzies are the vast majority of migrants jflThis is what Hindu nationalist jeets do in MENA countries
Subhuman Pajeet manlet oldcel gets a job in Saudi Arabia
Notice how his manlet height is actually a poor choice for the role yet the Saudis do not choose a tallfag who'd be better suited for this role. This is because a subhuman should be short, the tallfag CEO in the photo can easily spit on the top of the subhumans head after sanitizing his hands.
Afghans are iranian, like Persians, kurds, tajiks and ossestians
That's called Tactics you fucking faggot. Something Indians are wholly incapable off.
Wtf are you talking about ? The Byzantines withstood major invasions from Both sides for thousands of years only falling in the 13th century. It was white Bulgarians who weakened them btw. They had a very small population.Same byzantine’s who lost half their empire to the arabs in 20 years
Apparently not among Pajeets cause they keep seething about Muzzies.
The Kingdom Of Antioch and other Crusader States were in the very middle of the Islamic State retard. Holy fuck Pajeets aren't even sentient. No wonder you guys couldn't do shit against Muslims.
Yeah Afghans themselves dislike being grouped with Curries.
We still won battles you subhuman cumskin. Even against your own kind lmao
Fucking retard. The very same rajputs defeated the arabs and held of muslims for 600 years. And even then they managed to gain independence. within 20 years of falling to the khiljis lmao. Battle of sing oli and then the Mewar Malwa sultanate wars in which mewar routinely beat the armies of the Malwa sultanate, delhi sultanate, and gujurat sultanate.
We couldn’t do shit against Muslims?
No such thing as “afghan” Rather different tribes (Hazaras, Pashtuns, Uzbeks, etc).
We still won battles you subhuman cumskin. Even against your own kind lmao
Seleucid–Mauryan War - Wikipedia
Shunga–Greek War - Wikipedia
View: https://x.com/jhalazalimsingh/status/1699974900604412046?s=46
Fucking retard. The very same rajputs defeated the arabs and held of muslims for 600 years. And even then they managed to gain independence. within 20 years of falling to the khiljis lmao. Battle of sing oli and then the Mewar Malwa sultanate wars in which mewar routinely beat the armies of the Malwa sultanate, delhi sultanate, and gujurat sultanate.
Btw india is as real as europe is.
We couldn’t do shit against Muslims?
Marathas, sikhs, Jats, Rajputs after 1700: LOL.
Here are some instances of handful of rajputs defeating thousands of muslims.
Battle of Pilsud: 10,000 rajputs defeat 12,000 Afghans and 40,000 marathas
Battle of Barakheri: 10,000 rohilla pathans defeated by Kumaoni MILITIAMEN (JFL)
Battle of Kabul. Raja Man singh and 500 rajputs hold the Kabul fort against thousands of Afghans.
Qarachil expedition;
View: https://www.instagram.com/p/CYBCt-Drjuy/?igsh=MWo3M3dndXl2cXhhZg==
Battle of Dholpur: 10,000 Rajputs vs 30,000 Afghans.
Battle of Sammel Siri: 1,000 rathores rout almost 50,000 afghans and sher shah suri himself said “for a drop of giri i almost lost all of hindustan”
Battle of Gangawara 1,000 rathores charge against 40,000 mughal-rajput army in which the 10,000 mughals just flee the battle at the sight of the Marathas.
Don’t even make me bring about the Mewar Malwa Sultanate wars. In which Turkic kingdoms got routinely spanked by indic kingdoms their size.
Or about the Nak kati rani incident of 1635 in which a literal rajput queen defeated a mughal army and chopped of their noses
View attachment 1226428
Just like y’all keep seething about niggers?
We still won battles you subhuman cumskin. Even against your own kind lmao
Seleucid–Mauryan War - Wikipedia
Shunga–Greek War - Wikipedia
View: https://x.com/jhalazalimsingh/status/1699974900604412046?s=46
Fucking retard. The very same rajputs defeated the arabs and held of muslims for 600 years. And even then they managed to gain independence. within 20 years of falling to the khiljis lmao. Battle of sing oli and then the Mewar Malwa sultanate wars in which mewar routinely beat the armies of the Malwa sultanate, delhi sultanate, and gujurat sultanate.
Btw india is as real as europe is.
We couldn’t do shit against Muslims?
Marathas, sikhs, Jats, Rajputs after 1700: LOL.
Here are some instances of handful of rajputs defeating thousands of muslims.
Battle of Pilsud: 10,000 rajputs defeat 12,000 Afghans and 40,000 marathas
Battle of Barakheri: 10,000 rohilla pathans defeated by Kumaoni MILITIAMEN (JFL)
Battle of Kabul. Raja Man singh and 500 rajputs hold the Kabul fort against thousands of Afghans.
Qarachil expedition;
View: https://www.instagram.com/p/CYBCt-Drjuy/?igsh=MWo3M3dndXl2cXhhZg==
Battle of Dholpur: 10,000 Rajputs vs 30,000 Afghans.
Battle of Sammel Siri: 1,000 rathores rout almost 50,000 afghans and sher shah suri himself said “for a drop of giri i almost lost all of hindustan”
Battle of Gangawara 1,000 rathores charge against 40,000 mughal-rajput army in which the 10,000 mughals just flee the battle at the sight of the Marathas.
Don’t even make me bring about the Mewar Malwa Sultanate wars. In which Turkic kingdoms got routinely spanked by indic kingdoms their size.
Or about the Nak kati rani incident of 1635 in which a literal rajput queen defeated a mughal army and chopped of their noses
View attachment 1226428
Just like y’all keep seething about niggers?
Lol you fucking illiterate inbred cumskin. How does it feel to still be a cumskin and an incel forum. Bragging about your inbred incest kings and queens.
Ahh yes. Battles which lead to the demise of empires and conquests of whole land is small scale victories.
Rwally? The cuntish mayo whores who give me likes on dating apps disagree and compliments irl
Kings and Queen who altered the history of the very world.
The Greeks were tens of thousand of leagues away from their homeland with minimal men yet they conquered India and left a lasting legacy here. Destroyed the Tughlaqs ? Bro I know being a pajeet is hard but stop this delusionmaxxing. Hindu Jeets were Muslims slaves, their foids were raped en masse by Muslims and they couldn't do anything this is the truth. Admit it.
The actions of Europeans have altered the course and histories of entire continents. Indians for the most part were irrelevent to history other than being slaves. I have never heard of this Kumaon before in my entire life. Yet the entire world knows about the works of Aristotle and Ptolemy. Honestly even your small scale victories weren't really victories at all. They were more like minor mistakes on behalf of muslims which they rectified.
You cannot look the the maps of the Delhi Sultanate and Mughal Empire and believe this is true. As for South India. Lmao they welcomed Arabs with open arms.
That dating app and the phone you use too is built by whites.Rwally? The cuntish mayo whores who give me likes on dating apps disagree and compliments irl
So fucking weird when these niggers act like we can't use google to see Arabs/Persians ruled like 90% of inda aside from jungle backwater shitholes
Based Arab bulls. You can even see this in the Sinhalisid phenotype, which is said to be influenced by Arab/European dna, that's why you can see it's in the Maldives tooAs for South India. Lmao they welcomed Arabs with open arms.
In south they didn't even need swords. Their women happily offered themselves to Arabs.Marakkar - Wikipedia
I enjoyed this race war of yours with Anandkonda and this guy. Gigabased
What about telegu
Anyways Dhruv Rather is a Based Liberal, not a Sanghi Hindutvavadi Incel like you.
Based Liberal Dhruv enjoying his life while Sanghi hindutvavadi are coping and seething
Very retarded comparison really. When in actually this is what Gypsies did in Europe. Read genetics of gypsies, paternal lineage from singular Male source while maternal linage is diverse and Indian DNA was transmitted maternally. Even gypsies raped Europeans thenAs for South India. Lmao they welcomed Arabs with open arms.
Marakkar - Wikipedia
In south they didn't even need swords. Their women happily offered themselves to Arabs.
Pakis were the ones who lost to Arabs. Arabs lost to Indians
Do you have any source showing this contribution being paternally biased? Because many Sinhalese later married christian and muslims there
How ? Arab men have a long history in the subcontinent. The Mappila Muslim community today claims Arab origins.
Really pal ? Umm did you forget the reasons why North Indians are taller and fairer than you ?
www.travellerstimes.org.uk
Both lost to Muhammad of Ghori and subsequent Muslim rulers. Why do you kinsmen cry about shit like Muslim destroying their temples and love jihad if you managed to beat them ? Answer is you didn't. Hindu pajeets can't admit they are effete weakling subhumans for whom MENA and European slavery was a gift.
And you are now intentionally avoiding common logical reasoning. Lmao if you believe that Medieval Arab merchants and sailors were women I would have to say your mind is completely destroyed by cow poop consumption. The wiki page has citations and clearly states interbreeding occurred with local women. It's not just them btw. It seems Arabs have a strong genetic history in India. But I will provide proof nonetheless.
How ? Arab men have a long history in the subcontinent. The Mappila Muslim community today claims Arab origins.
Really pal ? Umm did you forget the reasons why North Indians are taller and fairer than you ?
"The results revealed that a substantial part of today’s North Indian paternal gene pool was contributed by Central Asian lineages who are Indo-European speakers, suggesting that extant Indian caste groups are primarily the descendants of Indo-European migrants"
"In the last 3000–10 000 years, Northern-Western India has experienced an enormous amount of gene flow from different parts of the world, with the majority of this gene flow being male-driven (Bamshad et al. 2001)."
Coming back to Gypsies most of them trace their lineage to modern day Pakistanis who once again have high concentration of central asian lineages. Just because something is termed "South Asian" doesn't mean it is related to manlet poopskin pajeets.
Pakistanis themselves have high concentration of foreign genes from Arabs too(along the paternal line) and gypsies were heavily mixed with other groups before coming to Europe.
"Haplogroup J accounted for 20% in the currently studied population. This haplogroup is predominately found in the Arabian Peninsula. The origin of this haplogroup is from the Middle East area known as the Fertile Crescent, comprising Palestine, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq around 42.9 KYA [39]. Merchants from the Arabian Peninsula brought this genetic marker to the subcontinental region [40]. The frequency of this haplogroup was reported to be 33% in Portuguese [35], 21% in Spanish, 9% in Bulgarian [34] and 33% in Lithuanian Gypsies [35,38]."
Poop eating manlet Hindu Pajeets like yourself should not hog the credit for the works of Pakistanis, Arabs, Pashtuns and other group's works.
Gypsies also have siginificant amount of Western Asian and European paternal DNA which you off course omitted because being disingenuous is the only way a pajeet can argue.
"Middle Eastern/West Asian lineages
The origin of Haplogroups J and E is an open ques-
tion. The differentiation of Haplogroup J, observed both
with binary and microsatellite markers, points to the
Middle East as its likely homeland, but haplogroup E
(E-M35) probably originated in Eastern Africa (Semino
et al., 2004). According to previous studies the observed
decreasing frequency gradients of haplogroups E and J
reached southwestern Europe as a result of demic
expansions of Neolithic agriculturalists from the Middle
East, and the markers represent the male contribution
of a demic diffusion of farmers (Semino et al., 2000).
Haplogroup J is common in India, but E is very rare.
The J2a2-M67 lineages displayed relatively high
frequencies in all Roma population groups, a lower
frequency in the host Hungarian population and an
absence in Indians. This finding suggests genetic admix-
ture with a population outside India during Roma migra-
tions to the Carpathian Basin. On the basis of the pres-
ent study, taking into account the sharing of haplotypes
with the Iberian Roma, we suggest that the J2a2-M67
chromosomes (Fig. 1C), at least in part, were incorpo-
rated into the Roma gene pool before their exodus from
the Balkans.
The E1b1b1a-M78 chromosome was observed in all the
Roma groups studied and in the Hungarian reference
population, but it was absent from Malaysian Indians
and almost all Indian populations previously investi-
gated. The majority of the haplotypes found (55%) in
Roma form two distinct clusters in network analysis,
indicating a close relationship between these groups
(Fig. 1E). Previous studies noted that some E1b1b1a-
M78 chromosomes might have been incorporated into
the Roma gene pool during their migration, probably in
the Balkans (Gresham et al., 2001; Pericic
´et al.,
2001; Pericic
´et al., 2005b
Gusma
˜o et al., 2008), since its frequency is considerable
in these regions (Cruciani et al., 2004), and our findings
are consistent with this possibe"
"Indigenous European lineages
Haplogroup I (M170) is widespread over Europe but
virtually absent elsewhere, including the Near East, sug-
gesting that it arose in Europe (Rootsi et al., 2004).
I1-M253 chromosomes were detected at relatively high
frequencies in all six Roma groups compared, and 61.8%
of these males share a modal haplotype (Fig. 1F), sug-
gesting a common origin of the Roma as well. According
to Gusma
˜o et al. (2008), the I1-M253 marker occurred at
different proportions in Roma groups compared to their
host populations, but can be explained by genetic drift.
The dispersed network pattern observed for I2a-P37.2
chromosomes in the present study (Fig. 1G) suggests
that they might have been incorporated into the Roma
gene pool by admixture at different times in different geographical regions"
Source: https://www.researchgate.net/public...re_of_the_Paternal_Lineage_of_the_Roma_People
And let us not forget you intentionally omitted a vital piece of information from your own studies(Not surprising given you are a pajeet suffering from an inferiority complex)
"Interestingly, comparing X chromosome ancestry proportions to those in the autosomes, South Asian ancestry had a higher result in the X chromosome than in the autosome [7]."
I Kidnapping and grooming children is considered appropriate courtship in Pajeetland(probably how your father and mother go together) but it isn't in Europe. Lastly despite what you believe Europeans never saw pajeets like you as anything other than slaves.
Slavery in Romania - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Feature - Roma and Gypsy Slavery
It's laughable you compare this to Arabs who lived as dignified Mercantile communities in India.
Lastly really buddy ? You picked the gypsies of all people to claim some sort of w ? They literally kidnapped, groomed and raped european children. They are the lowest of the low. I hope you don't claim to be Romani in Balkans. You will mostly likely end up in a ditch. Your people lived as outcasts and slaves in my land.
Meanwhile North Indians who have higher amounts of Yamnaya ancestry become Kings, Priests and Conquerors in your land. JFuckingL. Your own caste system puts those having higher steppe ancestry higher on the totem pole(cope as all Pajeets are unequivocally cockroaches). Even to this day South Indians cry about racism from North Indians lmao.
Both lost to Muhammad of Ghori and subsequent Muslim rulers. Why do you kinsmen cry about shit like Muslim destroying their temples and love jihad if you managed to beat them ? Answer is you didn't. Hindu pajeets can't admit they are effete weakling subhumans for whom MENA and European slavery was a gift.
And you are now intentionally avoiding common logical reasoning. Lmao if you believe that Medieval Arab merchants and sailors were women I would have to say your mind is completely destroyed by cow poop consumption. The wiki page has citations and clearly states interbreeding occurred with local women. It's not just them btw. It seems Arabs have a strong genetic history in India. But I will provide proof nonetheless.
View attachment 1227681
The Y Chromosomal haplogroup GM201 is present in Southern India.
This wikipedia page adds further context.
Arabs in India - Wikipedia
Honestly it's hilarious how hard you are trying to cope with your subhumanity here. Not even God can make you something other than a poop eating manlet jeet who claims to be blackpilled yet refuses to accept his genetic inferiority.
And ALL muslims claim Arabs origin, except Mappila Muslims might have some about of middle-eastern dna
This has nothing to do with anything, you are retarded because actually yes. High steppe groups in India have steppe transmitted by female. Check the genetics of Jats, rors, uttarakhand brahmins or kalash people today. Even bronze age swat valley samples, earliest place where steppe was detected had a maternal bias
Stop going on tangents and shooting yourself in the foot
Cry, same thing is today happening in UK from Paki grooming gangs
That's in North India, South Indians haven't even under muslims rule for even more than 100 years combined and we ruled North India and SEA for far longer
It's not impossible considering how steppe was transmitted though female in all of North-West India. And the point is if NOW muslims and chritian population ended all the male lineages and mixed with the Sinhalese there wouldn't be as much sex-bias in origin of DNA.
@anandkonda I would also like to use this opportunity to address a few things. Firstly your stat regarding the out marriage rate of Indian Americans.
Firstly this,
Social Realities of Indian Americans: Results From the 2020 Indian American Attitudes Survey
As the profile of the Indian American community has grown, so too has its economic, political, and social influence. But how Indian Americans choose to deploy this influence remains an open question.carnegieendowment.org
You used this study to claim FOB men have high out marriage rate while completely ignoring that it only sampled a mere 1200 people out of 4.6 Million Indians.
" Its findings are based on a nationally representative online survey of 1,200 Indian American residents in the United States—the 2020 Indian American Attitudes Survey (IAAS)—conducted between September 1 and September 20, 2020, in partnership with the research and analytics firm YouGov."
As if this already didn't put a massive hole in the conclusions of this study there is also the fact that this was conducted by an organisation called "Indian American Attitude Survey" which has no connection to any proper government database and census and the survey too was online which means that there is no actual proof of their claims and that many pajeets may have just straight up lied. You also ignored this article of mine.
Asian-Nation : Interracial Dating & Marriage
www.asian-nation.org
It draws data from the 2006 US government Census unlike your source. But no matter I have updated data.
“Foreign-born Asian Indians appeared to have the lowest rates of interracial marriages.”
“Among all foreign-born Asian groups, Japanese were most likely to marry interracially and inter-ethnically, while Asian Indians had the lowest rates of interracial marriage and interethnic marriage.”
“Nevertheless, there are large variations across foreign-born Asian groups in gender differences in intermarriage patterns. Table 5 shows the patterns of intermarriages based on foreign-born Asian householders by gender among Asian groups. One pattern was that, for almost all Asian groups, foreign-born male householders were more likely to marry within their ethnic group than foreign-born female householders. However, there was virtually no gender difference for Pakistani householders; in fact, Pakistani female householders (90%) were slightly more likely to marry within their ethnicity than Pakistani male householders (88.6%). Furthermore, foreign-born Japanese male householders (74.4%) were more than twice as likely as foreign-born Japanese female householders (34.4%) to marry within their ethnicity, but foreign-born Asian Indian male householders (94%) were only 3.9% more likely than their foreign-born female householders (90.1%) to do so and other groups were in between, with large variations in rates”
“12.2% of foreign-born Sri Lankan female householders were interracially married compared to 7.1% foreign-born Sri Lankan male householders”
“8.3% of foreign-born Asian Indian female householders were interracially married compared to 4.9% foreign-born Asian Indian male householders”
“5.6% of foreign-born Pakistani female householders were interracially married compared to 8.2% foreign-born Pakistani male householders”
“Except for Pakistanis, for all other Asian groups foreign-born female householders were much more likely to marry white spouses than their foreign-born male counterparts”
“For Pakistanis the reverse was evident, as 7% of male Pakistani householders married whites, compared to 4% of female Pakistani householders.”
So according to this data South Asian females marry out more than South Asian males, except for Pakistani females. I believe the reason Pakistani females had a lower interracial marriage rate than their male counterparts is because Pakistan is almost entirely Muslim, and in Islam women are not allowed to marry non Muslims, but men are.
Data from research by University of Winsconsin. Published in 2018.
Another thing I would also like to address is the data you gave regarding interracial birth rate was conducted between 1992 and 2012. India was much more poorer back then and women were largely absent from the workforce(the main way Indians enter USA). Honestly it's absurd that despite Indian female population being considerably low back then and the internet not having reached India(which means women were most likely conservative and unaware of Western culture) the birth rate between WMIF and IMAF couples are nearly equal. If anything your data is more proof of JBW.
Except no, it was a survey done in collaboration with US government
>Random shitty forum as sourceAsian-Nation : Interracial Dating & Marriage
>24000 men vs 4000 women sample from various pooled sources
Cope, only the richest upper castes moved out. And Indian women are one of the richest and most educated groups there
"SAAAAAR IM A MOD SAAAAR"
Arab/white genes are truly a blessing.
This proves that pakis are less subhuman than jeets, and it also shows islam helps control foids
