D
Doomer Guy
Deleted my account because this site is so dumb...
-
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2022
- Posts
- 2,033
I don't care about getting a girfriend anymore. I still want sex, just not a "girlfriend" because I don't believe anymore women are capable to genuinely love a man.
Let me start.
My parents always told me when I was younger these bluepilled phrases:
- There is a woman for every man including me (but that's obviously impossible statistically)
- One day I will find a "good" woman that will love me unconditionally and that won't be like the shallow ones that care about beauty or money (again a fake statement because no woman wants to marry a broke man and if a woman ever fucks a truecel I can guarantee you it's not because of unconditional love)
There's a general idea according the bluepilled view on relationships that a "good" girlfriend is the best person to share a deep emotional connection with, to talk to about your biggest problems and to receive comfort during hard times. I strongly disagree with this idea, in my opinion the best person to share your feelings, emotions and problems with would be a male best friend, not a girlfriend. Why? Firstly a man will relate to you more since he's of the same gender and is more likely to understand your perspective, so you're less likely to have misunderstandings. A lot of times men and women in relationships can't understand each other and just end up arguing. Secondly a true male best friend is a million times more trustworthy than a girlfriend, because women are incapable of loving you for who you are, if she "loves" you it's most likely because you're attractive, rich, with status, or you're giving her any other types of benefits. Showing vulnerability to a woman will make her lose respect for you because she'll perceive you as weaker, less dominant and less masculine. But a true male friend will listen to you and support you when you show vulnerability.
Basically the bluepill tells us that a heterosexual man should have a:
- Girfriend/wife for support during hard times, emotional connection, activities together such as hobbies, sexual intimacy & reproduction
But it's a mistake to expect all of these things from a partner. In reality, the following division should be made:
- Male best friend for support during hard times, emotional connection, activities together such as hobbies
- Woman for sexual intimacy & reproduction
Because, a woman is like a beast: if you tame it and dominate it, it will bring something good to your life.
But if you don't tame it and instead treat it like your equal, it will perceive you as weak and destroy you.
The western societies are full or double standards when it comes to gender. It is an undeniable fact that women there have it WAY easier than men: tribunals being more favorable to women (ex.: the woman always get the kids during a divorce), women being perceived as more pure than men, men get shamed for being virgins or for feeling down but if a woman goes through the same struggles she can easily get tons of emotional support, masculinity being seen as evil but femininity as good, men can get cancelled and have their careers destroyed if they ever commit the smallest ever sex offence but if a woman does the same offense everyone is fine with it and forgets about it... I can't name all of them, there's too many.
Why does these double standards exist? Because the western soycieties wanted to be more "civilized", these morons thought that a world where women had the same rights as men would be more "evolved". That it would solve lots of problems and inequalities. That it would turn the world into a better place for everyone...
You can't be further away from the truth. FEMINISM IS A CANCER FOR THE EARTH!!! IN A FAIR WORLD, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DESTROYED THE FIRST DAY IT EVEN CAME TO EXISTENCE AND THE WOMEN WHO INVENTED IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN EXECUTED PUBLICLY!!!

Feminism really is the consequence of a civilization that doesn't tame women and treat them as the equal of men.
It's common sense that, if you let an untamed beast free in a city, it will harm and kill the pedestrians.
Except women are the beasts and men are the pedestrians...
Although I don't believe there is such thing as a true religion, Islam is in my opinion the most respectable religion because muslims are the only people in this entire fucking world that still understand the necessity of taming women. And as a result, in muslim countries men are fine, they're respected and treated with dignity, they're not losing their careers because of false sex offense accusations, and women do not control them. Muslims are based for giving women less rights and beating them when they misbehave, because that's the exact treatment these primitive inferior creatures deserve and need in order to have at least a minimum of decency. They're so dumb that without getting beaten on a regular basis, they lose their humanity by becoming incel-hating chad-obsessed walking cum dumpsters...
Andrew Tate was right when he said Islam is the last religion of the world, it's the only one that's focusing enough on the importance of men dominating women.
But even if the two other abrahamic religions don't focus as much on this aspect, the Old Testament still somewhat recognizes this dark reality: The story of Adam and Eve in the Genesis metaphorically speaks about this truth.
Eve's fault was that she got seduced by a talking snake and ate an apple from the forbidden tree.
But what was Adam's fault? Not only he tolerated her sin and engaged in it too by taking a piece from the apple, but he didn't do ANYTHING to prevent the incident. He was her man, he should have supervised her to prevent her from sinning or at worst reprimand her for eating the apple.
Adam could have easily avoided his ban from heavens at least by NOT obeying to Eve and placing her above him, something a truly masculine man can't afford to do.
The New Testament also tells us multiple times that women are supposed to be submissive to other men (their husbands):
- Ephesians 5:22 NIV (Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord.)
- Ephesians 5:24 NIV (Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.)
- Colossians 3:18 NIV (Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.)
Men have so much positive things to offer: They built skyscrapers, walked on the moon, always performed the most dangerous jobs...
Women on the other hand are only bringing negative things: suicide by shaming broken men and destruction of masculinity...
Of sorry, I forgot there's one positive thing they can bring: sex. But it's only for the minority of men that are known as "chads", oof.
Men are doing everything, women nothing except fucking, whining and destroying. They're literal disgusting MONSTERS.
Pretty much all of the older civilizations understood the superiority of men above women. But the "modern" cucked world is trying to deny it due to feminism, white knights & other bluepilled beliefs.
TL;DR If you think about it, there's no logical reason for a heterosexual man to desire a girlfriend. Women are good for sex and that's it. They need to be tamed and dominated 100% of the time, or else they become dangerous ungrateful delusional monsters and promiscuous chad-only incel-hating whores. If you need emotional support and someone to love you, a true male friend is a better alternative than a girlfriend.
Let me start.
My parents always told me when I was younger these bluepilled phrases:
- There is a woman for every man including me (but that's obviously impossible statistically)
- One day I will find a "good" woman that will love me unconditionally and that won't be like the shallow ones that care about beauty or money (again a fake statement because no woman wants to marry a broke man and if a woman ever fucks a truecel I can guarantee you it's not because of unconditional love)
There's a general idea according the bluepilled view on relationships that a "good" girlfriend is the best person to share a deep emotional connection with, to talk to about your biggest problems and to receive comfort during hard times. I strongly disagree with this idea, in my opinion the best person to share your feelings, emotions and problems with would be a male best friend, not a girlfriend. Why? Firstly a man will relate to you more since he's of the same gender and is more likely to understand your perspective, so you're less likely to have misunderstandings. A lot of times men and women in relationships can't understand each other and just end up arguing. Secondly a true male best friend is a million times more trustworthy than a girlfriend, because women are incapable of loving you for who you are, if she "loves" you it's most likely because you're attractive, rich, with status, or you're giving her any other types of benefits. Showing vulnerability to a woman will make her lose respect for you because she'll perceive you as weaker, less dominant and less masculine. But a true male friend will listen to you and support you when you show vulnerability.
Basically the bluepill tells us that a heterosexual man should have a:
- Girfriend/wife for support during hard times, emotional connection, activities together such as hobbies, sexual intimacy & reproduction
But it's a mistake to expect all of these things from a partner. In reality, the following division should be made:
- Male best friend for support during hard times, emotional connection, activities together such as hobbies
- Woman for sexual intimacy & reproduction
Because, a woman is like a beast: if you tame it and dominate it, it will bring something good to your life.
But if you don't tame it and instead treat it like your equal, it will perceive you as weak and destroy you.
The western societies are full or double standards when it comes to gender. It is an undeniable fact that women there have it WAY easier than men: tribunals being more favorable to women (ex.: the woman always get the kids during a divorce), women being perceived as more pure than men, men get shamed for being virgins or for feeling down but if a woman goes through the same struggles she can easily get tons of emotional support, masculinity being seen as evil but femininity as good, men can get cancelled and have their careers destroyed if they ever commit the smallest ever sex offence but if a woman does the same offense everyone is fine with it and forgets about it... I can't name all of them, there's too many.
Why does these double standards exist? Because the western soycieties wanted to be more "civilized", these morons thought that a world where women had the same rights as men would be more "evolved". That it would solve lots of problems and inequalities. That it would turn the world into a better place for everyone...
You can't be further away from the truth. FEMINISM IS A CANCER FOR THE EARTH!!! IN A FAIR WORLD, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DESTROYED THE FIRST DAY IT EVEN CAME TO EXISTENCE AND THE WOMEN WHO INVENTED IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN EXECUTED PUBLICLY!!!
Feminism really is the consequence of a civilization that doesn't tame women and treat them as the equal of men.
It's common sense that, if you let an untamed beast free in a city, it will harm and kill the pedestrians.
Except women are the beasts and men are the pedestrians...
Although I don't believe there is such thing as a true religion, Islam is in my opinion the most respectable religion because muslims are the only people in this entire fucking world that still understand the necessity of taming women. And as a result, in muslim countries men are fine, they're respected and treated with dignity, they're not losing their careers because of false sex offense accusations, and women do not control them. Muslims are based for giving women less rights and beating them when they misbehave, because that's the exact treatment these primitive inferior creatures deserve and need in order to have at least a minimum of decency. They're so dumb that without getting beaten on a regular basis, they lose their humanity by becoming incel-hating chad-obsessed walking cum dumpsters...
Andrew Tate was right when he said Islam is the last religion of the world, it's the only one that's focusing enough on the importance of men dominating women.
But even if the two other abrahamic religions don't focus as much on this aspect, the Old Testament still somewhat recognizes this dark reality: The story of Adam and Eve in the Genesis metaphorically speaks about this truth.
Eve's fault was that she got seduced by a talking snake and ate an apple from the forbidden tree.
But what was Adam's fault? Not only he tolerated her sin and engaged in it too by taking a piece from the apple, but he didn't do ANYTHING to prevent the incident. He was her man, he should have supervised her to prevent her from sinning or at worst reprimand her for eating the apple.
Adam could have easily avoided his ban from heavens at least by NOT obeying to Eve and placing her above him, something a truly masculine man can't afford to do.
The New Testament also tells us multiple times that women are supposed to be submissive to other men (their husbands):
- Ephesians 5:22 NIV (Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord.)
- Ephesians 5:24 NIV (Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.)
- Colossians 3:18 NIV (Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.)
Men have so much positive things to offer: They built skyscrapers, walked on the moon, always performed the most dangerous jobs...
Women on the other hand are only bringing negative things: suicide by shaming broken men and destruction of masculinity...
Of sorry, I forgot there's one positive thing they can bring: sex. But it's only for the minority of men that are known as "chads", oof.
Men are doing everything, women nothing except fucking, whining and destroying. They're literal disgusting MONSTERS.
Pretty much all of the older civilizations understood the superiority of men above women. But the "modern" cucked world is trying to deny it due to feminism, white knights & other bluepilled beliefs.
TL;DR If you think about it, there's no logical reason for a heterosexual man to desire a girlfriend. Women are good for sex and that's it. They need to be tamed and dominated 100% of the time, or else they become dangerous ungrateful delusional monsters and promiscuous chad-only incel-hating whores. If you need emotional support and someone to love you, a true male friend is a better alternative than a girlfriend.