Nothing good ever came from the left

[Cybersex is our hope]

The left always destroyed and never built. They always love to brag about their contribution to progress when in fact they just contributed to destroy family, nation, males, virtues, decency.

In Italy every single economic reform that leads to economic social justice came from the social right aka fascists (8h working day, no work on Saturday etc) while every econimic progress came from the liberal right. The left never contributed whatsoever to shit and I hate when old lefties act as we own them something for all the good they did for us. Fuck you old hags, you just created an hell in earth

 

[Deleted member 1410]

Nazbolism, Strasserites, National Socialism, Fascist technically all take elements from the left

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

No. It originates from the refusal to play the left/right binary since they both originated from the jacobine revolution. The left is the finale stage of the servant rebelling against the master who became totally dependent from him. The financial right/rich capitalist did that to the aristocracy and the proletarian is supposed to do that to the rich capitalist in the future when it has served his pourpose to internazionalize the market, to secularize the world and to establish a good wealth (this stage never really managed to achieve its goals). This is to say that there is much more in common between capitalists and communists than between capitalist or communist with fascism. In a sense the capitalist is seen as a necessary evil or even as an ally for a short period of time by the communist. This has been proven several times in the last years (especially in France) when leftists didn't give half a shit about the "far right" social programs and they preferred to stand with ultracapitalists from the center-right to defeat the "common enemy". The same happened in the Spanish civil war when we witnessed the jacobine front (individualist capitalists and communists) teaming up to defeat the phalanx. Once again the left preferred to ignore the socialist ideas of the national sindacalism of Jose Primo De Rivera and fight them instead of collaborating for common goals. They chose the capitalists (with whom they had like totally different views on economy) because they felt nearer to them on social and ethical issues

 

[JJtheIncel]

Politics is cope

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Politics is cope

 

[Zaetheus]

Politics is cope

Excatly I could careless about politics lmao

 

[Deleted member 7448]

Left/right is relative, the issues change all the time.

If not one kind of asshole is controlling the system, it's the other kind.

Right/left, both just instruments of oppression.

 

[bimmercel]

Come to Germany and refresh your eyes

 

[Deleted member 1410]

No. It originates from the refusal to play the left/right binary since they both originated from the jacobine revolution. The left is the finale stage of the servant rebelling against the master who became totally dependent from him. The financial right/rich capitalist did that to the aristocracy and the proletarian is supposed to do that to the rich capitalist in the future when it has served his pourpose to internazionalize the market, to secularize the world and to establish a good wealth (this stage never really managed to achieve its goals). This is to say that there is much more in common between capitalists and communists than between capitalist or communist with fascism. In a sense the capitalist is seen as a necessary evil or even as an ally for a short period of time by the communist. This has been proven several times in the last years (especially in France) when leftists didn't give half a shit about the "far right" social programs and they preferred to stand with ultracapitalists from the center-right to defeat the "common enemy". The same happened in the Spanish civil war when we witnessed the jacobine front (individualist capitalists and communists) teaming up to defeat the phalanx. Once again the left preferred to ignore the socialist ideas of the national sindacalism of Jose Primo De Rivera and fight them instead of collaborating for common goals. They chose the capitalists (with whom they had like totally different views on economy) because they felt nearer to them on social and ethical issues

I understand that but leftism and liberalism (which the classical variant is right, all forms of it must be destroyed) are different things.

Left/right is relative, the issues change all the time.

If not one kind of asshole is controlling the system, it's the other kind.

Right/left, both just instruments of oppression.

Third Position is beyond left and right.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

Come to Germany and refresh your eyes

I'm italian and i'd love to be ur ally like in the good ol times
My great uncle fought with the italian social republic in 1943 aged 16 so he never evvva betrayed Germany not like the cuckest cuck Badoglio

I understand that but leftism and liberalism (which the classical variant is right, all forms of it must be destroyed) are different things.


Third Position is beyond left and right.

Of course they are. Progressivism want to reform the capitalist system, while communism want to directly destroy it however they are often on the same side culturally speaking (not economically)
Third posistion is of course beyond left and right since it refuses both (jacobine, internationalist creations)